ooooohhhhh got me hahahahaha

still a fag hahahahaha

I feel like somehow we're reaching the end of the line with the anti-Semitism trick:

Netanyahu accuses the entire world of anti-semitism (NewsTarget 12/6/2023)

I mean, how do you amp up from there? Maybe like life itself, Zionists will find a way.

hahahahahahahaa the old ad hominem, laziest ever

what a fag

Which ones did you look on yourself before asking me? And why are you under the impression anyone is under any duty to provide you with evidence of anything? What is it that I get in return?

Pretty simple <-- your shilling skils hahahahahahaha

It's funny, because I grew up knowing without doubt that nazis = bad. Now even with all the reeducation I've gotten over the last two years, I still can't figure out which one it is now:

• only certain nazis = bad
• russia = nazis
• trump = nazis
• give moar money
• it's all above my head and none of it's my business in the first place

Maybe the answer is all of the above?

When it comes to war and good guys and bad guys, my own journey of discovery has informed me that:

• All sides in a war fight for purposes other than those publicly stated, even by the good guys.
• They involve almost all good people with no argument with one another, but who come to deadly combat because large groups have been greatly deceived.
• The top levels are often rife with bad guys.
• The real bad guys are hidden, not wearing uniforms of holding public office.
• The really bad guys who orchestrated the wars in the first place are safe because most people simply cannot believe they exist.

All of the above being a quick sketch of the situation, it's no wonder most can't see through it, understand the threat of all warmongers, and just decline to participate.

Can you define "real government archives"?

Passio is the most important researcher out there, bar none, and the only one whose work I would recommend to anyone without reservation.

I've noticed NPCs never just give up. Part of the lack of sentience, I surmise. Never conscious they're being laughed at, even when a human tells them. lol

I knew someone would be retarded enough and have a big enough ego to say something like this. Thanks for playing! lol

Side observation: if you look through that gaping hole, does anyone see a gigantic nuclear furnace in there powering the Sun? Me neither, because it isn't there and that's not what powers the Sun. See the Electric Universe for more.

Second order observation: Everyone should note that they can show such a photo in mainstream media and yet no one notices for themselves what I just pointed out. If you've ever wondered how the deceptions of the world possibly get by people, it's just that easy,

Third order observation: If anyone here is brave enough to admit to themselves that I got by you too, you should be wondering what other screamingly obvious things have gotten by you all this time. The best will take their ego down a notch to see if that helps.

I understood there was a problem with archive.org a couple of years ago, when I went to get something from jameshfetzer.org from it. I got some message that all that site's content was banned.

That is, they only resorted to subterfuge in this case because they needed to act quickly. In normal circumstances, they can apparently vaporize an archive totally above board (well, for what phrase may mean any more). I never found any mention anywhere of what legal mechanism was used, not that they really care about proving legitimacy.

I actually remember the time when the FBI wanted lists of the books that "persons of interest" had checked out, and librarians told them to fuck right off. Those days are gone but not forgotten.

Let's see, inability to resist the opportunity to turn a few shekels rather than keeping their plans secret, believing they could chutzpah their way out of it later if it ever came to light?

Right on brand.

"Science" seems to be cautiously stepping clear of a phenomenon I realized existed a while back. Such things as "motivated reasoning" and "cognitive dissonance" are not only subsumed by it, they are examples of the phenomenon itself.

That is, we all believe (without evidence) that everyone reasons by gathering facts, analyzing them, then reaching conclusions. It turns out that in many circumstances, what we refer to as "normies" reason in the opposite direction: they begin with the conclusion.

Since they know what the "right answer" is, they just have to backfill the reasoning to support it. Even facts will give way to this, being ignored, distorted, or even invented. It's quite fascinating to study it in detail.

So imagine struggling on an algebra test, peeking at the smart kids paper, and seeing that the answer is pi/2. Since you have to show your work, you write down as much as you know, add in some BS, and then write down the answer, pi/2.

Get it? There's no way you're not ending up at pi/2. That is the answer, after all. All the of your "work"--true or not true, meaningful or meaningless--is irrelevant and need only superficially appear to be reasoning to the grader.

But at least you're aware you're cheating. In the phenomenon I observe, it's all done subconsciously, very quickly, invisibly and basically unknowably. But it's as real to that person as anything else in their reality.

The effect is extraordinarily powerful. I heard an interview with a hypnotist once, where he said he would implant a post-hypnotic suggestion in people in his office that there was a red-hot stove in the middle of the floor. When he brought them back, he would casually ask them to hand him a book on the far side of the office. They would all walk far around the perimeter, both coming and going.

Now here's the informative part: when he asked them why they took the long way, they each made up a "good reason": "I always do that," or "It was the best way," or even "That's what you asked me to do". They had absolutely no awareness any of this was happening.

This mode of "reasoning" is, in fact, what makes normies normies in the first place. It's also what makes normies programmable and controllable. "They" use it all the time, and that's why we aren't supposed to know about it.

Even here I think something interesting is going on. I think Netanyahu & Co. would love for the hostages to be kept indefinitely as an excuse for the war/extermination. Even as it is, they dragged their feet absolutely as long as possible.

And the blowback from the hostage situation has done and will do, in my opinion, tremendous damage to the Zionists. How long is it going to take Israel to live down the images of otherwise very intimidating masked and strapped Hamas gunmen taking old ladies by the hand and walking them to the Red Cross, where they warmly wave bye-bye to each other?

Wishful thinking, but it may be that "The Jewish State" will not survive to see that day.

I'm reminded of the original Star Trek episode A Taste of Armageddon, back from when such things were purely science fiction:

During a supposed attack by Vendikar, Anan 7 explains that the war is conducted as a computer simulation, and that the Enterprise has been "destroyed" in the attack. The two planets have a treaty, according to which they have to kill the "victims" of every simulated attack. The crew are thereby expected to report to Eminiar's disintegration chambers for execution....

After Spock arrives, Kirk destroys the war simulation computers. Anan 7 condemns Kirk's actions, arguing that it is unalterable nature to fight wars, so without the simulation they have no alternative but to fight a real war. Kirk instead believes that the only reason the war with Vendikar has gone on so long is because the simulation insulated both societies from the horrors of war and gave them little reason to end it.

I think we see that currently one side is insulated from the horrors of war and has little reason to end it.

This cannot be proven and it's just a guess, but...

First, there's no way a person with 10's of millions of followers expresses anything about something this radioactive lightly or accidentally. And he didn't delete it because someone happened to mention Pgate was "possibly debunked". It was all on purpose.

So it gets around out there to some extent because of posts like this one. People already in the know get confirmation that Elon is also in the know. People that have heard little or nothing get hip that there might be something to it because even though it's just a little meme, it comes from one of the highest profile people in the world.

On the flip side, what is the Pedocracy going to do about it? Bring the subject back up and demand Elon... um... delete it? After explaining what the idea was to everyone that never heard about it before? No way. They walked on by like it never happened.

All in all, I would say it was a well-designed little op.

You have to notice that the United States spends tens of billions of dollars a year on "homeland security" and counter-intelligence and foreign relations, and hundreds of thousands of people are involved, yet not a single one of them rushes to a microphone and says, "This is a very serious claim and the American people deserve a clear yes or no on it."

Which confirms that the answer is yes, and that the subversion extends completely through the tens of billions and hundreds of thousands mentioned above.

My personal theory is that even these mainstream media organizations are riddled with moles that sneak this stuff in under the radar.

Very, very few people ever quit their job over some sense of ethics or morality, but you have to imagine that, even so, some still retain a sense of what's really going on.

I mean, that's what I'd be doing if I suddenly woke up and found myself working for Fox News. In fact, I'd almost certainly stay specifically to try to get the signal out.

I can't help on either of those, but if you're working on any kind of a timeline you might want to take a look at the relative order of two events which I found to be very revealing. Those are: (1) the photos of the guys lounging around Nancy Pelosi's office, and (2) the melee where Ashley Babbitt gets murdered.

The key bit of knowledge is this: the barricaded doorway where the melee takes places leads to a hallway called the "Speaker's Lobby". About halfway up that hallway on the left is Pelosi's office.

So in what order did those events even take place? There's no sensible timeline you can construct. The unavoidable conclusion is that the photos in Pelosi's office were staged on some previous day.

I figured they were going to promote something like this sooner or later. Neither the Titanic nor the Olympic nor any other ship sank during that "event".

Nor did that stupid mini-sub earlier in the year, which was never going down to look at anything since nothing is there. In the wake of that, they were proposing laws to prohibit anyone going down there for "safety". Sure.

Now over a century later, they're going to bring the whole psyop to a close by showing everyone a picture of mud on the ocean floor and saying, "Yep, that's where the Titanic was."

This is from four days after the SMO began:

USA announces the United States will support the decision of Ukraine on declaring a neutral status to Russia, if Kiev accepts it — per Russian conditions to Zelensky’s request for ceasefire talks.

Did not work out that way.

The deepest, strangest thing I've seen along these lines is that Neil Armstrong and Yuri Gagarin were twins.

Their teeth are markedly different, which I suspect was from poor nutrition in the USSR. Also, when Yuri was starting to gain international notoriety, they gave him a scar through his eyebrow which does not at all look like he came about it naturally. Read the narrative of how he supposedly got it if you want a laugh.

So the basic thesis is that the dark occultists who run the world and orchestrated the Cold War got a set of twins and separated them, one to each superpower. Then they were groomed to become heroes of the "space race".

Which sounds bizarre until you realize that the most bizarre aspect is that it all took place right in front of the world yet no one noticed.

Also, I'm sure some are reading this and saying to themselves, "They don't look alike at all! This is crazy talk!" Well, don't you think the dark occultists know this is how most human minds actually work and base their plans around that very fact?

Getting close. Keep researching. Or don't.

Oh, I had no doubt that there are Americans in uniform, out of uniform, in Palestinian civvies, in Palestinian uniform, etc, all over Israel.

But what was weird to me was for Miller to casually say "Americans" were IDF. He can't possibly mean "ethnic Americans", there being no such thing. He could only possibly mean American citizens.

That being the case, how is that consonant with them being IDF? The oath of citizenship states:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen....

So what's the out? They're natural-born citizens and never took the oath, and that somehow naturalized citizens are under obligations the natural-born are not?? Or is it that they weren't IDF at the time they took the oath, they just swore allegiance later?

I can;t imagine that if an American was a member of the IRGC or SVR or PRC or DPRK or any other combo of letters that that would be okay with any US combo of letters. Seems like they'd flip the fuck out.

I think maybe everyone is just so discombobulated as to what the rules are, if any, that they just don;t notice these things any more.