If anyone is interested in a fun, really out there idea, I offer this without advocating it:
Electric Universe Theory holds that electricity is the dominant force in the Universe, not gravity. The Sun is powered by electricity, not fusion. IDK what they have to say about it, but I believe even planetary orbits are stabilized by electrical forces.
There are some who hold that Nibiru, or "Planet X", is returning the inner Solar System. No one goes so far as to say where it is now (except the ones posting pictures of "two suns", as if no one else would have noticed this by casual observation).
At some point, though, the Nibiru system would begin to have significant effects on the electromagnetic environment. In addition to changes in the Sun, I've heard mention of a brightening and warming of the planets.
Anyway, the point here is just to activate the radar of those with the most adventurous intellects.
For those of a mind to, one should analyze this "FE" phenomenon from a "meta-perspective", outside of the issue of the shape of the Earth itself.
That is, consider those advocating the "wrong side". Certainly some are paid shills, so we can discount some portion, but there is a remainder. The rest are honest people, who we must conclude genuinely believe what they're saying.
One thing about them is that they cannot settle the issue for themselves. In fact, they don't even try. I've never heard any of them say, "Here's what I thought up as a test anyone can do. I did it and these are the results. I invite others to replicate the experiment and report those results, as is the practice in science." This reasoning process is totally alien to them.
I believe that the Dark Occultists, probably via their minions in Intelligence, studied the way the human mind works... and They found a flaw. Of course, this is precisely the way computers and other technical systems are hacked. A few years ago, They launched an exploit based on that flaw and here we are.
Again, science demands an accounting of all the evidence. As regards FE, that evidence includes the fact that numerous people sincerely believe something preposterous.
I'm an optimistic person, and I take it as a sign of some progress that they apparently cannot find a single person to stand up in front of a crowd of tame reporters and try to justify this:
[Pentagon has ‘nothing to say’ about strike on Crimean beach with US-supplied weapons: Washington is providing the intelligence data for Kiev’s ATACMS strikes, the Russian Defense Ministry has stated] (https://www.rt.com/russia/599853-pentagon-comment-atacms-crimea/) (RT 6/24/2024)
I take this as an indication that "They" still judge they need people to vote for their candidates. I mean, why else would they bother? It all just draws unwanted attention. It's like a bank robber walking in to the branch while open-carrying and arguing with the security guard about his 2nd Amendment rights.
I suppose one could argue that this is some sort of "double reverse", so that we're all fooled into thinking "They" don't already have it in the bag. But then WTF could possibly be the point of that if They already have it in the bag?
I'm more a proponent of the idea that humans were physically more robust in earlier times, and that we have slowly been purposefully degraded in this aspect.
Every once in a while, if you're alert, you'll pick up examples of human physical prowess that simply do not seem possible even for the stoutest humans today. Native Americans were said to be able to run 50 miles and fight a battle at the end. Vikings could build complete sailing vessels with hand tools. Pioneers showed up in virgin territory with basic implements, built shelters and started farming. Who could do any of these things today?
There's an existing indigenous tribe in Northern Mexico where many can run over 300 miles. I thought it was some kind of Internet hoax when I first read about them. One can also read about the capabilities of Wim Hof, who says he's no one special and teaches his skills to many.
So maybe wearing full plate armor was actually no big deal at the time, and such a fact is part of the knowledge about our true capacities that is carefully kept from us.
I've come to notice that many people love to be in possession of "secret knowledge". They love to hint at, suggest, allude, refer to, imply, etc., speaking all in veiled terms.
Different people would give different excuses and alibis as to why they do this, but the dynamic is the same: they get off on the power due to the imbalance. They love that feeling of being "one up" on everyone else. I tend to think this is to allay internal fear and weakness.
I've also come to conclude that this dynamic is a sign of lower consciousness. For example, Mark Passio readily admits he was involved in Satanism because of his lower level of consciousness at the time. In general, it's why all these "occultists" do what they do, and they actively seek to arrest and regress the development of consciousness.
I have lately realized that this very same dynamic exists in those with a preoccupation with the occult. They don't reject the imbalance, they just want that which they believe the occultists have. All for good reasons, of course.
The typical connection between Satan and the Vatican looks a little something like this:
"something Biblical about Satan" --> ... --> "something modern about the Vatican"
There are very few people actually trying to fill in that "...", so you end up either rejecting the claim for lack of evidence, or taking it almost entirely on faith. And there's nothing to build on or investigate further.
One person trying to expand the "..." is anthropologist Robert Sepehr. A good example of his work is this presentation with evidence of Mithraism back in the time of Constantine:
How Christ Became King (5/13/2024)
He has a YT channel which the article embeds, but that link contains a transcript for easier study.
Well, you know, it all has to do with "being a good person".
Virtually everyone thinks of themselves as a "good person", then proceeds to do whatever it was they were going to do anyway.
Thinking this through, "being a good person" means "doing a good deed for the right reasons, then expecting for the right reward".
Really thinking this through, though, "being a good person" actually means "doing a good deed even if you know you're going to get kicked in the teeth for your trouble".
Not many people are ready for that. The ironic thing is, if enough people were, I believe there would quickly be a lot less teeth-kicking in the world. It's painful to have to watch it all drag out.
It really is in the hands of the population of the West as to whether there will be a WW3. Putin knows the crisis is coming. Russia and her allies are making preparations and will fight to the end if it comes to that, but that path is not of their choosing:
WEST HAS A DECISION TO MAKE – PUTIN (TID
[From his inauguration speech] “We do not refuse dialogue with Western states. The choice is theirs: do they intend to continue trying to restrain the development of Russia, continue the policy of aggression and relentless pressure that they have pursued for years, or look for a path to cooperation and peace.”
All these things we are seeing are outward confirmations of the choice the Western "leaders" have made. However, They would never deign to stir up the peasantry with such news. It really just comes down to, "Suppose they gave a war and nobody came?"
I have long held the position that DJT is a "closet truther". He says far less than he knows, and only crafted in measured bites and couched in specific ways.
If you show me a truther who has tried talking about everything they know to friends and family who may have known them their entire life and gotten the typical reaction, then I can show you a closet truther.
Another little angle I picked up casually concerning the "demonization" of nicotine: a few years ago I was in a casino and started chatting with a guy who was a chemist and he mentioned something about working with drugs. Just by way of conversation, I asked, "If you were emperor and could ban any single drug, which would it be?" He instantly said cigarettes.
I said, "Really? Nicotine can't be that bad compared to all these other crazy things, can it?
He said, "Oh, it's not the nicotine at all. It's all the additives. There are like 2500 compounds in a cigarette." Additives, huh?
I would say it's also why no one had heard of this: Project XA
So the picture starts to come together, doesn't it?
.
Interesting related trivia: even birds know about the anti-parasitic properties of nicotine.
City birds use cigarette butts to smoke out parasites (Nature 12/5/2012)
Very disturbingly, there's another guy that I take to be up to speed on current events, who stated exactly the same time frame a few days ago:
“The Train Has Left the Station and No One Can Stop It”. Europe Will be at War with Russia. Serbia’s President A. Vucic (Global Research 6/13/2024)
"We will have world war in 3-4 months - We're checking our oil, flour, sugar"
It should also be noted, for those not already aware, that Serbia and Finland would presumably be on opposite sides of this conflict, which is to say that we can rule out that this talk is some kind of loony NATO warmongering predictive programming initiative.
These guys are scared that no one is scared. Me too.
I thought I'd take this opportunity to resurface an old, related conspiracy that few seemed to ever know about, no one remembers now, and everyone should know.
There was the crazy idea floating around that Walmarts were going to be turned into FEMA camps or something along those lines. Sam Walton had been a captain in US Army Intelligence, and here's what he did during the war:
Wal Mart Founder Sam Walton Led Prisoner Of War Camps For US Military (8/3/2015)
Well okay, but that doesn't mean the FEMA thing is true, right? Maybe not, but then you have to wonder why the info about the POW camps has been Memory Holed since that article was written.
They link to his wiki page as a source for the camp statement, but you won't find it there now. You have to go to one of the saved versions, which no one will ever do unless they know what they're looking for.
Did they just run out of room on the page and drop that boring fact?
For students of what might be called "deep history"--the idea that the true account of events is something other than anyone is shouting at your face--this incident is a fascinating window.
In general, you have a basic triangle of opposing viewpoints regarding anything to do with the Bible. Those are: (1) it's totally phony, (2) it's basically phony and mostly rewritten to serve a political/social agenda, and (3) it's Holy Scripture meant to glorify God or some such thing. Just this one incident serves to kick all those into the ditch and point us towards another view, one which might eventually guide us to learning what actually happened.
The first issue to note is this: Nearly 200k soldiers getting completely smitten all at once by God would seem to be a prime news story about "the power of God" or "watch your step" or "check out this fairy tale". It isn't. To the credit of the Daily Mail, they cite the verses of this "news story":
Then the angel of the LORD went forth, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians a hundred and fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.
And it came to pass that night, that the angel of the LORD went out, and smote in the camp of the Assyrians an hundred fourscore and five thousand: and when they arose early in the morning, behold, they were all dead corpses.
Well, these are nearly identical sentences, so in total we get one single sentence about the facts and circumstances regarding something along the lines of (what we are supposed to believe was the nuclear) bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki put together.
Now I ask: does that type of coverage or "historiography" fit well with any of the views popularly held regarding what the Bible is? IOW, is that what someone would have written if the Bible was--as some would have it--complete fiction? Not in my book, not at all, not any of those views.
So what do I think was going on? Long story, of course, but research into deep history appears shows that the time leading up to 600 BC was the final stages of what is greatly misunderstood but is referred to as the "War in Heaven". Surprise, it seems to have taken place mostly on Earth.
But since the entire "world order" was being fought over, it was a time of upheaval and disorder. Out of that chaos, only a few fragments of history survived to make their way down to us and this is one of them. If one researches the topic, "history" itself as we understand it had yet to be invented.
How chaotic was it? I wasn't there but we do have an indication. The siege is said to have taken place in 701 BC. In a coincidence that I believe is no coincidence, this puzzler arose:
Why did all of the Worlds civilizations change their calendars in 701 BC (GLP 4/2/2010, but cited from Velikovsky in "Worlds in Collision")
If, in general, "the truth is stranger than you can believe", then we should always be checking our ability to believe before we entertain and evaluate the evidence.
Once again, this is proof that there is so little racism that it's easier to make it up out of nothing than to locate it.
Of course, bigotry against straight/white/Christian/cis people is rampant but you're not allowed to complain about it. It's defined to be "justice", and who can complain about justice?
Easy one first: QE2 = Queen Elizabeth II.
As for simulating the continuing existence of a person, they use a wide variety of methods, as convenient, to keep the psyop going. We're familiar with the overt ones--masks, body doubles, DeepFakes, Photoshop, etc--but some of them are very subtle indeed.
Take the example of the least effort, most convincing: you'll see an article about an appearance a subject made somewhere, including a picture. Well, that proves it, right?
It would be easy enough to take an old photo, Shop it a bit to make it look like the place they were supposed to have been, and give it a phony caption, but the really funny thing is that I've never seen that. They just use an old stock photo and label it "Stock photo", or they don't label it at all, or they put in a photo without the subject in question, or they do not include a photo at all.
All these things serve to convince the reader the subject is still alive. Of course they are! Their death was never announced, was it? The absolute key is that no one is actually looking, but their subconscious absorbs the "evidence" all the same. I'm not special, I'm just looking.
There are endless variations on this theme, such as someone mentioning their encounter with the subject. The latest iteration on this--and it is absolutely effective--is that the news will "leak" that the subject has done something bad or embarrassing. Conspiracy theorists jump on it like a duck on a junebug, just as they are meant to.
Finally, as much talk as there has been about DeepFake, the voice aspect has been around even longer but somehow, strangely, never gets any play even in conspiracy circles:
After 20 Minutes of Listening, New Adobe Tool Can Make You Say Anything (Vice 11/5/2016)
There's sort of a funny coincidence about the date of the article. That's right at the time of a big election, and a huge controversy at that time and continuing until present is that one of the candidates had "said something on a hot mic" about "grabbing women by the pussy". Yet you will never hear a conspiracy theorist (who isn't me) question the authenticity of that clip.
That really should tell you something about how the human mind works and the state of "conspiracy theory".
EDIT: I take back what I said. There was one time I saw them Photoshop a recent event, and that was Gavin Newsom's 2022 re-election. There used to be a set of these, but they've black-holed them all. The remaining Shopped pic of his "victory speech" is here:
Gavin Newsom and Ron DeSantis victory speeches pushed wildly different views of ‘freedom’ (San Francisco Chronicle 11/9/2022)
The other major paper just went with some kooky random pic, who even knows if it's real:
California voters elect Gov. Gavin Newsom to a second term (Los Angeles Times 11/8/2022)
Bizarre when you actually look, isn't it?
No, she's still dead. If you've seen some of the latest DeepFakes, they're nearly flawless. I am reliably informed that you can look up some celebrity DeepFakes on porn sites to see some of the recent efforts. Quite... uh... sufficient to purpose.
It's becoming commonplace these days for dead people to still be "alive", at least as far as the public is concerned. Hunter and Joe have been dead since before "Biden" was inaugurated. Gavin Newsom has been dead since late 2021. RBG and QE2 were both dead for about a year before it was ever announced. Hillary was executed just before the 2016 election. Putin has had a body double since way back in 2013 (although I do not believe he is dead).
The state of the information war is that you aren't supposed to believe any of this is possible. Shill posts can be easily identified as simply denying the possibility outright without addressing any evidence, or by diverting to another direction of inquiry. In conspiracy circles, such instances rise and fade, but the pattern is that even most conspiracists go back to generally accepting the people as alive.
So it isn't who might have died and when, or if it's even possible to fake their continued existence and how, but the goal now is to gaslight you into rejecting the plausibility entirely. No need for any complicated and troublesome hand-waving in that mode.
The higher-level decode of this is that the Establishment is losing the information war, and losing badly.
They have been reduced to simply calling their opponents things which their remaining audience will recognize as bad words. In another time and place, it would be like shouting, "Look at all these nigger-lovers!" The definition and implications are never defined, but the herd becomes alarmed.
No one who isn't already mentally enthralled to the Establishment is being persuaded by any of this. "They" can only attempt to tighten their grip on those remaining.
Electric Universe is a real treasure trove. The Thunderbolts Projects is sort of the main hub and you can find them at https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/.
Do be aware, though, that although there is a ton of solid material, it is ultimately a disinformation project. The goal is "all old mythology is just stuff people saw in the sky".
Want to know how far back this all goes? Check out this carving of Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten, his wife Nefertiti, and their three daughters. Take a good, close look at the end of the sun rays.
What you're seeing are stylized human hands. Akhenaten (in addition to looking like an alien) turned Egyptian polytheism upside-down. They tell us he installed monotheistic worship of Aten, the Sun.
Personally, I think he was trying to get people to understand we were quite literally electrically connected to the Sun, and thus to the other stars, the entire galaxy, and the rest of the Universe. (And maybe he knew all this because he was an alien.)
He supposedly died after a short reign. Surprise! Some believe, though, that he fled Egypt with his followers and became the basis for the story of (get this) Moses and Exodus. Sigmund Freud believed this and actually wrote a book about it.
Strange world, isn't it?