The "special military operation" in Ukraine is part of a much larger move. That move includes the gold-backed ruble, the demand for payment in rubles for gas and oil, and the end of the petrodollar.
What she's talking about is their counter-move. Not that they didn't have it planned for the future, but they know that if they don't retake what they had before, they will eventually lose everything. They can and will provoke any crisis they feel they need to.
Did you really? I actually didn't know that library existed until I saw a dashcam video of a guy driving towards the Capitol and saw a Folger sign next to the road. I thought, "But of course."
So from that link, we tie directly to the Shakespeare psyop of Francis Bacon. The library's founder was Henry Clay Folger Jr, president and chairman of Standard Oil, so we connect directly into the Rockefellers. Folger Sr. was, of course, from Nantucket. And speaking of books, Peter Folger's wife, Mary Morrill Folger, is mentioned in Moby-Dick as the ancestor of the Folger whalers of Nantucket. So yes, Melville was one of "Them".
I could go on but it's pretty damn creepy already, huh?
That's an excellent point. Back in the day, when the Parasites used organized religion to control the population, you used to have to get off your ass and go to church (or temple or mosque) once a week to get that reinforcement of virtue or guilt.
Now it's as close as your pocket as you shelter-in-place.
Welp, now I'm fairly well convinced Smith is gay and the marriage is fake. I wonder if that's even his child. Not cool in either case.
I think the popular understanding of Hollywood stars being gay and having fake marriages is that it's a fairly recent development, but it goes back to the very beginning. They even had a name for it then that has since gone out of usage: Lavender_marriage
I don't have any specific information on Colbert, but I would almost expect there to be a link. The work of researcher (and, sadly, ultimately disinfo agent) Miles Mathis shows these type of familial links over and over and over ad nauseum.
Just as an example of the type of links floating around but apparently totally unnoticed by historians or genealogists:
Abigail "Gibby" Folger, (fake) Manson victim, links to her direct ancestor J.A. Folger, founder of Folgers Coffee, links to his direct ancestor Peter Folger, one of the original settlers of Nantucket Island, links to his daughter Bathsheba (or Bethshua) Folger, primary witness at the (fake) Salem Witch Trials, links to her sister Abiah Folger, mother of Benjamin Franklin, all around freak and deep cover spook
Get the drift? There are innumerable such chains that can be put together.
I would suggest a couple of finer points on this general idea.
First, for "liberals", virtue signalling has entirely replaced virtue. If you get the same social credit for signalling that you do for concrete action--which can be very costly and troublesome--then what would motivate and rational person to make the effort?
Second, again for "liberals", guilt is no longer personal but now entirely abstract. Previously, if you felt guilt over some matter, you could choose to personally make amends that you felt appropriate. But now, TPTB declare collective guilt, and persons in those groups are forced to make amends TPTB declare appropriate.
So the first is the degradation of persons and society through the destruction of virtue, and the second is disguised tyranny.
A while back, I was about where you're at regarding Hall but I had only been exposed to a little of his material. I thought, "Wow, this guy is really lining it out and I've got to study his work closely!" Being slow and lazy, I never got around to that.
But in the meantime, I was doing other research and came to certain pretty concrete conclusions involving some of the material Hall covers. Then when I heard more snippets of Hall, I thought, "Oh man, that guy sounds like he 100% knows what he's talking about but he's dead wrong."
So in my analysis, I see him one of two ways. Hall have been a limited hangout, a disinfo agent. I mean, he writes a book called "The Secret Teachings of All Ages" and no one tries to stop him? How secret and dangerous to the power structure could it actually be? Why, they barely even bother labeling him an anti-Semite.
On the other hand, he may have been in earnest but just incorrect on many important points. Then TPTB would allow and promote him for that very reason. As I said, I found certain things to be way off the mark, right over the cliff.
Given this, I wouldn't take him as a source or authority on anything. But his work can still alert you to the existence of things, which is way more than half the battle, and you can use it as a starting point for further research.
Hey, do you remember way back in the day when terrorists used to make demands? Now I guess everyone is just supposed to think they do it for the lulz.
Which I suppose is a stronger rational basis than Russia's "special military operation" and everything bad that ever happened to the Jews, which was for no reason at all.
If and when "They" are ready to dump whatever clone is shuffling around, I don't see why they wouldn't send him out in a blaze of glory courtesy of a lone AR-15 ghost-gun-wielding Qtard Trumpist. That lone gunmen have taken out so many Presidents is undeniable history.
So then, being as incredulous as anyone else, could this actually be a sign of changing times? You may think it's foolish, but all along I have believed that even in a wretched hive of scum and villainy like WaPo, there were still journalists capable of doing the job if only certain (ahem) infiltrators were removed. We should all recall just how bad The Wall Street Urinal was.
There was a time when we could reasonably believe the relationship between Colbert and the Podestas was merely coincidental, but I think that time has passed.
Not that it's primary evidence of a hoax, but I found two features most "entertaining":
Christmas trees: Helicopter footage showed that the fire station had some Christmas trees left over from their sale. They had 26, which is exactly the number needed to set up memorial trees for each of the victims on the path leading up to the school.
Bullet holes: Teacher Lauren Rousseau's car had two bullet holes in it, even though it seemed to be parked in a way such that no stray rounds could have hit where they did. Bizarrely, the hole in the door showed rust. Super bizarrely, the one in the A-pillar was outgoing. Fatally bizarrely, no authority or anyone in the media showed the slightest scintilla of interest as to how these bullet holes were created.
Bonus: IIRC, DNA evidence showed Lauren Rousseau's blood inside one of the full but unused magazines. (Time travel or inter-dimensional Lanza?)
A true CTist finally asks the right questions!
No hard evidence ever turned up, but the rumor went around on 10/25/2020, and here's an example of it: The rumor floating around Gab and Parler...the account that allegedly was the first to break the news about Epstein's death is now claiming that Hunter Biden is dead
Pretty plausible given what a degenerate he was. There was a certain "profile" to the rumor that drew my attention, so I kept looking for him to show up in public.
Well, he didn't, not until just before Dad gets inaugurated: Hunter spends time with the 'big guy': President-elect Joe Biden is seen with troubled son with less than 48 hours to go until his inauguration
Look at the pics. Hat and a mask covering virtually his entire face. I think we've all seen his physique, but he also looks quite trim.there, doesn't he? Everyone can judge whether "Hunter" is walking with "Joe", but I know what I think about it.
Why cover it up? Well, the headline "Hopeless crackhead finally gets what he's been begging for as pedophile dad prepares to seize power after rigged election" may not have been quite the PR the Democrats were looking for.
And now his widow is banging dudes in Rio while the rest of enjoy the psychodrama playing out back home. Read carefully: I didn't say it was "evidence of", I said it was "consistent with". Makes perfect sense to me.
Yes, the Anunnaki and the Watchers are essentially the same group of 600 aliens that came to Earth, and the "Fallen Angels" are a subgroup of 200 aliens that were marooned here.
The name of "Watchers" comes, I believe, from a basic mistranslation thousands of years ago. The Sumerians sometimes referred to the group of "gods" as the I.GI.GI, by which they meant "the 600", but it turns out it can also be translated as "watchers".
The "War in Heaven", which was a dispute among these aliens, caused a faction of 200 to be stay behind here while the others withdrew. That faction is led by Satan, who also goes by many other names. But the key here is to recognize how the numbers from so many various sources tie together.
If you're interested in Biblical research, you may want to look at Jude 1:9. Conventional scholars basically wave their hands around and move on quickly, but an understanding of the Anunnaki provides a very precise explanation for that verse, which of course is further evidence of the Anunnaki thesis itself. Let me know if you'd like to know more.
BTW, as far as the aliens being benevolent, it's about like saying "humans are belevolent". Well, some are and some aren't, right? And it's not that they have human characteristics, we get it from them.
Can confirm this story. I heard it personally from REO Speedwagon, and they
Heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who Heard it from another [Putin's in Siberia] They say [Shoigu's in a bunker], [he's] out late [in the Urals] They’re talking about [Nuclear Armegeddon] and it’s bringing me down
If it sounds far-fetched on the surface, it shouldn't. Let's characterize it this way...
The rate depends on how old you are, but just suppose that every couple of years or so someone you're acquainted with dies. In the US, about 2.8M people die in a normal year. So if the vaxx killed off that many people, you only would likely know 2 people that had died in the last couple of years. If it killed off 5-6M, it would have only been 2 extra on average. Every person is different, and probably only about 3-5% of the shots were weaponized.
The counter-argument that goes, "I don't know anyone that got injured or died from the shot!" is brainless. It's been estimated that only 1 out of 50,000 rounds fired in the Vietnam War killed someone, so maybe you can find a veteran and tell him that ACKSHUALLY bullets aren't dangerous.
I have thought along much the same lines as you have mentioned. After much research I stumbled on to something that takes the related but somewhat disparate ideas you mentioned and ties them together fairly tightly, and that is the Anunnaki.
I have found that virtually everyone I've mentioned it to wholly rejects having their worldview disturbed so significantly by the acceptance of such a reality. I myself could not possibly reject it after all the evidence I've accumulated. But if you want to know in a far more precise way how the things you've mentioned are simply mischaracterized aspects of a single phenomenon, let me know.
Thanks for your reply!
I think you're all over the target with what you said. I might suggest as the bullseye, lying at the heart of the schools of thought and ideas you mentioned, is the concept of "solipsism", basically the idea that there is no external reality. Turns out it lies at the heart of Satanism as well (coincidence? I think not!). Mark Passio has made some comments on solipsism you may want to search out.
Thanks for your reply!
I always assume that, on issues like this where I'm confused and there are apparent contradictions, there is more information relevant to it of which I am not aware. So I have to work harder, dig deeper, expand my imagination, and review previous conclusions until I have dispelled the confusion and resolved the contradictions. I may choose to reserve judgment until the such information becomes available.
And while it's not a direct answer to your question, you may wish to consider a related question, one that I certainly posed to myself: "What good would it have done if he had spilled the beans on 9/11 or any other similar subject?" I would suggest you think about how much good it does when you "spill the beans" to friends, family, colleagues, and rabid political enemies who aren't already deeply into conspiracy (which I assume would be most).
Or you can go with the shill answer, which I'll give you here: "oRaNgE mAn CoNtRoLlEd Op! YoU'rE dUmB iF yOu DoN't GeT tHaT!"
What I've never been able to put my finger on is exactly why they have gone to such incredible effort to cover up the existence of giants, and succeeded virtually completely in annihilating record of them.
I mean, maybe it puts a bit a kink in "Evolution" (but they don't seem too worried about the huge plot holes there) and it lends some support to the Bible, but otherwise who cares? They could have simply written them all off as genetic freaks, and say they all evolved out of existence as further proof of evolution.
There's nothing even very surprising or shocking in the stories of humans dealing with them. Okay, some were cannibals, but so are some regular humans. And yeah, I fully believe they were the Nephilim, offspring of humans and Fallen Angels, but the mainstream could have just declared that to be superstitious nonsense of primitives that did not know genetics.
I get the distinct sense that there has got to be something very, very big (haha) that giants leads to. Best guess is that some or all of the Tartarians were giants, and they certainly did a great job of erasing Tartaria.
I've long thought that if I was one of these Elites, I'd be paranoid all the time--especially lately--thinking, "I wonder if someone on my security or personal staff is just waiting for the right circumstance to come up to take me out."
And I think that because, if I was on some Elite's personal or security staff, I'd be thinking, "I may despise this person, but I'll stay on the job as long as possible just in case the right circumstance comes up where I can to take this dirtbag out."
"I just say stuff. Does it mean anything? That's for me to know, and I'm not telling you. And who says I said anything? No one, that's who. No more questions because I'm not even here right now."
If anyone has the chance to talk to one of the ladies or little girls he's sniffed, ask her if she could hear the sound of the ocean coming out of his ears.
Ever notice that They never try to assassinate Putin, not in all these long years? The obvious reason is that it's because he's an NWO puppet. But then you think they'd be clever enough to fake it every once in a while, don't you?
The real reason--as I've been able to piece it together--is not at all obvious, but too long to go into here. I just think people should consider the matter.
(And if you're thinking of that remote hijack car accident a few years back, that killed his driver when Putin was very obviously not in the car.)
Wow, so I can do this at home? I need no longer be beholden to Big Bug, like Archer Daniels Maggot!