In lieu of an earlier post, I find most people really don't know anything at all about the giants of our past, and often assume it's all a big myth. Lincoln was so matter of fact about it, likely because it was a general known fact at that time. In 1881, Congress gave sole excavation rights of these mounds to the Smithsonian and gave them thousands of tax payer dollars to do so more than once. We all know what happens when they get involved in recovering history; anything consequential disappears. Some of their findings were made public in their Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for years 1873, 1875, and 1877. I'll post a link below to 1873 and you can change the years to view the rest. They found skulls measuring 36" in circumference, skeletons belonging to "gigantic savages," and so on. Publicly, The Smithsonian seems to mostly or only talk about the EASTERN mounds, but look for the stories from the Anasazi and also San Canyon Pueblo where footprints of 6 toed giants were found.
Would love to see what anyone knows about all this or give more info for those that want to know more. Of course this is just a glimpse of the story, definitely enough here to get started. This rabbit hole goes on and on once you start, but you will not be disappointed. It's more like, whole rabbit.
For those that want to go down the Giants/Nephilim road, there's also a very convincing story about giant remains being found on Jekyll island, along with a sacrificial altar built the same way the Canaanites built theirs. If it's true, the building that the infamous banksters' meeting happened in was built right on top of that altar. Search for Tim Bence on that story.
https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/34977#page/426/mode/1up (Human skull found measured 36 inches in circumference) https://quod.lib.umich.edu/l/lincoln/lincoln2/1:6?rgn=div1;view=fulltext https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11/pdf/GPO-CRECB-1881-pt3-v11-12.pdf
What I've never been able to put my finger on is exactly why they have gone to such incredible effort to cover up the existence of giants, and succeeded virtually completely in annihilating record of them.
I mean, maybe it puts a bit a kink in "Evolution" (but they don't seem too worried about the huge plot holes there) and it lends some support to the Bible, but otherwise who cares? They could have simply written them all off as genetic freaks, and say they all evolved out of existence as further proof of evolution.
There's nothing even very surprising or shocking in the stories of humans dealing with them. Okay, some were cannibals, but so are some regular humans. And yeah, I fully believe they were the Nephilim, offspring of humans and Fallen Angels, but the mainstream could have just declared that to be superstitious nonsense of primitives that did not know genetics.
I get the distinct sense that there has got to be something very, very big (haha) that giants leads to. Best guess is that some or all of the Tartarians were giants, and they certainly did a great job of erasing Tartaria.
Well since we are on conspiracy I’ll throw in my crazy.
The plot holes in evolution, the really weak “simulation theory” items pushed in our pop scientism. (Ex. 1) (Ex. 2) (Ex. 3) Are similar to Buddhism, Gnosticism, hermeticism, Freemasons, illuminate, and even philosophical views such as nihilism and postmodernism. These all share a similar views of essentially reality is fake and gay, either kill yourself or kill others on the way out. This inverts the Christian ethic of us being responsible for every action, every thought, that we aren’t victims.
I think covering up Nephilim, the true nature of reality, the subversion of Christianity, the creepy occult obsession of a SIGNIFICANT amount of powerful people from the beginning of time until now all point towards something higher than ourselves.
I’m a Christian so I have that bias. Honestly I was agnostic most of my life but the more I saw creepy occult stuff among the elite led me to study religion more.
Even science has such poor answers that it’s almost lazy. Simulation theory (who made the simulation?) directed panspermia (who directed all that jizz?) life evolving from primordial soup struck by lightening (lol Ancient Greece called they want their mythology back), ancient aliens(gods and demons relabeled ET), it’s all essentially hinging religious beliefs that make less sense the more we learn.
I think there’s a deliberate effort to take us further from the truth because they want to ursup God. It’s luciferian. Any school of thought that tells you “you don’t matter” “existence doesn’t matter” “it’s all an illusion” “random chance” all lead people to suicide, disillusionment, terrible decisions. I truly think these philosophies are purposely harmful to humans.
I’m done rambling but I’ll close with this: don’t let anyone tell you you don’t matter existence doesn’t matter, you do matter.
I think you're all over the target with what you said. I might suggest as the bullseye, lying at the heart of the schools of thought and ideas you mentioned, is the concept of "solipsism", basically the idea that there is no external reality. Turns out it lies at the heart of Satanism as well (coincidence? I think not!). Mark Passio has made some comments on solipsism you may want to search out.
Thanks for your reply!
I have both views. I think we are living in a simulation, but one that we control. We are responsible for our actions, because we create the simulation. We create our own experience and we create our effects on others.
If we are living in a simulation, then your idea that this is a simulation is also apart of the simulation. It defeats itself.
It’s akin to saying reality is false, except for the part that told me reality is false.
I don't see why thats a problem or how that "defeats itself". Everything is simulation. If everything is simulation, nothing is. You are responsible for your actions. Just because reality is an illusion / simulation / trick, doesnt mean that its not real. Just because video games are their own simulated realities doesn't mean that they're not real, it doesn't mean you can't learn from them, have experiences with them, etc.
Illusions have their purposes.
It’s completely unknowable and unprovable because everything that could be used as evidence is apart of the simulation. This has been pondered since Ancient Greece.
That’s literally the definition of simulation though. I like where you’re logically headed that our actions matter and I applaud you there but I think your case may need to flesh out the vocabulary a little bit first. We can learn from video games and simulations I’m not arguing against that at all, but to say that a simulation is real is antithetical to the definition of simulation.
I think you're the one that doesn't know what simulation means lol.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simulation
Definition of simulation 1: the act or process of simulating 2: a sham object : COUNTERFEIT 3a: the imitative representation of the functioning of one system or process by means of the functioning of another a computer simulation of an industrial process b: examination of a problem often not subject to direct experimentation by means of a simulating device
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/simulating
Definition of simulate transitive verb
1: to give or assume the appearance or effect of often with the intent to deceive : IMITATE 2: to make a simulation of (something, such as a physical system)
A simulation is a thing. A thing that exists. A "sham" object is still an object. A counterfeit object is still an object. An imitation or representation is still a real thing by itself. A simulation is an illusion, but an illusion is still a thing itself. The illusion exists, therefore illusions are real things. They are deceptions, but the deceptions are still "real" objects themselves.
Your position is unknowable, you’ve yet to address that.
As for the definition of simulation. Do the words sham, counterfeit, imitative mean anything?
That concept works for only a superficial level. I’m talking on a grand scheme. When I play a video game like Skyrim, the game is real, the keyboard is real, I’m really interacting with a programmed reality. But am I a wizard that can ride dragons? No.
Can I learn useful things yes, but one thing you can never learn in a simulation is that you are in a simulation.
The Nephilim or their spirits, depending on how you take those scriptures, are coming back in the last days. It most certainly has to do with the great deception. Which is part of why I've made a point to study it so intensely. I think the hiding of the giants is 2 fold though. Lucifer wants to shape his own narrative, so they have to hide everything related in order to ensure the most success. If God wiped out the Earth because of what they had been teaching people, then God would also be sure that knowledge was hidden for a time as well. Ritual sacrifice, especially that of babies and children, was a fundamental part of who the Giants were. It was much more than just cannibalism. And I believe there was something very real, and obviously very dark, about what it accomplished. Old Testament sacrifice and the New Testament sacrifice of Jesus tells me those laws of blood sacrifice are built in to this realm. It gave us a line to God and the heavenly realm. Lucifer cannot create, he can only corrupt. So they have corrupted that ritual for their own benefit along those same lines as well. I think it caused a thinning of the fabric between realms or maybe a direct door way to commune with evil.
The short version of the Anasazi legend, passed down to the medicine men over the generations, says that a reptilian being came out of a portal and taught them evil ritual practices that eventually led to a portal opening and giants coming out of it that started to attack and feast on their people. That's why they built the defensive structures in the mountain side and eventually fled the land in 4 directions. The official story says they had to leave because of a lack of water, but that doesn't explain why they left behind everything important.
I'm also starting to believe the injection is being used solely to bring them back. Mass human trials, phase 1. Many experts believe the human DNA experienced a sudden mutation, all at the same time. Likely around 3000 BC. Maybe they are trying to undo that so the Nephilim can return?
Lastly, when you trace back the bloodlines to the Nephilim, it changes the whole narrative that we see shaped around God in the Old Testament. Any time He says to wipe out a tribe, kill everyone, kill all the animals, etc, it is one of these lines traced back to the Nephilim. It shows His mercy for his true creation, not some blood thirsty, vengeful God. Their blood line was a direct threat to our existence. This is something I've only come to understand recently, and it really helped me understand the nature of God much, much better. Also helps explain why evil men spend so much effort to hide the existence of giants.
I have thought along much the same lines as you have mentioned. After much research I stumbled on to something that takes the related but somewhat disparate ideas you mentioned and ties them together fairly tightly, and that is the Anunnaki.
I have found that virtually everyone I've mentioned it to wholly rejects having their worldview disturbed so significantly by the acceptance of such a reality. I myself could not possibly reject it after all the evidence I've accumulated. But if you want to know in a far more precise way how the things you've mentioned are simply mischaracterized aspects of a single phenomenon, let me know.
Thanks for your reply!
What you call the Anunnaki, I believe, are the Watchers. The fallen angels that mated with human women who bore giants, taught them secrets they were not supposed to know, and were ultimately the reason God had to flood the Earth. I've gone down the Ancient Alien path, but it all leads right back to what is written in the bible. You can trace the history of their offspring (6 fingers and 6 toes is a gene that came from the Nephilim) and in every case, these are tribes surrounded by violence and human sacrifice. If it were "aliens" that produced the Nephilim, they sure as hell don't have our best interest in mind. Yet the ancient alien crowd seems to think they are some benevolent group worth looking up to, but that is simply not the case historically.
Yes, the Anunnaki and the Watchers are essentially the same group of 600 aliens that came to Earth, and the "Fallen Angels" are a subgroup of 200 aliens that were marooned here.
The name of "Watchers" comes, I believe, from a basic mistranslation thousands of years ago. The Sumerians sometimes referred to the group of "gods" as the I.GI.GI, by which they meant "the 600", but it turns out it can also be translated as "watchers".
The "War in Heaven", which was a dispute among these aliens, caused a faction of 200 to be stay behind here while the others withdrew. That faction is led by Satan, who also goes by many other names. But the key here is to recognize how the numbers from so many various sources tie together.
If you're interested in Biblical research, you may want to look at Jude 1:9. Conventional scholars basically wave their hands around and move on quickly, but an understanding of the Anunnaki provides a very precise explanation for that verse, which of course is further evidence of the Anunnaki thesis itself. Let me know if you'd like to know more.
BTW, as far as the aliens being benevolent, it's about like saying "humans are belevolent". Well, some are and some aren't, right? And it's not that they have human characteristics, we get it from them.
Well exactly because it lends support to the Bible. If God doesn't exist, neither does the devil.
This is exactly what the devil wants people to believe.
I took it to be a challenge to the whole manifest destiny ideology that at the time was used to justify genocide of the natives
Definitely part of it. Along with the giants, they hid any evidence that contradicted the "isolation theory" of the Americas as well. If the public knew humans had been coming to the Americas for many centuries, and specifically what we call the USA, that would've definitely caused problems with that narrative.
Fun fact; the original 007, famous occultist, and advisor to the Queen of England John Dee is credited with the suggestion that England should attempt to erase any knowledge of previous claims to America. It was a part of a geopolitical strategy to lay greater claim and undermine the much older Spanish and French settlers.
This is only one minor aspect of the attempts to rewrite history but I always found it fascinating that some old wanna be warlock had so much influence.