To be completely frank, I've fallen off the track of even being able to guess who might be up to what in this situation, and that's even knowing the following....
The nexus between the JFK assassination and MK-Ultra is that Jackie did it, specifically that she was both a programmed assassin and a "Presidential Model". It surprises me that no one seems to realize this is where they got the name.
That didn't take 40 boxes or even 40 words to state the core thesis. Analyzing the evidence of the event under that thesis, you realize 98% of what passes for "JFK research" is meaningless irrelevancies and red herrings. That's the point of it.
It was a Salem Witch operation. JFK was one of them, he crossed the line against them, and he was sanctioned. Allen Dulles (whose mother was a Foster) was the CIA Director that JFK fired, his deputy Charles P. Cabell was fired with him, Earle Cabell was mayor of Dallas, and Lyndon Johnson took over when he was dead. The list goes on.
At this point, I still have no information to indicate that anyone in the Trump Administration knows any of this, and who knows how many moles there are. Seeing that Olivia Coleman is the ODNI spokesperson is a bit disturbing. But if I were a White Hat trying to do battle with these embedded scum, I'd play my cards hella close to the vest, too.
Not just that: the general public could never believe even the few simple paragraphs I've just written. They would never even entertain it. Perhaps the White Hats have concluded that there is not now nor ever will be a point to mentioning any of this to the public. It is deeply disturbing and therefore destabilizing.
And let me be brutally honest on this point: it is barely worth mentioning to supposedly open-minded tin foil hatters.
EDIT: Forgot to mention that the Church Committee and the Rockefeller Commission where "the lid was blown off MK-Ultra" were limited hangouts courtesy of the Salem Witches. Thus, the Congressional intelligence oversight set up in the wake of that is kabuki. I've been planning to write a post on this for some time but still far from it.
The children's parents insisted during their trial they had always acted in the interest of the youngsters.
That's the single crucial sentence in the entire article. I believe 100% that they believe this 100%. The NPC level of consciousness begins with the assumption that they are a good person and therefore correct in their reasoning and actions. They are the hero of the narrative playing out in their own head.
If anyone reading this assumes that they are a good person and therefore correct in their reasoning and actions, you might be an NPC. If you never worry about that and aren't worried after reading that last statement, you're definitely an NPC.
Jailing them does nothing to alleviate the situation and can be compared to beating a dog for what is deemed a moral transgression. It helps nothing but it makes the low-consciousness feel better about themselves.
This is a severe phenomenon and deserves a serious explanation. I find that it confirms a major aspect of "NPC theory". That term should be considered only a handle which has no agreed definition. The definition and characteristics are what is being discussed.
Most of the human race--perhaps 80%--are NPCs. One big aspect of that is that they are already psychotic. Even that term is poorly understood by mainstream science, but the core of it which I consider vital would be loosely described as "detachment from reality".
They get a small but vital part of their idea of reality from firsthand experience, but most of what they believe is happening in the rest of the world comes from sources they consider "authorities": parents, teachers, priests and preachers, fancy people on TV, etc.
A main cue of "authority" is to make statements with 100% conviction. It's even called "speaking with authority". AI does that 100% the time. There are no cues being emitted indicating to someone that they should question what is being produced: "<beep> That's the best I can figure out about it for now. I could be wrong and you'll have to decide for yourself. <boop>." Never happens.
At no time have any authorities told them that what comes out of computers as something labeled "AI" cannot be inherently trusted and may be wildly incorrect, no matter how reasonably it is stated and how authoritative it seems. That's part of the psyop, actually. Thus, anything AI spits out is "reality".
But the AIs themselves are psychotic under the definition above. It's far worse, actually, because the AIs can never look out the window or consult personal experience and common sense to adjust their reality. Particularly if they're ingesting social media, which is full of the the lunatic rantings of everyone that owns a keyboard.
The feedback mechanism amplifies psychosis with psychosis with no natural governor. I suspect that what pulled these individuals out was that eventually they came into contact with a person they considered an "authority" who said, "That's all crazy bullshit. Put your fucking phone down."
If you're reading this and thinking, "That could never happen to me," you're almost certainly correct. That's my point: it does happen to some people because their minds operate in a fundamentally different way.
The paramount observation out of all this is to stop believing that everyone thinks like everyone else, just with the dials and levers set in different positions and different punch cards fed in. Not true at all.
Most will never "wake up" no matter how indispensable and persuasive the social media posts they read may be. The few that can wake up have to begin making decisions under that reality.
I think there's a useful meta-lesson from this incident:
There's a universal subconscious assumption that "They" are at all times malicious and that everything "They" do is inimical towards the rest of the human race. Thus, researchers find something bad and then look for who to pin it on. This methodology is entirely unreliable and often misleading.
There's nothing inherently bad about the use of anesthesia, so far as I know. Nothing unhealthful or immoral. (I mean, within reason. Don't go sniffing ether, kids!) So what's going on here.
My guess would be that the Salem Witches realized that the discovery and rollout of anesthetics was right around the corner. Therefore, They needed to be the ones rolling it out and everyone was going to hear first what They had to say about it.
Sure, yes, Their control over the science is long-term inimical but is in such a fashion as no one is ever going to detect Their influence. It's been almost two centuries and no ones has, right?
A note on AI consciousness: Before anyone gets to discussing AI consciousness, it should be understood that no one understands human consciousness, even in its fundamental aspect.
That's a strong claim, but the demonstration of it comes from anesthesiology. First note that even the "engineering" of it is so poorly understood that a dedicated specialist is required to administer anesthesia during surgery.
Wikipedia's article is excruciatingly long but manages to avoid the simplest of characterizations of the science of anesthesia: scientists know that it works, but they do not know at all how it works.
In about a decade since I first learned this, I have only heard it mentioned one other time. It's yet another one of those "informational black holes" that the entire culture gets steered around.
Think of it like this: if you discover that putting your cell phone in a microwave means that it won't ring when you call it, that is no demonstration that you understand anything at all about the science and technology of either cell phones or microwaves.
Even in that trivial case, virtually everyone would jump to the wrong conclusion unless they already knew otherwise. Not all microwaves block all cell phone signals.
Bonus: The "History" section of that Wikipedia page mentions that the first demonstration of anesthesia took place at Massachusetts General Hospital and involved a dentist named William Morton and a surgeon named John Warren. Next to the text is a painting by Robert C. Hinckley illustrating the momentous event.
Well, surprise or maybe not surprise: MA General is in Boston, next to Salem. Morton, Warren, and even Hinckley are all Salem Witch names.
Double Bonus: I haven't covered the Mortons before so it might not be immediately recognizable, but I'll just mention as one example the 22nd Vice President of the United States, Levi Parsons Morton. Yes, those Parsons.
The whole organization is to be considered suspect, but the scheme is much deeper than anything visible on the surface.
Back in 2001, Liberty Media acquired Liberty Digital. The founding president and CEO of Liberty Digital was Jarl Mohn. No one comes out and says it, but everyone assumes that's how Mohn became a billionaire.
Not true. That's merely how they laundered his secret inheritance to him. I wrote up who Mohn really was two years ago:
The new CEO of NPR is an obvious spook, but not obvious at all is that the CEO before last, Jarl Mohn, was a secret Nazi billionaire (not a metaphor) (conspiracies.win 4/19/2024)
Finally, note that Liberty Media isn't headquartered in Los Angeles or New York, but in Meridian, Colorado, which is part of the Denver metro area. Denver is, of course, a primary Stronghold of the Salem Witches.
As far as outsourcing thinking, I learned something recently which I found provides a crucial insight on this. It concerns something which would be considered humorous and trivial:
This Scammer Used an AI-Generated MAGA Girl to Grift ‘Super Dumb’ Men (Wired 4/21/2026)
The anomaly is buried deep in the article:
The same logic, however, apparently does not apply to left-wing influencer accounts, as Sam learned when he created a short-lived liberal counterpart for Emily on Instagram: “Democrats know that it’s AI slop, so they don’t engage as much.” (Sam’s explanation for why MAGA influencer accounts work is blunt: “The MAGA crowd is made up of dumb people—like, super dumb people. And they fall for it.”)
"Liberal Emily" was not accepted by them as an "authority figure", and getting their reality from "authorities" is what basically characterizes liberals. More precisely, the authorities they grew up with were liberal and their level of consciousness simply entrained them to that.
Obviously it's not that half of us are dumb and the other half are also dumb and so we're all dumb. Sam--who is dumb--doesn't get the subtle phenomenon that has been revealed (or confirmed, since I realized a while back that this is what was happening).
Detecting AI is a pretty advanced exercise of our powers of observation and reasoning. You can do it and I can do it and we see that even Democrats can do it. Mostly it's subconscious and happens almost instantly. We get a "feeling" then we can look for specific evidence.
The difference, though, is that our subconscious also decides when it is "permissible" for that reasoning to prevail. For Democrats in this instance, it was harmless to come to this conclusion so they "recognized" it right away.
On the flip side, Gavin Newsom has been CGI since early 2022. He even got reelected. No one seems to have noticed this. It's better than slop but still detectable. The difference, though, is that it's a worldview-shattering conclusion to recognize such a deception. So it does not get recognized.
Same thing goes for the recent very obvious Netanyahu AI fakes. Whatever individuals "saw" or "did not see", no one came away thinking, "Ohhh, given that, I've been the dumbshit and on the wrong side all along, haven't I?" No, the actual function of our consciousness is to protect us from such upsetting realizations.
Well, the consciousness level varies by person. To ensure the development of your consciousness, one should strive to think, "Ohhh, given that, I've been the dumbshit and on the wrong side all along, haven't I?" as often as appropriate.
... or face demerits for protecting sources who share important information at great personal risk.
When is the last documented case of a source who was harmed for sharing important information? If that number is above zero, we can compare it to the number of lying jackasses making up bullshit that got published by the mainstream media for propaganda and political purposes. Also useful to compare it to the number that were ever held accountable for generating and propagating bullshit.
The world is as it has long been, and Thucydides said it two and a half millennia ago in the Melian Dialog:
The strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must.
Much of what goes on in discourse and analysis of the world serves only to obfuscate this state of affairs. Trump is called a "king" by those who crusade for whatever they're calling justice that day, yet that king is constantly overruled by judges whose names you've never heard and who you most certainly never voted either for or against.
So who are the strong in this scenario? Where shall we say the power lies? No one seems to care to discuss that. It's not visible on the org chart, that's for sure.
So here, the problem lies not with AI and journalism, per se, but it is simply another authority for the NPCs to point to when they like what the machine is saying about that journalism.
The mere fact that anyone puts any faith whatsoever in anything labeled "journalism" these days is much closer to the trouble.
I find this misunderstanding reminiscent of and related to the larger issue of modern slavery.
I feel certain that if you asked any social justice warrior how many slaves there were in the United States, they would picture neck chains and auctions blocks and tell you there weren't any, since it had been outlawed by the Great Emancipator and the Thirteenth Amendment (he wasn't and it didn't).
Turns out they'd only be off by over a million:
MODERN SLAVERY IN UNITED STATES
The 2023 Global Slavery Index (GSI) estimates that on any given day in 2021, there were 1.1 million people living in modern slavery in the US, a prevalence of 3.3 people in modern slavery for every thousand people in the country. This places the US among countries with the lowest prevalence of modern slavery in the region (21 out of 25) and globally (122 out of 160), but represents the highest estimated total number of people in modern slavery in the Americas, accounting for over one-fifth of people in modern slavery across the region. While data on modern slavery are not aggregated at the national level – making the true number of cases reported difficult to ascertain – the National Human Trafficking Hotline (NHTH) reported receiving 10,360 reports of suspected human trafficking cases in 2021.
I like the part where none of the Democrat crusaders in their dashikis have ever bothered introducing legislation where the federal government would collect the numbers and add them up. Reparations yes, SUM() no.
Again, none of this is of any concern to SJWs since they have not been instructed by their TVs or social media feeds that they can signal their virtue over the issue. No avatars have been even temporarily changed because of this.
The current promotion of "Q = Operation Trust" is indeed fake demoralization propaganda, as you say. It's promoted by shills and amplified continuously by zealous dummies who love to be "right".
The difference is subtle and always left out. That's primarily because the dumb zealots are only up to parroting what they hear.
Firstly, Operation Trust was meant to identify real monarchists and anti-Bolsheviks. Do Qanons wish to keep their identities secret? Quite the opposite, and they only refrain from talking about it because they don't wish to start pointless arguments with inflamed and out-of-control zealots.
Secondly, Operation Trust was aimed at penetrating and disrupting any anti-Bolshevik organization. I mean, what exactly does anyone think Q penetrated and disrupted?
About the closest any of the trolls can come to a justified analogy is that Q is meant to keep anyone from taking action. This is how close Operation Trust came to that:
MUCR kept the monarchist general Alexander Kutepov from active actions, as he was convinced to wait for the development of internal anti-Bolshevik forces. Kutepov had previously believed in militant action as a solution to the Soviet occupation, and had formed the "combat organization", a militant splinter from the Russian All-Military Union led by General Baron Pyotr Nikolayevich Wrangel. Kutepov also created the Inner Line as a counter-intelligence organization to prevent Bolshevik penetrations. It caused the Cheka some problems but was not overly successful.
If any of these fools think they're clever for discovering that Q derailed incipient military action, I'd say that's proof they've lost their minds and should stay away from keyboards entirely. They won't, because you don't have that kind of sense when you've lost your mind.
Haha, no one escapes! Henry was covered in a post a month ago concerning American manufacturers, the context being: American brands > Ford > Lincoln > Leland, and then actually mentioning Ransom Olds:
It used to be considered patriotic to drive an American car, but was it just a Salem Witch marketing campaign? (conspiracies.win 3/30/2026)
So this post starts at Olds and looks back the other way, even linking to the American carmakers post. But, you know, as mentioned in the post itself, you've got to start snipping the connecting threads somewhere to keep the whole thing manageable.
In this case, Leland was cut (metaphorically) because it's not a recognizable "Salem Witch" name and I want to keep the focus as sharp as possible.
Call it an unwitting limited hangout. Which do you think "They" would rather have people contemplating?:
(1) A mysterious figure had some tenuous association over two decades ago to the germ of an idea, and who years after that had some possibly incidental connection to an organization that is endlessly flogged in conspiracy theory circles as being involved in dark doings, but is only important because it serves to demonize the reviled enemy Donald J. Trump.
(2) Palantir is recording and analyzing every single thing you're doing on Polymarket. Everything.
As I've pointed out before, shitty research is it's own form of disinformation. "They" know this well and "They" know how ignorant and unwary people are of such dynamics.
Something I've never heard anyone mention: A couple of months ago when I looked into Polymarket personally--as in how it ran and how to set up an account--I read on their site that they did not allow accounts based in the US. I didn't even try to set one up.
They seemed to be serious about it, too, not just some wink-and-a-nod thing. It was more like, "We got in trouble with the CFTC back in 2022 and we won't risk that again."
But here we are and everyone's talking about Polymarket. Corbett discusses insider trading as something NO ONE is talking about, but doesn't mention that no Americans are supposed to be doing this in the first place as something NO ONE is talking about. Strange.
Here is a recent summary of the picture:
POLYMARKET REBELS STILL BETTING IN BANNED COUNTRIES USING VPNS (Sportico 4/7/2026)
While Polymarket said its new surveillance technology is going to safeguard its not-fully-launched U.S. exchange, it didn’t specify whether the tools would also be used to protect its separate international prediction market exchange, where about 98% of the company’s total betting volume and almost all of its controversy comes from.
There's another note about that surveillance technology. Corbett mentions that Admiral Poindexter was the head of DARPA back in 2003 when the idea of something like Polymarket came up and was shot down. He notes that Poindexter was later involved in the founding of much-maligned Palantir. Of course Corbett is aware of such things because he's one of the deepest and most thorough researchers out there, isn't he?
Well, he seems to have missed the news from 2026. From that same Sportico article:
Polymarket announced new integrity monitoring tools and procedures last month, highlighted by a partnership with data software firm Palantir enabling “world-class surveillance” of sports bets.
Deep and thorough researcher James Corbett always seems to have us looking deeply and thoroughly at the wrong things, which is perhaps why James Corbett is flourishing.
The secret cult of generational Satanists I have come to name the "Salem Witches" were heavily bound up in Quakerism, although I have yet to discern in precisely what way.
I completely discount the idea that this particular small group held any religion to heart other than what we might crudely call Satanism (there is a long story attached). My best guess, and the lines along which I would investigate if I ever get there, is that they created (or infiltrated and subverted) a sect that they could entirely control.
As for George Fox, I have no doubt he was one of these Satanists. There were, in fact, three Foxes--Hannah, Jabez, and Rebecca--involved in the fake Salem Witch Trials.
Just a simple search for "george fox salem witch trials" yields as the first result:
My Quaker ancestors: A Story of the Early Quaker Trials (Ancestry Archives 3/22/2015)
There is a people not so rigid as others are at Boston and there are great desires among them after the Truth. Some there are, as I hear, convinced who meet in silence at a place called Salem."-Henry Fell (in a letter dated 1656) June 27, 1658
So when I read that Professor Dutton titled his book, The Quaker Question: Exposing the Sect That Really Rules the World, I am not at all surprised. If only the professor had any idea how deep it really goes.
There is almost nothing to go on in this case, but I thought I would submit information that caught my eye concerning the name of the purported attempted assassin: Cole Thomas Allen.
The first anomaly gets weirder the longer you think about it: I only saw his full name reported once, but now he's always referred to simply as "Cole Allen". With most criminals and always, always, always with assassin, all three names are reported, so much a rule that it's become conspiracy theory lore. Why not with this guy?
Second, his name is--you got it--a Salem Witch name. Cole Thomas Allen. As usual, Wikipedia does a shitty job in the List of people of the Salem witch trials, but you will find both surnames there.
The story gets deeper because on that same page, you will find in Reference 10:
Pike Family Association (1901). Records of the Pike Family Association of America. Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center.
I almost LOLed at the strange way the Universe works sometimes. Reference 10 is from a name listed under "Public figures", a man named "Major Robert Pike".
The first thing that's funny is that while the name is not hyperlinked, that man actually has a substantial Wikipedia page, which you will find under "Robert Pike (settler)".
It's barely mention on the page and--again--not hyperlinked--but Pike was one of the original "Proprietors of Nantucket", who you will find listed on the page for Nantucket.
Another of the Proprietors you will find listed but who does not merit his own Wikipedia page is Thomas Coleman. Name sort of rings a bell, doesn't it? Is that the reason they mentioned his full name only once?
Secondly, from the Nantucket page you can see that the Proprietors bought the island from Thomas Mayhew. Right up near the top of his page, you can read that he had been appointed to his position in setting up the colonies by a man named Matthew Cradock. All I can do is point out that the name "Thomas Matthew Crookes" sounds like a combo of those two names, if anyone has heard of him before.
Thirdly, Thomas Coleman and John Pike, brother or Major Robert, came over in 1635 on the same ship as a Parker, a Parsons, and (get this) a Butler, if any of those names ring bells. The full list of passengers is here.
So what does all this add up to? Well, Thomas Matthew Crookes (or whoever he was) was merely the distraction and patsy in the Butler attempt. We were all supposed to think he did it and was immediately put down to end the affair, while the real assassin got away. Here, we have a suspected Salem Witch as a distraction while... well, there's really no more information available.
There is a long case to be made as to why the Salem Witches are not allowed to murder those who oppose them. They can murder their own, but Trump is not one of Them. Their servants can murder Their opponents, but only if they are seduced into doing so, not by command. In short, Cole Allen was not supposed to murder anyone, but maybe someone else was.
Bonus: If you were wondering, Major Robert Pike was indeed a lineal ancestor of Albert Pike. That should tell you a lot of what you need to know about the value of anything Albert Pike had to say.
I used to be a huge reader, more than anyone I ever knew, but it all fell by the wayside. I can't tell you the title of the last book I finished nor how long ago it was.
As you've seen, the material I fell into through no plan whatsoever is stranger than any fiction I ever read. And I've hardly broached in writing any of the really out there stuff having to do with human consciousness and the Anunnaki.
Neither of those subjects, ultimately, is separate from the Salem Witches. You can see how long it's taking and, even with the convenience to point to unchallenged mainstream evidence, you can see just how hard a sell it is. Writing up the other stuff, well... it doesn't even bear thinking about. The only motivation is a deep (and apparently masochistic) inner compulsion.
But speaking of sci-fi and the Anunnaki, I can look back in retrospect and see that a work like Childhood's End (by Arthur C. Clarke, haha) is a dim and distorted version of a few elements of the Anunnaki story. With that hindsight and all the context I've gained, I would now consider it to be intentional.
But, you know, we're a helluva long way from that writeup... lol
I read only sci-fi for the first 25 years of my life because I loved imagining how awesome the future would be. I just had to wait for it.
Fast-forward and I gave up reading it entirely longer ago than I can remember. I realized it had all become dystopian garbage, with an inordinate amount of virtue signalling mixed in.
I'm beginning to consider that the evidence demonstrates something quite counterintuitive, and that this is intended to be the ultimate effect of initiatives such as UBI. That is, "getting everything you want" leads to degradation, dissolution, self-destruction and collapse.
We have seen this dynamic in everything from John Calhoun's "Mouse Heaven" to Neo's conversation with The Architect to the "Song of the Vineyard" in the Book of Isaiah. Few seem to have taken the lesson to heart.
If someone wanted to criticize Elon Musk over UHI, it would be for this reason. However, high income is desired nearly universally and the social engineers wish to propagandize against Musk so they won't touch it.
To put it crudely, imagine locking someone in a room with all the food, drink, games, media, porn, drugs, etc, that they could want. How many would bang on the door demanding to be let out so they could get a productive job or continue their scientific research?
One way of looking at all this is, "Thomas Dolby was just some guy who happened to do all this incredible stuff to change the music industry".
Another way of looking at it is, "Thomas Dolby was a plant put in by a small group to engineer changes They desired and none of it was any coincidence at all".
I happened to look into Dolby just a few weeks ago because I stumbled into a bizarre coincidence concerning him. His name is not Thomas Dolby, of course. That's a stage name. He was born Thomas Morgan Robertson.
Does the name Morgan Robertson ring a bell? For any self-respecting conspiracy theorist, It certainly should. That was the name of the author of the very bizarre book titled, Futility, which mystically and startlingly foretold the sinking of the Titanic. None of that Futility or Titanic stuff was any coincidence at all, being operations of that same small group mentioned before.
I researched Dolby further and found more than one could imagine. The connections get 10x stranger than that first "coincidence". That's a story for another day, but few are interested so I suspect that day will never come.
Same. Particularly all the ones with big afros like Rachel Dolezal or really really dark skin like Elon Musk. They look like they're right out of Africa.
</absurdist_humor>