1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

I guess I was a sleeper agent all along. Well, it's off to get vaccinated and HRT away my jimmies. The chief rabbi will be pleased.

2
IGOexiled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why don't she cast a shadow?

2
IGOexiled 2 points ago +2 / -0

Somehow I feel like this is directed at me specifically.

6
IGOexiled 6 points ago +6 / -0

The neat thing about clay is, it stays however you form it.

McDoodle's "food" is mostly fortified, flavored clay.

3
IGOexiled 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it is a good proof that scientific and technical progress is artificially stopped by elites and corporations.

I confirmed this within my own circles in 2008 in various ways. They deliberately stifle any attempt to leap forward.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, black is just money reinvested into growth of the Conglomerate. Black behaves like a cancer, but interestingly the side-effect is a one-way shift of the white money becoming gray money.

6
IGOexiled 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not from oral circumcisions on infants, we swear. Like super duper swear.

4
IGOexiled 4 points ago +4 / -0

The problem with chasing the dragon is that one day you just might catch it.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

What would constitute proof? I could show you documentation of a plant that does NOT produce a certain protein of our choice, be administered an 'alleged virus' into the plant, and then the plant produces that certain protein of our choice.

If that's not evidence that we know what we're talking about and that viral payloads exist...

Massively available resource to generally understand the process.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know who your MIT friend is, but we worked with virus in uni. Similar to a construction worker saying "You can't tell me bricks don't exist because I've worked with bricks."

Virus exists. I'm sorry someone fooled you. Absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence. Although it may be possible to prove non-existence in special situations, such as showing that a container does not contain certain items, one cannot prove universal or absolute non-existence. source

The rock metaphor was simply to address a claim that virus must be A Living Organism in order to harm a person. Broken glass on the floor hurts people and glass isn't alive.

Your twist is that something must be alive to ATTACK. Which may be true--it's semantics. But being ATTACKED only applies if you're being force-inoculated by someone. The virus is the proximal weapon, the knife, not the aggressor. And you can harm yourself against it without being ATTACKED.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reddit post to me appears as Chinese-run honeypot looking for someone to type "yeah me too" so they can reach out and control him.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

In order for a creature to want to attack a living being, it needs will

This is still irrelevant. A falling rock doesn't have will, but it will fall down and wreck someone's truck over an embankment. Will and life aren't requisite for danger.

I'm not sure what to say about the last half of your comment. I feel you. Injecting poison is retarded and now their mistake is our problem.

3
IGOexiled 3 points ago +3 / -0

I paid for Spiderman.

I'm not paying for Spiderman 2, Spiderman 3, the reboot, reboot 2 & 3, the cartoon version, the woke version...

If you want new money come up with a new character for a new movie with new events.

If you produce garbage, I'm gonna dumpster dive.

It is generally considered legal for a person to rummage through the trash that has been left in a public area, such as a curb, for pickup. Once the garbage is placed in such a place, the person whose garbage it is has basically forfeited their ownership rights to the items, as the property is now in the public domain. Dec 7, 2023

2
IGOexiled 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're about 2 technological advancements away from the FBI loading into a First Person Shooter to do a hit on a rogue chatGPT who has been spreading misinformation.

5
IGOexiled 5 points ago +5 / -0

traditional vaccines depend on using "killed" viruses

What they mean is they use the protein sheath without the usually contained DNA or RNA inside. "Killed virus" is an ELI5 description/label.

"Aliveness" is not a prerequisite for being a harmful arrangement of molecules, nor is "aliveness" required in order to mitigate said dangers.

5
IGOexiled 5 points ago +5 / -0

The media never says the name of anyone whom they don't already control.

6
IGOexiled 6 points ago +6 / -0

They need enough chaos in the streets to justify releasing their facial recognition T-100's.

They infected you with a nagging cough, so that the HK-Drones can hear where you're hiding.

1
IGOexiled 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was going to disagree with you, but then you said the things I agree with.

I still think Hip Hop was built the same as all the others, from the Feds up.

Good post.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›