Then I hope you don't have children. Or have anything to do with children. Ever.

Women and children do. The entire post-modern project exists to normalize pedophilia. Do some research on Derrida and Foucault.

Here is the DOJ’s exact quote, “any suggestion from a court that vaccines are not safe would cause ’embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various departments on one question.'”

Well, give the DOJ credit - that's unusually honest of them.

Yes. I agreed with everything but that last point. It's kind of soon to forget that the election was stolen.

Trump's first mistake was going along with the Covid-1984 hoax in the first place. I'm sure some day - probably after I'm long gone - the truth will come out as to what he was threatened with. Assuming that there's anything left of (what we would recognize as) the human race to care.

Everyone knows that those aren't birds. They're dinosaurs. Duh.

Upvoted for giving me my lol for the day.

The tragic death of Sarah Everard has instigated a national demand for action to tackle violence against women," David Lammy, the shadow justice secretary, said in a statement.

Somebody ask Lammy what a woman is. Because up until now, the Labour Party has defined "woman" as any man who says he's one.

The LP has campaigned to put rapists in women's prisons and shelters, allow men to sleep with little girls (in their version of the Girl Scouts) and allow any man to access any space where women and children are vulnerable, just on his say-so that he's really a woman inside. This in spite of the fact that this policy has already resulted in women and children being assaulted..

And for those of you that think this is funny - they're after your kids.

Paranoia strikes deep...

IIRC, it was axo that posted this off-guardian article about it weeks ago: https://off-guardian.org/2021/02/22/synthetic-mrna-covid-vaccines-a-risk-benefit-analysis/

Moderna admits they want to turn your body into an operating system: https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development

ADA, then.

Great interview byJon Rappoport from 2007.

"Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?

A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.

Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.

A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.

Q: Which is?

A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.

Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.

A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective."

It's more fear porn from PBS. Basically: get vaccinated or die. Why would anyone bother giving them the clicks?

You say so, so it must be true.

We have been talking about it. Come over to conspiracies.win.

Makes more sense than "compression artifacts".

Yeah, but we're just CraZY ConSpiRacY TheoRisTS.

In an interview with WaPo. No video. Is she still alive? I know there are people who are convinced that it was a double at the fake inauguration.

Chalk one up for the Jehovah's Witnesses.

Reminds me of a scene in a Woody Allen movie where he tells his shrink that dogs and cats were put here on Earth to spy on us. I often think that might be true.

Algiers (1938): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aXkhkSPFhmk

My lol for the day:

Kenny Baillie, a research group leader in the department of genetics and genomics at the University of Edinburgh who has received research funding from Wellcome... explains, “I certainly can speak to my personal experience interacting with the science side, and there’s been no attempt to influence me or any other researcher I know from doing the best science to benefit humanity.”

The first comment sums it up: "If this information comes as a shock to anyone after the last year of this covid shite, there is no hope for you."

That's the difference between morons like you and me. When intelligent people are told that something they believe can't be proved, they go and do some research.

For instance, here's what happened when Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test, went looking for the "AIDS virus". Hint: He couldn't find it. http://www.whale.to/a/mullis_h.html

Thanks.