What are the implications of this?
If one implies only; then addition; subtraction; division and multiplication can only one happen within one.
How does 1×1=1
Being implies differential within equal aka partial within whole aka one within oneness aka form within flow aka living within process of dying.
Other ones suggest the equalization (=) of differentials (+ - x /) by tempting one to ignore self for counting others.
Living implies differential; dying implies equal...trying to make differences equal destroys life.
Example: 1x1=1 represents an equation both you and me can mentally consent to, while ignoring that either one of us exists physically in a different position from one another.
If physical differentials are mentally equating, then that's a contradiction, hence tempting different ones against (contra) one another.
Certainly doesn't fit the standard definition of multiplying
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) cannot ascertain; fit; standardize or define anything without mentally contradicting physical.
Whole adds (inception) and subtracts (death) partials (life); which implies that each partial is a division within whole able to multiply by intercourse with one another.
666 aka star of david/divide, when divided implies 33 (upward + downward triangle)...
a) Reality implies ones perception RE-sponding to ALL perceivable...consenting to suggested implies artificial.
b) Video/videre - "to see" + Audio/audire - "to hear" once again implies ones perception of all perceivable...not ones consent to audio and video suggested by another.
c) Only nature generates...artifice is shaped out of what nature generates, hence a mimicry IF one consents to the suggestion thereof.
d) Telling each other what's real or fake implies technology aka tekhnē (artifice) + logy (logic), hence establishing a conflict of reason (real vs fake).
e) Nature doesn't tell...it's those within telling tales to each other to distract from nature.
Sleight of hand... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tell aka "I am the free will of choice to tell tales" by shooting suggestions like an arrow at the apple (perception) of the tree of knowledge (perceivable).
an astrologer...another astrologer
Hence astro-LOGY (logic) aka a conflict of reason (one vs another).
know
Predicting suggested outcomes tempts one to ignore knowledge aka having perception within perceivable origin.
I stick with
Only mentally; while ignoring to being physically moved from inception towards death.
i'm playing it safe
Playing implies gambling aka taking a chance, while sacrificing choice within the process. That ain't safe (free from danger), but dangerous ignorance by free will of choice.
Uranus, Gemini, Pluto, Aquarius, Neptune, Aries...
Zodiac/zōdiakos - "circle of little animals" implies ones circular logic diminishing ones perception of animation, hence ecliptic/ekleipein aka ek (out) leipein (to leave)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/eclipse
The wheel in the sky which keeps on turning...was implemented into ones mind as logic (circular thinking), which tempts one to ignore to think (life) straight (inception towards death)... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxGEVIvSFeY
Only within a line (motion) can a circle (matter) be shaped...don't get fooled by the kike/kikel - "circle".
a) MGS aka METAL/mettle (spirit; courage) GEAR (partial within whole) SOLID/sol (whole)...being implies partial within spirit of whole.
b) Solid Snake aka limbless (inception towards death) reptile (life) within whole. Both reptile/repo + serpent/serpo imply "to creep; to grow along", hence each living being growing along the process of dying.
the content of law across
Content implies "to rest", hence con (together) tenere (to hold)...across implies impelling motion moving across expelled matter.
Let's apply this to law...natural law implies impelling motion (inception towards death) moving across expelled matter (life). Artificial law tempts many to hold together the rules of behavior as suggested by few.
Which leads to...
the uniformity of timing
Many following laws by few implies artificially uniformity, while holding these rules of behavior together establishes an artificial frame of time.
As long as many follow laws by few; so long does a uniformity of timing distract many from natural law.
don't happen by chance
If choice takes an artificial chance, then it gambles choice within natural balance given.
Nature doesn't offer chance...only choice. A chosen one suggests chance to tempt ones choice to gamble on outcome, while ignoring origin.
The jews are the key to prosperity.
Prosperity implies "thriving; growing"...a jew locks natural growth underneath artificial growth, which always collapses upon gentiles. A gentile consenting to suggested artifice implies the key which permits a chosen one to lock natural (perception) underneath artificial (suggestion).
a) Relgion/religio - "to bind anew" contradicts free thinking.
b) Prize/prise - "taken by force" contradicts noble/gnoscere/gno - "to know" aka given towards ones perception.
followers changed their nature
If nature implies change; then following implies going with the temptation of change instead of resisting it.
Adam and Eve chose
The split of adam into eve implies the balance for choice.
chose to change
Only within change (inception towards death) can there be choice (life).
gives us our original natures back
Nature gives and takes being; nature backs and fronts being; nature originates beings towards outcome.
Jesus Christ gives
Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies ones choice to take. Christ/christen (to anoint) implies being given life...taking what is being given ignores change.
I think
One was christ (anointed) before one can claim self as jesus (I am)...
"I think" implies ones ignorance of moving potential by taking into possession, hence not thinking what moves straight through ones mind (perceivable inspiration); but using circular logic upon what one holds within ones mind (suggested information).
A pissed on breadcrumb...
Can one measure ones birth without others? If not, then why use others to measure...especially since your example shows 2025 years of conflicts over correct measurements?
What comes first...coming into being as ONE or numbers suggested by others?
holds the solution to break free
A solution cannot be held onto...since it disperses, dissipates, loosens aka sets free. It's free will of choice, which can be tricked to ignore that by holding onto beliefs; truths; ideals; definitions etc.
prison
a) Prison/prehendere "to take"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prison aka mentally putting self into imprisonment by taking (consent) and holding onto what another suggests, while ignoring that perceivable moves.
b) Prison aka phonetic PRISM...a solid (life) whose bases are equal and parallel plane (inception towards death).
What's a polygon? A plane (inception towards death) figure (life) with numerous (each one) angles (of perception).
the mind is projective reality at all time
All was projecting before ones mind can come into being. Project implies to throw (ject) forwards (pro)...having a mind implies being (life) thrown forwards (inception towards death).
Suggested theism (the); determinism (is) and measurement of duration (time) tempt one to ignore that.
it takes time
Aka measurement of duration aka ones mind taking "time" into possession, while ignoring that nature moves.
the mind is like a projector
Throwing (ject) forwards (pro) implies a differentiation (life) of equal (inception towards death)...not a likeness. Ones mind consenting to what another suggests "is" establishes a like-minded way of thinking aka a distortion of each ones different perspective.
the remote is faith vs fear
Others suggest what one fears or has faith in, which when consented to, permits others remote control over ones inward logic (circular thinking), which turns outward into a conflict of reason (faith vs fear).
Common sense says if a person focuses
To sense implies a differentiation of ones faculty of sense (perception) and all that can be sensed (perceivable)...focusing aka consenting to suggested common-ism establishes an artificial hivemind aka a commonsense.
When many people focus on the same ideas
Aka gentiles consenting to the jewish suggestion of ideal-ism, yet the ideas/ideals/idols aren't the same; it's alike consent which ignores differences.
If one consents to a suggested ideal, then one superimposes it upon everything perceivable, hence narrowing ones sight outwards through focusing upon the ideal inwards.
they manifest those ideas together. For example, if we...
Pluralism represents such an idea, hence tempting natural singular (one) to view self as part of artificial plural (we), while manifesting collectivism aka amassing many slaves under few masters.
a life full of winning.
Living implies within full/fall (inception towards death)...reasoning (winning vs losing) tempts one to ignore that.
Wanting to win tempts one to ignore needing to grow (life) during loss (inception towards death).
Few suggest that winning implies "crossing the finish line"...which tempts many to finish self by crossing (life) the line (inception towards death) in competition against one another.
Few are openly mocking many for wanting to win... https://genius.com/Elton-john-and-stevie-wonder-finish-line-lyrics
Luckily this change
Luck implies ones ignorance of change by gambling choice on chance.
Luck aka fortune/fortis/fors/bher - "to carry" aka the sin of burdening self by holding onto what nature moves through each being, hence becoming a carrying carcass aka the living dead aka reanimated corpse (zombie) etc.
years ago
Consumer vs. Commercial vs. Industrial vs. Military...how many decades in-between consumer and military grade use for any technology?
Make it so
Only nature makes/macian - "to give being to, give form or character to, bring into existence; construct, do, be the author of, produce; prepare, arrange, cause"...each being within either re-makes what nature already made OR falls for each others made up magic.
subcontract
Nature (all perceivable) sets each being (ones perception) free from one another...consenting to a suggestion establishes a sub-contract, hence binding ones choice under a chosen one.
Fiduciary
Aka holding something (suggested) in trust (consent)...a being (perception) cannot hold onto nature (perceivable) since nature moves beings apart from one another.
Few suggest currency to tempt consenting many to hold onto it; while ignoring to be (life) within natural current (inception towards death).
a) Nature originates differences; artifice replicates differences alike.
b) Nothing within nature can be identical, yet imitation (suggestion) distorts differentiation (perception)...if held onto.
biggest secret
Secret/seco - "to divide"...implies setting each thing apart from one another, not the accumulation together into the biggest vs smallest things.
It's ignoring this, which permits others to hide the divide under accumulation.
Illuminati and other agents are slowly lured in
Light (lumen) and action (agent) liberates aka sets free rays and reactions. It's ones free will of choice to join "Illuminati agents" which lures one into the darkness of ignorance.
One's free to join; but joining binds free will of choice.
Freemasons... seek to enslave society
Ignoring free (will of choice) when consenting to suggested mason; magic; mass; match; mingle; mongrel etc. from root mag - "to knead, fashion, fit" enslaves oneself to another.
Society/social/soc - "together" contradicts the free will of choice of each being, set apart from one another within all of nature.
Each one was FREE before joining MASONRY...just like religion/religio - "to bind anew" is a temptation testing ones free will of choice.
after death
The lengthwise line (inception towards death) of a sailing vessel (life) aka stem-to-stern aka fore (dying) and aft (living)...ones free will of choice represents the alternating rudder aka "row, row, row your boat...gently down the stream"
Dynasty aka succession (inception towards death) of sovereigns (life), as in...dynamo aka electrical power (action) generating mechanical power (reaction).
Few suggest the inversion of dynamo (mechanic to electric) to trick many into wasting their power to artificially recreate nature, which keeps them occupied enough to ignore few sustaining dynasties by utilizing the wasted power of many.
LMFAO...ROFLMFAO...BWAHAHAHAHAHA!...retards
To deride others implies ones exerting force "operating" influence. The animating spirit aka "psyche" of nature doesn't deride any being...it flows (inception towards death) through form (life).
Suggested OP distracts from perceivable PSY.
Believing implies trusting another aka ones consent given to a suggestion offered...that's not natural; but artificial.
Fundamentally...FREE implies each beings free will of choice, while MASONRY implies manipulating choice to freely bind itself to another ones suggestion.
Death implies the ongoing natural order aka the process of dying for those living within aka perceivable inspiration for each ones perception to draw from. The manipulation of choice with suggestion tempts one to ignore perception.
That's how freemasonry works underneath the plethora of distractions upon it.
The reason none of this makes sense
Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies linear progression aka from all perceivable through each ones perception. Reason implies circular logic within self; turning into conflicts against others.
One senses that which shapes; not the shape. One cannot sense a circle; only an ongoing line shaped into a temporary circle.
Even Israel
Isreal/yisra'el - "he that striveth with God" implies being at odds...not even.
isn't at the top there's something even higher
Odds (life) can only exist within even (inception towards death)...not above or below one another, but in-between aka as above/so below.
Top vs bottom aka high vs low implies a conflict of reason among gentiles, who instead of thinking straight are thinking circular aka logical, based one the suggested logos (words) by a jew.
not the devil or God
Devil aka dia (across) ballein (to throw)...motion throws matter (life) across (inception towards death). The word "god" distracts gentiles from motion; and the word "de-vil" from being matter within the momentum of motion.
Not aka nothing aka nihilo implies ones de-nial of everything moving each thing apart from one another. The words a jew suggests to label motion, are held by gentiles who ignore perceivable motion for suggested label held onto.
literally not even one straight answer anywhere about anything.
Cause there's only one solution (inception towards death) for any problem (life) within. Problems questioning and answering each other distracts from solution.
Notice literal (by the letter)... nature generates liberal (liber; free) hence giving each being free will of choice. A letter tempts ones free will of choice to LET another shape words into questions and answers.
it's so irritating
To irritate implies "stimulate to action"...one cannot act; only react aka respond to all of nature acting upon each one within.
Few utilize suggestion as a stimulus to tempt many to react in the name of taking action. In nature...reaction (perception) cannot take action (perceivable)...because it fucking moves.
Letting go of what one chose to hold onto...calms irritation.
Its almost like "science" is just the bounds of the lies.
a) Science/scio - "to know" implies each ones perception of all perceivable...anything suggested implies scientism, which tempts ones consent to hold onto the suggested, hence becoming a scientist. -ist implies follower of -ism.
b) Your consent to suggested information by choosing either true or false; binds your choice within a conflict of reason (true vs false).
c) Truth is bound to lie and vice versa, because in nature two different sides (inception and death) imply the same motion for each temporary matter (life) within.
Sides imply balance within motion for the choice of matter to adapt by balancing...choosing to hold onto any side implies imbalance for ones choice.
this is about everything
Everything implies about/abutan (on the outside)...each thing implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death).
THIS IS implies the suggestion of another tempting ones perception inside to ignore everything perceivable outside for what another suggests THIS IS.
Perceivable WAS before ones perception can be distracted with the suggestion of what IS.
WAS implies reality moving; IS implies affixed fiction...if one consents to the suggestion thereof.
I have no idea if this meme or whatever is true.
a) Instead of thinking straight; you think circular (logic); hence turning against others within a conflict of reason (true vs false).
b) Your de-nial of straight (reality) for circular (fiction) represents NO aka nothing/nihilo/nial.
c) Others tempted you with suggested information aka idealism (idolatry) to choose a side (true or false), hence tricking you to TURN from your position at center of everything towards a side, hence off-center; hence off the straight and narrow path of righteousness...
Letting go of either true or false allows one to perceive CHANGE, which implicates (if/then), while inspiring adaptation by choice.
Reason (true vs false) tempts ones choice to choose the same VS aka VERSUS aka VERTO aka "to turn" from either side, hence encircling ones line of thinking.
Being able to perceive implies an ongoing differentiation of all perceivable and each ones perception...suggesting others if earth or heaven doesn't move, tempts one to ignore perception for suggestion.
Being implies differentiation (life) during equation (inception towards death)...few suggest mathematical formula for the equation of two expressions, as to distract the one consenting to it, from discerning self as a singular part within whole.
Nature implies impression (action); being implies expression (reaction)...counting expressions together tempts one to ignore that each expression was set apart from one another, before one could count them together.
Math was designed by few to equalize differences among many.
I don't feel above.
In a balance based system...deriding anything under (satanic larp) implies from an above position.
I'm pointing out
Being alive implies sentenced at inception towards point of death..."pointing out" represents a rhetorical trick to tempt life towards death.
One may view what is shown by another as a satanic larp, but the handiwork of the great deceiver (satan) can be traced back to ones behavior.
Pointing out is the inversion of being sentenced within, and these inversions by few turn many against each other, like for example in a ball/ba'al game.
is not to be confused with actual demon summoning
a) Actual implies nature ACTING upon each RE-ACTING being within. There's nothing within nature that isn't actual; but reactions can be confused through summation aka with establishing a sum of all things by artificially putting together what nature sets apart from one another.
b) Demon aka dai (divider) mon (provider)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/demon implies nature providing (inception towards death) division (life) among being.
Nature providing action divides into reactions...that's demonic. Being a reaction within action aka a difference in direction between intersecting lines (angle) implies angelic.
That doesn't mean it's innocuous and doesn't render the symbols meaningless though
Meaning is symbolic; not actual. Nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life) each one within, not sym (together) bol (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/symbol
Throwing apart implies linear progression (action towards reactions), while throwing together implies a circular conflict (meaning vs meaningless) called reason...a deception.
One isn't IN mathematics until one consents to enter mathēmatike tekhnē (artificial learning) from a suggesting teacher.
...which permits a chosen one (the teacher a student chooses) to utilize dualism to operate on ones perception from outside the confines of artificial learning. The student meanwhile believes in the combination of two, while ignoring to remain one within all.
The TION in operation implies action, which doesn't combine, but divides into reactions. A cause cannot combine with anything, only divide into effects...it's the effects which can combine with one another, while ignoring cause.
A factor implies a jew utilizing artificial learning (mathēmatike tekhnē) as agent to trick gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consent) and selling (suggest).
Nature doesn't produce substitute agents, but as the primary action it brings (duces) forward (pro) reactions, hence externally generating internal reactors.
A gentile cannot fathom this while being held accountable by a jewish agent. Mathematics trick gentiles to count each other, hence making themselves accountable to a chosen ones suggested numerology aka arithmos (number) + logy (logic) aka gematria (geometric) aka talmudic gemara/gamar (to finish/complete)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemara
By seeking equations...different gentiles are finishing each other off by utilizing jewish agents like mathematic.
a) Result/resilire - "to rebound" aka ones response being bound, while falling back. Nature produces free will of choice; a jew suggests results to bind free will of choice among gentiles into a commercial contract between buying (consenting) and selling (suggesting).
Nature produces productive beings...suggested results tempt beings to become unproductive.
b) What does energy produce? What's the product of energy?
a) Essence implies being. Cutting short being implies dying.
b) IT implies a genderless third party...how could essence be genderless?
As for first (he) and second (she) party...notice S(plit)HE, hence not first (1) and second (2), but one within one another. Also FE(minine)MALE and WO(mb)MAN.
What if math is being used to tempt 1 to view second as 2, instead of second/seco - "to divide"?
What if repeated addition implies the inception of each being, hence the resurrection of each anointed one (christ)? What if the use of contraception against inception and abortion against birth implies a "shortcut" for repeated addition?
Why is it that a bunch of numbers can distract you from the essence of being and those who're trying to destroy it?
a) If it's the same, then why compare it to different equations? Why does equality (sameness) require the drawing together of comparisons? Without those artificially drawn comparisons...would equality be perceived as differentiation?
b) 3x4 and 4x3...why equalize differences? Why can an essential being perceive those differences...just to equalize them for one another?
c) What if you miss ONEself in your mathematics? What if suggesting numbers tempts the one consenting to first ignore the ONE suggesting, and then ONEself in the process?
How would math work without ONE suggesting and another ONE consenting?
d) How does 3 (tricycle) x 4 (car) equals 12?
Because one suggested what IS to distract another one from what WAS perceivable.