literally not even one straight answer anywhere about anything.

Cause there's only one solution (inception towards death) for any problem (life) within. Problems questioning and answering each other distracts from solution.

Notice literal (by the letter)... nature generates liberal (liber; free) hence giving each being free will of choice. A letter tempts ones free will of choice to LET another shape words into questions and answers.

it's so irritating

To irritate implies "stimulate to action"...one cannot act; only react aka respond to all of nature acting upon each one within.

Few utilize suggestion as a stimulus to tempt many to react in the name of taking action. In nature...reaction (perception) cannot take action (perceivable)...because it fucking moves.

Letting go of what one chose to hold onto...calms irritation.

Its almost like "science" is just the bounds of the lies.

a) Science/scio - "to know" implies each ones perception of all perceivable...anything suggested implies scientism, which tempts ones consent to hold onto the suggested, hence becoming a scientist. -ist implies follower of -ism.

b) Your consent to suggested information by choosing either true or false; binds your choice within a conflict of reason (true vs false).

c) Truth is bound to lie and vice versa, because in nature two different sides (inception and death) imply the same motion for each temporary matter (life) within.

Sides imply balance within motion for the choice of matter to adapt by balancing...choosing to hold onto any side implies imbalance for ones choice.

this is about everything

Everything implies about/abutan (on the outside)...each thing implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death).

THIS IS implies the suggestion of another tempting ones perception inside to ignore everything perceivable outside for what another suggests THIS IS.

Perceivable WAS before ones perception can be distracted with the suggestion of what IS.

WAS implies reality moving; IS implies affixed fiction...if one consents to the suggestion thereof.

I have no idea if this meme or whatever is true.

a) Instead of thinking straight; you think circular (logic); hence turning against others within a conflict of reason (true vs false).

b) Your de-nial of straight (reality) for circular (fiction) represents NO aka nothing/nihilo/nial.

c) Others tempted you with suggested information aka idealism (idolatry) to choose a side (true or false), hence tricking you to TURN from your position at center of everything towards a side, hence off-center; hence off the straight and narrow path of righteousness...

Letting go of either true or false allows one to perceive CHANGE, which implicates (if/then), while inspiring adaptation by choice.

Reason (true vs false) tempts ones choice to choose the same VS aka VERSUS aka VERTO aka "to turn" from either side, hence encircling ones line of thinking.