Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason against another, and circular logic within self based on ones consent to suggested logos (words). That's infiltration of perception.
Consenting to anything suggested permits infiltrators to set parameters for ones thoughts aka mind-control aka govern-ment.
Holding onto suggested establishes circular thinking, which in return prevents ones perception to think straight, hence from within (life) a line (inception towards death).
Don't know Sophia.
Sophia/sophy - "to know". Ones perception within all perceivable implies Sophia. A jew utilizes pistis (persuasion) to distract from sophia (knowledge) with intelligo (understanding).
He (God) is not the one degradating things
What if God giving (inception) and taking (death) allows each thing (life) within to elevate and degrade?
It is the devils and they use jews
God implies singularity; devils and jews implies plurality...only ones singular free will of choice can shape a plurality while ignoring singularity.
Devil aka dia (across) ballein (to throw) implies a separation, as does each chosen one establishing apartheid among gentiles.
The jews look for miracles to establish someone as credible in what they claim.
A jew shapes a suggestion to tempt gentiles to claim the suggested by giving creed/credit to it. Miracle implies the jewish sales-pitch for the suggested, which amazes the minds of gentiles into wanting to claim by giving credit.
A jew knows that all perceivable moves through each ones perception and cannot be claimed, nor does it require credit/creed to utilize ones "free" will of choice.
a) History tempts memory to artificially store what nature moves. Few narrate history to stagnate the memory of many within motion, hence distracting from adaptation.
b) Counting holds one accountable by an accountant...nature sets one free.
c) Chrono (time) logy (circular thinking) tempts one to ignore thinking straight during (life) linear progression (inception towards death).
Applying history to circular thinking permits others to regurgitate the same stories aka revisionism.
d) Being implies NOW...not before or after. Ones perception within all perceivable only works NOW....others suggest before (historicism) and after (futurism) to manipulate ones memory.
A being can only adapt to nature NOW. Choice can only adapt to balance NOW. Potential can only adapt to procession NOW. Effect can only adapt to cause NOW.
soul at conception
a) Soul (motion) was before inception and death (momentum) of being (matter).
b) The difference between inception and conception? Conception implies taking together; inception implies coming into being within that which gives and takes.
A jew suggests conceptualism to tempt gentiles to take a consenting part within a consensus.
like water
a) Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death), hence in-between natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
b) Being implies differentiated from one another...consenting to suggested conceptualism shapes a like-minded consensus.
increasing value
Only within value (perceivable) can evaluation (perception) increase and decrease.
From a christian perspective...increasing value implies increasing God. A contradiction. God cannot be increased or decreased, since God implies ALL...not more or less.
all other views
All implies singularity. Other implies internal separation of singularity from one another. Views implies plurality ignoring singularity.
too carnal in their manner of thinking to handle it.
Manual aka manus (hand) + al (all)...that's how all gives each one a hand to handle. Others suggests mannerism to distract from that.
Exoteric teachings are face-value ones that are external to a person
Person aka per (by) son/sonos (sound) implies each internal (eso) instrument within all external (exo) sound.
Esoteric teachings are deeper meaning ones that apply internally
It doesn't matter how deep one inhales...nature forces each being to exhale. Why? Because being within nature implies as a temporal potential during an ongoing process. Others suggest "meaning" to tempt potential to ignore procession by taking into possession aka by artificially applying (joining; combining) what nature sets apart.
Nature implies the moving process which allows each potential being within to learn to teach self by teaching self how to learn aka as above/so below. Others suggest one to submit as student to teacher aka as follower to leader aka as many to few aka as ones choice to a chosen one aka as slave to master...
a different and deeper story
God implies all giving...story (to store) implies taking into possession, while ignoring all giving procession. Differentiation implies equal procession (inception towards death) generating different potential (life) by internal separation from one another.
the places, names, numbers
a) Name/nombre/number - "designation of a unit", from unitas/unus - "one" aka the oneness of God for each unit of being within.
b) Position implies potential (posit) within action (ion) aka each ones place-ment (mind placed) within all.
Each of our Souls
Each implies one apart from one another, hence soul/sole - "one and only" implying the singularity of God...others suggest pluralism (souls) to tempt ones singular consent into a consensus (our) with one another.
There can be only one aka one for all and all for one aka alone...all(in)one.
created at the beginning of Creation
a) Begin implies being (be) generation (gin)...only within generation (inception towards death) can one come into being (life).
b) Being (life) implies in-between beginning (inception) and end (death)...God (motion) generates beginning/end (momentum) for being (matter). Only within God can there be a begging and end of being.
c) All was before one can come into being...coming into being within all implies a transformation aka the transfer of form (life) within flowing action (inception towards death).
Others suggest creationism aka creatio ex nihilo... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)."
Creation (out of nothing) represents the inversion of transformation (within everything). Furthermore...nothing implies suggested nihilo-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
The origin of nothing implies ones denial of everything. Creationism tempts denialism...a simple trick to distract from self discernment.
God cannot create...God was all that can be, which internally transforms into each being. That's how origin (inception) and outcome (death) imply the same God for each Christ (anointed one) within.
We are like
One implies differentiated from one another. Others suggest "we" aka pluralism aka nosism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we to invert analysis with synthesis by alchemy.
a neuron in the Mind of our Soul, whereas our Soul is like a neuron in the Mind of God
a) God (motion) > mind (momentum) > body (matter)...a sole/soul process animating spiritual essence by division/divination/differentiation.
b) Neuron/neuro - "tendon, sinew" aka being drawn by strings, while ignoring that God sets each being free (will of choice).
Notice neu/new (there's nothing new under the sun) + tend (turn the mind aka circular logic) + sin/syn (together; jointly)...these are all tricks to invert the natural with artificial.
A person's
There's not "a" person; only one SON (sonos; sanus; sound; whole; entire; all) for each PER (by) within. Being an in-stru-ment (mind structured within) implies being a by-product of sound aka a per-son.
Others utilize spell-craft like "insane person" to distract one from discerning self as in sanus (within sound) per sonos (by sound). Consenting to the DEFINITION of words makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
our Souls, The One is God
If God implies one, then "our souls" contradicts God...possession of plural contradicts given singularity.
what is a level above
Level implies being in-between above/below aka odd choice within even balance, hence level/libella/libra - "balance".
Level aka levare (to raise) el (god).
To the animals
Animal implies all (al) animating (anim) each one within. Branding matter as motion (animal) tempts one to ignore that motion animates (inception towards death) matter (life).
Being implies re-anima-tion aka reacting to being animated by action, also implying re-in-carna-tion.
God emanated throughout its Creation on various levels, where it gains...
a) God cannot gain, which would imply more than God. Only within God can there be ongoing loss (inception towards death) for each temporary growth (life).
b) Emanate implies "flowing out". Only within God can animation flow in (inception) and out (death) of each formed being (life).
knowledge
Knowledge implies being (matter) at the edge (momentum) of known (motion) aka "livin on the edge"... https://genius.com/Aerosmith-livin-on-the-edge-lyrics
a) Retain aka re (to respond) tain/ten (to stretch) aka responding to being (life) stretched (inception towards death)...that's the struggle of yisra-el.
b) Upright aka up (towards) right/reg (to move in a straight line) aka life being moved from inception towards death in a straight line, which once again implies the struggle of yisra-el.
c) Gentiles are tricked to ignore analysis for synthesis, hence accepting "retain" (to keep in possession) and "upright" (erect; not bent or curved) as definitions/meaning/truth.
Being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death)...a jew tempts gentiles to solidify their minds with artifice, while ignoring natural liquidity or as stated in your link..."to become rigid from the retention of liquidity"
Suggested information tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration...the former tempts one to hold onto, while the latter moves through one, and cannot be held onto.
A jew (singular) thinks fluid; gentiles (plural) think solid...fluid destroys solid unless resisted.
tl;dr: Thanks for the link.
truth is subjective so what I imagine is as equally valid as whatever anyone else thinks
Nature implies equal; being implies differential...subjecting to true or false information equalizes differences among one another.
Nature cannot be true or false...only ever changing, hence offering equal value.
I complain the loudest
Which only works because natural sound implies silence, while artificial words imply noise. Nature neither articulates sound into words, nor does nature com (together) plain (to spread)...it sets instruments apart from one another.
natalist
-ist (natialist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (natalism)...which one can only do after being born (natal).
-ism implies consensus; -ist implies consent...natal represents the distraction used to harvest consent into consensus.
just look at how many kids they have
Looking/locking onto another is unjust to ones offspring. Nature implies singularity...a jew suggests the rhetoric "how many" to tempt gentiles with plurality.
how one could tolerate Islam
Islam/salam - "peace/piece" implies each piece within all of God aka law of all (al-lah). Tolerance vs intolerance among one another tempts one to ignore that.
Nature gives and takes each beings life...no matter how tolerant or intolerant one chooses to be to one another.
obviously, Christians are bad, right
Obvious aka ob (in front of) via (way).... https://www.etymonline.com/word/obvious
Being implies in front of (life) way (inception towards death)...not a right vs wrong aka good vs bad conflict, but a separation during a transfer representing christ (to anoint) and islam (to separate into piece).
A jew suggests the rhetoric "religion of peace" to tempt gentiles into "war" with one another. What's religion? Re (to respond) ligo (to bind) aka binding pieces together within war.
Because it's real in my mind
One responds (re) to all (al) perceivable, while holding suggested within ones mind....that's why anything fake is also real.
If one fights others (real vs fake), then one cannot discern self as response (re) within all (al).
a) Contro/contra (against) vers (to turn) i (within) al (all)...hence the conflict everything vs nothing, when choosing "not" israel vs America "first".
First implies God (everything)...Israel aka yisra-el implies "he that strives with God".
b) Someone had to foot the bill for that board...
Try viewing Mr. Beast as an asset of the jewish banksters to devalue the perceived value of money and labor within the minds of gentiles.
tying two positions together
Counting each position as "two" ties them together within ones mind. Posi (potential) tion (action) implies a separation from one another.
one logical and one incredibly unpopular
Logic implies circular thinking (popular or unpopular) turning into a conflict of reason (popular vs unpopular). It's logic which tempts ones mind to tie two positions together.
you can't have an anti-Islam party that isn't also natalist.
"I wasn't lying...it was real in my imagination"...who are you to decide what another can't have in his imagination?
Compare me to something and tell me what I am like.
Any comparison drawn establishes artificial likeness among natural differences.
my mouth is utterly unable to say what you are like
Because uttering likeness by the mouth contradicts difference of the mouth. One can only utter outwards if ones mouth has a different position within all sound and from the mouth of one another.
If I tell you one of the sayings he spoke to me, you will pick up rocks and stone me, and fire will come from the rocks and devour you."
Tell/del - "to count"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tell Counting makes one accountable to one another. That's why others lash out to whatever one articulates in speech. DON'T TELL...guess who uses that while distracting everyone else with tales?
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/No-doubt-dont-speak-lyrics
- Don't speak...I know just what you're sayin'
- So please stop explainin'...Don't tell me 'cause it hurts
wasn't told to the masses
Like how christen (to anoint) implies separation, which amassing contradicts?
in which certain truths are exoteric and others esoteric
Being within nature implies eso (internal) within exo (external)...others suggest "certain truth" to tempt one to hold onto, while ignoring that exo separates eso internally during a process which cannot be held onto.
the masses receiving exoteric doctrine
Joining a mass implies going into it aka from external towards internal. Consenting to a suggested doctrine implies internal consent inviting external doctrine in.
reincarnation
Aka being reaction (re) within (in) the flesh (carna) of action (tion) aka nature acts; each being reacts in the flesh.
pre-existent soul
Soul/sole implies "one and only". Existence implies each ones expressing (ex) stance (stence) within (i) the one and only.
Cause implies oneness; effect implies each one within. Cause (nature) implies the soul of each essential effect (being).
secret
Aka secret/seco - "to divide" aka the division of all (god) into each one (christ) aka divinity.
owned slaves
a) One cannot own what nature gives and takes freely...others can suggest artificial ownership to tempt one to ignore perceivable nature.
b) Nature gives each being free will of choice...slavery implies ones free will of choice binding self to another. Slave selects master.
almost
Most implies a summation of ones within all...few suggest "almost" as a synthesis to distract many from the analytical process of all separating each one within from one another.
Replace AL(all)most with EL(god)most and notice that there cannot be "most of god" without contradicting that God equals all.
The trick...mosaic law aka summation of ones within all into a mostly mosaic. It's a game called "puzzle" and each jew tricks most gentiles to artificially puzzle nature back together...a futile waste of time.
Confirmation (rendering valid by formal assent of authority) implies by way of deception thou shall make war. A jew couldn't operate under the veil of deception without the war (agree vs disagree) gentiles are fighting against one another for confirmation.
Drawn child-porn supplier pushing boundaries of legality gets allegedly hassled by outsiders.
In fact, God
Why put facts shaped within before God?
It has just been changed
What if God implies change? What if one can only shape facts within change? What if holding onto facts tempts one to ignore change?
no cavemen
If believing in nothing implies one de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable, then denial represents a cave for each one within all.
If circular logic prevents one from thinking straight, then most men are living in a cave of their own making.
created instantaneously
Creation implies out of nothing... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Nothing contradicts everything (god) and each things stance (stant) within (in).
not through a blind process
What if the process (inception towards death) giving sight (life) cannot be seen by anyone within?
What if coming into being implies "blinded by the light...another runner in the night"?
Neanderthals
Neander aka neo (new) ander (man)... "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
extinct
Aka ex (life) tinct (inception towards death)...only during extinction can one be alive.
what if
If implies cause; then implies effect...what implies effect lacking self discernment within cause.
Living within the process of dying implies each ones struggle...not mine or yours.
Brown skin is a great adaptation to dealing with sunlight btw
"For You light my lamp; The Lord my God illumines my darkness" ~Psalm 18:28
Shrouding oneself in extra darkness to "deal" with light...that ain't gonna work.
Where was rape promited in Mein Kampf?
a) MEIN...holding onto for self implies taking from another, while ignoring God given. That's rape; verb - "seize prey; abduct, take and carry off by force".
b) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) being (life)...beings giving and taking from one another implies an artificial conflict.
c) The origin of mein/mine implies I AM (je suis; jesus), which establishes kampf/struggle against YOU ARE (judah).
the stronger must dominate...the weak
Cause dominates effect; action dominates reaction; whole dominates partial; process dominates potential; dying dominates living etc.
The trick...effect; reaction; partial; potential; living can be manipulated into a strong vs weak conflict against one another, while ignoring cause; action; whole; process; dying.
In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti...consent isn't given to father; son and holy ghost, but to those suggesting IN THE NAME OF (in nomine) which thereby contradicts the first commandment.
God doesn't require consent...God forces adaptation by free will of choice. Others tempt choice into submission by consent.
True vs false tempts one to ignore change. If one applies change to true, then it becomes false and vice versa.
Others suggest "true" and "time" for one to hold onto, while ignoring that only within motion can there be differentiation. If one holds onto anything, then one ignores that everything moves each different thing within apart from one another.
Both "true" and "time" represent measurement aka ones mind artificially TAKING measure of what nature was GIVING. Doing that establishes a contradiction between giving and taking within ones mind.