Jewish holy book PROMOTES idiocracy
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
In nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti...consent isn't given to father; son and holy ghost, but to those suggesting IN THE NAME OF (in nomine) which thereby contradicts the first commandment.
God doesn't require consent...God forces adaptation by free will of choice. Others tempt choice into submission by consent.
True vs false tempts one to ignore change. If one applies change to true, then it becomes false and vice versa.
Others suggest "true" and "time" for one to hold onto, while ignoring that only within motion can there be differentiation. If one holds onto anything, then one ignores that everything moves each different thing within apart from one another.
Both "true" and "time" represent measurement aka ones mind artificially TAKING measure of what nature was GIVING. Doing that establishes a contradiction between giving and taking within ones mind.
Possibility implies being potential (life) during procession (inception towards death)...taking into possession reduces the potential given. One has the free will of choice to take given, but doing so reduces ones awareness of given.
Whatever one holds onto...God continues to set apart.
Resisting suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Whenever tempted by true or false option...discern self as being free will of choice in-between until binding self to a side. Resisting SIDES grows ones SIGHT aka the requirement to resist temptation.
Life cannot perceive its inception or death, because it lives in-between aka separated from origin and outcome. Others suggest "time" to trick ones mind to consent to artificial origins and outcomes.
If one consents to past and future, then one permits another to shape PRESENT aka ones PRESENCE (forwarded essence).
Try expressing self within motion instead of repressing self by timing motion. Nature does, which allows each being within to re-do self only NOW.
Manage/manus (hand). Giving and taking isn't manual, but auto... https://www.etymonline.com/word/auto- aka all moving through each one within. Resisting the temptation to take represents adaptation to given. Resistance is fertile.
Compare the mental capacity of an infant and an elder...whatever mental capacity was grown in-between wasn't there before, and won't be there after. Growing implies shaping, not holding onto the shaped.
The more one chooses to let go, the freer ones choice, and the clearer ones awareness of others tempting one to hold onto.