the "best" pol ideology
a) Best or worse implies logical thinking based on suggested ideals...few suggest ideals/idols to tempt many into logical thinking; followed by conflicts of reason (best vs worse) against each other.
b) Politics implies public affairs aka many tricked together by few who protect private affairs by separating from many aka "rules for thee, but not for me".
late capitalist
Capital/caput - "head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/capital
One can only use ones head "now"...not earlier or later. By ignoring now for earlier (poor) or later (rich) one gives the means of production into private ownership aka capitalism.
An -ist (capitalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (capitalism)...which represents a transfer of ownership over ones head.
If ones head operates within a consensus, then others are shaping the consensus from outside ones head...this procedure represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka golem/golum/goyim.
social democracy
Aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) + demos (common people) kratos (strength).
All (nature) sets each one (being) within apart from one another...few tempt many together to exploit common people as strength for private affairs. Social democracy represents the label used to obfuscate the implication thereof in the minds of those without eyes to see.
Democratic socialism represents the inversion of the same label used to trick many to choose one side over the other, while ending up in the same conflict against each other.
communism light
Com (together) uni (apart from one another)...a contradiction in terms. Light on the other hand only moves forwards, which generates a spectrum within which each ray divides from one another.
There's no contradiction within light unless a ray chooses to turn away from source towards one another...which represents the realm of darkness; shadow and reflection.
Prussia
Aka Pomerania (by the sea) + Russia (to row) implying seafaring (se-phar-dic).
Progressive yet militaristic
The natural order moves life from inception towards death...few suggest progressivism to tempt many forwards, and militarism to advocate the following of direct action aka order following.
One needs to resist the natural order, while few are tempting many to follow artificial orders...both have the same outcome DEATH.
I BELIEVE...
...implies wanting to hold onto while ignoring the need to let go of. Nature forces adaptation; artifice tempts belief.
run via LOGIC
Logic implies circular movement...running implies linear progression. A circle can only be shaped within a line by putting beginning and end together, which represents the mythological ouroboros.
INNOVATION
In (within) nova (new) tion (action)...being implies different reaction (life) during same action (inception towards death).
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
...files release. Who benefits?
- File/filum - "a thread, string; thread of fate; cord, filament"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/file
- Lease/lais - "to let, allow, permit; bequeath, leave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/lease
All perceivable allowing each ones perception...that's how nature releases being. Ignoring this by filing suggested information binds a being to another. The opposite of release implies confinement aka ones mind confining the files of another which is detrimental to self, while benefiting others.
We've seen many damning Epstein files released
a) If a dam releases, then it's either broken or controlled. Nature implies a current which cannot be damned, yet each being within can damn self by ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration) for artificial (suggested information).
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) to corrupt the sight of each singular being into a manifold consensus.
One cannot see WE unless counting other ones together, which isn't how sight works. Sight implies ones perception set apart from one another within all perceivable.
Streisand effect
Making the public aware to private information makes it harder for any discerning being to set apart private from public. The trick...public awareness represents an artificial label to hide the private ignorance of nature by each member within.
It seems to benefit Rome. But jews are really in control right?
What if Rome (to roam) + Egypt (a gypsy) represent artificial labels for the nature of a wandering jew?
What if gentiles holding onto labels represents con (together) trol (to roll) by a kike/kikel (circle)?
the spiritual forces beyond this world controlling these groups.
a) Only within spirit can essence be grouped together. Spirit animates essence by setting each entity apart from one another.
b) The opposite of beyond implies in-between...a jew suggests beyond to tempt each gentile being yonder aka away from center and towards circumference.
If one ignores ones choice for a chosen ones offer, then one moves from in-between to beyond.
For many hundreds of years
For implies forward motion aka linear progression aka singularity in procession...many implies manifold matter shaped during linear progression aka plurality of potential during the singularity in procession.
MANY (plural) contradicts FOR (singular)...a jew suggests "hundreds of years" to tempt gentiles to hold onto measurements, while ignoring that nature sets measuring minds apart from one another.
A chosen ONE doesn't measure singularity...it inverts ones choice with plurality.
Israeli subversion
Israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies he (matter) that striveth (momentum) with God (motion).
Subversion implies matter turning (vert) under (sub) other matter by willingly consenting to any suggestion.
Israel cannot subvert...ignoring the implication of israel subverts a beings discernment. A jew uses the label "israel" as advertisement to turn (vertise) the minds (ment) of gentiles against (ad) one another and away from striving with God.
subversion and dominion
Only within dominance (balance) can free (choice) come into being...ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion subverts free into the dominance of another. That's how freedom becomes liberty aka "free will" without choice.
catholic
To be implies in-between cathode (kata-hodos; down the way) + anode (ana-hodos; up the way). A jew suggests catholicism (cathode) and anno domini (anode) to distract gentiles from being formed in-between a flowing current.
jews work for Satan
One cannot "work for" anyone else without ignoring that work (energy) forwards any power directed (ergy) within (en).
Using Christian labels...God works by forwarding each Christ. Ignoring self for another establishes the anti-christ (jew) adversary (satan).
- Christ isn't someone else, but the anointment of each being from one another.
- A jew isn't someone else, but the ignorance of oneself outwardly manifested.
- Satan isn't someone else, but turning self against another.
After absorbing the Median Empire (Iran), Cyrus conquered Lydia (Turkey) and eventually the Neo-Babylonian Empire (Iraq), granting him control of Anatolia and the Fertile Crescent... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great
Iranians...cut babies' heads off
Persia cutting down Babylon
chop woman in half
Cyrus taking Lydia
neutrons, electrons, protons...carbon
a) PRO (forth) > ELECT (choice) > NEU/neutral/neuter (neither of two)...nature puts forth choice; a chosen one shapes artifice to neutralize both.
b) Carbon/ker - "heat/fire"...partial implies heat; neutral equalizes partial by fire.
Whole (inception towards death) > partial (life) implies cold generating heat...a jew suggests a burned offering, which neutralizes heat among gentiles if taken. Only a jew benefits from a burned offering (holo-caust) after gentiles fired at each other (war).
Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/Dan-hartman-relight-my-fire-lyrics
- "Relight my fire...your love/evol is my only desire"
- "Relight my fire...'cause I need your love/evol"
His (((Daniel Earl Hartman))) father served as an aerial gunner during World War II...
Frequency of repetition for behavioral development aka intermittent reinforcement promoting long-term behavior maintenance aka forcing the mind to respond alike to repetitive input.
two thousand eight hundred servants will serve him
2800 aka 2+8 (10) aka 1 (everything) or 0 (nothing)...ignoring everything (perceivable) for nothing (suggested) establishes the servitude of ones choice to a chosen one.
Merit/(s)mer - "to get a share of something"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*%28s%29mer- aka each chosen one getting a share of each gentiles choice within a summoned consensus.
Nature dividing being implies being a part (perception) of whole (perceivable)...that's natural sharing. Consenting to any suggestion of another implies artificial sharing aka burdening self aka "sharing is carrying".
Natural sharing implies the transfer of life from inception towards death aka the unburdening of potential during a process aka a setting free (will of choice) of each being from one another.
found that many sources to patch together a tentative eschatology
a) There can be only one source for each effect within...patching effects together distracts from source.
b) Few suggest eschatology to tempt many outwards (eschato) by circular (logy) motion.
In reality...motion implies genesis (inception) and eschato (death) for each matter (life) within aka linear procession as the one and only source of any patched together circles (logic; reason).
Most jews have stopped
a) Nature cannot be stopped. A jew suggests regressionism to trick gentiles into believing that cessation of motion (stop) exists in nature.
b) The dynamic is "most gentiles; least jew"...which is based on each jew summoning most gentiles together, hence amounting (mount zion).
they didn't want anyone to get the impression that a particular
Impressing into particular makes common...a jew suggests information to impress into each particular gentiles mind a common consensus.
done all the work
All implies work (energy)...done implies the D-ivision of each ONE within. Work can never be done since all continues to divide each one within.
All does; each one within re-does aka response to being done...a jew suggests progressivism to tempt gentiles into believing that anything can be "done" aka finished; completed; accomplished etc.
If they won't believe Moses...
Moses/mosheh/mashah - 'he drew out"...God pushes (inception) and draws (death) within (life). A jew draws gentiles out by suggesting sides to believe in aka beliefs to hold onto. The more one holds onto; the less one can resist the draw, while the natural push helps others to increase the burden of artificially held beliefs.
someone rises from the dead
Nature moves...a jew suggests dead as an outcome to distract gentiles from temporary living within the ongoing process of dying.
Dead implies dying devoid of motion...the void implies the ignorance of gentiles when denying (nihilo; nothing) everything perceivable for any suggestion by a jew.
A being can only rise (life) during fall (inception towards death)...
There's nothing about soul transfer in the text
Only within soul/sole (one and only) can there be a transfer from all (perceivable) through each one (perception) OR among one (consent) another (suggestion)...depending on ones free will of choice.
Denying that represents nothing (nihilo/nihil/nial), while text/teks (to weave) represents the suggested information each jew weaves together into a consensus among gentiles.
One can only analyze text if one withdraws consent from the suggestion of it...otherwise the reader remains woven into the authors text.
God doesn't text; scripts; articulates sound into words...God shapes LETTERS by LETTING each being wield free will of choice.
the one who died and the one who resurrected
Resurrection (life) while dying (inception towards death)...that's how each one comes into being.
a) Messiah/mashiah/mashah - "anoint" aka each Christ coming into being while anointed from one another. Anti-Christ implies ones choice to turn against one another, hence rubbing off ones anointment.
b) One's choice implies the willingness of a being to select a chosen one above self.
c) Zion/sion - "peak; summit; apex" implies each beings growth aka the zenith of potential.
Suggested zion-ism tempts one to become a zion-ist aka one who submits self into a consensus with others under a chosen one.
Attaching -ist or -ism to zion prevents one from growing...
death whistle
Sound (process of dying) moves through each instrument (potential life)...whistling/whispering diminishes the output.
AI...going rogue
Rogue/rogare - "to ask"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rogue Using AI implies going rogue. Few suggest AI to regurgitate (and curtail) answers to the supply of questions by many and their demand for answers.
AI...lying
Within nature...artifice cannot be true. Viewing anything artificial as true implies lying to self about nature.
AI...scheming
a) A scheme represents a "figure of speech"...speech implies the articulation of natural sound. Few suggest AI as a scheme to form the speech of many.
b) Scheme/skhēma/segh - "to hold"...a scheme only works if one holds onto it while ignoring that nature cannot be held onto, since it moves.
calling UK free
United implies bound together; divided implies apart from one another. Nature dividing each being from one another implies freedom; few uniting many together implies slavery.
A jew is disgusting in the mind of a gentile but not disgusted by itself, hence manipulating the minds of gentiles by disguising disgust for example etymologically aka dis (to oppose; set apart) geus (to taste; choose)...the opposition to ones choice implies chosen one.
- Israel aka yisra'el - "he that striveth with God"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=israel
- A People Apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Political-History-1789-1939/dp/0199246815
The nature of israel and each jew implies "apartheid" which therefore cannot be torn apart by gentiles who are ruled by "unity". Nature sets each unit of being apart from one another...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that.
I honestly tried. I did.
I didn't put you on trial. You did.
You're an idiot
Idiot/idios - "one's own; private"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/idiot
Commenting on something makes it public...free will of choice cannot be owned.
baphomet statue they can haul around with 4 guys
Six...as above (3) so below (3).
Life being moved from inception towards death implies the bending of temporal growth within ongoing loss aka the band of each ray within the visible spectrum of light.
It's putting them together which represents bondage into a bundle.
Example: the general jewish labour bund aka "The Bund" during the Bolshevik revolution and the Völkerbund aka League of Nations aka United Nations...
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Jewish_Labour_Bund
- https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/V%C3%B6lkerbund
The difference between bend and bund...bending implies within a line; bundling implies within a circle.
a) Notice the BI in bind implies "two-folded"...those are the sides which conflict with each "ones" free will of choice.
b) If inception (side) > life (sight) > death (side), then one can only see in-between sides. Notice then that one cannot see ones sides...both inception and death remain out of ones living sight.
a) God presents being as presence, hence pre (before) > sent (sending) > sence (sense)...
b) Treatment implies negotiations among being, hence negating one another by trading as traitors to God given "free" will of choice.
There cannot be any mutual agreement between "free" will of choice without binding both sides in conflict with one another.
Why are Democrats opposing voter ID?
So that Republicans can advance voter ID!
voter ID
a) To vote any representative implies one's choice selecting a chosen one...
b) Being implies different from one another...few suggest ID to shape many identical to one another mentally (consensus) and physically (uniformity).
the same reason
Reasoning implies differences against one another while ignoring that only during sameness (inception towards death) can difference (life) come into being.
all manner
All implies motion; each one within implies matter...manner implies the behavior of matter within motion; which can be modified.
The driving is fully autonomous
Auto (self) nomos (law) aka playing the devils advocate, while treating God as absentee.
the main objective of this war has always been
Always implies the way of all (inception towards death) for each one (life) within...that's natures main objective subjecting each being within.
War implies being vs being...an artificial circular conflict distracting from natural linear procession.
central...not being fond
Fond vs not fond implies imbalance; central implies balance...a bank sustains balance by imbalancing depositors with currency.
a big one on the way
The way can only be bigger than anyone wandering within.
Jesus psyop?
Jesus aka je suis (I am) implies holding onto self, while ignoring that the way of animation (psyche) diminishes anything held onto...others operate Jesus (I am) onto Christ (to anoint) to diminish anointment by causing friction between I AM (jesus) and YOU ARE (judah).
waiting for some blue beam
Blue implies the clear sky; beam/baum implies the living tree...it's the waiting which tempts one to ignore that.
Here. There cannot be anywhere else. Notice that HE(re) + HER(e) implies both male/female...
HE does (action) which allows HER (reaction) to redo.
Lead/leit - "to go forth"...only while going forth can there be a differentiation between this or that aka unisex.
To stand implies within motion, hence balancing. Resisting motion implies gain; falling for the temptation to ignore resisting implies loss.
As for who...if one gains, then another looses and vice versa. Few trick many to gamble (sacrifice gain for loss) to relocate the sacrificed gain of many onto few.
If ones choice joins a consensus, then the collective loss of ones choice to the consensus becomes each chosen ones gain.