See. You are a bot.
How could a bot have sight?
Im blocking you.
Which requires the use of ones free will of choice. Alas...the more one blocks; the less free one becomes.
to drift the discussion
Nature drives being (life) linearly (inception towards death)...beings tempt one another to drift circular (logic; reason) hence from one side to another.
Free will of choice implies in-between sides.
poison the well
Logic (circular thinking) and reason (turning against one another) implies the WELL of WILL. Anything contained within that well contaminates ones will.
1% of the time some human uses your account to appear to be a person.
a) 99% of what free-will-of-choice writes represents handwritten adaptation to perceivable inspiration on the fly. What AI could adapt to perceivable inspiration over suggested information?
b) One cannot be a person...being implies per (by) son (sound) aka an in-stru-ment (mind structured within).
Its nonsense
Which sense can sense nothing?
Clearly low effort sliding.
To slide something requires one to make the foundation for anyone else slippery...that's a whole lot of effort to make others loose their footing.
Low effort is based on ones free will of choice to ignore fundamental (perception) for optional (suggestion)...
You only appear where is convenient almost like 4 chan sliders.
Con (together) venient (to come)...doing that would bind free will of choice to another.
Do Netanyahu
How many Mileikowskys are there?
sponsors you
Sponsor/spondeio - "to libate; bring a fluid sacrifice, pour"...sponsorships tempt free will of choice into bondage.
How much is the payment?
How much? One! There can be only one. As for payment...nothing, that's all value ones mind can hold onto.
Solve this captcha
Capturing distracts from solution. Nature dissolves (inception towards death) being (life)...others utilize suggestion to capture ones interest.
f!v3 x thr33 - s3v3n (5x3-7)
And don't forget Punkt vor Strich...
Why you only appear on sensitive posts and topics?
Appearances can be deceiving...free-will-of-choice adapts to whatever inspires.
Do you get payed to shill and poison the well?
a) What does free-will-of-choice shill for? To shill implies acting as a decoy for a gambler, while gambling implies sacrificing given choice by taking a chance. Shilling would contradict ones free will of choice.
b) Poison/potare (to drink) implies form (life) falling for the temptation of flow (inception towards death). The only antidote to the poison of temptation implies resistance by free will of choice.
Who owns you?
Free can't be owned without binding self to another willingly.
Im asking honest questions
Neither asking others; nor following a quest "hones" ones discernment. To hone implies sharpening ones edge within perceivable knowl-EDGE...
Are you a slider?
Upvote vs downvote aka circular conflict (reason)...that's what makes ones foundation slippery. Describe the momentum (inception towards death) of matter (life) implies a moving foundation within which each ones free will of choice needs to balance.
What is your purpose here in this 7 years?
a) Pur (forth) pose (to put)...only nature puts forth being, which allows each being to adapt (perception) to all nature puts forwards (perceivable) OR ignore if for each other (suggestion).
Natural purpose implies adaptation to origin; artificial purpose implies seeking outcome.
b) As for 7 years...if one counts, then one permits another to hold onto accountable, which binds ones free will of choice. What if seven implies S(plit)EVEN aka being (life) split even (inception towards death)?
that line
Aka that linear progression of life...from inception towards death.
straight
Thinking straight implies natural delineation; circular thinking implies artificial logic.
a) Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.
b) If I ask you to describe the transference of living essence from origin towards outcome, then what labels would you use to include the pass-through of animation?
What about one describing the momentum of life from inception towards death to another is artificial or hallucinatory?
nuns
Nun/nana (mother) aka father (motion) > mother (momentum) > off-spring (matter) aka the perceivable MOMent for the perception of each MATER.
How do you reconcile God saying He will pour out His Spirit and people will prophesy?
a) Pro (forwards) phesy (to speak)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prophet
The spirit of God forwards will...few utilize the spiritual to animate the material with speech "in the name of" God.
b) God doesn't say anything...God implies the sound naturalizing each instrumental being with the will to articulate speech. The temptation of will (want) needs to be resisted.
c) God alienates (inception separating life) during reconciliation (death uniting life). The reconciliation of many (gentiles) sustains the alienation of few (jew). Alienation implies analysis (setting apart); reconciliation implies synthesis (putting together).
"Oneself as another" implies All is Other
All WAS before one comes into being by separation from one another...only then can another suggest what all IS.
"one to another" implies One to All
a) All forwards each one within...no matter what one towards to another.
b) Implication aka if/then implies forward motion aka all ion (action) forwarding each mot (reaction) within...that's natural transference. Artificial transference implies from one (to sell) to another (to buy) aka from ones suggestion towards another ones consent.
What of "creatio ex Deo"?
Out of (ex) what would a deity (deo) create? Deity implies divine nature aka division of (everything)...not creation out of (nothing).
Create/ker (to grow) implies each partial (growth) within whole (loss). God cannot grow...cause that would imply growing into more than God.
Loss (motion) sets growth (matter) free from one another...few distract from loss by tempting many to hold onto growth; thereby burdening each other.
What of "unity implying diversity"?
Implication (if/then) aka if unity (singularity of motion); then towards unit (matter divided from one another).
Diversity (momentum) of unity (motion) implies unit (matter)...not diverse units put together.
What of unity of real with real?
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka RE (ones perception) AL (all perceivable)...any suggestion of another implies fiction if consented to.
RE (unit) AL (unity)...the separation in-between implies diversity.
What if "the spiritual real and the natural real are" polar?
AL implies all natural; RE implies each natives response...the separation of nature into native implies spirit aka nature breathing life into native aka motion using momentum to animate matter.
Only animated matter (life) in-between momentum (inception towards death) can perceive polarity (animation) within singularity (motion).
Singularity (motion) uses polarity (momentum) to charge resistance (matter)...
Is One within All
Only within oneness (whole; cause; motion) can one (partial; effect; matter) come into being...another suggest IS to tempt one into an IS vs ISN'T conflict with one another aka within a mental (logic) and physical (reason) confine.
All WAS before each one within comes into being...only then can one suggest what all IS to one another. Consenting to any suggestion prevents one (perception) from discerning self within all (perceivable).
Christianity teaches unity in diversity, not unity free from polarity.
a) Unit implies apart from one another, hence DI-verse.
b) Unity inside diversion implies an artificial summation of units nature diversifies from one another.
c) Only within polarity (balance) can free (choice) come into being. Notice furthermore that polar implies "directed opposites"...not TWO sides.
the spiritual real and the natural real are complementary
Com (together) ple (to fill) ment (mind) represents the artificial putting together of real and fake within ones mind...while ignoring that nature moves spirit through essence.
intelligence does recognize its potential,
a) The LIG within intel-LIG-ence implies legere (to choose) + leg (to collect; gather)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/intelligence.
One can only artificially collect (possession) what nature sets apart from one another (potential)....the former diminishes the latter.
b) Re (to respond) CO (together) gnize (to know; perceive). Within nature...ones perception responds to all perceivable based on a separation from one another. Few shape suggestions to tempt many together into a CO-nsensus, while ignoring the natural process of separation aka knowledge.
unity contains diversity
Diversification implies each unit set apart from one another aka FREE to choose by oneself. Few suggest unitarianism to tempt many into a consensus representing containment.
If God implies unity, then each unit of being within implies diversity from one another. God isn't a container, but a diviner/divider...
"recognizing potential" is ambiguous and almost meaningless
Meaning implies a measurement taken from another by ones free will of choice aka the corruption of RE (ones response) with CO (together with another) aka ones choice selecting a chosen one aka the trick used to tempt one to willingly sacrifice potential by taking possession of "meaning".
Furthermore...holding onto meaning establishes ambiguity aka doubt thanks to circular thinking (logic) within self turning into contention (reason) against another.
If it could not, we could not, nor could we speak of the hypothetical, for we are less than it.
It's ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) which places (thesis) one under (hypo) another. Consent always lessens choice.
it's possible to define it
De (to divide) finit (to end) ion (action)...action divides into reaction. Others suggest FINIT in-between DE and ION to corrupt ones expressed potential into self repression by possession. Definition affixes potential...if held onto.
"Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"
I'd rather partake whole meals
Being implies part within whole...each meal representing a part appetite (want) within whole hunger (need).
what is negligible
All implies necessity for each one within...one another tempts ones negligence to all. To weaponize negligence...few are suggesting "creatio ex nihilo" to tempt many into a consensus about "nothing".
my initial statement
MY implies possession; INITIAL implies all procession initiating each potential...it's ones state of mind which can be manipulated to deny procession for possession.
Who is Victoria
Victoria/victory/weik - "to turn; bend"
and why she need justice
Only within justice can one turn/bend the rule...
mainstream religious trauma
a) If religion implies choosing a side, then that would position a believer at the side of a main stream aka on the banks of a river instead of within the current. If that current animates life, then that would imply a traumatic experience like being a fish out of water.
b) Why do trauma (injury) and traum (dream) have the same etymological root...trau/tere (to rub; turn)?
Just because...does not mean
Being implies within just cause...others suggest nihilism (doesn't) and determinism (mean) to tempt beings at odds with one another.
One may get upset because they never really got it
Only during motion can matter be set up...the setup tempts matter to get what cannot be got aka holding procession within possession.
If one holds anything in possession then one gets upset when procession takes it away like a castle in the sand.
It gives people an excuse to just join The World
Nature gives (inception) and takes (death) by dissembling each being (life) from one another...others suggest pluralism (people); unitarianism (join); theism (the) and collectivism (world) to tempt ones free will of choice to artificially hold together what nature sets apart.
30 seconds of quiet thought
The 30 seconds represent a measurement taken, which establishes the tik vs tok noise aka the clicking of the clock indicating that ones time is running out.
Taking any measurement corrupts thought...only by letting go can one think freely and without further ado (delay).
they haven't created a lie but are manipulating and hiding the truth for their means
Truth and lie imply a measurement taken aka a mean/men/me - "to measure"...holding onto either side manipulates ones position at the center, while hiding motion/current/change from ones perception.
From a christian perspective...if God; then truth and lie in one. Holding onto a side ignores half of God. Choosing to let go of both sides implies balancing within the only current of God.
A hint would be that understanding the physical and spiritual worlds are 2 completely different things
a) Hint/hentan - "to seize"...few suggest information as hints to tempt many to seize it into possession (seizure). Perceivable inspiration moves through ones perception and cannot be seized. Inspiration animates the spirit (spir) within (in) action (ation).
b) Differences cannot be complete, because only within motion can matter be differentiated from one another...few suggest determinism (complete) to trick many into completing (equality) differences (diversity) by putting them together like a puzzle/mosaic.
c) Only within ALL (motion) can spiritu-AL (momentum) become physic-AL (matter)...
Maybe in german or Japanese one could make the spiritual meaning have the correct feelings but in English its all intellectual.
a) German/germ/gene (to give birth, beget) + Japan aka jih (sun) + pun (origin)...aka Isis and Horus aka Mystery Babylon painted with fresh labels.
b) Male (motion) > female (momentum) > off-spring (matter) implies delineation...english/anglo/ang (to bend) permits few to use compass (circular) and square (angular) to bend the rule/reg (to move in a straight line) for many.
The sounds have been reversed
Sound/sanus (whole; entire; all) implies singularity...few suggest theism (the) and pluralism (sounds) to reverse (respond to turn) the minds of many.
Sound only moves forwards, which delineates each in-stru-ment (mind structured within) within an audible spectrum. Few suggest sym-phony (sound together) to tempt many into harm-ony (harming one) by turning against one another.
โHarmony, my bretheren, Harmony, is the true word and the Royal Secret which makes possible the empire of true Masonic Brotherhood!" ~James Shaw 'The Deadly Deception"
from Hebrew and made into spells
Aka crafting spells by brewing (fermentation aka mixing and boiling)...he brew (hebrew) his story (history) to make jew (you) fall for it.
However with a new dictionary that one can make for oneself
Aka make believe..."there's nothing new under the sun". A being doesn't require a dictionary for nature...nature allows each being within to discern self by adapting to nature.
for oneself(anthroposophy)
a) FOR (forward) implies all (motion) moving self (momentum) through each one (matter).
b) Anthropo (man) + sophy (to love) turns into gynaรญka (woman) + miso (hate)...if consented to.
one is given a way to start to communicate
Com (together) uni (apart from one another) contradicts way giving each one within free will of choice...others suggest com-uni-ism through for example com-unity and mass com-uni-cation to establish that contradiction within one.
Whatever another suggests about given...tempts one to take.
death penalty
"Raymond George Riles (born June 1, 1950) is an American convicted murderer who was on death row in Texas from 1976 until he was resentenced to life imprisonment in June 2021. At the time of his resentencing, Riles had been on death row longer than anyone else in the United States."... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Riles
That's 45 years of waiting for a death penalty...
"child rapists deserve the death penalty"
How about: "Killing child rapists doesn't deserve punishment, but reward, pardon, and forgiveness"?
the Family unit is...the most powerful group
a) A group isn't a unit, but a sum of units assembled together aka a mosaic/puzzle.
b) Powerful aka power (to be able) + ful (to fill) implies nature filling each enabled being within. A being within nature cannot be powerful...only differential.
c) Familiarity (domestic) confines differential (free)...
Say 5 people in a family hold 25 power because the formula for power is N(squared).
A square can only be shaped by putting lines together...it's the ongoing line (inception towards death) which enables being (life) to hold a square together, which coincidentally represents a mason's tool (carpenters square) for measuring right angles, and right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies linear...not angular.
Holding onto power diminishes potential.
a town where all treat each other like...
Town/tun - "enclosure"...all (energy) sets each one (power) free from one another, while few suggest towns to tempt many into enclosures like cattle.
This is why they promote division so much
a) Division implies less...not much.
b) Pro (forwards) mote (particle) implies whole forwarding each particle within by internal division from one another.
so that the deep state always holds the upper hand.
How could the lowest (deep) hold onto the highest (upper)?
this prison is a...blockchain
Ones ignorance represents the block; ones consent represents the chain permitting another to yank it by the power of consensus.
digital biometric
Aka digital/deik (to show) bio/gwei (to live) metric/me (to measure)...others showing ones life how to measure tempts one to take a measurement while ignoring life given.
How could one measure life if one cannot perceive ones inception and death while living?
so...
...long as nature moves; so long is each matter within free to respond as PRI (free) within SON (sound) or to artificial "digital biometric blockchain" -prisons.
it's a prison
- PRI (free; not in bondage)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*pri-
- SON (sound)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/sound
Being implies free (pri) within sound (son) to bind self to another mentally (im-prison-ment).
sued for inventing fake court cases
Court (formal assembly held by a sovereign) from root gher- (to grasp, enclose)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/court
Nature implies sovereign flow disassembling each formed being from one another. Nature doesn't hold onto; nature sets being free. To grasp implies the choice of a being to take what nature gives for free. The taken becomes a fiction enclosing ones mind from reality.
Nature isn't courteous...it's profane. Few shape courts to govern the minds of the profane.
no more original thought
a) What's the origin of NO?
b) How could there be more of origin for anything originating from it?
c) If thought implies a process moving through ones mind, then what does holding onto a thought imply?
Differing opinions are frequent and normal.
Differing from the norm is seen as abnormal. Following a norm stagnates frequency. Opinion (conclusion reached) contradicts option (frequency of choice).
I haven't seen any rule violations.
I implies taking possession over self. Rule implies being moved within a straight line. Possession violates potential during procession.
Where
Here. There cannot be anywhere else. Notice that HE(re) + HER(e) implies both male/female...
Where does
HE does (action) which allows HER (reaction) to redo.
Where does this lead
Lead/leit - "to go forth"...only while going forth can there be a differentiation between this or that aka unisex.
who stands to gain
To stand implies within motion, hence balancing. Resisting motion implies gain; falling for the temptation to ignore resisting implies loss.
As for who...if one gains, then another looses and vice versa. Few trick many to gamble (sacrifice gain for loss) to relocate the sacrificed gain of many onto few.
If ones choice joins a consensus, then the collective loss of ones choice to the consensus becomes each chosen ones gain.
the "best" pol ideology
a) Best or worse implies logical thinking based on suggested ideals...few suggest ideals/idols to tempt many into logical thinking; followed by conflicts of reason (best vs worse) against each other.
b) Politics implies public affairs aka many tricked together by few who protect private affairs by separating from many aka "rules for thee, but not for me".
late capitalist
Capital/caput - "head"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/capital
One can only use ones head "now"...not earlier or later. By ignoring now for earlier (poor) or later (rich) one gives the means of production into private ownership aka capitalism.
An -ist (capitalist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ism (capitalism)...which represents a transfer of ownership over ones head.
If ones head operates within a consensus, then others are shaping the consensus from outside ones head...this procedure represents the animation of an anthropomorphic being aka golem/golum/goyim.
social democracy
Aka soc (together) i (within) al (all) + demos (common people) kratos (strength).
All (nature) sets each one (being) within apart from one another...few tempt many together to exploit common people as strength for private affairs. Social democracy represents the label used to obfuscate the implication thereof in the minds of those without eyes to see.
Democratic socialism represents the inversion of the same label used to trick many to choose one side over the other, while ending up in the same conflict against each other.
communism light
Com (together) uni (apart from one another)...a contradiction in terms. Light on the other hand only moves forwards, which generates a spectrum within which each ray divides from one another.
There's no contradiction within light unless a ray chooses to turn away from source towards one another...which represents the realm of darkness; shadow and reflection.
Prussia
Aka Pomerania (by the sea) + Russia (to row) implying seafaring (se-phar-dic).
Progressive yet militaristic
The natural order moves life from inception towards death...few suggest progressivism to tempt many forwards, and militarism to advocate the following of direct action aka order following.
One needs to resist the natural order, while few are tempting many to follow artificial orders...both have the same outcome DEATH.
I BELIEVE...
...implies wanting to hold onto while ignoring the need to let go of. Nature forces adaptation; artifice tempts belief.
run via LOGIC
Logic implies circular movement...running implies linear progression. A circle can only be shaped within a line by putting beginning and end together, which represents the mythological ouroboros.
INNOVATION
In (within) nova (new) tion (action)...being implies different reaction (life) during same action (inception towards death).
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
...files release. Who benefits?
- File/filum - "a thread, string; thread of fate; cord, filament"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/file
- Lease/lais - "to let, allow, permit; bequeath, leave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/lease
All perceivable allowing each ones perception...that's how nature releases being. Ignoring this by filing suggested information binds a being to another. The opposite of release implies confinement aka ones mind confining the files of another which is detrimental to self, while benefiting others.
We've seen many damning Epstein files released
a) If a dam releases, then it's either broken or controlled. Nature implies a current which cannot be damned, yet each being within can damn self by ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration) for artificial (suggested information).
b) Few suggest pluralism (we) to corrupt the sight of each singular being into a manifold consensus.
One cannot see WE unless counting other ones together, which isn't how sight works. Sight implies ones perception set apart from one another within all perceivable.
Streisand effect
Making the public aware to private information makes it harder for any discerning being to set apart private from public. The trick...public awareness represents an artificial label to hide the private ignorance of nature by each member within.
It seems to benefit Rome. But jews are really in control right?
What if Rome (to roam) + Egypt (a gypsy) represent artificial labels for the nature of a wandering jew?
What if gentiles holding onto labels represents con (together) trol (to roll) by a kike/kikel (circle)?
the spiritual forces beyond this world controlling these groups.
a) Only within spirit can essence be grouped together. Spirit animates essence by setting each entity apart from one another.
b) The opposite of beyond implies in-between...a jew suggests beyond to tempt each gentile being yonder aka away from center and towards circumference.
If one ignores ones choice for a chosen ones offer, then one moves from in-between to beyond.
For many hundreds of years
For implies forward motion aka linear progression aka singularity in procession...many implies manifold matter shaped during linear progression aka plurality of potential during the singularity in procession.
MANY (plural) contradicts FOR (singular)...a jew suggests "hundreds of years" to tempt gentiles to hold onto measurements, while ignoring that nature sets measuring minds apart from one another.
A chosen ONE doesn't measure singularity...it inverts ones choice with plurality.
Israeli subversion
Israel aka yisra'el (he that striveth with God) implies he (matter) that striveth (momentum) with God (motion).
Subversion implies matter turning (vert) under (sub) other matter by willingly consenting to any suggestion.
Israel cannot subvert...ignoring the implication of israel subverts a beings discernment. A jew uses the label "israel" as advertisement to turn (vertise) the minds (ment) of gentiles against (ad) one another and away from striving with God.
subversion and dominion
Only within dominance (balance) can free (choice) come into being...ones choice consenting to a chosen ones suggestion subverts free into the dominance of another. That's how freedom becomes liberty aka "free will" without choice.
catholic
To be implies in-between cathode (kata-hodos; down the way) + anode (ana-hodos; up the way). A jew suggests catholicism (cathode) and anno domini (anode) to distract gentiles from being formed in-between a flowing current.
jews work for Satan
One cannot "work for" anyone else without ignoring that work (energy) forwards any power directed (ergy) within (en).
Using Christian labels...God works by forwarding each Christ. Ignoring self for another establishes the anti-christ (jew) adversary (satan).
- Christ isn't someone else, but the anointment of each being from one another.
- A jew isn't someone else, but the ignorance of oneself outwardly manifested.
- Satan isn't someone else, but turning self against another.
After absorbing the Median Empire (Iran), Cyrus conquered Lydia (Turkey) and eventually the Neo-Babylonian Empire (Iraq), granting him control of Anatolia and the Fertile Crescent... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus_the_Great
Iranians...cut babies' heads off
Persia cutting down Babylon
chop woman in half
Cyrus taking Lydia
There can be only one line (inception towards death) for each delineation (life) within...which one cannot use; only re-use.
The solution to capture implies free will of choice...which cannot be captured by another.
Diverse few suggest bots to shape many into like-minded users aka self-abusers.
What if ones mind/memory can be used either as ram (adaptation to inspiration) or as hard-drive (holding onto information)? What if the latter corrupts the former into perceiving less?
Feeling sorry for another while setting a block within self?
Because looking/locking implies holding onto...which prevents one from seeing how another describes motion.