Thanks! u/Graphenium:
The worldview expressed in the Law of One/“Ra Material” and the Hidden Hand interview
https://www.wanttoknow.info/secret_societies/hidden_hand_081018
The way I see things, these two sources explain existence, the state of our world, and the meaning of life far more accurately than any other. One is a “channeled” work, and the other is a long series of Questions and Answers between a conspiracy forum (RiP ATS) and a self-proclaimed world-controller. I see them as complimentary, showing a deeper reality by showing two sides of the same coin. One side being that of Service-to-Others, and the other being Service-to-Self
https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ASG9Vy4Tl/round-table-suggestion-thread/c
Thread will stay open for 3-4 weeks thanks to a very helpful suggestion.
a) Unit implies apart from one another, hence DI-verse.
b) Unity inside diversion implies an artificial summation of units nature diversifies from one another.
c) Only within polarity (balance) can free (choice) come into being. Notice furthermore that polar implies "directed opposites"...not TWO sides.
Com (together) ple (to fill) ment (mind) represents the artificial putting together of real and fake within ones mind...while ignoring that nature moves spirit through essence.
a) The LIG within intel-LIG-ence implies legere (to choose) + leg (to collect; gather)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/intelligence.
One can only artificially collect (possession) what nature sets apart from one another (potential)....the former diminishes the latter.
b) Re (to respond) CO (together) gnize (to know; perceive). Within nature...ones perception responds to all perceivable based on a separation from one another. Few shape suggestions to tempt many together into a CO-nsensus, while ignoring the natural process of separation aka knowledge.
Diversification implies each unit set apart from one another aka FREE to choose by oneself. Few suggest unitarianism to tempt many into a consensus representing containment.
If God implies unity, then each unit of being within implies diversity from one another. God isn't a container, but a diviner/divider...
Meaning implies a measurement taken from another by ones free will of choice aka the corruption of RE (ones response) with CO (together with another) aka ones choice selecting a chosen one aka the trick used to tempt one to willingly sacrifice potential by taking possession of "meaning".
Furthermore...holding onto meaning establishes ambiguity aka doubt thanks to circular thinking (logic) within self turning into contention (reason) against another.
It's ones (singular) consent to suggested we (plural) which places (thesis) one under (hypo) another. Consent always lessens choice.
De (to divide) finit (to end) ion (action)...action divides into reaction. Others suggest FINIT in-between DE and ION to corrupt ones expressed potential into self repression by possession. Definition affixes potential...if held onto.
"Express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"
What of "unity implying diversity"?
What of unity of real with real? What if "the spiritual real and the natural real are" polar?
Is One within All?