Banking is about keeping...
-ing denotes action, which cannot be kept without shaping inaction. If being (life) implies within action (inception towards death); then keeping anything makes ones reaction inactive.
keeping people in debt
A person (singular) drowns if keeping a people (plural) together by joining.
debt
Debt implies dead...being alive implies rising (life) within a current (inception towards death). Keeping a currency in possession, while trying to rise within a current makes not drowning in debt/death exponentially harder.
War creates a lot of debt.
Few suggest creationism (something out of nothing) to sum many into a lot aka into a consensus called reason (peace vs war).
Few cast many into lots to make war.
Bankers love to finance wars.
a) Love versus hate implies the banks aka both sides of a moving currency, and it requires ones trust to enter a bank aka ones choice to incline towards a side.
b) Finance/finer - "to end, settle a dispute or debt" implies few tempting many to settle the end of their lives in disputes against each other while drowning in debt/dead.
c) Love vs hate implies rich vs poor...no matter which side of any suggested currency one chooses to keep.
VS aka verto (to turn) represents the bank keeping ones trust, while ignoring that nature delineates (inception towards death) being (life). The turning against one another represents an artificial decease of the mind called willing ignorance.
What if...were right all along?
All along implies all moving forwards while moving each one within along...there's no left vs right conflict (war) unless one chooses to ignore all along.
How quickly all that bullshit disappeared...
All (perceivable) moves each one (perception) within steadily along...few suggest bullshit to tempt many into an unsteady war (quickly vs slowly).
Within nature...quick and slow aren't in conflict against each other, but represent each beings choice to physically measure or to mentally hold onto a measurement. That which can be physically measured is based on nature moving it apart, while measurements held onto represent ones artificial ignorance of nature.
nature doesn't have banks
Nature implies a current (inception towards death) which tempts each being (life) within to incline towards a side.
fair...doesn't...either
These represent you the being choosing to bank one side over another aka fair vs unfair + does vs doesn't + either vs both. Others suggest the words "fair + doesn't + either" to tempt you to invest trust into banks by inclining your free will of choice towards a binding side.
Natural current implies linear progress; banking implies circular conflict.
- Loan/lehn/loikw - "to leave"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/loan
Taking a loan implies taking a leave of absence aka denial of presence. Nature doesn't give loans...it advances "free" will of choice.
ot god and nt god are different entities
a) Entity implies each being within God. Only within God (motion) can flowing abstract (momentum) form entity (matter).
b) Old Testament versus New Testament implies a circular conflict among differences turning against one another, hence making them ALIKE one another. Old vs new implies the mutual destruction of different entities, and it's based on a test/teks (to weave) of ment (mind) aka few weaving the minds of many together into a conflict.
c) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
New implies the inversion of now, within which one old/al (to grow; nourish) aka God nourishing growth now....not before (old) or after (new). If one chooses new or old, then one ignores now aka living within k-NOW-ledge.
The Father of Jesus likes to sacrifice animals
a) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Putting a THE (theos; god) before FATHER implies an imposter...
b) Sacrifice implies "offering"; animal implies "all animation" aka all offering animation through each animated one within. It's putting the labels "animal" and "sacrifice" upon one another which distracts from God.
c) Same (animation) generating difference (animated) implies sacrifice...LIKE implies a self sacrifice of being differentiated from one another by choosing to behave like one another.
God divines aka makes private (apart)...not common (alike).
It needs no cabal.
Cabal aka cab (cube) al (all) aka all giving cue to being. This gives being the choice in-between needing to adapt to cue or wanting a clue from one another.
Being implies in-between cue (perceivable) and clue (suggested).
Why not the opposite?
Because how could "not" have an opposite?
All things
All implies whole; thing implies partial...things implies a sum of partials within whole. A sum of partials cannot made whole again...a jew suggests tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) to tempt gentiles into believing that it can.
constant vibration
Constant implies "standing together"...applying vibration to anything standing together would shake each stance apart from one another.
different types
If it's different from one another, then why type it together? Few suggest typecasting to tempt many together, which distracts from differences.
all is counciousness
Con (together) scious (to perceive)...all perceivable sets each ones perception apart from one another, thereby making differences perceivable. Few are conning (con) perception (scious) by suggesting many to join a consensus.
Likeness obscures difference.
speculate that every physical object
a) Spec implies special aka apart from one another...every implies a collection of each held together. One cannot speculate about every (plural) without ignoring each (singular).
b) Physical aka phsy (to be) i (within) al (all) implies as partial within whole aka as essence (perception) within abstract (perceivable).
But there's a C in physi(c)al...because it's based on each being to SEE (c) or not to SEE (c). Those with eyes to see (c)...didn't fell for phonetic tricks.
oscillate
Only within a current (inception towards death) can oscillation come into being (life).
The more synchronized these vibes are...
...the less stable each VI(brating)BE(ing) becomes. Vibration implies holding onto one side while turning against the other; adaptation implies resisting the temptation of both sides (inception/death) from in-between (life).
Few suggest vibration to distract many from adaptation... https://genius.com/The-beach-boys-good-vibrations-lyrics
complex
Com (together) plex (to weave) implies bondage for each ones free will of choice if joined like for example the world wide web.
our
Our implies holding in possession...being implies procession (inception towards death) letting go potential (life). Possession restricts potential if held onto.
around
Being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death)...few shape an inward circle (logic); which turns into an outward circle (reason) to tempt the minds of many into circular confinement aka the mythological ouroboros.
US
To be implies a different state from one another, hence within the process of differentiation.
Few suggest united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; uniformity; university; unicode; unisex; universality aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka mosaic law (a game of puzzle) aka "there's comes a time when we need to heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one" aka globalism aka multiculturalism aka miscegenation aka melting pot etc. to artificially put together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).
It's ones consent to any suggestion by another which establishes the connection between slave (ones choice) and master (chosen one).
resonance
Re (to respond) son (sound)...sound/sanus (whole; entire; all) generates each instrument (mind structured within) by internal division aka motion (sound) > momentum (spectrum) > matter (instrument).
Few trick many with the articulation (word) of natural sound into an echo-chamber aka ones mind resounding the words suggested by another.
A word is shaped by putting letters together which implies ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape LETTERS together. Oneself represents the letter of each word shaped by another.
The letters are then shaped through an alphabet aka abecedary (abracadabra) into crafted spells to establish definitions aka DEAF PHONETICIANS aka those who are deaf to phonics (sound).
Furthermore...it's the word (logos) which shapes the inward circle (logic) which turns into outward conflict (reason) among instruments.
some people refer to this as a simulation?
ATION (action) generating reaction implies singularity. Reacting to pluralism (some; people) SIMULATES action. If you view others as a sum and yourself as part of a people, then your mind is running an artificial simulation of natural differentiation.
Being implies person (per sonos; by sound) aka a singular instrument within the singularity of sound. It's the mind of each instruMENT which can be instructed with pluralism (people) to deny singularity.
systems needed to sustain life
Sys (together) sta (to stand)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/system Only apart can life choose to stand together, and standing implies balancing as choice within motion, which togetherness shapes into a progressively increasing burden.
The opposite of system implies disorder aka division (life) of order (inception towards death) aka the process of dying providing the necessities for living. A system represents a wanted or not wanted arrangement within the mind of a living being, which few shape into a consensus among many to systematically enslave each divided/divined being.
An Ultimate Creator makes the most sense to me
a) Ultimate implies coming to an end...it's origin which brings into being by moving forwards. Few suggest ultimism and progressivism to turn the mind of many from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.
b) One cannot sense "most"...artificially summoning together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis) distorts ones sense.
Most implies "more"...being implies one within all. There cannot be more than all for each one within. More God contradicts almighty all-father, yet a contradiction can be shaped within a mind who ignores God.
God cannot create because that would imply creating more than God. All transforming into each one implies loss (inception towards death) generating growth (life)...more vs less implies a contradiction based on measurements taken.
A being can always shape more (want) or less (not want) out of all given (need)...
If non...
...then nothing else.
non-living matter
Living implies within animation...the "mat" within aniMATion implies matter living within motion. There's no such thing as non-living matter; only matter in de-nial/nihilo (nothing) of motion.
higher being
Being implies in-between inception and death aka rising during loss. High and low represent measurements taken by a being who ignores in-between for inclining towards a side.
created life
Creation implies out of nothing... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo which represents a jewish deception tempting gentiles into denial.
Life implies effect within cause aka reaction within action aka growth within loss aka one within all aka each thing within everything aka form within flow.
Life implies transformation (action forming transfer)...not creation.
chance
Nature gives being choice...beings tempt one another to ignore given choice by taking chance aka gambling.
common sense
Sense implies being send apart from one another...few suggest common (together) as the inversion of private (apart) to invade ones privacy by tempting one to join others willingly.
logically makes sense
Being send aka becoming sensible implies within linear motion...logic implies circular thinking. Only within a line can a circle be shaped, and few shape circles inwards (logic) and outwards (reason) to confine the minds of many.
Alien Hybrid
Each being represents a native to nature and an alien to one another. Hybridization aka mongrelization aka miscegenation represents the mixing together of alien beings set apart within nature. Today it's called "globalism"...
I don't believe in neutrality or coincidence
a) Believing in "I" + "YOU" neutralizes "ONE". Neuter (neither of two) implies singularity. Life being moved from inception towards death cannot hold onto either side without neutralizing self.
b) Coincidence aka co (together) incidere (to fall). The rise of being implies falling (inception towards death) apart (life) from one another. Choosing to hold onto a side (i or you; do or don't; belief or disbelief) inverts apartheid into coincidence.
Writing: "I don't believe" coincides with "You do disbelieve"...either of which neutralizes the state of being if held onto.
AI systems engage in...
Sys (together) stem (to stand)...it's the users of AI who stand together while engaging (binding) themselves. Few adapt to nature while tricking many to bind themselves to artifice.
refining
AI regurgitates artifice which contaminates users. Refinement implies being within nature resisting the temptation of artifice.
without the need for external supervision
Being implies within nature. AI tempts being into mental confinement aka ignoring nature, while permitting artifice to supervise ignorance.
Since humans are not involved in this process, who or what is?
Nature implies process; being implies potential. AI tempts potential to take possession of artifice, while ignoring natural procession.
Questioning who or what implies ones lack of self discernment which another cannot give one. AI is being used to give artificial answers to ignorant questions as to maintain the lack of self discernment among users.
Ignoring self discernment implies self abuse...few trick many into a circle of use/abuse. Every user represents an abuser of self.
recursive autonomous learning
a) Recursive (returning) implies circular response...living implies linear response.
b) Autonomous (self law) aka self/sel/sol (soul; sole) aka natural law representing to sole soul self for each being within. It's choosing to hold onto anything which establishes dependency during autonomy.
c) Teach (to give instruction) implies giving structure (life) within action (inception towards death). Learn/lois/læst (sole of the foot) implies walking (life) within sole (inception towards death).
To teach self implies to learn self and vice versa. That's autonomy...student under teacher implies dependency. What's the Hebrew word for instruction? Talmud!
Few utilize AI to maintain the circle of dependency, which distracts many from natural autonomy.
because we're livin' it
Living implies being within cause (be-cause)...we implies an artificial summation of many shaped by few to distract being from cause.
given to you by people who want your money
a) Many don't have money; few use money as a currency moving through many. The origin and outcome of money represents few; which use many as a medium to launder currency through.
b) Few suggest screens to tempt many into a want vs not want conflict, while ignoring God given need.
If I turn you by force, then you are still being (life) send forwards (inception towards death), hence one a mission within the primary force as God's missionary.
Notice missION + versION...that ion (action) implies God giving choice (reaction) to being aka the choice in-between MISS (send forwards aka linear progression) or VERS (turn against each other aka circular regression).
Gods missionary needs to resist the temptation of wanting to turn against.
A SUBmission under another, hence establishing an under vs over conflict...as in versus/verto - "to turn".
Turning (version) contradicts being send (mission)...
If one submits; then a subversion has been established...
tricks people into limitation
Plural (people) deceives singular (person) into limiting self by joining others.
how to break free
Coming into being implies the forcible (inception towards death) separation (life) aka being given a break by being set free from one another. It's the joining together which tempts one to ignore the break.
spiritual secrets
Spirit moving through essence implies secret/seco - "to separate; divide; break apart". It's ignoring that which permits another to cast natural secrecy into artificial mystery.
the demons they summon
Demon aka dai-mon (divider-provider) implies nature providing division to being...summoning beings together permits few any provision given to many.
how to restore your power
Storing response (re-store) diminishes power...it costs power to hold onto. Coming into being implies a power differential...storage inverts that.
running oceans worth of media
There's only one ocean (inception towards death) running each medium (life) within...it's applying worth to what others are mediating towards one, which tempts one to ignore that.
The belief in outward authority
To believe implies by free will of choice aka inert authorization (choice) by active author (balance)...believing implies inclination towards another aka towards a false authority and away from being authorized within the process of authorization.
There is no authority except God and even that is optional
Optional implies option (choice) al (all)...only within all can each one wield free will of choice.
The word "optional" puts together primary (al) and secondary (option) to tempt instrument (secondary) within sound (primary) to give consent to word (optional).
In-stru-ment implies mind structured within sound, hence being of sound mind...
AI scenarios
Scenario/scene/skia - "shadow; shade"...only within light can a shadow be shaped. Holding onto shapes darkens ones perception within light. AI represents artificial shadow play aiming to distort and confine ones mind (confinement) from light passing through (enlightenment).
From Hopeful to Horrifying
From > to implies delineation of light; hopeful vs horrifying implies circular confinement based on taking measurements, which once again darkens ones mind.
What The Deep State Want
Ignoring need for want puts one into a deeper state of being...few tempt the consensus of many into the body politic (Staatskörper aka body of state) by shaping a want vs not want conflict of reason within their minds.
For example...both wanting to be a republican versus not wanting to be a democrat ignores the need to free oneself from representation by another. The more need is ignored; the deeper ones body of state falls into the circular hole aka bottomless pit aka inward (logic) and outward (reason) self confinement.
Ultimately...
Being (life) implies in-between initiation (inception) and ultimatum (death)...logic and reason hermetically seal ones mind within a circle, while ignoring delineation.
They got so used to the enslavement and the power that they don't want to release it now that humans evolved into a more civilized people.
Enslavement implies "slave within mind"...few suggest civilization to tempt many into domestication by willingly giving the power of consent away. Joining a consensus enslaves ones mind.
they tried to prevent evolution
Evolution/evolve - "to unroll"...few shape suggestions to roll many into logic (inward) and reason (outward) aka into circular confinement.
De (life) delineation (inception towards death) cannot be prevented, yet preventive measurements taken are shaping a circle during linear procession.
we all use our free will
a) Being implies one within all, which "we" sums up. The former sets one free from one another, while the latter binds one together with one another.
b) Free will implies "of choice" aka the re-use of balance. It's motion which uses balance (momentum) and reusable choice (matter).
c) Our implies taking into possession; free implies given potential during procession.
"Happy" was unrelated to emotion but was related to fortuitous chance, for instance.
a) Happy implies happenstance aka happen (chance) + stance (choice)...emotion/emotio - "to move from" implies inclining from ones stance aka taking a chance by given choice.
The relation of choice and chance is established by "taking" what is given and holding onto it, while becoming emotional unstable.
b) God WAS before choice (stance) was given and chance (happen) can be taken aka motion was before emotion can be chosen by matter.
"Fun" didn't exist
Fun aka fond implies choice inclining towards chance aka fond/want...representing each beings will (want) within nature (need). It's each beings emotional struggle to be fond of things one doesn't need like fondling titties because it's fun.
Fun...simply meant "hoax", so naturally doesn't appear
Appearances can be deceiving...all (perceivable) makes each one (perception) appear, which one another uses for deception (suggestion).
All implies nature...each native within alternates by choice in-between real (perceivable nature) or fiction (suggested artifice). Few represent artificer who tempt many with hoaxes (hexes; magic spells) into deceiving self.
"Freedom" was a very technical word still,
God giving choice implies dominance setting free...an analytical process. The word free-dom implies an artificial synthesis of what nature sets apart for analysis. This deception requires ones choice to take and hold together the artifice within nature aka technical (artifice within all).
A word can only be shaped within sound...the latter moves; the former tempts ones mind with noise into stillness aka ignorance. That's why one who's ignorant sounds noisy without actual saying anything.
it's all in the word choice.
a) Choice cannot contain all, nor can any word contain all sound...it's the one who chooses to ignore that which becomes the container (contain-ment) of self-deception. Others simply hoax one into it.
b) Words are shaped by LETTERS aka ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words. It's the men of letters who control any words others choose to communicate with.
c) The difference between operative masonry and speculative masonry...words represent speculation within operational sound. The mason of free (will of choice) uses bricks (suggested information) and mortar (consensus) to build walls of ignorance within the minds of many by distracting from operation (sound) with speculation (words).
Stand fast
Standing implies choice (matter) balancing (momentum) within motion...fast implies affixing an imbalance (slow vs fast) within choice by distracting from motion.
Christ hath made us free
Christ (anointed one) implies each being set free from one another within the singular delineation of God...US aka uniting states implies anti-christ aka those set free turning against one another.
One implies free; us implies joined together like a masonic joint...
isn't that ironic. If you want people to figure out alternative energy solutions...
Energy aka en (within) ergy (work)...work implies ongoing solution (inception towards death) for each temporary dissolution (life) within. Dissolution implies a division aka alternation in-between.
OIL/ALL implies the dissolution of each alternating one within aka each anointed one (Christ)...the irony of which is hidden within the language itself aka the figure of speech. Why? Because speech is formed (unification) within flow (dissolution)...
Finance/finis/fin (end) implies one side...it's ones consent to suggested finance which establishes the other side, while ending self by drowning in debt/dead.
The opposite of finance implies defund aka the division (life) of foundation (inception towards death) aka nature giving being "free" will of choice aka the beginning of each ones sight.
RE implies reaction; forever aka ever forwards implies action aka ever forwarding action (inception towards death) generating temporary reaction (life).
Living implies A GAIN...not repetition (again); but diversification (a gain).