I bet
That's gambling aka giving up choice by taking chance aka forfeiting choice as a pledge to another.
never
Aka NOTHING (n) EVERYTHING (ever)...a contradiction in terms.
camping
- Camp now..."open field, level space"
- Camp before... "contest, battle, fight, war"
The meaning of "camp" was changed in the 15c... https://www.etymonline.com/word/camp
As free will of choice one operates within an open field, level space, while needing to resist the wanted temptation of contests, battles, fights, and wars.
Anyway...I'm an early bird, so camping with others was mostly me being busy out in the woods, while the rest was snoring in their tents. Even on schooltrips I got reprimanded for sitting at the lake fishing instead of being at camp for head count.
People attach meaning to words.
a) A person uses free will of choice to attach self (singular) to a people (plural)...attachment restricts free will of choice. Few suggest artificial pluralism to distract many from natural singularity.
There can be only one.
b) Attaching implies synthesis (putting together)...to put anything together requires each thing to be divided apart (analysis) from one another.
Few invert natural analysis with artificial synthesis to shape attachment among many called "consensus".
c) Meaning implies a measure taken by ones mind from what the mind of another suggested. Being implies all perceivable moving through each ones perception...a being cannot hold onto perceivable without ignoring that all moves.
Meaning implies possession...being implies potential within procession. Few suggest meaning to burden the potential of many with possession.
d) Sound generates in-stru-ment (mind structured within)...only after that can an instrument shape a word, which represents spell-craft.
Words are shaped by LETTERS aka by ones choice LETTING a chosen one shape words. You represent the letter of any word others are shaping for you to use for communication.
Sound cannot be described by words without distracting instrument (perception) from natural (perceivable) with artificial (suggested).
Nature divides being...few suggest words to distract many from division with labels attached to mind.
Heidegger
a) DASEIN aka DA (there) SEIN (being) implies a beings perception of perceivable differentiation from one another as here (me) and there (you).
The issue...if a being labels "here" and "there", then it ignores the ongoing motion which divides each temporary being from one another.
If motion implies singularity, then each single unit of matter within cannot be "here" or "there"....only in-between aka as above/so below.
From a different perspective...if form (life) within flow (inception towards death), then simultaneous perception of living/dying from in-between. If ones mind attaches "here" to living and "there" to dying, then one mentally ignores physical procession.
b) "Heidegger's magnum opus, Being and Time (1927), is widely considered one of the most significant works of modern philosophy."
"This question (of being), he believed, had been neglected or obscured throughout the history of Western philosophy"
Who defines his work as significant philosophy, while ignoring him describing philosophy as neglected and obscured? Where does the signal come from...perceivable or suggested?
Heidegger or something
Heidegger's DASEIN implies one thing (sein) among (da) another thing (dort)...a separation from one another. Something aka "sum of things" implies a unification together.
Few suggest unification (synthesis) to distract many from separation (analysis).
This is extremely borish.
IS implies versus ISN'T...that conflict of reason represents mental confinement. You holding onto one extreme while fighting the other...makes whatever I describe from outside seem borish.
FREE will of choice will be perceived as uncultivated by a mind bound to extremes. Why does analyzing this doesn't feel borish to me?
Which AI can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly? AI is based on regurgitating suggested information to tempt users to ignore adaptation.
There's two definitions of "necessary."
Definition implies division (de) of finite (finit) within action (ion) aka division of finite (life) within action (inception towards death).
What's the opposite of necessary? Dispensable aka necessity (inception towards death) enabling division (life) aka the necessary process of dying making each life within dispensable.
tl;dr...There can be only one need (nature) for any want (being) within.
One delineates a requirement the other an inevitability
Delineation implies from origin towards outcome aka linear motion. Requirement implies the inquiring mind responding to being (life) moved from origin (inception) towards outcome (death).
Inevitability implies outcome orientation by ones inquiring mind, while ignoring origin. Inevitability implies avoidance of response-ability aka ignoring origin for outcome.
Avoidance tempts one into confrontation against another, hence into a circular conflict (confront vs avoid) while ignoring linear delineation (inception towards death) of being (life).
You're sort of waffling between the two,
Choice (life) operates IN-BETWEEN balance (inception/death)...inclining to one of two sides imbalances choice.
Notice that while alive...one cannot perceive ones inception or death. Nature offers SIGHT...few suggest SIDE to tempt many to lose former within conflict for latter.
a distinction between the two.
Distinction implies apart from ONE another...two implies ONE ignoring apartheid by counting together ONE + ONE.
How does nature inspire being to count together? How could a being count together without nature setting apart first?
I forced your hand and picked one.
Manually (manus; hand) picked one by choice. Only within balance can there be choice, and only the force of motion generates balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
There's a natural force dividing each being from one another, before a being can choose to artificially force each others hand.
the person you were responding to was using that form
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies flowing sound forming instrument (mind structured within).
I try to describe how nature works...you describe artificial responses among beings within nature.
What if
Implication (if/then) implies delineation. Reason (vs) implies circular confinement...if one chooses a side.
Deepak Chopra
Any influencer suggesting information distracts form (life) from flow (inception towards death). Holding onto any suggested information (form) distorts perceivable inspiration (flow).
Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto suggested information; definition; meaning; denotation; explanation; interpretation; connotation; illustration; translation; terminology; semantics; exegesis etc.
Why? Because holding onto binds free will of choice.
If you see a child rapist, they need to die
That's your measuring mind establishing a conflict of reason aka want (child) vs not want (rapist), while ignoring that within nature ...you; me; the child and the rapist need to die. Why?
it becomes necessary to remove
What if coming into being (be-come) and responding to be moved (re-move) necessitates motion?
What if coming into being (life) implies being removed (inception towards death)?
die unnecessarily
What's the necessity of dying?
It would cause a humanitarian crisis
a) Few suggest humanitarianism to distract many from being effect within cause by affection for one another.
b) Crisis implies a "turning point"...being implies delineation of life from inception towards point of death. Few suggest crisis-actors to shape turning points within the minds of many, like Turning Point USA for example.
if every...were destroyed
Flow (inception towards death) destroys any form (life) structured within. Few use destruction to make many afraid by tempting them to hold onto structures...physically (idols) and mentally (ideals).
Whatever is being destroyed...nature works as always. Structures merely represent shapes formed within flow aka transitory existence.
The US could certainly
Certain implies "affixed"...uniting states together tricks ones perception into certainty about a suggestion. Nature divides each state of being.
the bombing of Iran
Shifting the "center of world trade" from west to east...requires eyes on the east to distract the west.
A cover up and a pay off
Using free will of choice to pay...covers "free" will of choice under a payment aka debt.
jews in government today are the same
Only nature implies same; each being within implies difference. Gentiles are being tempted to respond alike which in return permits each jew to sustain apartheid.
A jew can only weave a cover to control the minds of gentiles if a gentile willingly accepts payment. It's this alike acceptance aka consensus, which mimics sameness and thereby feels like sameness to a gentile.
this story has circulated among the jews
a) Nature delineates being...a jew shapes stories to encircle gentiles mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
b) There's no "among the jews"...only each jew among (in the midst of) gentiles.
it (lust) certainly is one of the most powerful forces
Being implies choice; lust implies inclination. Choosing to incline tempts being off-center. That being said...most vs less implies inclination by choice.
knowledge was the one chosen to 'tempt'...
...tempt to be taken by given choice.
It happens as a cycle.
Happen implies "coming to pass by chance". Chance implies "taken by given choice".
What if choice was given during delineation, while taking a chance shapes a circle?
always inverting
There's only one way for each one within. Coming into being as one within all implies exterior (motion) delineating (momentum) interior (matter).
Interior holding onto exterior shapes a circle (vert) within (in) a line.
invert the meaning
Meaning implies "to measure". If one takes a measurement, then one inverts the measurable given. Notice that while alive...one cannot measure the length in-between ones inception and death.
cards
What's a card? A chart to navi (ship) gate (to move). What's a deck? A covering extending from side to side over part of a ship.
If motion (sea) > momentum (side to side) > matter (ship) then what does drawing a card from a deck imply for the navigator?
tarot
Instead of drawing cards from a deck...how about tarot/taraha (he rejected, put aside) or horah (he taught, showed) or torah (instruction)?
Tarot/torah...
The MASS of men lead lives of quiet desperation + MOST of the world is either asleep or dead
Nature doesn't amass (mass) or amount (most)...it fractions whole into partial.
The religious PEOPLE are, for the MOST part, asleep.
Religion aka religio (to bind anew) implies artificially binding together what nature sets free from one another. To enter religion requires ones free will of choice to join a chosen ones offer...thereby establishing the bondage.
not know
Not implies ones willing de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything known.
the instinctive pull of the transcendent. It’s an old observation.
a) Instinct implies within distinction from one another during transference, hence being (life) pushed (inception) and pulled (death) apart from one another.
b) Choosing to hold onto a side (old or new) during transference tempts one ob (towards) serve (servitude) to another.
The saints were the ones
The words "saints" and "ones" imply plurality...the implication of saint/sanctus (holy; whole) and one (one and only) implies singularity.
Few shape words to trick many into using them to lure each other's awareness to sleep by describing reality (sound) by artificial (words) means.
real historical
Real implies "response to all"; historical implies "storing within all"...storage burdens response.
Notice that history is shared from being to being...not delivered from nature to being. Few use the label "history" to describe BEFORE to many, which tricks many to ignore nature FORE(warding) BE(ing).
Before (fake) represents the inversion of forebe (real).
Even the stolen election feels like it was layers of total bullshit.
a) Thinking that political sides at odds with one another can be even...that's a con.
b) Thinking that what nature gives to being for free can be stolen from one another...that's a con.
c) Thinking elect (choice) can be shared by voting representatives...that's a con.
d) Thinking that diverse (life) within equal (inception towards death) can be made alike one another...that's a con.
e) Thinking that what nature delineates apart from one another can be layered upon one another...that's a con.
f) Thinking that whatever amount of bullshit can be layered into a totality...that's a con.
g) Thought shaped by the articulation of words within natural sound...that's a con.
long con
Length implies a measurement taken into possession, which tempts one to ignore process (inception towards death) giving potential (life).
We (created beings) are the ones, singular
WE and BEINGS implies plurality. WE aka plural of I, first person plural pronoun, "I and another or others".
unwhole
Un- "not" implies the negation of whole. Using the word "unwhole" blasphemes holiness. How could a partial negate whole other than by denial? Does a partial in denial negate whole or only self?
without wholeness
Whole implies out (outer cause) for partial within (inner effect). The synthetic word "without" tempts one to ignore analyzing out > with > in aka singular procession.
Nothing can't create something.
A sum of things can tempt one to denial being set apart within whole.
trying to be Holy means
Meaning implies holding onto aka defining as affixed to build a consensus among beings...that's a synthesis. Whole (holy) dividing (divining) partial implies an analysis.
Synthesis implies comfort (want); analysis implies trial (need)...there's a choice to be made in-between.
to be set apart as God
God remains whole (motion) while setting (momentum) apart (matter)...viewing God as apart implies God lacking parts.
Only within wholeness can apartheid come into being.
our Creator
How was "our" created? By partials choosing to join together. Our implies a sum of partials ignoring whole setting partials apart from one another.
Whole cannot create for whole implies the whole of what could be created. Whole can only transform (transfer form) partial. Creationism was implanted into partial to build sums aka to permit few the summoning together of many.
Creationism implies speculative masonry permitting few to shape the imagination of many by free will of choice.
God...is set apart
God WAS whole before partials within; set apart from one another, can suggest what IS.
sets us apart
US (uniting states together) contradicts apartheid (setting states apart).
we were made that way
Way implies singular motion...we implies plural of matter. If a singular being joins a plurality; then one loses ones way.
to be His
His implies possession...Him implies procession towards division (him/her) of being.
not to become Him
To become aka "coming towards being" implies His work...not aka "nihilo; nihilism" implies ones denial of His work.
to be within Him Who CREATED us and to be His, NOT to become Him.
It's ones consent to suggested creationism (creatio ex nihilo) which establishes nihilism (not).
If one lets go of creation, then nothing seizes to exist. Why? Because without creation there can be only transformation of everything into each thing.
Better to try to be Holy then, I think.
The trial implies ones struggle to sustain particularity among commonality...within whole.
Trying to be Holy implies trying to be God...that's satanism. Trying to make holy implies tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) which establishes a commonality (gentiles) under a particularity (jew) aka slavery.
try to be
TO implies God; BE implies being (life) forwarded (inception towards death) within God, which establishes the trial of sustenance.
Better...I think.
That implies circular confinement (better vs worse)...not a free mind thinking straight.
The other way...from holy (whole) towards partial aka cause setting effect into position.
They gave us first
First implies God given..."us" implies a synthesis inverting the God given analysis into a conflict aka thesis (us) vs antithesis (them).
See what happens when you go to the other extreme
Only choice can operate in-between extremes (balance)...choosing either puts both into conflict (imbalance) while corrupting ones sight.
What game are they playing there?
There can be only one...tempting given choice (reward) to take a chance (risk).
sound far fetched
Sound doesn't fetch...it releases. It's each instrument (mind structured within) which gets tempted to play fetch with one another.
Nature sets being free...a jew suggests artificial prices to tempt gentiles to sell self out by buying into anything, which shapes a gentile from alive into debt/dead.
Pay/pax - "peace; to pacify"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/pay A gentile selling self out into dead (war) has to pay (peace) those alive.
The accumulating debt of dying gentiles gives peace to each living jew...that's how nature works balance upon choice.
There's a word that has gone out of fashion over time and that's "charlatan"
Charlatan/ciarlare - "to prate; babble" aka Mystery Babylon. Few tempt many to physically prate/babble as to fashion (make-up) a mental prison of their own design. Any suggested information held onto by consent...enslaves ones mind to prate and babble about it.
Sleight of hand...Charlemagne (charlatan); the king of the Franks (free, liberal, generous, outspoken).
there are always layers
Layer/lay - "cause to rest" tempts one to ignore that cause generates effect without rest. Few suggest affectation to distract many from cause, which lures effect to rest.
Effect implies being within cause; affect implies effect ignoring cause for one another...the latter establishes the layers under which ones resting mind slumbers. Few shape layers to tuck many into arrested development.
Artemis/arktos (to bear) + moon/me (to measure) aka bearing the burden of measurement taken, which in return tempts one to ignore mission/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw).
Nature releases being...others suggest measurements to bind a burden onto a being.
our country
a) Counting (country) permits another to hold one accountable. Nature sets each being free...not accountable to one another.
b) Possession (our) prevents potential from expressing oneself. Nature generating being implies procession generating potential.
Tempting two losers to fight each other, then declaring one the winner over the other, while distracting both from having lost by fighting...that's how winning works.
Head or tails? Betting on either pledges ones choice to the coin maker, and coin/cuneus - "a wedge" implies a jew wedging itself in-between conflicting gentiles.