What would happen to a modern(ish) country is every power plant, bridge, and water treatment plant were destroyed inside a one week period?
The US could certainly do this. But it might not be advisable.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (38)
sorted by:
What's the necessity of dying?
a) Few suggest humanitarianism to distract many from being effect within cause by affection for one another.
b) Crisis implies a "turning point"...being implies delineation of life from inception towards point of death. Few suggest crisis-actors to shape turning points within the minds of many, like Turning Point USA for example.
If you see a child rapist, they need to die, since they're most likely to commit the same crime again, it becomes necessary to remove them from the planet.
That's your measuring mind establishing a conflict of reason aka want (child) vs not want (rapist), while ignoring that within nature ...you; me; the child and the rapist need to die. Why?
What if coming into being (be-come) and responding to be moved (re-move) necessitates motion?
What if coming into being (life) implies being removed (inception towards death)?
There's two definitions of "necessary." One delineates a requirement the other an inevitability. You're sort of waffling between the two, or somehow, don't see a distinction between the two.
I forced your hand and picked one. The one implying requirement; because, the person you were responding to was using that form.
What if you stopped talking like Deepak Chopra?
It's dude using AI. He occasionally breaks character and posts like a normal human.
Definition implies division (de) of finite (finit) within action (ion) aka division of finite (life) within action (inception towards death).
What's the opposite of necessary? Dispensable aka necessity (inception towards death) enabling division (life) aka the necessary process of dying making each life within dispensable.
tl;dr...There can be only one need (nature) for any want (being) within.
Delineation implies from origin towards outcome aka linear motion. Requirement implies the inquiring mind responding to being (life) moved from origin (inception) towards outcome (death).
Inevitability implies outcome orientation by ones inquiring mind, while ignoring origin. Inevitability implies avoidance of response-ability aka ignoring origin for outcome.
Avoidance tempts one into confrontation against another, hence into a circular conflict (confront vs avoid) while ignoring linear delineation (inception towards death) of being (life).
Choice (life) operates IN-BETWEEN balance (inception/death)...inclining to one of two sides imbalances choice.
Notice that while alive...one cannot perceive ones inception or death. Nature offers SIGHT...few suggest SIDE to tempt many to lose former within conflict for latter.
Distinction implies apart from ONE another...two implies ONE ignoring apartheid by counting together ONE + ONE.
How does nature inspire being to count together? How could a being count together without nature setting apart first?
Manually (manus; hand) picked one by choice. Only within balance can there be choice, and only the force of motion generates balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
There's a natural force dividing each being from one another, before a being can choose to artificially force each others hand.
Person aka per sonos (by sound) implies flowing sound forming instrument (mind structured within).
I try to describe how nature works...you describe artificial responses among beings within nature.
Implication (if/then) implies delineation. Reason (vs) implies circular confinement...if one chooses a side.
Any influencer suggesting information distracts form (life) from flow (inception towards death). Holding onto any suggested information (form) distorts perceivable inspiration (flow).
Free will of choice needs to resist the wanted temptation to hold onto suggested information; definition; meaning; denotation; explanation; interpretation; connotation; illustration; translation; terminology; semantics; exegesis etc.
Why? Because holding onto binds free will of choice.