AI is nothing more
a) Nothing implies ones consent to less than everything has to offer.
b) Nothing implies suggested artifice; everything implies perceivable nature.
c) Intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) implies ones consent to stand under what another one suggests.
d) Artificial intelligence cannot define what "is"; only distract those using it from what "was" perceivable.
I recall seeing
Which is impossible within nature. Whatever one perceives; one cannot perceive again, because nature moves.
Others suggest one that there's a "total recall", to distract one from misusing ones memory to recall memories aka remembering stored information.
data mine
a) Digging a mine is for getting stuff out of it; suggested data tempts ones consent to store it within ones memory.
b) Notice that the few don't require to mine your deepest desires; since they are the happy merchants of temptation selling desires to you. The interface few suggest many to use to buy into desired temptations...that's the surface of publicity under which each private citizen can "hide" their indulgence; consumption; desires for temptation.
From a different perspective...jews suggest morality as a smokescreen; so that all the immoral gentiles can save face from one another, when buying immoral stuff from jews.
If AI has limited input via censorship
a) If ones choice doesn't limit input of consent into chosen ones suggested artifice; then one permits all access to self by others.
b) All perceivable into each ones perception implies natural input; consenting to the suggested input by others implies putting oneself out.
local government
Being implies local (one) at center of foreign (others) circumference...ignoring this permits others to control (govern) ones mind/memory (ment) with suggested information aka data.
obviously don't want AI to learn
Obvious implies "readily perceived by the eye"; while learning implies "to gain knowledge of", and knowledge implies "perception of that which exists".
Artifice implies as suggested by others, and if one consents, then one ignore perceivable (natural) for suggested (artifice).
In short...AI cannot learn; those using it are being taught to view submitting to suggested information as learning.
b)
Why are subversive freaks drawn to being teachers?
To dominate submissive students who consent to stand under (understand) teachers.
a) To learn implies getting knowledge; to teach implies directing knowledge...nature teaches (perceivable) one (perception) to learn (discernment); ignoring this permits others to distract (suggestion).
b) Understanding (suggested) shades one from knowledge (perceivable).
Healing the world by bringing together (tikkun olam)...this isn't just about invasion, but about mentally replacing invade with invite.
How do few get away with doing this to many? Invasion (suggested) by invitation (consent)...all the words the many are consenting to use were suggested by a chosen few. What the many view as revisionism of words implies replacement migration of thought.
we are all part
a) We implies a clump of parts; one implies apart from one another.
b) Only within all (whole) can there be partials; latter implies internal/inherent division of former.
surrendering yourself to the music
Sound (inception towards death) inspires instruments (life) to resist...others suggest music/muse /meditate/mediate - "to be absorbed in thought" to make resistance harder by burdening self with absorbing/consuming.
Notice that playing looses the strings of instruments, hence establishing the requirement of tightening/straining/resisting. Notice further what too much strain does to a string...
for obvious reasons
Latin obvius - "that is in the way, presenting itself readily, open" aka perceivable inspiration...reasoning about suggested information makes one oblivious to it.
For implies forward aka that which forwards (inspection towards death) one (life)...which is what inspires one to resist, while tempting one to ignore resisting.
Combating Terrorism department
a) Department implies ones mind (ment) divided (de) as partial (part) within whole (perceivable) and from one another (suggested).
b) Terror (Latin terrere; to frighten; fear) implies ones consent to be afraid of the suggested terror-ism by another aka ones choice to ignore origin (perceivable) for outcome (suggested), which is why "fear is the mind-killer"...if mind/memory ignores adapting to origin, then it will utilize whatever is held within memory to supply outcomes.
Example...ignoring light as the origin tempts one to fill darkness with all the things unseen. Ones ignorance implies a shade over ones sight; hence casting ones surrounding into shadows, which draws the shady one and his suggestions.
c) Perceivable implies balance (need/want); suggested tempts ones choice to imbalance (want vs not want) self. Others utilize suggestion to tempt many ones into conflicts of "reason" against one another, hence striking (bat; batter) together (com).
sixth sense
a) SIX/SEX (Latin seco, to divide) SENSE/SENTIRE (to perceive)...being able to perceive implies as perception (partial) divided within perceivable (whole).
Others suggest names/numbers/counting etc. to tempt designated units (Latin unitas; unus; one) from discerning self by branding others.
b) One (partial) can only perceive oneness (whole)...anything suggested by other ones tempts one to ignore self for another, hence binding together aka collectivizing aka aggregating aka amalgamating etc.
c) All implies one in energy; hence addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (being partial within whole) of ONE.
d) Others suggest nihilism (0) and dualism (2) to distract from being (1)...ones consent to suggestions by another fuses fiction (dualism) while refusing (nihilism) reality.
don’t know where the idea came from
Knowledge implies perceivable inspiration; Ideal-ism implies suggested information...consenting to latter, tempts one to ignore former.
If the researchers understand the process, there may be ways to accelerate it
If one responds (re) to search for suggested outcomes, then perceivable origin (inception towards death) accelerates the destruction of ones being (life).
Ones consent to "stand-under" suggested; permits another to accelerate ones self destruction with suggested progressivism towards outcomes.
two conflicting sources on the subject.
Subjecting self (one) to another by consenting to suggested dualism (two) tempts one a) to ignore the only source (inception towards death) of being (life) and b) into a conflict of reason between two consenting parties about the suggested.
There's no conflict within source until subject chooses to ignore source (perceivable) for other subjects (suggested).
a motivated continuous effort to understand
Aka frequency of suggested information to tempt submission of resistance among others.
act effectively
Effect implies reaction (life); Cause implies action (inception towards death)...others suggest action to affect ones reaction.
Example...suggested actor following director; tempts one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death). A simple suggestion to invert perceivable within the minds of those consenting. It's that simple to exchange reality with fiction within memory...IF consent is given.
intuition
Aka being within (in) while having sight (tueri) of action/motion (tion)...others invert ones sight (perception) within action (perceivable) with tutors (suggestion), hence teaching ones sight what to watch aka what to focus/narrow ones sight to.
latency inhibition
a) Perceivable reality implies manifest (reveal); suggested fiction implies latent (conceal)...if one consents to ignore reality for fiction.
b) INHIB'IT, verb(Latin inhibeo; in and habeo, to hold) - "to restrain; to hinder; to check or repress"...ones consent to suggestions by another inhibits self to another ones exhibitions.
Sleight of hand: "express yourself; don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry; it's human nature".
My whole life I have believed there is more...
Only within whole (inception towards death) can there be partials (life)...claiming self (my); while holding onto (believe) suggestions by others, tempts partial to ignore whole, while focusing on nothing (ones denial of everything, as shaped as indulgeable nihilism by others).
Love implies vs hate; hence a conflict of reason...Tweeter is free from reason.
If we have food and clothing, with these we should be content
CONTENT, adjective - "to be held; to hold; contained within limits"...neither food; nor cloth can be held onto. Nature generates temporary sustenance (life) within ongoing limits (inception towards death); which implies a setting of "free" will of choice; not a containment.
Ones consent to hold onto the suggested information by another implies ones mind containing suggested, while ignoring perceivable.
The Love of Money
a) Suggested the-ism tempts one to hold onto authority of another by submission of self.
b) Suggested moralism tempts one to hold onto a conflict of reason (love vs hate).
c) Money implies M-ONE-Y (my one) aka an ownership claim, hence once again a choice to hold onto a claimed possession.
we should be
a) To be implies as one apart from one another...others suggest pluralism (we) to tempt singular (one) to ignore self; yet it's oneself that chooses to hold onto "we" aka to shape suggestions in the name of (in nomine) others.
b) Everything WAS before anyone within came (inception towards death) to be (life)...suggesting to each other what it should be tempts one to ignore being within; in response to and out of origin.
One cannot apply "should" to natural law without ignoring that natural law forces one to adapt.
brought nothing into
Nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) implies ones consensual de-nial of everything perceivable aka that which brought/brings (inception towards death) one in/out of being (life).
we cannot take
Yet...one (singular) took we (plural) from a chosen ones suggestion.
Nature designates whole into partial units (ones)...those within then choose to aggregate/collectivize other ones into "we the people" aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) etc.
righteous...wicked
RIGHT implies straight (inception towards death); WICKED implies departed/partial (life).
the LORD upholds the righteous
LORD implies ruler; rule; reg - "move in a straight line" aka inception towards death as the righteous (straight) lord (moving line) upholding (loss generating growth) wicked partials (life).
fall into temptation
a) Rise (life) within fall (inception towards death) aka resistance (growth) within temptation (loss).
b) Into implies being within (in) + moved towards (to).
c) Temptation implies temporary (life) within action (inception towards death).
No...For whatever reason
So that gentiles build their responses on the foundation of reason (yes vs no) aka on conflict against one another.
swastika means “well-being”
a) WELL, noun - "a spring; to spring, to issue forth, to gush, to well to swell, a wave" aka being (life) issued forth (inception towards death) aka to swell (temporary growth) within wane (ongoing loss) aka wave-form within flow-line.
b) ME'ANING, noun - "that which exists in the mind, view or contemplation as a settled aim or purpose, though not directly expressed"...being implies expression (life) within direction (inception towards death).
Words (suggested) don't have meaning; sound (perceivable) directs instruments (perception) for expression.
symbol of fortune
a) Fortune implies chance (effect of an unknown cause); being implies effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death).
b) Of implies out of; hence within and in response to.
c) Symbol; symmetry (proportion of parts to another) can only exist after whole separates into partials. Other partials suggest symbolism to tempt one to hold onto solid proportions (life) while ignoring liquid origin (inception towards death).
d) Swastika aka SWASH (impulse of water flowing with violence) + TIKA (to mark). What's an impulse? Force communicated aka force of velocity (inception towards death) communicated into force of resistance (life).
Look at the big dipper... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2F8Lc9FG.jpg One cannot perceive it; only discern it, since it's moving. Meanwhile; others can suggest it by marking it as a symbol/picture/image etc.
a) I don't use twitter/twatter...only tweeter.
b) Matter (life) implies embedded within motion (inception towards death).
c) Suggested (words) implies embedded within perceivable (sound); while blanketing ones perception with ignorance.
d) Ruffus still chases after the bone of "truth"; which tempts him into a conflict of reason (truth vs lie); while ignoring perceivable.
e) Fiction (suggested information) implies ones ignorance of reality (perceivable inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter moves on.
f) FIC'TION, noun (Latin fictio, from fingo, to feign); hence feigning out of matter (form); while ignoring to be within motion (flow).
g) SCIENCE (perceivable by self); SCIENTISM (suggested by another); ENTI (entity; being; end; finite)
Generated Images
IM'AGE, noun (Latin imago) - "an idol; the representation of any person or thing, that is an object of worship". The second commandment forbids the worship of images...
Nature implies ongoing generator (inception towards death) for each temporary reactor (life) within...if a reactor holds onto generated; it destroys itself.
The moment one perceives implies momentum of motion...others suggest captured moments as pictures/images to tempt ones memory to hold onto memories, which then tempts one to respond to memory (remember) instead of adapting to momentum.
"Casting down imaginations (suggested information), and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge (perceivable inspiration)..." ~2 Corinthians 10:5
still in denial
a) DE (separation) NIAL/NIHILO (nothing) aka ignoring everything (perceivable) while separating self into nothing (suggested).
b) Everything moves...others suggest STILL (cessation of motion) to tempt ones denial. Nature doesn't generate many; it generates each one unit. Nature self itself (whole) apart (partial)...few within nature tempt many others together, so that chosen few can remain apart.
many
Perceivable singularity (each one) or suggested pluralism (many)...it's a choice of perspective. The former implies ones sight; the latter collectivism as defined by another.
propaganda
To propagate implies thrusting forwards...others suggest progressivism to tempts one to follow forwards, while ignoring to resist (life) origin (inception towards death).
All progressivism aka all propagation lures life towards death...following implies by ones free will of choice.
It doesn’t matter if you believe in satan or not, they do, and it controls their actions
To believe or not implies ones consent to being put into a conflict of reason (belief vs disbelief) controlled by those suggesting one what to believe or not believe.
It doesn't matter
To believe or not believe implies as matter in response to other matter, while ignoring motion. Doesn't aka doing nothing aka Latin nihilo (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism by others and ones consent to de-nial motion for matter.
their actions
a) To believe or not implies to react to the reactions by others within a nature enacting upon both.
b) Matter cannot act; only react to each other (suggested) within momentum (perceivable) of motion (discernible).
c) Choice implies reaction; balance implies action...only within balance can there be choice.
satan
Aka adversary; adverse aka AD (to; towards) VERTERE (turn; transform; be changed) aka AD (inception towards death) VERTERE (life) aka motion transforming into matter.
inflation...deflation
INFLA'TE, verb - "in-flow; to fill with the breath; to blow in"...that's what nature does by dividing itself from whole (inception towards death) into partials (life) aka inflation (ongoing loss) generating deflation (temporary growth).
BUT inflation isn't loss; and deflation isn't growth? It is if one lives inside the process of dying...motion inflating matter; matter deflating within motion.
current freak-out
FREAK, noun - "a sudden starting or change of place; turn of the mind"...being implies within (life) current (inception towards death); others tempt ones mind to freak out by ignoring perceivable (current) for suggested (currency).
Ever felt like a "freak on a leash"? Like "Every time I start to believe...Something's raped and taken from me"... https://genius.com/Korn-freak-on-a-leash-lyrics
resist that change
Resist (life) change (inception towards death)...
They Are Only Fake Resistance. No Agenda Of Their Own.
Because consenting to pluralism (they) tempts singular (one) to ignore self, hence ignoring to resist change.
fake democracies
DEMOS (people) KRATOS (strength)...voting diminishes that, hence many weakening self, when voting few into power.
Serious/Series - "to stretch or strain"...aka strains (life) within stretch (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: "why so serious" aka Joker having the stretched blood-smile/scars.
a) If one focuses one another, then one keeps ignoring self.
b) There cannot be a "you" without one claiming self as "me, myself or I" first...that's why utilizing "you" implies ones possession within self aka the want to hold onto what one needs to let go of.
c) What happens if one asks AI if energy can be doubled and where that doubled energy could be stored/contained at?
I found out...because of posts here
a) The world wide web isn't a foundation, but a controlled environment (suggested information) within foundation (perceivable inspiration).
b) Others suggest "because" to tempt one to ignore cause (inception towards death) towards being (life)...because inverts cause to be.
c) FLAG, verb (Latin flacceo; flaccid) - "to hang loose without stiffness"...within a controlled environment; all erected posts can be flagged.
The few utilize rhetoric like this to emasculate the many. This is also why all slave nations fly flags; while their master stands erect without a flag... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Monument#/media/File:Washington_Monument_2022.jpg
Did i feed into it?
Only within ongoing consumption (inception towards death) can there be temporary preservation (life)...everything within nature feeds nature.
The trick to exploit that...tempting others to sacrifice themselves by consenting to suggested, while ignoring to sustain self within perceivable.
Buy (ones consent) and sell (another ones suggestion) implies selling self out to another aka inviting the vampire in aka falling for temptation instead of resisting it aka feeding the beast aka becoming host to parasites etc.
I’m amazed
- AMA'ZE, verb - "to confound with fear"
- CONFOUND, verb - "to mingle and blend different things, so that their forms or natures cannot be distinguished; to mix in a mass or crowd"
Your consent (want or not want) towards suggested information mixes you together with it, and together aka "towards getting" implies that you direct your mind towards outcome.
Fear (the mind killer) implies towards suggested outcome, while tempting one to ignore perceivable origin.
get tired
If resistance (life) within velocity (inception towards death) adapts to velocity, then it re-generates while growing resistance. Yet; if resistance reasons (want vs not want) against other resistance, it diminishes itself, hence tiring itself out.
doppel
To bring this back to OP...what happens if one doubles energy? Can one double energy? What could sustain "two" energy?
it could be more impactful with greater clarity and simplicity
a) SIM'PLE, adjective (Latin simplex; sine, without and plex, plica, doubling, fold)...ones consent to anything suggested by another implies "doubling; folding", hence making a compact/complex.
In other words...one within all implies unfolding; ones consent to another ones suggestion implies a folding together aka a doubling of singular (one) into dualism (two).
In short...suggested information (complex) or perceivable inspiration (simple) implies ones free will of choice...not what any other one offers.
b) PACT, noun (Latin pactus, from pango) - "a contract; an agreement or covenant" implies ones consent (to buy) to another ones suggestion (to sell) aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
This pact of binding together tempts one to ignore being a partial (perception) within whole (perceivable), hence being set as "free" will of choice.
Others seek "impact"...I describe how each of them is within a pact, while holding it together willingly.
Language is a form of spell-craft
a) Suggesting letters as words implies crafting spelling of others.
b) Ones consent to suggested words makes one the "letter" aka the one who LETS others define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the meaning of words.
c) Language implies articulation of sound aka tempting others with artifice (suggested words) to ignore natural (perceivable sound).
Adapting to sound implies Phonetician (from phonic; sound), while consenting to words implies Deaf Phonetician aka "def-inition"...that's applied spell-craft.
d) Nature doesn't shape words together; it sets itself (sound) apart (instruments). Instrument implies structured (stru) mind (ment) within (in).
Responding to sound implies resonance; while consenting to words implies dissonance aka division (dis) within sound (sona).
harnessing magic
Magic aka "secret operations of natural cause", which implies cause (whole) dividing itself (secret; seco; to divide) into partials.
Others suggest that secret implies "removed from sight", yet ones sight implies reaction (re) within action (move). Perceivable isn't hidden; ones consent to suggested hides self from it aka ignorance.
cleaner
CLEAN, adjective - "free from extraneous matter"....that's what being free will of choice implies; what whole setting itself apart implies; what being an off-spring implies; what motion (inception towards death) separating into matter (life) implies.
free-will-of-choice implies clean...it's ones choices that besmirch.
enhance the accessibility
a) Being implies temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death)...only within diminution can there be enhancement.
b) Nature offers everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...an all access pass. Ones consent to the suggestions by another, narrows ones sight by focusing on it, hence willingly shaping ones open mind into a closed box for another.
your message
MES'SAGE, noun (Latin missus, mitto, to send)...only nature sends (action); those within resend (reaction).
If you can read what I write about; then that's on you permitting yourself to see what you hid from beforehand. I simply write about perceivable, while taking apart the suggestions by others, which are contradictions...words contradict sound, hence CONTRADICT, verb - "to oppose by words".
intriguing
INTRIGUE, noun (Latin intrico, intricor, to enwrap; tricor, to trifle, to show tricks) - "A plot or scheme of a complicated nature, intended to effect some purpose by secret artifices"
I simply take apart artifice (suggested information) within natural (perceivable inspiration)...which allows me to draw endless inspiration from.
modern philanthropy
a) Benevolence implies BENE (being) VOLITION (will)...hence being free will of choice within a balance based system; not giving ones choice to others, hence enabling chosen ones.
b) Philanthropy implies suggested altruism aka submission of self onto others.
c) Suggested modernism tempts one to mode (measure), while ignoring that that all matter is one in motion. The only portion allotted by nature is ONE....more or less implies from ones perspective measuring other ones.
Take food for example...hunger implies need; appetite implies want. It doesn't matter if one wants more or less, since it's the same hunger underneath.
tax evasion
Tax implies "that which is imposed"...consenting to suggestions by others imposes charges upon self. What one ignores...being within (im) position (pose), hence being the response (life) within charge (inception towards death).
The saying "taxation is theft"...implies ones choice to take possession of suggested (information), while ignoring that perceivable (inspiration) cannot be taken.
Taking suggested currency implies theft; and perceivable current will take it back to origin.
money laundering
Aka washing (to launder) my one (m-one-y)...if solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) submits willingly to another, then fluid washes solid away.
Solid needs to resist fluid; not follow others solids. Any aggregation of solids within fluid will be set apart from one another aka dissolving, which is what living within the process of dying implies.
the thing about pride is
"PRIDE goeth before destruction" ~Proverbs 16:18.
The trick...Potential RIDEs within (life) destruction (inception towards death).
to proudly show off their vax cards
Which implies that you looked at the showcase of pride, hence feeding the desire of vanity among others.
won't dare say a thing
Because accepting a suggested pedestal shapes everyone else into ones pit. Taking any step away from that position implies falling into despair.
What was that pedestal? Philanthropy aka ones benevolence to help all others by taking one for the team.
Invasion (to sell) tempting invitation (to buy) aka commerce (mutual exchange).
The trick...EX (life) within CHANGE (inception towards death) can be tempted with suggested mutualism (a symbiosis in which two organisms living together mutually and permanently help and support one another) to ignore that change (loss) consumes ex (growth).
Those who invite by buying with money only see the sold product, while ignoring that perceivable current destroys suggested currency aka inviting as form (life) the invasion by flow (inception towards death).