Also probably that older people don't stress their heart as much because they don't do sports or screw around as much.
So young men might take their heart to 90% max on the soccer field whereas older people only to 60% max on the treadmill. While they both have damaged hearts, older people may be less likely to get to the point where the heart seizes up and they fall over dead.
Doesn't mean there's not other bad consequences like blood pressure, lower lifespan from damaged older hearts.
It's probably more like they get the injection to their arm fat instead of their muscle. Less circulation, less immune response inside fat rolls, takes longer to identify and kill spike-making fat cells.
But I'm not a doctor that's just a theory.
- mRNA injected into muscle
- Interstitial fluid drains into lymph
- Immune cells in lymph nodes turned into spike factories
- Immune system learns it own self is an invader, or if lucky just some percent of immune system is destroyed.
It's not rocket science. There's nothing in the vaccine that makes it only taken up by muscle.
It was in the Weinstein podcast where the 3rd guy was annoying and screechy.
He said he waited to see if there were signs of ADE then later took it so that he could travel easier. Also pretty sure he said he wasn't against the technology in general, just the application. I'm thinking like if they can sequence the particular HIV mutant you have and make an RNA custom made for you - something basically impossible with traditional vaccines.
Sounds plausible for me that he decided it was worth the risk for himself individually at an advancing age and to travel, but against mandates, censorship, and giving it to healthy younglings.
It's a stunt to get Elon to go up in his rocket - which he'll never do because he knows firsthand how rushed the design is and dangerous because he demanded they go fast and break things - or troll him for not doing it.
The TCP connection has to be a unique identifier -- that's how the packets get to your computer instead of a different one. The identifier is (local IP, local port, remote IP, remote port). See wikipedia TCP. The only way it doesn't uniquely identify a browsing session is if you connect through a proxy.
To read about how Google forced the industry to rubber stamp HTTP/2 search for "Poul-Henning Kamp" the main guy opposed to accepting it as-is (also a computer science wizard, even 2004-era Google would be a step down for him), ietf-http-wg, SPDY (Google's internal name for HTTP/2). I don't know there's a particular summary of how it went down.
The connection to google-analytics being left open for half an hour you can test yourself with Wireshark. I last tested it a few years ago in Chrome so possibly Chromium or Brave protects you by not keeping it open. There was a bug report on chromium or bugzilla where Google said they did this on purpose for "performance", but I can't find it. I may have been censored.
In any case what is an unhinged rant going to accomplish.
If you are looking for a Chrome conspiracy though...
Google forced the industry to rubber stamp their HTTP/2.0 protocol and along with that the TCP connection to google-analytics is kept open longer than 30 minutes whereas it was under 6 minutes previously in HTTP/1.1. This TCP connection is itself, because of how the internet works, a unique identifier for your browsing session. Before this they changed Chrome so that all domains reuse the same TCP connection for google-analytics.
Google also made it so that the only way to drag links and not open new tabs in Chromiums is to drop it in a tiny space over the current tab in the tabs list... sometimes a 50x10 pixel area or smaller. It's basically impossible to have one window open that you read, and another that you drag links to just glance at to see what they are without opening lots and lots of tabs.
Well, if any one of the tabs has google-analytics and refreshes or fetches anything then it keeps your tracking connection to google-analytics open for another 30 minutes. More tabs, more chance to keep the tracker from timing out. And they've engineered the UI to make it hard to not create new tabs.
I don't see how these things taken together could be anything other than a deliberate attempt to create a tracker, stealthily embedded into the protocol itself.
But Israel has like 80% vaccination, so if the vaccinations were not doing anything you'd naively expect 80% of the infections, not 40% claimed in that article.
So if 40% of delta cases are in the vaccinated then clearly the vaccine is doing something... 80% reduced to 40%. On top of that the vaccinated are probably carelessly taking more risks and getting exposed more often, so if you were vaccinated and taking the same precautions as unvaccinated that 40% should be even lower for you personally.
Most of the time vaccines work and most of the time they don't seriously harm people. The question is just how many people are they hurting and for you is it a good risk to take vs ivermectin, vitamins, and just generally staying health.
There are many possible explanations for more deaths in the heavily vaccinated >50.
For example, evolutionary pressure could have made it into measles-like hyper transmissible, so it spreads even among the ~10% vaccinated that didn't develop antibodies.
You must have more data than reported to determine what is really going on - which is probably why they neglect to include that data.
The report and analysis does not account for total number of vaccinated vs unvaccinated people.
So >50 yr there's not many delta deaths in the unvaccinated because there aren't many unvaccinated in that age group.
The reports says the vaccines may be around 10% less effective against Delta, meaning they are still fairly effective against it.
If you are not going to get the vaccines you should get ivermectin in case you get infected, especially in UK where you can't find a doctor to proscribe ivermectin because of universal healthcare.
You can't actually program something to wait until your death unless you are wearing something that can monitor your vitals
You and I can't because we're not famous.
McAfee just needs a bot that searches Google News for "McAfee suicide" and some threshold. In a sense you could say that all reporters are the 'switch' part of the deadman's switch.
So they put you in prison for 6 months so you have to contact your lawyer and tell him how to reset it or your dead man's switch becomes a hangman's noose and you're killing yourself.
Imagine how you would create a dead man's switch that you did not ever have to do anything with - no reset, no service payment, nothing - for 10 years at a time and would spill the beans a week after you'd been killed.
McAfee was also smart and savvy enough to use blockchain AND create an automated deadman's switch to troll Google News for "McAfee dead" and release it automatically.
The reason all these deadman's switches haven't panned out isn't because they didn't exist, it's because it's really hard to make one that can't be found out and shut down before anybody gets the message.
If you have to reset it every few months they just monitor your traffic and find it. If it's checking a particular twitter then they beat it out of you and shut down the account. If you remember where the server is they beat it out of you and go turn it off.
But McAfee was so paranoid he may have even had like a suicide tooth or way to die before they could torture it out of him - or his brain may have been so fried from bath salts he couldn't remember where it was. So this could likely pan out.
Also the power usage is because mining a block gives you ~$300k, which pays for the electricity.
In 10 years mining a block will only be worth $75k at today's valuation, in 20 years only $10k because the value of the blocks cuts in half every so often.
Basically the bitcoin energy problem will solve itself in a short while unless it explodes in value. So bitcoin shooting up is the thing the globalists care about - not the environment - and that's because if you can park your money in bitcoin and even have it grow in value they can't steal it through devaluation and money printing.
I think another purpose of this is so that the death rate stays high.
Now that people are vaccinated they can't just label any regular death as Covid, so the fatality rate would fall. So by only counting high-severity cases as Covid they boost the fatality rate and keep people scared.
Look at the tracking and in the US the fatality rate has increased from ~1% last august to ~2% today -- with basically every old person vaccinated, better treatments and procedures. This doesn't make any sense unless the denominator of low-severity or misdiagnosed infections is way less.
In fact, I bet hospitals were already not reporting high Ct counts as covid before this announcement.
Try learning how bitcoin works.
The amount of energy used is arbitrarily determined by the demand for being a miner and that's currently dominated by the ~$300k value inherent to each block, which halves every few years of mining.
Less value in a block, less mining, less energy used. It's built into the bitcoin protocol to reduce power use over time.
You got that backwards. MacFarlane is shaming Damon for knowing and still working with / supporting those people, not that he was offending with them. That's why he wasn't coming (to the meeting).