You are welcome sir :) Here is one about the covid shots if you are interested https://www.bitchute.com/video/Yw7gyWKqmrMj/
There is a video compilation out there somewhere of dems saying they won't take Trump's vaccine, complaining it was rushed to market, inadequate safety testing etc. Then as soon as biden took over they absolutely loved it and couldn't wait to force it on everyone. No jab no job etc.
I never claimed who did it, only that it happened. It's impossible to say from only the physical evidence of the building who did it.
But the nist report is the modern day magic bullet theory, government scientists paid to come to a conclusion. An entire organisation filled with thousands of experts was created dedicated to refuting their garbage, and that was the architect and engineers of 911.
Nist claimed building 7 collapsed primarily due to fire. If that was really the case probably thousands of similar buildings around the world would have needed emergency updates to fix serious safety defects, but this never happened. No building codes were modified.
Lol again I never made that argument. In any case wtc 7 was a text book controlled demolition. They blew the central columns first to insure it collapsed in on itself without damaging the adjacent structures. Then it collapsed at free fall speeds in a symmetrical fashion. It was a professional job.
Eyewitness testimony from the day saying the buildings was blown up is not a complete nothing burger. You are choosing to ignore it because it doesn't fit with your government science narrative. Nist never even tested for explosives nor did they test the explosion hypothesis. They also couldn't explain the molten metal or iron spheres.
What? I never said anything about the cia or mossad lol. Only presenting evidence that was recorded on the day showing it was blown up.
Also Nist never explained the collapse of the building nor did they even try. They claimed column 47 failed and then after that collapse was inevitable. No serious expert who understands physics would be able to explain a symmetric simultaneous collapse at free fall speeds. This is why nist didn't even try.
Even cnn reported live on the day that the building was about to blow up https://youtu.be/cU_43SwWD9A
At some point will realise the obvious, the wtc buildings were not immune from the basic laws of physics.
He called into a radio show some years later seemingly unaware of this official version and recalled how the building was taken down in a controlled implosion https://youtu.be/gNIzC4a8rLs
These buildings have massive structural redundancy, they can support on average 3-5x their own weight. In a controlled demolition it's common for 20% of the core columns to be cut to weaken these structures before they are demolished. Nist tried to claim column 47 failed then the entire building just collapsed into its own foot print at the speed of gravity (ie freefall). The premise is absurd and violates the basic laws of physics. In any case we know it was blown up due to eye witness testimony. Ron insana if I recall from abc news was there when it happened and he testified it was blown up deliberately.
Foundring posts here sometimes