This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
These buildings have massive structural redundancy, they can support on average 3-5x their own weight. In a controlled demolition it's common for 20% of the core columns to be cut to weaken these structures before they are demolished. Nist tried to claim column 47 failed then the entire building just collapsed into its own foot print at the speed of gravity (ie freefall). The premise is absurd and violates the basic laws of physics. In any case we know it was blown up due to eye witness testimony. Ron insana if I recall from abc news was there when it happened and he testified it was blown up deliberately.
I found this clip of Ron, nowhere does he say anything about the towers being deliberately, nor does he mention tower 7 at all.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2c4DRR_150
He called into a radio show some years later seemingly unaware of this official version and recalled how the building was taken down in a controlled implosion https://youtu.be/gNIzC4a8rLs
This is already trash evidence.
Even cnn reported live on the day that the building was about to blow up https://youtu.be/cU_43SwWD9A
At some point will realise the obvious, the wtc buildings were not immune from the basic laws of physics.
Speaking of "trash evidence"...
I keep trying to click that link, but alas.. I guess we're all just dining on your say-so today, huh?