This is a great video debunking the popular “Truther” claims about Building 7. https://youtu.be/7PpsCCTMP8w
The points brought up in the video are:
• “Why wasn’t building 7 ever mentioned in the 911 Commission Reports?”**
This is because the Commission Reports were specifically about the actual targets of the attacks, not collateral damage like WTC 7. It was however investigated in a NIST report which is here https://www.nist.gov/publications/final-report-collapse-world-trade-center-building-7-federal-building-and-fire-safety-0
• “How could it collapse if it never was hit by a plane?”**
Pretty simple, huge chunks of burning debris crashed in through the top of WTC 7 from the towers. This not only caused massive structural damage, but also caused a massive fire to spread throughout WTC 7.
Truthers deceitfully only ever show pictures of it from the south, where it was not struck by debris, making it seem like it was a perfectly fine building that collapsed out of nowhere, but images of it from the north side clearly show the massive damage WTC 7 sustained from the falling debris
• “Building 7 collapsed in free fall out of nowhere! This is only possible through controlled demolition!”**
This is just an outright lie. Footage of the attack clearly shows building 7 folding in on itself over the course of hours before finally collapsing. All footage of the “free fall” conveniently only ever starts right as the building falls, it never shows the footage before of the penthouse caving in.
Remember, the truth doesn’t fear investigation.
He called into a radio show some years later seemingly unaware of this official version and recalled how the building was taken down in a controlled implosion https://youtu.be/gNIzC4a8rLs
This is already trash evidence.
Even cnn reported live on the day that the building was about to blow up https://youtu.be/cU_43SwWD9A
At some point will realise the obvious, the wtc buildings were not immune from the basic laws of physics.
How does him saying "its about to blow up" at all in anyway prove that it was a controlled demolition conducted by Mossad/CIA ect?
The NIST report and all evidence concerning that are on my side though, not yours.
What? I never said anything about the cia or mossad lol. Only presenting evidence that was recorded on the day showing it was blown up.
Also Nist never explained the collapse of the building nor did they even try. They claimed column 47 failed and then after that collapse was inevitable. No serious expert who understands physics would be able to explain a symmetric simultaneous collapse at free fall speeds. This is why nist didn't even try.
Speaking of "trash evidence"...
I keep trying to click that link, but alas.. I guess we're all just dining on your say-so today, huh?
The link to the youtube video I posted contains it. My post is a recap of the points made in that video. Again, eye witness testimony is already trash evidence, but 18 years after the fact is laughable.
And so Myles Poser, with his 160k followers and only a quarter million views over eleven years, is what you consider your gold standard.
Ok