1
dukey 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it has worked for a good chunk of the population. They have poisoned the Trump brand in the mind's of a lot of people.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Normies are still convinced Trump is controlled opposition, even though the entire establishment has been attacking him constantly from about every angle possible for 4+ years now. I've never in my life seen the media, the intelligence agencies, etc go after 1 man like this.

by DrLeaks
2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it sets an insane president. Being able to win a trial with absolutely no evidence other than you claiming it was true. In this scenario everyone is going to claim trump raped them so they can collect 5 million dollars.

by DrLeaks
5
dukey 5 points ago +5 / -0

She claimed that the entire floor of the department building where the lingerie section was, was empty, no staff, no security, no other customers that could verify her story. Imagine winning a case like this with absolutely no evidence other than some bat shit crazy lunatic saying it was true.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you had actually been raped at no point would you be saying rape is sexy or that it was a fantasy. Even Anderson Cooper is surprised.

1
dukey 1 point ago +1 / -0

He has some sort of speech disorder, which is a shame because a lot of what he says is really important, especially with regards to vaccines.

4
dukey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually if you look into his history he spent most of his career trying to get mercury out of the environment and vaccines. I don't agree with everything he says but he's not an establishment shill. Quite a conundrum though. He says this whilst announcing he wants to run for president.

4
dukey 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty sure they lived with FBI informants too. Obvious patsies.

9
dukey 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not sure why you got the downvotes. But they never used CGI for those movies, it was all scale models, or physically building the sets, which in many cases can look better than CGI.

7
dukey 7 points ago +7 / -0

In order for a building to 'fail' like that (ie symmetrical collapse) every single core column would have to have failed at exactly the same time which is basically impossible. Steel framed buildings normally have massive structural redundancy. They can normally support 2 to 5 times their own weight. When a Steel framed building is rigged for demolition it's very common for them to cut up to 20% of the core columns to weaken the building before it's blown up. These buildings don't magically collapse if a single columns fails as NIST tried to suggest.

8
dukey 8 points ago +8 / -0

An important point to note is these are graphs of mortality and not incidence. But yes it's true the mortality of most of these diseases dropped as much as 99% before vaccines for them were introduced.

6
dukey 6 points ago +6 / -0

I had plenty if Karens literally hyperventilating because I refused to muzzle.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

as a matter of fact, not a single "survivor" account mentions ANY of the symptoms of chronic or acute cyanide poisoning:

Why would their be survivors of gassing? That is extremely unlikely. There is video of the actual gas champers they used, along with the canisters of Zyklon B.

2
dukey 2 points ago +2 / -0

And, no. Some YT video isn’t “proof”. Any verbal testimony is “hearsay”.

It's not random video. That is video footage of the actual camps as they were found immediately after the war, including the people in it and the conditions they lived in. It clearly documents their torture, murder etc.

Any verbal testimony is “hearsay”.

Hearsay means heard it from someone else. That makes it a secondary source. The people who were at the camps lived it. They are a primary source of information.

4
dukey 4 points ago +4 / -0

What point are you trying to make? Mass murder was basically government policy in Germany. And it actually started in the medical industry, more specifically with psychiatry which systematically exterminated the mentally handicapped. I don't believe the 'supply lines' argument holds water because the there is countless footage of people in the local towns being marched to the camps to actually see what went on there, and these people were well nourished. They generally killed prisoners with 6 different methods, shooting them, starvation, deliberately exposing them to the elements, beating them, lethal amounts of drugs and gas. I am not saying the allies didn't commit atrocities, they absolutely did. The fire bombing of Dresden, where they literally burnt out the people, women, children, everyone. Listen to this poor old fucker that was involved in it: https://youtu.be/suOBgOk1SgY?t=95 . Japan also went crazy with committing atrocities in ww2.

3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you ever watch the concentration camp footage shown at the Nuremberg trials? It's pretty fucking grim. How many actually died? Who knows exactly. You can watch the footage here: https://youtu.be/TCy02267X8A

Not to downplay what happened but no one talks about all the other people that were also killed. I'm pretty sure it started with the people mentally and physically retarded. People that were clogging up institutions .. were first to be murdered.

by pkvi
3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your title in unreadable garbage

3
dukey 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know this is a shitpost, but like, they actually replaced the Queen of England with a black person in Bridgerton.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›