Cell phones, near the head, were dangerous since the 3G days.
I use speakerphone whenever possible.
put body-side shielding in your pocket.
His face at 7:23 says it all.
That was the loudest silence I have ever heard.
Why are the "experts" the last to know?
The US used to have 60 million bison.
every time I light my barbecue pit with starter fluid
it melts to the ground
$$$$ surgery on people less likely to die.
Buffet is more of a frugal tightwad. Shrewd business trader.
He is not building rocket ships to Mars.
IMO --- the obvious
He got mega rich a little too fast to be normal --- like Gates, Epstein, Pelosi
Buffet and Trump are more believable (even though Buffet is a goddamn liberal).
I would argue that using your logic, we 'fly' submarines under the water.
Small aerodynamic models are often tested in moving water because of the Reynolds number. A vacuum doesn't work.
There is a submarine that "flies down" in the water instead of using ballast.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/03/06/eod.luxury.submarines/index.html
calculator
There are XYZ coordinates
There are XYZ velocities
There are XYZ accelerations
There are XYZ rotational coordinates
There are XYZ rotational velocities
There are XYZ rotational accelerations
If we find that no one on the planet can recreate what Neil Armstrong did,
that would be a big fat red flag.
...and NASA wanted to shut down the LLRV/LLTV program....
WHY would NASA want to do that?
That just didn't make any sense if you were going to do a man guided moon landing.
actual physical simulations
The ones he crashed? --- using the same gravity he practiced with?
have only done that in video games.
Neil Armstrong did not have modern day video games
knowledge in orbital mechanic to use.
That was one of the very first simulations written, when ported to a pdp-11 led to the development of Unix
IMO it would be the ultimate test that would be easy to do.
settle it for all
Someone who could fly the Neil Armstrong Challenge
would give it plausibility.
I have a picture of bigfoot and elvis
I am still on the fence.
I have factored out things to make the landing possible
I have factored out things to make the hoax possible
It still comes down to the skill required to make the final approach and landing possible with what NASA had at the time.
Here's the rub --- It would be easy to simulate. The (easy version) simulators I have tried are next to impossible. I am a pilot. I have test flown experimental (never been built before) home-brew aircraft. I have landed some with control reversal. I consider myself an amateur test pilot.
...but fuck -- the lunar seat-of-your-pants landing is hard for me to believe.
So --- I present the Neil Armstrong lunar lander challenge --- still no takers
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hqafAzugooY