Practice 30 moon landings with a simulator.
Change the gravity setting and successfully do it on the 31st try.
When Neil Armstrong did it, the final approach and landing were done "by the seat of your pants" --- there was no computer used. The de-orbit burn did use a primitive computer. The final approach and landing did not use a computer.
The craft was not flying (no air), it was translating.
There was no aerodynamic stability. - The was no aerodynamics.
When you successfully do it, post a screenshot. :)
I have no problem imagining myself making a perfect 3 point landing. prove me wrong.
I think you maybe just do not understand just how robust the craft was and the suits.
6 missions in three years and we never need to ever ever look back again, nothing to see we been there done that.
Who would need a computer to land a easy mode craft like that? it basically drives itself.
Have you ever landed a real plane?
The lunar lander used no computers.
The "suits" don't enter into it.
I am a pilot and have landed planes over 50 years.
You are funny -- go land a real airplane.
GO TRY A LUNAR LANDER
No one has taken this challenge yet.
Pffft, I have flown pretty much every single plane man has created.
I am an ace pilot, I can land anything on anything, I could fly.
I am pretty sure based on this alone, I could fly that ol' lander right thru the eye of the needle.
Look, nothing can compare to the total hours spent in my favorite flight sim.
hahaha, relax bud. I am pretty sure noone can take you up on the moon lander challenge.
The lunar lander was not flying --- no dihedral stability, no terminal velocity limit
It was translating --- not flying.
Now, flying is translating. The measurement of forces against the craft and being in control of reactions to those forces make you a pilot flying a translating craft.
So in my books, if it has velocity and you can steer, it has no wheels, nor friction from dense physical matter then you are flying it.
I would argue that using your logic, we 'fly' submarines under the water.