Practice 30 moon landings with a simulator.
Change the gravity setting and successfully do it on the 31st try.
When Neil Armstrong did it, the final approach and landing were done "by the seat of your pants" --- there was no computer used. The de-orbit burn did use a primitive computer. The final approach and landing did not use a computer.
The craft was not flying (no air), it was translating.
There was no aerodynamic stability. - The was no aerodynamics.
When you successfully do it, post a screenshot. :)
The ones he crashed? --- using the same gravity he practiced with?
Well, I cannot play devils advocate forever here. I am not of the belief that the moon stuff went off as described. I cannot actually understand the loss of all the related materials and that alone forces me to hesitate in accepting anything.
Continue to add the constant stream of lies since then, I just reject anything that cannot be proven directly. So anything that is based on ideas or spin in a way then its just conjecture.
If we find that no one on the planet can recreate what Neil Armstrong did,
that would be a big fat red flag.
I don't think so no, he had a calculator and also a few base instruments, so with moderate talent this is how it is done.
If you know your vector and your velocity, then you should be in control.
There are XYZ coordinates
There are XYZ velocities
There are XYZ accelerations
There are XYZ rotational coordinates
There are XYZ rotational velocities
There are XYZ rotational accelerations