Just try to talk with this toy using non-existing words.
are expecting neural networks to be fantabulous replacements to workers just because they use the term "AI".
Everything that is named by them "AI" is ANNs. There no any single other thing that could be named "AI". So, always, when you see they use term "AI", in is 100% ANN.
All other research on something that could be eventually resemble any intelligence is heavily curtailed long ago. They have specific reasons for that, but it is another rabbit hole.
A chat bot will take your order at the drive through.
Until something unexpected happen. Oversimplyfing that problem - ANN have no any means to understand that normal customer will never order 1000 hamburgers. So, owner of such drive through will have to hire somebody with apropriate knowledge of matter to look after "AI". There still be same workers with same skills to be competent enough to judge "AI" "decisions", just doing another job.
We had fully automatic cafes in USSR times. Vending machines with cakes, donut cooking machines with vending frontend serving hot donuts, coffe/tea machines, machines that wash crockery and so on. Everything worked fine witout any "AI". There was absolutely no any need for any "AI" for that task at all. But there still was same amount of workers to load machines, to look for them, to service them, to resolve customer problems and so on. And no "AI" could resolve that and replace that workers even now. IDK, it is insane how quickly people forgot something that goes out of their range of view. Automatic cafes is a distant past. They are not something new, and they do not free workforce. Moreover, automatic cafes demand more advanced tech and more skilled personnel than regular ones. In USSR it was not a problem, but in the modern world it is. Personnel, apart knowing regular cafe workflow, had to be familiar with advanced tech and automatisation and have an ability to make more complex decisions.
That nowdays "AI" shit have nothing to do with what you talk about. It is purely a way to hide behind non-existing "AI". They train ANN to produce results they want, and then "You see, it was not us, it was AI decision! We have nothing to do with that! AI knows better!". Simple as that.
The language parsing/analysis of the chatbots is actually more impressive than the AI
It is not impressive at all. Stupid very old IRC chatbot Elisa from early 90s written in perl does not differ a lot. And it was not even neural network, just a small script with very simple algorithms who could, unlike chatbots, "self-educate" during conversation and hold a sensible dialogue with user. And despite it was heavily English language dependent, I was able to get sensible dialogues in Russian too. Kind of, because order of words in Russian sentence does not really matter, so that dim the picture a lot.
There is nothing impressive when you feed terabytes of questions and anwsers pairs from real internet conversations, and see something similar as a result. That is exactly now neural networks work. No any AI magic at all. Chatbot does not understand you. It does not even learn from you. It just calculate most probable reply from known replies for the question that is closest to yours.
You are mistaking a neural network with a general intelligence.
If you are not aware, "AI" other than neural networks does not exist. In the past, there was huge efforts applied to computer science and programmer startups to shut down anything connected with expert systems, self-categorisation, inventing algorithms, and other stuff that is different from neural networks and magnitudes of order closer to intelligence than stupid neural networks.
Fucking chatbot is a dumb neural network that trained on internet content that just show you compilation of most probable phrases it was trained on suitable for your request. Nothing more.
And ive met bottom workers that arent as smart as the chatbots.
Unlike chatbots they could deal somehow with something they never met.
First. There are no "AI" exist at all. Thing they pose as "AI" have nothing to do with "Intelligence". It is very simple and absolutely dumb thing that just "produce" most probable result from all data it was trained on. Nothing more.
Second. Even bottom tier workers have some intelligence unlike that fake "AI". They at least could identify new situations when something go wrong. That fake "AI" can't do that because it wasn't trained on that new situations because they are new. Fake "AI" is incapable to deal with new things in principle. So even lowest possible tiers of workers could not be replaced with that fake "AI". There is a lot of issues of that kind even with simple automation, and with fake "AI" things will be much worse, because propaganda narratives about "AI" create an illusion of fake "AI" abilities. Misguided bu that propaganda will inevitably fuck things up.
Third. When that stupid thing with "AI" eventually fail, the number of bottom tier workers necessary to fix all that mess and try to somehow continue production will be much more than before because when you replace one worker with a robot, and then a robot fails, you need more than one worker to replace robot, because all stuff needed to make one worker enough for that operation was removed when robot was installed,
It will be opposite, really. As soon as they will try to really use something their dumb neural networks will produce, there will appear a huge demand for those who will be able to fix all that mess. And no, script monkeys they will try to replace with neural network will not be able to fix it. They will need much more skilled and much more expensive professionals to repair (or rebuild from scratch) things they broke.
Artificial neural networks are too dumb to account for consequences of using one or another solution. And any tech is not just combining random patterns, but also thinking about how one solution will interfere with others and so on.
We will see a lot of circus with solutions like that - https://acidcow.com/pics/64081-the-most-epic-construction-fails-ever-48-pics.html
You could easily make parallels into any other tech you know.
Thank you. That could be the real cause for that circus. At least may be some chips will fall to the tables of Rwandians while their government will saw that loan to fill the pockets. Or even may be Rwandian government are thieves with honor and will build few roads for their people.
Exactly. We don't know whose money that BlackRock/Vanguard invested in some public company we interested in. So that thread to world owners effectively cut.
Reading such news about all that CBDC/ID/etc in poor countries, I always find myself thinking about technical details of that shit and see huge inconsistencies.
To widely use something digital whole population need an internet access and smartphone. And not a cheap one, since applications for that digital crap are enormous bloatware with all modern bells and whistles that would not work normally on a cheap $50 Chineese smartphone. But even that $50, with monthly dataplan fee is a huge money for people in a poor country. Poor country, but everybody have internet access and advanced modern smartphone. That does not fit together at all.
Digital ID, theoretically could be made in a form of cheap RFID card or whatever. But again, you will need relatively expensive reader + computer + internet in every place where that Digital ID could be used. Without that, they will have to print name/photo/whatever on that Digital ID cards, but there will be no any sense in Digital ID, since it will not differ in use from regular ID or passport or what they use for identification now.
I didn't not check, but may be some IMF or other terrorist organisation offer large loans for implementing all that digital crap? So poor countries just took them and imitate enthusiastic activity of implementing that crap that will never really work.
Hardly that tiny shares could compare with ~40% of Murdoch. He could also own more that 50% through proxies including BlackRock/Vanguard.
BlackRock/Vanguard/whatever are just a cloak to hide real owners, who could hide behind other private proxy funds, holdings, banks, corporations and so on.
Vanguard/BlackRock are just an entities everybody interested could point to like "they own whole World" and think the job of uncovering owners of the World is done. But its not. It is a distraction. Real persons who use such entities as a proxy are hiding behind that curtain (or more likely behind chains of such curtains). It could be uncomfortable for some TPTB memeber to openly own most assets in the world, they don't like attention. As far as I understand, publicl companies have to disclose their shareholders (or shareholders have to disclose what shares public companies they own, does not matter,really). So if you want to hide, it is logical to use some private company who will buy you a share under its name, and will keep your name as a private client in secret. It's even not a big deal who own that Vanguard/BlackRock things (yes, they highly likely a persons trusted by TPTB, but hardly TPTB themselves), much more important who are their main private clients.
Your title is correct, but you pointing to the proxies, not to the real owners.Vanguard/BlackRock trick works perfectly. And even Murdoch himself could be just another proxy.
Russian, obviously.
а, б, в, г, д, е, ё, ж, з, и, й, к, л, м, н, о, п, р, с, т, у, ф, х, ц, ч, ш, щ, ъ, ы, ь, э, ю, я
Other languages that use cyrillic letters could have other number.
Within 18 months
The only thing that does not suck Bill think out is a vacuum cleaner. I learned to read in a month, being 4-5. My children learned to read in a month being same age. Many families I know teached their kids to read in a month or so at 4-6. It is not hard for a kid of that age to remember how 33 letters look and sound. Yes, in Russian words read as they written, there is no complex rules, but I learned to read English in a month too, as all kids in my school class.
So Bill think out a way to teach kids to read that sucks too? And it obviously does not help the kid to learn reading at all. So what stunning "help" does he mean and to whom?
I find very suspicious that this list does not distributed by "truthtellers" as plain text. So to use it for abusing google one have to type all that by hand or feed it to OCR and check every string for mistakes.
That insanity of posting text as images simultaneously have no any sense and fucking annoying. I hope there is a special part of Hell devoted to the severe torture of those who do it.
Do you really think they can't have two words for the same thing?
I do not think, believe or imagine. I know. Iranians name it rusari. Even those hardcore muslims from rural areas, who was on the streets of Tehran during their islamic revolution named it rusari, and shouted exactly about rusari. No single Iranian men or women I talked with about their traditions (in some point of time I had being selling powerful Russian-made laser systems to Iranians and had a lot of talks with them) named it hidjab.
You imagine Iranians like yet another little brown arab men somwhere far away who run around mountains and deserts and live in shitty houses made from crap. But they are don't have to satisfy your imagination. Iranians ar not semites, they does not speak arab language, they do not have sharia law, they do not treat their women like saidus (did you know that there are more girls than boys in Iranian universities ?), their civilisation is not some young state appeared from nowhere, they are not barbarian imbeciles without science and tech, they don't have western level of poverty and homelessness, they are not what you think about them at all. You have been lied and manipulated with all that bullshit about "hidjab" and other "Cambridge University" or "Central Intelligence" stuff. And that's the only thing you "know" about Iranians. All that to indoctrinate you with narrative that Iran is a severe danger to all "civilized" "world".
Yes, and cambridge.org will never lie to you about anything.
Look, you even "suddenly" skipped an example of correct naming of headscarf that is directly at your own link (are they ocasionaly missed it, or couldn't miss such a rhyme for purposes of their propaganda?) -
“Wear a Head Scarf or Get Your Head Knocked” (Ya Rusari Ya Toosari).
Headscarf is named "rusari" by Iranians, not fucking "hidjab".
You could go luck yourself with that level of hypocrisy. Hiding the uncomfotable truth in the hope that nobody will check your link to a well-established liars does not differ a lot from lying. Also, enjoy f.e. this crap by same Cambridge University Press which you, for unimaginable reason, giving any credibility.
Do you understand that everything you know about Iran was told you by Iran's worst enemies? Or that level of thought is unavailable for your "civilized" mind? Why some barbaric Russian orc have to teach you basic methods of thinking?
Do you understand overall, that it's not West fucking business of how Iranians treat their women and men at all? Are you indignated with the fact that Western men are forced to cover their dicks, despite that some crave for the right to display their dicks for everybody including children? How is that different from norms of other civilisations, that is very different from your own? Why you are so concerned about Iran norms, but completely ignore your country norms in wearing clothes in public? Hipocrisy, arrogance and ignorance is an unholy trinity will ruin West eventually.
You mean killed, killing and will continue to kill most by far until stopped?
Unfortunately I can't post in that message all of my collection of gifs with different facepalms. Please watch one by yourself: https://media.tenor.com/fxA3074BfcIAAAAd/panda-face.gif
Iranian women headscarf named "rusari". You could type it in Google image serach if you don't believe me, or check Iranian farsi dictionary. Do you know, that Iranian language is farsi, not arabic? It is indo-european language not semitic as arabic. Using same letters does not make all languages that use that strange hooks arabic. Word "hidjab" sounds like farsi number, I don't remember which, something like 15 or 13, check by yourself, I'm too lazy to do it for you. Also, Iranians are shia, not sunni, so they have no that globalist sunni sharia laws you project to them, their religion laws are local and set by their imams.
Serioulsy, it is amasing sometimes to see western arrogance that is inseparable from ignorance of same size.
Strange that nobody protest against wearing hidjab in Ukraine. And, suddenly, it is mantadory for Ukrainian women to wear them if they enter Orthodox Church. Oh, wait, that's why Ukrainian Jewish government ban Orthodox Churches! They just want to free Ukrainian women from hidjab!
There is rumors that Transnistria existence is necessary for keepeing Potsdam Europe borders. Suddenly, Transnistria is the only element of USSR that does not issue any document about exiting USSR or denouncing USSR entry. So, even if it could sound funny, Transnistria is the only existing part of USSR, so it is de-facto and de-jure it is USSR itself. And Potsdam papers about European borders after WWII is valid while all who sign it exist. If something happens with Transnistria, post-WWII borders in Europe are no longer valid.
May be this will be a shit they prepared next, when Ukraine shit will be silently memoryholed, as they did with coronahoax.
PS: It is just a rumors, and I'm not shure that anybody really care now about Potsdam borders, however, it is true that Transnistria never did anything that could be interpreted as exit from USSR. Transnistria is a consequence of Moldova way of exiting USSR - Moldova denounced joining USSR, so, suddenly, fall to borders they had before joining USSR and that borders didn't include Transnistria. From the other side, Ukraine exited USSR in borders of 1991, so it does not include Transnistria too. So, after USSR fall, Transnistria become perfectly legal separate state, that never exited USSR.
Gamalei Research Center is one that profited a lot from not-a-vaccine. Now their profit river is nearly dry. Name me a single reason, why they will stop their bullshit about "new strains". :)
I have a 40 years old vacuum equipment that expirience same temperature range as satellites, from liquid nitrogen to ~300°C. Nothing happened with seals and metals for 40 years. And why it should? Also satellites are not made from cast iron and they do not use bubblegum for seals. There is no rust in space and it is only 1bar pressure difference in the worst case. Many satellites are not even pressurized, so they have no seals at all.
You lived in Iran?
And that is told to you by whom?
Now I get that. It's about how Musk get US residence (citizenship?) in the first place to later evolve into what he is in US. I didn't know about that.
Wait a second. If a men without having boobs, pussy and XX chromosomes could lawfully declare himself a woman and no court will even allowed to question that, than why this Musk can't just declare himself even a PhD without being in colledge and why the court dare to question him about that?
I'm completely lost. Help me! :) :) :)
So he declared once (or show fake diploma) that he have some degree of education to do something that by law could be done only if he have a degree, and was sued for that, but he didn't even went to colledge? That's the whole story?
Person will try to figure out what you mean in different ways, from asking questions to relying on context. ANN can't understand anything and can't analyse context at all. And without understanding context it is impossible to correctly parse phrase.
Also - "Naked conductor runs under the carriage" - every time a lot of fun with any ANN.