It is probable that in this case Durov will gladly pass every single byte of available information on all that Telegram conversations to FSB. He is complete dick, but he is Russian. Also, he is very angry toward US government for SEC prohibiting his TON/Gram cryptocurrency project.
Interesting, but looks like Russian state bureacrats eventually found out that Telegram is much more useful for them than harmful. After their completely failed attempts to ban Telegram, when even state officials continued to use Telegram as their officia; channels.
In any case Telegram is garbage, just like any other centralized messenger.
The US warned about islamist attacks against concerts. putin chose to dismiss the warnings.
So, they know that is will be attack, that it will be islamists, that it will be concert, but somehow absolutely didn't know anything else, like exact source of that information? I'll call pure bullshit. :)
Interesting, that "islamists" clearly was not islamists. No single "Allah Akbar" shout, attacking muslim property, shooting muslims, no beards, running for their lives to Ukraine and so on. At the time, when nearly all muslim states and movements account Russia as ally or partner, including all that "scary" islamists from Hamas to Taliban including Houtis and Hezbollah.
So, US blatantly lied about "islamists". Why? To purposedly misdirect Russian authorities in wrong direction? Well, there is one tribe that constantly use chutzpa and at the same time control US and UK government. Also, this tribe are inventors of that new kind of terror - murdering innocent civilians instead of politicians. And this direction is much more probable than this "islamists" bullshit.
I'm sure US/UK/Israel is dreaming day and night about breaking strengthening Russia relations with muslim world, so attempt to disguise their terrorism as "islamic" looks very logical.
But again - arrogance and ignorance is a 100% recipe for fuckup. They didn't even bother to check background and nuances of attack target.
So, you are telling us that they blackmailed Putin with terrorist attack intentionally holding back any details of planned attack, Putin obviously didn't submit to this blackmailing, and they decided to run attack as promised.
Well, pretty solid logic, I have nothing to object.
But as usual, US/UK/Israel idiots in their arrogance and ignorance didn't account for some local nuances. Very expensive and prestigious Crocus City Hall owned by wealthy and serious Azerbaijani muslim diaspora. No any faithful muslim will ever attack it, because you know, all that blood feud traditions among caucasian tribes and all that stuff. And perpetrators destroyed this very expensive property. And it is not about money at all.
If Putin had wanted to repeat "terrorism" game as at beginning of 2000s terrorhoax he would choose some government owned theater or school or some apartment building. But not the pearl of important diaspora, especially when US/UK/Israel actively meddling in Armenia-Azerbaijan tensions trying to sneak into yet another place they have no fucking business in.
So all that bullshit about "islamists" or ISIS from usual suspects is just yet another proof that it was exactly usual suspects themselves.
So now, not only FSB is looking for perpetrators, handlers and masterminds, but also many muslims. Nasty muslims. Unlike FSB they will not stick to some laws, ethics and all that "diplomatic inviolability" or borders. Guess how that dumbfucks car was identified and why they was unable to change it and had to use already exposed car in attempt to run to Ukraine.
Also interesting to observe all that miserable and silly attemps of so called Ukrainian officials to convince at least somebody that they have nothing to do with all that shit. Level of panic among that dicksucking LARPers is on the level of Feb 2022.
And notice how US gov instantly declared that "Ukraine have nothing to do with this" when even none of terrorists was detained and barely anything was known at the place. How is that?
reply to https://conspiracies.win/p/17si9zxCg1/x/c/4ZA1L6wqN7Y
All oppositions has to be controlled and they can either send the dissenters to prison and camps (1984) or they can give them land outside of the technocratic megapolis (Brave New World).
Looks like the can't choose what way to go and trying to implement all dystopias known. And still they hadn't succeed.
They are using the anti-communist, democratic right sentiment to push people away from Russia and towards the west as if the west is in any way right or democratic.
Interesting that their "West" and "european values" is a totally artificial construct, that have little to do with real Western (West European, to be exact) civilisation. With all tensions inside Europe, it is still specific and more or less common set of values and ethics.
What is the necessity for them to destroy that millenia old Western civilisation? It could be a good basis for building some stable union under single rule on the way to NWO. But they thoroughly destroy exactly what unites Western Europe - family values, labour culture, local communal traditions, even common (though sometimes very violent towards each other) history in under attack. And all that things really could be used for building their NWO.
F.e. Western attitude to labour and creating things. Engineering traditions. Old ones. NWO, obviously need high-quality tech to control people. But at the same time globalists destroy the basic source of that tech - Western labour culture. All their DEI and ESG crap will just leave NWO without tech resources they plan to use.
I do not believe in the narrative that "they do evil because they are evil and that's all". There should be some logical reason or external order for that shit. Either NWO is not that technocratic nightmare many paint in imagination today, either whole NWO purpose is to stop any technological advancement of humanity.
In the latter case I'm especially interested of what exact potential inventions or discoveries they so afraid of, that they even agree to deprive themselves from all that future tech that could be so handy for implementing their total control and power.
I agree but we're talking about ethnic jews only, not about their henchmen
Do you really distinguish between ethnic Jew and his sockpuppet?
Why do you think interating with sockpuppet is not in reality interating with Jewish master?
If account all that sockpuppets, there will be not 66% but 99% of Jews in western politics.
66% is only you account those who have Jewish blood in veins. You could also estimate similar number by those who was circumcised as infants and not being muslims, but that way you will miss some women.
Are you sure on those numbers?
I think 66% is underestimated. Just take a look at all that politicians and their handlers. They just can't represent anybody except Jews and Jewish interests, except rare exclusions.
Well, hardly this ratio applicable to all that "evil dictatorships" MSM continously speak about, but Musk was not observed in heavy interaction with politicians from those countries.
Why not use Musk supportive visit into Israel during palestinian genocide as an argument? For me it is more than enough to get who Musk is and on which side. Why try to stretch some questionable arguments?
So, you want to tell us that Musk evading Jews?
66% of public politicians are more or less Jewish (if not more if took in account all that cryptojews and shabbesgoys). So if assume that Musk absolutely neutral, he have to have 66% of Jews among accounts he interacts with. But he have only 33% of Jews among accounts he interacts with. So he evade interacting with half of Jews he could interact with.
Mask is half-antisemite, that's your point?
Reply to https://conspiracies.win/p/17si9zxCg1/x/c/4ZA12MHs8pO
Regardless tools like propaganda, monarchy, and other.
Interesting that large part of modern propaganda based on declaring some things inherently bad, and then arguing with that. And I see it on both sides nearly equally. "this is bad because it is authoritarian", "that is bad because it is crypto" and so on.
Nice marker, meanwhile.
Today, there isn't a unified value system for all people, although great efforts are made to erect such a system and most normies in the West will adhere to it
True, but such indoctrination will break every time such person will visit non-Western country. Especially "very bad" country. So they will have to introduce exit visas as minimum, like it was in USSR.
the globohomo soyence consoomer transhumanistic hedonistic degenerate nihilistic one.
Many will fall to it, but I think 20-30% of population will not. Did you ever feel bored from doing nothing? When you began to create, repar, draw, learn something just to entertain yourself.
And as I understand, they need total and willing obedience for whatever reason. They don't leave anybody alone. It is clearly visible as in internal so in external politics.
I think it is also good thing to find out - why they need us all and not satisfied with just majority.
She got hijacked by the propaganda. Living in the West makes you a part of the experiment. It's a giant Skinner box of sorts. People get indoctrinated and their worldview is changed without realizing it.
Not all of them, definitely. I know enough sane people around the West, who didn't fall to all that stuff. Interesting that my classmate grow, study and graduate from university here, and most part in times of USSR. Many at the time of USSR fall bought to Western narratives, but eventually found out that it was all same crap as many soviet narratives. Looks like she fell to Western narratives at USSR fall and unlike most here then moved to GB where Western narratives supported constantly, so she missed that part when Western narrative fall into pieces here and become too uncurious about things around.
Not all my fellows who moved to the West fell to that. Most who didn't eventually returned to Russia with reasoning like "alt least at home we have shit we know how to deal with".
Does that mean that if somehow stop MSM and all that dumbification, people will evetually return back to norm? If it does, then their system is just unsustainable, regardless of their dreams and propaganda of that "sutainability".
Also interesting thing I noticed, that Western elites began to believe into their own propaganda and fall into same trap as regular people. Like uroboros. With each day they further and further from reality. Hard to imagine how this could end really. :)
Staying unvaxed and overcoming enormous social push rised your self-esteem and self-appraisal. You are winner. Humans and animals feel that. That simple, without any misteries.
If it was real, then why you use "much worse"? It is oblviously "much better" should be used.
Since I don't observe much whinning and screaming in MSM about CISA hack, it could be some real fuckup.
Forum do not allow so long conversations :), so I'm answering to this your comment - https://conspiracies.win/p/17si9zxCg1/x/c/4ZA12CwpGA1 here
Depends on how strong the government is and how people feel about the government. I agree we did ignore many covid rules here in the east because people didn't trust them but also because the government couldn't enforce them.
It is interesting phenomena, really. How it appeared that Eastern Europeans that was under stricter government control in the past preserved more critical thinking and ability to resist authorities than Western Europeans. Either that "Eastern totaliarism" and "Western democracy" was not what they say, either people just need some push or opression to keep their brains work. :)
People are conditioned to have faith in the system. Societal values are not constant and they can be influenced through media, education, culture and religion.
So the people's faith in the system allows manipulation of basic societal values.
Therefore, distrust, or at least some level of suspicion toward system is the key thing to keep society healthy.
Karl Marx believed it's all power dynamics and reality is a social construct which is one of the greatest psy ops ever.
That exactly what all that WEF stooges push today as their strategy - "reality creation" through propaganda. But too much propaganda eventually morth into total and obvious bullshit that become clear even for target audience.
Really I don't see propaganda as something inherently bad. It is just a tool that could be useful or harmful depending on who and with what purpose use it. What could be bad in propaganda of family values, knowledge or healthy way of life, for example?
They are not the same as moral laws although that's what they're supposedly based on.
Validity of state laws depends on their distance from moral laws. Further state laws from moral laws, less they would be respected. To implement those insane laws globalists want, they have to change moral laws in the first place. And according to all above they need faith in system to change moral laws. And again, faith in system is a key thing in all that psyop.
Paradoxically, those who have less "democracy and freedom" in Western terms have much better chances for survival as conscious beings.
there was loss of trust but people forget and they will fall for it again the next cooked crisis
That's one of misteries I can't resolve, really. Why and how people forget recent events so fast. Yes, that narrative of living in current day and all that stuff is powerful, but shock from previous manipulation should be strong enough to be significant to remember.
Just one example - when my classmate living in GB make constant visits to Russia (through Turkey) in the times of coronahoax to take a rest from all that GB coronahoax insanity and freely spent time with friends, she told about ways Brits use to circumvent coronahoax restriction, like putting tables and chairs outside house window for the guests to celebrate something together when it was not allowed to visit each other in GB. And was glad she had an opportunity to come back to Motherland and spent time like normal human being hanging with friends. This definitely should be significant thing to remember. But today she suddenly assume that all that GB crap was right thing and helped to "stop covid". And went mad when we remind her about her visits and happiness here. Suddenly, our authorities was reckless and didn't care about us enough. And nothing, including lower losses and absence of all that miocardites and blood clots could convince her. We are still oppressed here, and she lives in free country. :)
That paradoxes show that all that modern alt-anti-globalist-movement miss something important and focuses on wrong things in their activity. Well, they do a good job of speading some info, but somehow don't try to dig deeper. And even if they do, it results in some "saturn worshipping" crap and other weird things that looks more like distraction or well poisoning than attempt to find out something practically useful.
"Khazars" is not etnicity.
Fuck, again that slops of whitewashing kikes.
Khasarian kaganate was multiethnic state where power was in hands of Jews, and other etnicities was servs or slaves. It is clear that Judaism was state religion, but it is unknown if the lower castes of Kaganate was allowed to practicise it. Taking in account that Talmud do not allow Jews to share their religions with goyim, and that there are no any non-Jew etnicities in the area where Kaganate was that practicise Judaism, most probably only Jewish authorities of kaganate practicise Jewdaism.
There are two branches of Jews - sefards and ashkenazi. They both Jews genetically, the difference is that after destruction of ancient Israel one part of Jews moved to the north-west, to the Spain and around (sefards) and other part moved to the north-east (ashkenazi). Khazarian Kaganate was under the foot of ashkenazi Jews.
It is just stupid to push all that bullshit about "it's not Jews doing shit, it is Khazarians", because "khazarians" is not an etnicity at all, it was "citizenship" where non-Jewish "citizens" was slaves or servs of the Jews, but also because non of those shabbesgoys who produce that "Khazarians are not Jews" bullshit never even was somewhere near Russian city of Astrakhan where center of Kaganate was so never did any archeological research of Khasarian Kaganate, so can't have any clue what it really was.
"Khazarian" distraction is an operation of some Hasbara or whatever Jewish gang to distract attention from kikes. It is just yet another chutzpa to somehow whitewash fucking Jews, their Satan worshipping cult and their crimes against humanity well-known since Old Testament times, including creation of Khazarian Kaganate terrorist state.
Those who spread that Jewish chutzpa are no better than those who produce that vomit and Jews who is behind it.
I'm not westerner myself - I'm a balkan guy.
So you have to know that laws is not enough to make things real. In the best case laws just mirror reality of society values. If they are not, then people will ignore them.
Laws are an expression of power.
Kind of. But issuing a law that 2+2=3 does not really make 2+2=3. It's a manifestation of power that they could force something, but if it does not agree with reality, then such law is just void.
As for coronahoax, you could find a lot of fuckups despite the laws and enforcement. It was not grounded in reality, so it was not sustainable. And technocracy even make things easier. Recall that QR-codes counterfeiting, I personally make several QR-codes, perfectly valid for all that computerised shit, never needed, but checked few times just out of curiosity.
And as first decent reason appeared in media space in form of Ukraine war, all that coronahoax shit was quickly curtailed, because they perfectly understand that coronahoax could not last long, regardless of their laws and enforcement. They had to curtail it, because if they don't all that shit eventually would have inevitably fall apart, showing their weakness and impotence. They couldn't allow any doubts in their power, so just switched attention to another shit and stop coronahoax by themselves.
Total control is not an easy thing to implement. And technocracy gives much more ways to mitigate any insanity than raw enforcement by army or whatever.
FEMA camps and that Australian madness was more for fearmongering than as some real approach, because you can't build camps for all population, only for small part of it.
Nice butthurt. :)
There are tons of different Princesses, Dukes, Kings and so on around the world. This does not make them important at all.
So what exactly make this Kate the Princess of Wales important? She revealed that Windsors are half-reptilians or that the royal family of that small European island make child sacrifices or that we all live in Matrix or that head of Britain is zombified by City of London jews, so her life is now under severe threat?
Who the fuck is that Kate, and why anybody could be concerned about this?
Is she kind of new Erin Valenti or Tiffany Dover or what?
This article full or some stupid "royal family" mumbling nobody cares about does not provide any clue of Kate importance.
A more reasonable prediction is having smart-grid credit score megacities inhabited by the NPCs, while people who opt out could be sent to live off grid in sort of rural reservations. Either this or labor camps.
This could sound easy on paper, but couldn't be really done properly. Take all that elites controlled social media for example. Even on that simple level, elites are far from total control and reservations. Real life implementation will be even more pathetic.
Well, what else can it be? All land and property ownership is just papers. Their papers are backed by the law and the threat of force against anyone who crosses it.
How it is different from fiat? Fiat is also "backed by law and force". That does not make fiat something real. Moreover, necessity of laws and force is a proof that fiat (and papers) are sham.
There can't be any real ownership even of land, without personal participation of owner in developing and using it. Some paper in safe does not mean ownership of some land where "owner" never even been.
May be it's kind of cultural difference between us, it always wonder me why western people account laws as something significant. Laws is just some rules created by your enemy to control you. Why account them as something worthwhile?
Ownership without personal active use and participation in object of ownership is utter nonsence. Having paper of ownership of something you don't have any clue about is no different from having paper about ownership of few acres somewhere on Venus, Moon or Mars. It is fake and virtual. If you lose that paper (records in some database) you have no any proof that it is your property. You never put your hand or foot on it and nobody will be able to witeness that you ever owned it.
If you live and develop your land, or participate in life of your enterprise, then you are owner. If you have only paper about ownership, you own only that paper.
It's some core question of ownership, really. Is it ownership when owner have nothing to do in reality with owned object? How that ownership reveal in reality? In some piece of paper? I doubt it.
Let's say my boss knows nothing about the work I do for him and yet he owns the business and I'm his wagecuck.
It's a bad boss. But at least he participate in his enterprise directing it.
Will you tell the same if it will be just some paper in the safe of unknown person? Will you account him as your boss?
I don't think all so called elites are the real deal.
So to get a real picture we have to clearly separate those who are real deal from those who are not. This will make picture simplier and cleaner.
Good material.
Having high IQ does not mean being clever. IQ is necessary, but not enough. IQ is just a gauge of pattern recognition ability. Useful thing, but only with connection with curiosity, creativity (I mean ability to create something useful, not that modern meaning), ethics and many other things.
Encouraging curiosity is really important thing. Lack of curiosity is shine even here, when people share some "hidden truth" without any questions and attempts to find out is it really truth and how things really work.
At least I imagine that's how it's sold to them.
That's a good point.
They won't have profit per se but they will own everything either way so profit becomes useless.
Then half of elite brains will explode. :)
In your picture is assumed that people should be made NPCs dumbed down by entertainment or technical means. But that not much different from current situation when people dumbed down by endless race for earnings, when they have to spent all their time in making money.
There is one more question I have no answer in that picture. Great Reset narrative about owning nothing and being happy is suspicious for me. People who own nothing have nothing to lose. And people that have nothing to lose are most dangerous for elites. Making people happy to avoid that danger is a tricky task. In the best case you could make only ~80% of people happy, regardless of means to make them happy, from chemicals to indoctrination. Other 20% will be a direct threat to elites.
Now, this threat is mitigated by the fear of losing what people earned by years and decades of labour along with other means like entertainment and expropriation of people's free time.
Then what's the point of forcing "own nothing" for NWO? It will make things worse for them.
The crux of the matter is the financial elites believe they will still be at the top even when the NWO government emerges because they not only have money but control of the land, resources and infrastructure.
I will question that. Their "control" over land, resources and infrastructure in reality is just some papers, nothing more. Just like fiat or paper gold or oil, this papers backed with nothing. Having some paper is obviously not enough to be an owner.
And there is one interesting thing coming to mind - all that stuff with BlackRock, Vanguard and so on. "They own everything" is a plain bullshit. Huge distraction. They have shares of everything, yes, but this shares are small, largest share that shady organizations have is 15% in Apple. Combined. It is not enough even to have noticeable influence on company's roadmap. In other compaines their shares are lower. And that BlackRoks and Vanguards know nothing about things they "own".
Also, owning a paper without any clue about manufacturing process, knowledge of how things really work and how enterprise make money is kind of senseless. And financial elites have no any clue about that matters at all. Middle-age feoudals at least knew how to ride the horse and how food grows on their land. New "owners" know absolutely nothing about their assets.
Adding that to the "owning nothing" perspective for people we come to the situation where nobody really owns anything.
Too bad for them because they will be dealt with eventually if they're causing any trouble (here's looking at you John McAfee).
McAfee knew his business in depth. You see - those who know things they own and so real owners are exterminated.
"You will own nothing" is not only about regular people. It is about everyone, including elites.
Then who will become real owner?
Nothing unexpected here for those who are trying to make a business from speaking the truth.
When you have all the resources of the world at your disposal and you control every aspect of society, including money creation, profit becomes meaningless.
Interesting. Then the usefullness of all financial institutes and so financial elites will end. And all that ex-financail figures will become useless for the player and will be removed from the game. So it is not in interests of financial circles to rush for the goal of total control.
Also, most profits made by financial elite through parasitizing on different criminal activities. If there will be total control, then criminal activity, including financial aspect will be seriously lowered. So financial circles will lose larger part of their profits. And, this means that financial circles, if they are some independent player, should be against total control over the people.
It's not the models eventually suddenly output that numbers. This models are created specifically to prodce exactly that numbers. That is why nobody even try to prove that models with experiments. If it was scientists who created a model and then find out some threshold or whatever, there would be experiments (may be even rigged) that proves or "proves" their theory/model and so its final conclusion. But look - nobody need any proof at all. This happens only when theory/model was created specifically to give necessary outcome.
All the negatives will be covered by the proles
Even if you will expropriate all the wealth created by 10M slaves leaving absolutely nothing to them, it still be less profit than expropriating only 20% from 100M.
Either game is not about profits at all, so financial elites is irrelevant and could not play significant roles in game, either there is something else.
I think finances really just a tool of manipulation for elites, not the goal. So financial elite (basically just manufacturers of hammers or screwdrivers for higher level process) should have low significance for the figures.
Really, term limits is a distraction.
The problem is not in that somebody hold some electoral position for a long time. The problem is that he could not be revoked, bear no responsibility for fulfilling his promises and incompetence.
You could not resolve that problems with term limits. It could even make thing worse.
There is no any point to replace working part with new one. Moreover, new one could be of lower quality and have internal defects.
To resolve the problem with corrupted representatives other means necessary:
- Responsibility. At the end of term any unfulfilled promise for voters should be accounted like pure fraud with criminal charge, jail time and private assets seizure.
- Recall. Voters should be able to recall their representative at any time without any exceptions or obstacles. Nobody except voters could fire of impeach representative.
- Competence. All that mandatory IQ tests and mental health checks. May be some exams to enshure at least minimum competence of candidate.
And sane and good working representative could have his job as long as he able to fulfill the will of voters.
Term limits, especially without aforementioned conditions will attract only candidates with the goal of self-enrichment. They will know that it is a temporary job without any consequences and with nearly unlimited access to power. Guess what kind of people such job will attract.
Moreover, the problem with all that elections stuff is much deeper, really. Freedom of choice is not a freedom at all when it is not you who select availabe options to choose. In ideal world, voters should form their list of candidates, not candidates wannabes themselves or some political parties or whatever. May be even without consent of potential candidates themselves. Say, people of some county know a highly competent man who will be perfect representative for them in power. But he is lazy or just don't want participate in elections or not interested in being representative. There should be some way to convince or even force him to represent his people at least for one term. Something like calling a juror or like. This could be kind of not very fair toward this man, but the benefits for all people of county including himself could hugely overweight any doubts. Politics should be duty for competent and best people, not some stairs for slimy bastards greedy for power and money.
The specific markers are mostly bs pseudoscience made up by the technocratic class. It's like the 6 feet distance covid rule which they officially admitted to have made up on the spot
Pseudoscience usually unstable, since it does not have any ground, so its deductions constantly changes. Your 6 feet example is a good example. 6 feet was chosen for US/UK who use imperial units. In other countries it was 2 meters, 1.5 meters, 2.5 meters. You still could find it in google:
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+1.5+meter+distance
https://www.google.com/search?q=keep+2.5+meter+distance
:)
Unlike that social distancing bullshit, climate bullshit is stuck with some fixed values - keep no more than 400ppm with "optimal" target of 350ppm CO2, do not allow more than 1.5°C temperature rise - it is too specific things, appeared from nowhere, and unlike pseudoscience random are not changing. There is no any ground for them in anything, but they are fixed for a long time. For me it is a clear sign that it was some authority above any bureaucrat and pseudoscientist that issued that demand.
Depopulation agenda also contradicts with at least corporation and finance figures desires. Lower the population - lower the profits and wealth to be extracted from people. And also lowering population will devalue assets elites own - lower the population - higher the amount of assets/money/whatever per person - lower the value of that assets/money/whatever. It is equivalent of creating money from thin air, just in that case not amount of money grow, but population declines.
And so on.
Remember that no one knows who actually owns the Fed.
So it is a good task to find that out, isn't it?
Sometimes leaders get exterminated when they step over their line or go off script. That's what happened to JFK, Khadafi and Saddam.
They are figures who broke the rules of game, not that they was exterminated as a move of another player. They like a figures that stop to obey any of the players and tried to play on their own rules. And I'm not shure Saddam have place in that list. He was pawn of other pawn in the best case, not that he did something against players or rules, unlike JFK and Gaddafi.
Financial elites are figures too. Important ones, but they are not real players.
There is some markers in game that is too specific and too unattached to any figure. F.e. that exact 400ppm CO2 in Earth atmosphere threshold. In no way financial elites could set such marker - it just absolutely does not fit in their (or any other figure) role. So, they are not players and it's not them who set the rules.
Also, one of the rule that everybody obey, including financial elites - one figure is not allowed to just exterminate another figure. There is no any problem today to kill figure - Rotshild, Windsor, Putin, Biden, whatever. But figures never do that. So there is some strict rule, external for the figures and set by somebody out there.
There was no any intelligence shared with Russia. The text on US Embassy site is the only information that was somehow shared.
Russia didn't dismiss warnings. Russian officials named that "sharing" as blackmail.
You know, it is easy to understand, that if your neighbour tell you something like "nasty surprise waiting you, don't come close to windows and walk looking around" without telling what exactt surprise is and who exactly is a threat - this is not a warning at all, this is pure blackmail and intimidation by neighbour.
You can't be so dumb to not understand such simple things.