False. Different experimenters successfully transferred different kinds of information, from original Nimtz experiment pulse whose form does not change during transmission, to the music, literally.
Whatever theory is behind, it defintely allows FTL information transmission. And looks like tunnelling time is just zero. So information could be transmitted at infinite speed.
Theory of quantum tunelling is very far from completeness. You just cant do such bold and fundamental statements basing on incomplete theory. There could be tons of explanations, from different nature of tunnelling to timeless virtual space in cavity for particles.
Einstein quote is just a description of how speed of observation distort objective reality for moving observer due to finite speed of observation (speed of light in this case). Nothing more, nothing less.
If you will observe same "two simultaneous events" using sound waves instead of electromagnetic waves, you will get exactly same math, but with speed of sound instead of speed of light. If you will use post pigeons to observe events, then you will get fucking speed of fucking pigeons in math instead of speed of light.
Dumb kike just silently omit the simple fact that he "look", i.e. use that slow EM waves of visible range to make his observations. And that explains everything, if you take speed of observation (speed of light or speed of sound) into account.
That's it.
And this absolutely does not mean that events could not be simultaneous. Problem of syncronisation of two distant clocks solved long ago, and solution is routinely used today in NTP protocol invalidating Einstein nonsense billions of times per day on planet Earth and even around. Just fucking take into account speed of information exchnage, and that's all. You will get two syncronized clocks at a distance without any problem and events happened at same time on both clock will always be simultaneous, regardless of what some observer see.
2.5 million molecules of air per cubic cm.
Just scale it by, a factor, say 10 million to get a clue how sparse it is.
Average size of oxygen, nitrogen and argon is around 0.3nm.
2.5 million molecules of 0.3nm size in volume of cubic cm is like 2.5 million 3mm balls in a volume of 1 million cubic km.
Obviously, it is just 5 (five) 3mm balls per 2 cubic kilometers.
It will be very tricky to even purposedly find at least one 3mm ball out of five in a 2 cubic kilometers. Not talking about accidental interaction during crossing that volume by straight line.
Literally impossible and proven thus.
If you are not aware, Nimtz experiment is extremely cheap, relative to many scientific experiments of such significance. You could replicate it in your garage at weekend and measure superluminal speed of quantum tunneling just for fun.
Also, you could not prove impossibility. You only could proove opposite. It is Einshtein declared impossibility without any reason and in was Nimtz who proove opposite.
but it didnt matter because his math was right.
It wasn't his math at all. It was Lorenz and Pounkare math.And yes, it is correct. But conclusions Einshtein did from this math was completely wrong.
Only thing that had to be done was to make this false Einshtein conclusions a dogma. Jewish tribe did that job without problems. They are really great in making hacks look like geniuses. You could find numerous examples in any area of human activity without any problems.
Special Relativity does not require a Unified Field Theory. What´s your point?
Special relativity uses EM waves for observation. And suddenly omit simple fact that EM waves have finite speed. All observable effects of Special relativity could be easily explained just as effects of finite speed of observation.
Such as?
Impossibility of FTL information transfer. There are no any "telegraph to the past" paradoxes at all.
Impossibility of syncronizing distant clocks. Your OS do that regulary without any problems just by taking in account the "speed of observation". Simple thing this kike "genius" could not understand.
And so on. There is no any speed limit. You don't need infinite energy to reach speed of light. There is no any paradoxes or time travel at all in travelling with speed close to speed of light or faster. Exactly like there is no any paradoxes in traveling with speed close to the speed of sound or faster.
Superluminal quantum tunneling is a hypothesis and far from being a theory.
It is a fact, proven by perfectly documented and replicateable experiments. What theory will appear behind that experimental fact does not really matter. Information could be transferred faster than light. All special relativity should be in the garbage bin long ago.
Special Relativity is mathematecally correct. But all this math is just a corrections have to be made on the side of observer to get how remote moving things look like in reality. It is not how remote things really are.
If not a confirmation from a subjects, I would not be sure that it is real.
May be whole thing will be released eventually, however I don't think there will be something we don't already know.
Heim was a crackpot who never completed his theory
He tried to make theory of everything. As far as I know, relativists failed to do that too.
and several of his predictions have been falsified through experiments.
Several predictions of special relativity was falsified too.
Which of the predictions of Special Relativity have been falsified?
See Gunter Nimtz, f.e. You absolutely can transmit information faster than speed of light. Significnatly faster. And Nimtz experiments was succesfully replicated by independent researchrs multiple times.
There are few of them, f.e. Heim theory. Also, there are good theories that invalidate General Relativity too.
Special Relativity, really, is not even a theory. It is nothing more than wrong use of Lorenz transformations applied to the observations made with electromagnetic waves. Things could look weird because you observe them with some relatively slow method of receiving data. Lorenz transformations mathematically describe that distortions.
If you will observe something moving close to the speed of sound using sound waves, and will try to describe what you observe mathematically you will get exactly same formulas as in "Special Relativity", but with speed of sound instead of speed of light. Same Lorenz formulas.
That's it. That jewish swindler just turn everything inside out. Any sane human perfectly understand that if you use some information transmission process with finite speed for receiving data from observation, usage of it will distort your observations and you will have to correct them (with Lorenz math) to find out what happens in reality. Einshtein declared that what you see using that relatively slow EM waves (ligth) is reality, and things you observe happens with observed object for real.
Eihstein only success was that he found a thing that could be perverted believably and mathematically correct to stop or at least slow scientific and engineering progress of humanity. All other work of pushing his shit as dogma was done by other people.
Funny that Einstein was so untalented, that even "his" only research he got Nobel prize for, was literally stolen from his ex-wife. That is why he had to gave all Nobel prize money to her, to keep her silent. She needed money more than fame, because Einshtein keep his family in poverty, because was unable to earn any money due to lack of any talent for science.
Leaked docs posted in anonymous Telegram channel. Didn't try to find it, I have no Telegram account.
Docs look like that: https://vk.com/wall-69838054_280173 (see images at the end)
IDK, may be leak will appear on torrents, but for now only source is Telegram channel.
Nothing interesting (yet?). Templates for spamming and shilling are well-known and completely uninteresting, like people who made them lacks any imagination. At least, names and surnames in payrolls aren't redacted, so looks like real leak. On average, troll (elf in their terms) have to post 100 messages per day using provided template for $200-$500 per month. Around 20 cents per post.
Nearly all dudes who participate in Manhattan project was quintessence of evil, really. F.e. Oppenheimer proposed to contaminate German soil with strontium 90 filled dirty bombs to poison German food supply. It was around 1942-1943, long before nuke project.
I would not be surprised if this project Sunshine was not about abstract contamination after nuclear tests around the world, but because of testing earlier projects with that Oppenheimer idea, since Oppenheimer idea used strontium 90 as contaminant and project sunshine look for strontium 90 decade later in bones.
Strontium 90 works like calcium in human body, and calcium have slow metaboilsm, so strontium-90 needs many years to accumulate in bones in detectable amounts. Decade is more reasonable deadline, than few years since massive nuclear tests of 50s for looking for strontium 90.
It is possible that insane Oppenheimer idea was implemented in 40s and tested/used in some areas. That is why they need baby bones from distant places decade later. To check how that's work.
Hopefully, strontium 90 is not very harmful contaminant, it is cheap and radioactive, but it β-decay into yttrium 90 and then yttrium 90 β-decay into zirconium 90. So, it only emits high-energy electrons and neutrinos, which are less harmful than gamma-radiation, and you need to consume to really high amounts of strontium 90 for a long time to get some very unpleasant effects on marrow or whatever. Also, calcium (and so strontium) digested by human body only in specific compounds, so it should pass all chains of chemical reactions in nature to finally settle in our bones. This is unlikely in case of plutonium and uranium nukes tests few years ago.
What if really there was strontium 90 dirty bombs used in WWII and this project Sunshine is a study of consequences of that dirty bombs usage, and not recent nuke tests? And that is why they need baby bones from Europe and other places. And "shortage" was just a cover to hide world-wide usage of strontium 90 dirty bobms.
PS: hopefully, strontium 90 have 25 years half-life and yttrium 90 have a half-life of days, so most of it, if used in WWII already decayed and turned into stable and inert zirconium 90. It will be interesting to analyse amount of zirconium 90 in modern soils all over the world, it could uncover unnatural spots somewhere on Earth which could be proof of Oppenheimer strontium 90 dirty bombs usage.
Like people come here to read the MSM headlines. :)
Fortunately there is still persons writing something by themselves.
From the other side, this MSM parrots create a good cloak to latter ones. :)
Fortunately, everybody in that spheres believe that "Kinzhal" missile under the belly of MIG-31K was developed only as a fancy way to destroy "Patriot" ADs or other ground/navy targets, so we are fortunately free from permanent crying and whineing noise about imminent danger to massive satellite constellations spreading freedom and democracy all over the globe.
Strange that this thing is like some taboo in Western MSM. Too stupid to add 2 and 2 and come to obvious conclusion or there is something else behind that silence?
At least they want to control all possible social media.
So, those who dream to shut down Musk proprietary social network, through their NYT outlet condemn those who did exactly that, just because it was not them.
Funny :)
So, he want babies from those who shouldn't have babies in normal circumstances?
Why not help normal families who can have babies, but just don't see any perspectives in corporate financial capitalism and liberal insanity? IDK, lower taxes to make real business profitable, or make housing affordable, remove stupid regulations that prevent people from starting businesses or do whatever thing necessary in US to make normal people want babies again....
Somehow humanity grow for millenias without any IVF shit. Hardly IVF could solve reproduction problems.
Or he just want to feed BigPfarma and health care even more?
It is a total lie.
Free speech is free (excluding internet provider bills) if you just don't use centralized platforms.
There are no any need for servers, datacenter rent, bank accounts, licenses, taxes or whatever shit imaginable to have a chat or forum or whatever in, say, rapidshare or tox or other distributed solutions. Also, there is no way for any state or corporate actor to censor anything or pressure owners, because there are no tools for censorship and no owners.
Location does not matter. Keeping control over your content does.
It is like your finances. When you give your finances to some dude who promise you to take care of them, honestly, he even swear, it is your fault when all your money gone. What is obvious and reasonable way to preserve your money? Of course you don't put all eggs into one basket. You keep cash, may be some precious metals, have few bank accounts, invest into different businesses.
Why the thought to do something similar with your content doesn't come to most heads? And content could be copied, unlike money. You could easily preserve all of your content, not just part of it. Do backups, point web-scrappers to it, use multiple third-party platforms, share it with p2p networks. And if some third-party do something with your content you don't like, you not only will be able to easily restore it, but also clearly show all your content consumers who did that and how.
So, how's the PR stunt being received in Russia?
As stupid UK PR stunt and yet another meat grinder for LGBT rights fighters.
Are people still talking about it
Not much. There are a lot of meat grinders on our outskirts happening now. There is no much difference between piece of our Kursk region occupied by LGBT rights fighters and, say our Kharkov, Kiev or Odessa regions occupied by same LGBT rights fighters.
or just pretending that it's not happening?
Nobody pretended that it is not happening ever. On the opposite, it is MSM pretend that nothing happened before 2022, when since 1991 many Russian territories was occupied by the West and West even installed their puppets to rule Russia. However, as usual, things slowly, but inevitably returning to the normal, regardless of Western wet dreams. Russia is an interesting entity, it always devour and digest those who try to attack it.
I see you still get your infromation only from MSM again? If you do, may be you already read f.e. that: https://www.wsj.com/world/ukrainian-f-16-is-destroyed-in-crash-4f6d66f6 ? How UK PR stunt you obsessed with, helped to avoid that?
Meanwhile, what about that simple question, you still didn't want to answer: Do you understand that "ukraine" literally means "outskirts" in any slavic language?
Did you forget the fuck spez drama?
Really first time I hear about it. :)
Every instant of fuck spez was changed to hail spez
With scrappers possible, both variants would had been saved somewhere.
Why should accounts like that be available?
So, people trusted some third-party to store their content, without keeping even their own copy, not even talking about keeping backups in multiple places, including scrappers, and when third-party change something, they become amazed. Well, with such infantilism no wonder that BigSocial could do anything they want with their users now.
Australia police are allowed to pretend to be the user in their social media due to covid laws.
And still you don't understand how backups and scrappers could be useful...
There is no any way you could prevent third-party to change your content if you fall to that single third-party as your content keeper.
There are numerous cases when people lost all their content because of stupid trust to all that clouds, social media and all that shit.
Still don't get why all that bastards are obsessed with prohibiting and countemeasuring web-scrappers and tools for backuping of your content?
I just can't imagine that, f.e. I post things here with purpose for them be some private things or my "intellectual property". If I want thing to be private, I don't publish it on network created to share data.
IDK, may be it is some cultural thing, but I can't feel anything that resemble privacy/property rights for public posts or messages. I can't even imagine what feeling it should be.
I'm all for any kind of scrapping, bigdating, using in ANN training and copying of anything I publish in internet without any restrictions.
Look, some time ago here was a few posts about "disappearing internet". When content is just disappear due to technical or other reasons, intentionally or unintentionally.
When you talk about personal accounts, try to look wider than usual egocentric approach. Does that "personal accounts" bullshit worth loosing even 0.001% of gold that exist even in such garbage bin as Gab?
Of course, there is a problem of separating gold from shit, but you never know what will become gold eventually.
Real example - on one forum (car fans), someone shared a blueprint of replacement part. This was posted on some image sharing shitty service, so eventually it is of course disappeared. Nobody really cared, because there was possible to find NOS or used ones, so there was no need to manufacture this part by yourself. More than decade pass and part become completly NLA, all NOS and decent used ones was bought out and weared ones had wrong dimentions to replicate. People began to search original blueprint, but it was lost long ago, since this shitty image hosting bankrupted and disappeared. And the gold was found in one old post in different thread, where someone shared a link to a file on personal server with archive of nearly all drawings, blueprints, schematics and other useful scrapped stuff archived. That was gold under tons of shit. And if not this scrapper this valuable (for some people) information would had been lost forever.
Same with everything else. Ability to have an unrestricted access to the information people ever willingly posted to share with somebody is very important. Limiting this ability for whatever reason is an attempt to prevent further development of humanity sum of knowledge.
Latest mutilation of Twitter, that made search and scrapping impossible is a good example. Earlier you could easily check some posts and coincidences for specified time using simple script to scrap data for specific keyword or whatever. And possible found something interesting, like results or causes of some past event that become known only today. Now you just can't do that.
So, standing with those who rant against scraping and free access to information, makes you one who stand against ability of anyone to find the truth.
If you prefer that transcendental awakened approach - any limiting of access to information is an attempt to damage Akashic records or noosphere, meddling with natural process of information flow. Person who came up with idea to share something with others is a God-like particle feeding that Akasic/noosphere field. Any attempt to contain or limit this radiation in time or space dimention is a crime against Universe.
Is that why everybody here use archive.org webscrapper to share links to information that would have been lost without webscrapping?
If you train ANN (posed as AI) with text with some alternative opinion, then there is probability that this ANN will include this opinions in produced result.
So, not allowing training ANNs with texts from Gab he is just excluding Gab users opinions from ANN results.
Really, why people so vulnerable to all kinds of hype and marketing, regardless of positive/negative sign, that they lost their minds and ability to think logically at least one step further?
" 'AI' is good/bad!!!!!1111" and both parties start to do stupid and illogical things like dumb sheeps.
Merketing methods using any emotions are what make any reasonable approach to any problems impossible. I hope there is special segment in hell for those who work in modern marketology of any kind, from top politicians to the clickbaiters.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.3944 and references.
And so on.
No, we don't. Tachyons are ugly crutch to specifically satisfy special relativity dogmas. They are not necessary if you are not sticked to Einstein dogmas.
FTL does not violate casuality. That infamous Minkovsky diagram is total bullshit based on unfounded dogma of speed of light as dogmatic limit. FTL is just a path with higher angle than light cone and nothing more.
Imagine, you have supersonic plane flying toward you and observe it with your hearing by ears. You will definitely observe "casuality violations". Like you will hear sound of touch-off after the sound of landing. But is absolutely does not mean that there is any real casuality violatons. Plane for sure still arrive after departure, but it moves faster than information you use to observe this events from your frame.
Same with FTL. If someone who use EM waves with specific speed of light to observe FTL processes should just account a simple fact that he use "slow" EM waves to observe faster process and fix his observations using that knowledge to get a real picture. And not to try to pass his observations for reality.
Principle of accounting for influence of method used for observations is unseparable for any measurement. F.e. when you measure resistance with ommeter, you adjust your measurement by resistance of wires and probes. Especially if you measure resistance close to the resistance of ommeter probes. You get observation of 0.1Ω. Your wires and probes have 0.05Ω resistance. So, you correct your observation by that 0.05Ω and find real measured object resistance as 0.05Ω. But somehow Eistein sect is absolutely unable to do exactly same thing when they do their observations. And come up with all that Minkovsky space bullshit and "casuality violations".
It's really insane, if you look at all that relativity stuff from the point of a regular engineer.
FTL does not make effect happen before the cause. It does not lead to time travel or any other garbage. Just effect follow the cause faster than some ignorant observer will do its observations and that's all.
If you have FTL data transmission line between Berlin and Los Angeles and it takes twice less time than conventional one to transmit a message, message still will arrive after sending, just two times faster, and that's all. Fact, that some side observer could see events of departure and arrival in different order means that this observer just choose bad means of observation that need correction to find real way of things and nothing more.