I just can't imagine that, f.e. I post things here with purpose for them be some private things or my "intellectual property". If I want thing to be private, I don't publish it on network created to share data.
IDK, may be it is some cultural thing, but I can't feel anything that resemble privacy/property rights for public posts or messages. I can't even imagine what feeling it should be.
I'm all for any kind of scrapping, bigdating, using in ANN training and copying of anything I publish in internet without any restrictions.
I'm not for every company profiting off individual IP, but the individuals. Did you forget the fuck spez drama? Every instant of fuck spez was changed to hail spez. Why should accounts like that be available? Australia police are allowed to pretend to be the user in their social media due to covid laws.
You, and I simply have different situations on our minds when this topic comes up.
Every instant of fuck spez was changed to hail spez
With scrappers possible, both variants would had been saved somewhere.
Why should accounts like that be available?
So, people trusted some third-party to store their content, without keeping even their own copy, not even talking about keeping backups in multiple places, including scrappers, and when third-party change something, they become amazed. Well, with such infantilism no wonder that BigSocial could do anything they want with their users now.
Australia police are allowed to pretend to be the user in their social media due to covid laws.
And still you don't understand how backups and scrappers could be useful...
There is no any way you could prevent third-party to change your content if you fall to that single third-party as your content keeper.
There are numerous cases when people lost all their content because of stupid trust to all that clouds, social media and all that shit.
Still don't get why all that bastards are obsessed with prohibiting and countemeasuring web-scrappers and tools for backuping of your content?
Location does not matter. Keeping control over your content does.
It is like your finances. When you give your finances to some dude who promise you to take care of them, honestly, he even swear, it is your fault when all your money gone. What is obvious and reasonable way to preserve your money? Of course you don't put all eggs into one basket. You keep cash, may be some precious metals, have few bank accounts, invest into different businesses.
Why the thought to do something similar with your content doesn't come to most heads? And content could be copied, unlike money. You could easily preserve all of your content, not just part of it. Do backups, point web-scrappers to it, use multiple third-party platforms, share it with p2p networks. And if some third-party do something with your content you don't like, you not only will be able to easily restore it, but also clearly show all your content consumers who did that and how.
I just can't imagine that, f.e. I post things here with purpose for them be some private things or my "intellectual property". If I want thing to be private, I don't publish it on network created to share data.
IDK, may be it is some cultural thing, but I can't feel anything that resemble privacy/property rights for public posts or messages. I can't even imagine what feeling it should be.
I'm all for any kind of scrapping, bigdating, using in ANN training and copying of anything I publish in internet without any restrictions.
I'm not for every company profiting off individual IP, but the individuals. Did you forget the fuck spez drama? Every instant of fuck spez was changed to hail spez. Why should accounts like that be available? Australia police are allowed to pretend to be the user in their social media due to covid laws.
You, and I simply have different situations on our minds when this topic comes up.
Really first time I hear about it. :)
With scrappers possible, both variants would had been saved somewhere.
So, people trusted some third-party to store their content, without keeping even their own copy, not even talking about keeping backups in multiple places, including scrappers, and when third-party change something, they become amazed. Well, with such infantilism no wonder that BigSocial could do anything they want with their users now.
And still you don't understand how backups and scrappers could be useful...
There is no any way you could prevent third-party to change your content if you fall to that single third-party as your content keeper.
There are numerous cases when people lost all their content because of stupid trust to all that clouds, social media and all that shit.
Still don't get why all that bastards are obsessed with prohibiting and countemeasuring web-scrappers and tools for backuping of your content?
If your goal is to be an informative encyclopedia, the issue I'm bringing up means you're probably not referring to the same internet locations.
Location does not matter. Keeping control over your content does.
It is like your finances. When you give your finances to some dude who promise you to take care of them, honestly, he even swear, it is your fault when all your money gone. What is obvious and reasonable way to preserve your money? Of course you don't put all eggs into one basket. You keep cash, may be some precious metals, have few bank accounts, invest into different businesses.
Why the thought to do something similar with your content doesn't come to most heads? And content could be copied, unlike money. You could easily preserve all of your content, not just part of it. Do backups, point web-scrappers to it, use multiple third-party platforms, share it with p2p networks. And if some third-party do something with your content you don't like, you not only will be able to easily restore it, but also clearly show all your content consumers who did that and how.