measured Raman spectrum of benzene, where the peaks at 3,063, 2,950, 1,586, 1,177, 992 and 606 cm −1
Here we go. 1,586 G-peak in benzene ring is the same G-peak in graphene/graphite ring.
However, benzene have only one ring, there are no connections with other rings. So it does not have 2D peak. But if you take naphtalene, made from two benzene rings, you suddenly get that 2D Raman peak around 3000 cm-1.
When you go to more benzenes connected together, like in anthracene or phenalene you get raman spectras with peaks also specific to graphite. Meanwhile some polycyclic hydrocarbons are coagulants and could be a reason for blood clots. Unlike graphene.
Doing raman spectrometry with complex unknown substance, you get a lot of peaks everywhere, you don't get that nice two-peak picture from pure graphite/graphene even if graphite/graphene present in specimen. And they would not be that sharp and visible as on pictures you look at in a paper about pure graphene. You will obviously have peaks from all bonds of all substances at once. Including water. It will be a complete mess.
To make Raman spectrometry useful you have to find composition first. Then, thoroughly separate ingridiens and do a raman spectrometry on them separately to find out bonds you have. Then, using chemical formula and what bonds used to connect atoms in it you finally could determine what exact substance you have.
Raman spectrometry don't give you composition, it gives you what bonds you have. In case of simple compounds, you will be able to figure out that, say, there is water, table salt and some organic. But with such thing as vaccine where lot of stuff mixed, it is impossible to do any conclusions from Raman spectra you get. Well, in best case you will be able to tell that there is a lot of water in it. May be salt will be also obvious.
To clearly find out graphene among other organic and inorganic substances in water with Raman spectrometry you will need a suspension where graphene overhelmingly prevail over all other stuff, so G and 2D peaks will be comparable to peaks from water and salt. It will be grey or even black liquid, not that clear solution we see,
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc.
Exactly. This gives the first and basic clue about composition of substance on atomic and submolecular level. It allow you to get preliminary information for chromatography and chemical tests for specific substances. If you have carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, lead and iron, you don't need to look for arsenic compounds or cesium. But force you to look for cyanides and lead compounds.
How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
You will have high relative amount of carbon, much higher than for hydrocarbons or carbonates.
Also, just think why they so stick to that graphene stuff. Graphene is one of greatest nothingburger of science. It is known for around century, but still we don't have any more or less useful use of that substanse other than fill MSM articles and empty scientific papers.
Of course, talking about some polyhexamethylene guanidine in vaccines or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate will not create attention from regular public, but overhyped graphene will.
Also, graphene narrative as microblades in vaccine that cut everything in bloodstream directly contradicts blood clots facts. You can't create a clot with something that cut objects in pieces. But some uninterestin calcium hydrocarboaluminate (widely used coagulant) or other complex calcium compounds or, say, synthesized thrombines, easily could be the reason.
And, suddenly, you need mass-spectrometer to detect calcium in specimen to get a clue where to look for if you want to find a reason of blood clots.
Don't you understand that whole anti-vaccinehoax publications just does not fit together and with known facts about not-a-vaccine. It is just insane - "who cares why blood clots is a main consequence of not-a-vaccine, look, GRAPHENE!!!!".
Unscientific, non-systematic, self-contradictory "studies" floating around on non-official side with all that overhyped "nano", "graphene", "aluminium" and other keywords just make things worse.
Raman spectometry does not detect graphene. It detects bonds in molecules. Every bond have specific frequency, so you could differentiate them. Graphene basically is just carbon rings assembly. But a lot of substances have same carbon rings with same bonds.
So, Raman spectrometry alone is nowere enough to make any exact conclusion about composition. But it could be very useful as additional study to determine specific isomeres of substances with already known chemical formula.
You will get similar spectrums for graphite, graphene, benzene, any other cyclic hydrocarbons including even sugar that have two carbon rings.
Raman spectrometer is cheaper and simplier than quadrupole mass-spectrometer. There even successfull DIY projects of Raman spectrometers. But they are only supplement tools in figuring out unknown substance composition.
Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions.
It does-not. Typical quadrupole mass-spectrometer is a tabletop device with a size of a good office printer. It is not even very expensive in comparison with other lab equipment.
You could even find used ones for the price affordable to a small private business or a middle-class enthusiast.
Yes, they work from regular wall outlet and consume around 1kW.
Mass-spectrometer does have particle accelerator, just like CRT monitor or home air ionizer. "Particle accelerator" does not mandatory mean some giant cyclotrone or LHC. Any device that accelerate particles is particle accelerator, be it electron gun in CRT tube or very similar assembly of few electrodes in mass-spectrometer.
I found very strange that there is still no any independent full chemical analysis results of any mRNA vaccine ever done.
To make such analysis you need mass-spectrometer to find out existence and concentrations of basic elements and chromatograph to determine actual chemical composition. Not a very simple task, and not very cheap financially and in time, but it is routinely done every day in thousands of scientific and research labs.
Eventually you get exact and full list of actual ingritients of studied specimen.
Why nobody still did that is a greatest mistery with those who declare themselves as coronahoax and vaccinehoax enemies. Seems they are not really, and even more - they work to defile public questioning this hoaxes.
At the time, I had a conversation with one biochemist who was very critical about coronahoax and vaccinehoax. When talk come to the question why he didn't make an full chemical analysis of mRNA vaccine, he told that he can't obtain a sample legally, so paper he would wrote will not be accepted by any peer-reviewed journal. Later I come to conclusion that modern scientists don't care about science and research at all, they care only about fucking publications in official journals and citations.
All those who mentioned in your posts do have the ability to make straight full chemical analysis of vaccine and obtain its full and exact composition with every ingridient concentration and exact formula. And publish that list. However none of them ever did that. They only mumble something about some overhyped ingridient even without any quantative data about it. That's absolute nonsense in science. When you study something unknown you don't limit yourself with single ingridient with most popular name and you absolutely want to know exact concentrations and full composition.
It is like you care only about amount of salt in a dish and suddenly have no any interest about sugar, vinegar, pepper, antioxidants, thinners and other stuff which could not only interfere with effect of salt, but also be more harmful and bad than what you stick to.
Weird.
Yes, Christian Church is definitely much closer to psychology even scientifically than that modern "psychology science". And have much longer expertise in that field.
It's satanic in nature because it's goal is the control of the free will and suppression of rational thinking and behavior which ultimately leads to truth, the good and the affirmation of life and existence - it leads to God.
Exactly. Also modern psychology is trying to replace Church in the field of resolving soul problems, not with repentance and learning the lesson, but with acceptance and self-forgiveness with all consequences.
Putin clones or doubles is well-known conspiracy theory in Russia. :)
May be we don't hear about country leaders asassinations just because TPTB decided that things like JFK or Gaddafi are too loud and rise too many unneded questions? So just put a clone or double instead of exterminated one to avoid all that mess.
What do you define as human behavior? Have self awareness, and free will ? Not chemically driven by instincts?
That was the first question psychology had to answer before doing any further research. But it never did.
F.e. you can't study alternating current without defining what AC is and what it is not and how it is different from DC or static charge. It is basics of science - to properly define object of study.
It was hijacked by Freud crowd. There was different approaches in studying human mind and behaviour at the beginning, but Freud crowd "cancelled" them at the time.
Who knows how psychology would have been developed if it wasn't turned into current crap.
Serious science that study human mind is necessary, but of course Freud bullshit have nothing to do with it.
elites wanted to shut down NASA
I think it could be legit.
Look, elites use money for exraction of wealth from people to keep them below the level of independence not even talking about any competition.
Then they need to somehow utilize that money to prove their value. If they wouldn't spend them somehow, then, their money value will be lost quickly. What's the point of their money if even those who have them in billions can't find any real use for them?
Today they throw money they steal into military industry creating illusion that money worth something and at the same time converting them into their real wealth, control and power.
Space exploration is another obvious way to utilize money, but unlike military it is less profitable, because some things really could cost a lot, unlike military tech, and does not convert into power much. It is hard to punish some defiant country with Moon base or spaceship orbiting Mars. Also, space can't produce as much death as military tech could.
So, it is reasonable for them to get rid of any alternative to MIC and so reasonable questions about spending preferences. NASA is useless, since military could easily handle their space needs without any civilian structure.
Shit happens. It is natural order of things. Problems begin when shit start to happen routinely.
Probability of shit happening is proportional to the complexity of device. More components device contain, more complex that components are, more chances of shit could happen.
Clever engineering is when you find balance between purpose, complexity and reliability. If you need to add some complex thing to the design and preserve reliability on the same level, you have to simplify other things. Everybody do former, but all forgot to do latter.
Also, modern trend of making everything computerised, and so much more complex than necessary, inevitably makes shit happens routinely. And this is not even talking about adding all that computer problems with bugs, backdoors, hacking and so on. And not talking about deterioration of engineering culture due to computerising everything. Why bother to properly and thoughtfully engineer and design something if you could just drop a computer in between to do anything you need?
You absolutely can do that, you can literally write "write a song that sounds like X and is about Y" and it will generate multiple songs for you in under a minute for free that sound quite good.
I know how song generators work.
Song that sound good is not equal to song that you will like. Most songs written by people and AI sound good. Nobody need a song that sound bad. But very few songs you will like.
Also, he wrote text by himself, at least in songs I liked.
I upvote some of his songs. To save them in my Upvoted List here.
No AI tool will help you to write something that will be fine not only for yourself or kind of approved by your relatives, but by random persons around the world.
You still need some talent to make something that others would like sincerely.
Also he write text by himself, its not a suno.ai generated text.
If you could write an adorable song in a day - good for you, you are definitely talented.
But you didn't do that here. This guy did. Good for him.
PS: Could you do something like Dragon Force guys did in their "write a RandomBandName song in 10 minutes" streams diring coronahoax? :)
Imagine making pleasing songs about Jews, regardless of motivation. Nor me, neither probably you are able to write even single song in a day, not even talking about pleasant and on topic. :)
You can't deny his talent. :) As somebody replied to one of his songs - "I could easily imagine this song in my car's playlist".
I'll easily exchange him for all that trolls who systematically post links to MSM propaganda to enforce it here.
If somebody pay him for that, he deserve that money, for sure.
Plenty
20 in a decade is in no way "plenty" and far within statistics margins.
I can't help you with basic math and logic, if you completely deny them.
You cannot name a single Western executive or official who died by falling out of a window in recent years.
I was not paid to make a bullshit propaganda article for MSM to support some stupid narrative.
It is you, who are interested in that shit, not me. Why do you think somebody will spent a significant time for free just to satisfy your whatever wish?
But your attempts to cut or ignore any reasonable discussion, even completely aligned with stupid narrative from article, clearly tells me that you absolutely don't care about thist poor bastartds and have no any interest in that at all, your goal is just shitting this forum with obvious MSM bullshit and do not allow any sensible analysis of that crap.
Because you claimed it would be easy to find them and create a similar narrative about the West.
Because it is perfectly fits available suicide statistic.
Do you need detailed photos and exact VIN numbers to know that Ford trucks sometimes participate in road accidents? Obviously not.
But somehow you urgently need same data about suicide cases to find out that executives sometimes fall from windows.
The fact that you have utterly failed to do so just proves how full of shit you are.
The fact that you insist that there could not be 20 executives who fell out of windows in US in last decade prove that your mission here have nothing to do with any critical thinking.
You look miserable. Just like any other person here whose posts contain only links to MSM propaganda garbage and never able to have a reasonable conversation on the topic.
About satellite - you could check ukrainian sources if MIG-31s was in the air at the time close to this satellite accident. This could give you some clues. Something hypersonic fired from 30km altitude from supersonic jet could be not just some fancy air-to-surface missile.
As for "Ukrainian Navy" - it was completely destroyed in a first days of war. All existing navy. Some ships parked in Berdyansk and Mariupol ports came under Russian control. Today Ukraine have no any navy for a long time.
What you referred to are cargo ships that "only carrying grain from Ukraine!!!111" and border patrol boats. They was actively hunted and destroyed, in Odessa and Nikolaev ports. Looks like finally Russian MoD decided to finish that obvious circus with "it's just innocent cargo ship/patrol boat that didntdonothing".
Plenty of
21 for decade. Pretty within statistical margins.
Russian executives
Only few are executives, most are state officials. And from that executives some are executives of failed startups or small regional branches or ex-executives.
You cannot name a single Western executive or official who died by falling out of a window in recent
Why should I? It's not me who care about few nobodies who fell from windows found by Western propagandists. It was you who bring this MSM propaganda article here and asked a question in the title, like you are interested in finding an answer.
If you are interested in that phenomena, do your own research.
I thought that you are interested in that phenomena and your question, so proposed two explanations for you:
- Putin kill them.
- It is just a usual cherry-picking often used by lying Western media.
Both explanations should be investigated by you, because it is you who are interested in that. To check validity of those explanation you obviously need
- Search for the reason why they are so significant threat to Putin that he had to organize their asassinations
- Search for statistics of suicides by falling from window in different countries.
But somehow you deny any discussion or research on any of proposed explanations. And you didn't provide any alternative explanation. So, the only goal for you was to bring MSM propaganda article here and do not allow any discussion.
So who you are? Why do you need to shit this forum with MSM propaganda and cut any possible discussion?
The Move would be if some independent candidate (if any) suddenly win. :)
From the outside there is really no any significant difference between two main candidates. In addition, it looks like wrestling show where rivals throw and hit each other hard, but it is all in pretence, for public. Looks very unnatural, really.
So now you are just making up numbers out of thin air.
Somehow you have no same questions to Western MSM. Only to me, who dared to question Western MSM.
Either you can point out specific executives and officials who fell out of windows or you can not.
You mean to do the complex and uninteresting job for you for free. Are you a commie?
Pathetic.
Pathetic is pushing yet another obvious Western MSM bullshit made up for Western money using purely Western cliche to the conspiracies froum and inability to explain or even question anything about this bullshit. :) That is pathetic.
So why post them if there is no indication that they were executives and officials? I never claimed that people don't fall out of windows outside of Russia.
So, if random people fall out of windows from time to time, then there will be executives and officials among them. It is simple statistics. Executives and officials are not protected from being suicidal or suicided. And one of popular form of suicide is falling from window.
Suicide rate is around 45000 a year in US for last decade. https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/facts/data.html If even only 1% is falling from window, then there is 450 persons per year who fell from window in US.
There is no any way there will be no executives and officials in that 450 persons. There are 20M officials in US for 300M population. It is every 15th person. There are 33M businesses in US for 300M. So every 9th person is a head of a business. So, every 6th person in US is either official, either head of a business (if state officials are not allowed to be a businessman). From those 450 per year who fell out of window around 75 people either head of business, either state official.
For decade there will be 750 heads of business or officials who fell out of window in USA. With such statistics, there is no any problem to make a list of 21 person and write an article "White House throwing executives from windows in USA"
Read the thread title again.
And where is in title described difference between executive and random person? Or were is explanation why executive is so special that it can't be suicidal and jump out of the window,?
You haven't found a single one yet.
How do you know than? Check that links I found in a minute, may be some of them was enterpreneurs or bureaucrats. Why you completely denying that probability?
Interesting, you bring MSM propaganda article with narrative that for some reason exists for many years, written by somebody who paid to write such articles. You didn't do anything except copying link. You obviously didn't study local Russian press for accidents and didn't even check who the people from the list really were. But somehow think that you have a right to demand that from me.
Those examples are random people, not executives and officials.
How do you know that? There is nothing about who they were in articles. IDK, if it is some cultural difference or whatever, to not mention past and present occupations in reports on accidents in USA. Privacy or whatever. It is up to you to find out who they were.
Also, why do you separate executives and officials from random people? Are they somehow special and it is absolutely impossible for them to suicide themselves falling from window?
This few examples is just what I get from a minute search in Google. Imagine how many you will eventually find if you thoroughly check all US local press and other sources. For decade there will be hundreds if not thousands of those who died falling from window in USA. There is no way there will be no any CEOs, officials or whatever you account as "special" in that list.
Why don't you just admit being wrong instead of digging yourself in deeper?
Wrong in what exactly? Asking unintended questions about article in MSM?
You are still denying any conversation about why exactly this nobodies mentioned in this article (and many other) are so important for both Putin (to organize their asassination) and Western press (to circle that list for years). Why are you evading that conversation?
Of course you don't. As expected. A significant number of executives and officials falling out of windows in the last 10 years is a purely Russian phenomenon
21 is in no way a significant number for a 10 years. And they are definitely not top, widely-known, famous, even politically active (except, may be, that Khodorkovsky pal) persons. They are nobody in political or financial sense. And half of them are state bureaucrats on the positions with high probability of corruption.
Strange that article does not count that doctors from coronahoax times too.
Let's see f.e. at USA:
https://abc7ny.com/nyc-window-fall-upper-east-side-washing-ues/12056023/
https://www.healthcarefacilitiestoday.com/posts/Man-Dies-After-Falling-Out-of-Hospital-Window--28624
Just in a minute, in Google (!).
So, people fell out of windows and die in USA too. If you are truly interested, what prevent you from finding all that "fell out of window" accidents across the USA for a decade, finding out who they were, and choosing bureaucrats, state workers, enterpreneurs and CEOs (including ex-) among them? I'm sure you will find of them in this list.
But why you don't want to discuss a conspiracy side of that topic?
OK, Putin killed all that persons. What exactly was the reason for Putin to organize whole extermination operations against them? Why Western MSM circulate that list again and again, like they were very important for somebody or something behind MSM? Why nobody ever heard about them before death? No any political statements from them, no scandals, no rumors, nothing before death. What connects all of them except that articles? Who they were really, if they are so important for Western MSM? Why there are no mention of Navalny, who was open political rival for Putin in that Western MSM list? He was from separate group?
That's really interesting questions, why not discuss them?
Not just geeks - they passed a specific rithual of receiving psychologist diploma. :)
You are right about psychology as a replacement for religious practices.
Interesting, that unlike psychology, Church distiguished human and non-human mind. Priests have some procedure to distinct between posessed and bliss f.e. One is non-human and other is human. So, one needs exorcism to get rid of non-human mind, other need mercy and charity. Psychologist will account both just as diverse human.