Toxic, Metallic Compounds Found in All COVID Vaccine Samples Analyzed by German Scientists - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/toxic-metallic-compounds-covid-vaccines-german-scientists/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=f7cf9f90-f6de-447f-8b4c-3b94cd5f6219
Japanese study proves Pfizer and Moderna shots contain entities that assemble themselves in complex structures - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/19957kg1BP/nanobots-in-covid-shots-that-ass/c
German scientists reveal what's in the shots with Raman spectroscopy - https://odysee.com/@ildrzaius:6/German_Scientists_Show_Magnified_Images_Of_Massive_Vaccine_Damage_and_Unnatural_Contaminants_In_Vaccines:5
Spanish scientists exposed the Graphene Oxide in covid shots using Raman spectroscopy. La Quinta Columna has over 1000 scientists, who have collaborated for this information with over 1000 hours of research combined. - https://odysee.com/@ekab:2/VID_20220326_082809_583:f
Spanish scientists discover that the vaccinated and the tested for covid emit unknown bluetooth signals - BlueTruth documentary full - https://odysee.com/@ARGONAUT:d/CC_2022_06_11_DocBluetruth_English:10?src=embed
Graphene oxide discovered in covid shots using optical microscopy - Greg Reese report - https://odysee.com/@InfoNews:f/What-Graphene-does-in-your-body:5
Surveillance Under The Skin - Dr. Yuval Noah Harari - A tiny gae joo, who's WEF's right hand man. "The thing that people would remember from the covid crisis is that this was the moment when everything became monitored" - https://odysee.com/Surveillance-Under-The-Skin---Dr.-Yuval-Noah-Harari:1?src=embed
This guy didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995H03Swm/covid-strikes-again-at-a-person-/c
This guy also didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995CQBlf3/those-of-you-who-think-the-vacci/c
These athletes didn't have heart complications and didn't die from sugar. Jwilderness - https://www.youtube.com/@JWilderness/search?query=what%27s%20going%20on
"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established." - 2 Corinthians 13:1
Not by a comment from a redditor, who can't distinguish SUGAR from Graphene oxide, and his whole theory (which is promoted on Reddit, and here) is - "Look the other way, people. Nothing to see here... Ignore all these reports from scientists all over the world..."
It does-not. Typical quadrupole mass-spectrometer is a tabletop device with a size of a good office printer. It is not even very expensive in comparison with other lab equipment.
You could even find used ones for the price affordable to a small private business or a middle-class enthusiast.
Yes, they work from regular wall outlet and consume around 1kW.
Mass-spectrometer does have particle accelerator, just like CRT monitor or home air ionizer. "Particle accelerator" does not mandatory mean some giant cyclotrone or LHC. Any device that accelerate particles is particle accelerator, be it electron gun in CRT tube or very similar assembly of few electrodes in mass-spectrometer.
You are correct, there are table top devices. I was doing some more digging and it looks like a combination of time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy is used to study graphene. Although its not clear to me how one would use that to study graphene suspended in a liquid. In principal though, I think you are correct that one could devise a means to do so in a medium sized lab.
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc. How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
Exactly. This gives the first and basic clue about composition of substance on atomic and submolecular level. It allow you to get preliminary information for chromatography and chemical tests for specific substances. If you have carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, lead and iron, you don't need to look for arsenic compounds or cesium. But force you to look for cyanides and lead compounds.
You will have high relative amount of carbon, much higher than for hydrocarbons or carbonates.
Also, just think why they so stick to that graphene stuff. Graphene is one of greatest nothingburger of science. It is known for around century, but still we don't have any more or less useful use of that substanse other than fill MSM articles and empty scientific papers.
Of course, talking about some polyhexamethylene guanidine in vaccines or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate will not create attention from regular public, but overhyped graphene will.
Also, graphene narrative as microblades in vaccine that cut everything in bloodstream directly contradicts blood clots facts. You can't create a clot with something that cut objects in pieces. But some uninterestin calcium hydrocarboaluminate (widely used coagulant) or other complex calcium compounds or, say, synthesized thrombines, easily could be the reason.
And, suddenly, you need mass-spectrometer to detect calcium in specimen to get a clue where to look for if you want to find a reason of blood clots.
Don't you understand that whole anti-vaccinehoax publications just does not fit together and with known facts about not-a-vaccine. It is just insane - "who cares why blood clots is a main consequence of not-a-vaccine, look, GRAPHENE!!!!".
Unscientific, non-systematic, self-contradictory "studies" floating around on non-official side with all that overhyped "nano", "graphene", "aluminium" and other keywords just make things worse.
Yeah that makes sense. It does seem like the graphene that was detected was probably from contamination from their preparatory steps that got into some batches, and was likely unrelated to the issues people were seeing. Which, to your point, could be part of a disinfo campaign. I think what got alot of people looking at the graphene angle was the guy talking about graphene razor blades (which seemed like some science fiction to me) who suddenly died after his discovery. Pretty suspicious timing. I'm forgetting the guy's name...
I'm in doubt they detected anything. It is unlikely that you will notice any peaks from contamination. Raman spectra itself is very dim, it is a great challenge to detect Raman scattering even from pure substances, say water or salt crystal. And brighness of Raman scattering obviously proportional to the amount of substance studied. If it is some weak water solution, then water lines will be magnitude orders brighter than from dissolved substance.
With Raman you have to separate light source line from very dim scattering lines. It is like trying to make a photo of a stars in daylight. And moreover you have to do the same again to separate dissolved substance scattering from O-H water bonds scattering f.e.
If you have a mix of numerous substances dissolved in water, then you get a lot of tiny peaks at the noise level mixed alltogether.
Raman spectrometer is not some magic device that print out exact composition of scanned specimen. It is a very useful device that could give you some clue in some circumstances. But to make it useful you have to know how to use it properly and how to correctly interpret results.
Even with that X-ray (or laser) gun that show composition of alloy as a list of elements found in measured metal object things are not that simple. You could get high zinc amount just because the thing is zinc-plated. And it does not show you crystal structure of ally. It is hard to distinguish martencite from austenite stainless steel f.e. It gives you a clue, and then you have to use your brain and knowledge to get some real result.
As I see proper study of not-a-vaccine:
Eventually we will have exact composition of not-a-vaccine specimen with all substances found and their concentrations.
Such independent research is perfectly possible for any more or less equipped biochemical lab. It will take some time and money for spendables, but it is absolutely doable and could have been done in passed years easily. It hardly will be accepted by "official" science due to "legal" issues from obtaining samples to non-granted use of lab equipment, but if the goal is truth and not grant money, h-index or publication in famous journal that does not matter.