It's not feathers around, it's spikes of wheat.

How do y’all stay excited and up in life when everything seems stacked against you?

By trying to understand what the hell is going on and not giving a fuck to anything that "seems stacked against you". There is always multiple ways around, you just have to select the best one using knowledge you got by understanding.

Nuking Mars you will not make its atmosphere 100 times larger, which is necessary for real terraforming. They don't care about terraforming, they care only about amount of CO2 molecules around.

If my theory have any sense, and NIR is vital for them, they will get 5 times more NIR on Mars than on Earth now. On Mars insolation on the top of atmosphere is twice lower than on Earth, so it is twice less NIR falling from Sun to Mars. But 10 times less CO2 on Mars means 5 times more NIR on Mars surface than they have on Earth.

PS: Escape of elites from greening Earth to Mars is not the worst outcome of current elite-humans war.

And Mars they dream about is an ice cold desert they are desperately trying to create on Earth with their attempts to prevent Earth climate return to normal by preventing CO2 level rise to normal 1200ppm (0.12%).

Interesting, that Mars atmosphere is 95% CO2 by volume, with total mass of 2.5⋅10^16kg. Earth atmosphere now is 0.04% CO2 by volume, with total mass of 5.2⋅10^18kg. However, (after some math: CO2 is 44g/mol, Mars atmosphere 43g/mol, Earth atmosphere 29g/mol, and vol%=mol% for gases) the mass of CO2 on Mars appeared to be is 2.4⋅10^16kg, and on Earth is 3.2⋅10^17kg but should become 9.6⋅10^17kg when CO2 rise to 1200ppm. So, the amount of CO2 on Mars over your head is 10 times less as on Earth now and will be 30 times less in future.

They are afraid of certain amount of CO2 over their heads as fuck. Even consider nearly inhabitable Mars as apropriate replacement if things will go not in their favor here, and Earth become really green, from pole to pole, but with 3 times more CO2.

So who the fuck are they? Why are they afraid CO2 so much?

Had some thoughts on that, and that Mars thing perfectly fit too.

We are experiencing controlled demolition engineered and performed by grotesque incompetent performers.

Interesting. Only Jews was allowed to emigrate to USA from USSR. As for non-Jews, only some spies or high-ranked scientists, artists or athletes could do it duiring visits abroad. Ukrainian farmers definitely was not on that list.

Aslo, some Ukrainians, who well served as Germany collaborants had a chance to escape with retreating Germans during WWII. But again, barely it was Ukrainian farmers.

So, how your family left Ukraine after holodomor being farmers? Had some special paper signed by Stalin? Or just was Jews, and not farmers? Or moved out as Germany collaborants during WWII?

Something like limit number of times things could be reselled without actual processing?

Marx didn't use it himself

True. Marx & Engels use "kapitalistische produktionsform" in their writings (along with "socialistishe" and "kommunistishe produktionsform"). However, term "capitalism" was not invention of Soviet translators, that term was introduced in some Marx & Engels followers in the West around 1860s. There was no any Soviets at the time.

Sorry, but if you don't know anything about the history of socialism, you don't know where socialism has been attempted and failed.

LOL. Tell me moar! Name me one country where "common ownership of means of production" was really implemented.

Weathly people and profitable companies are NOT interested in free market capitalism.

Yes. That's what I'm telling you. That's why they are socialistic inside. That's why I'm concerned about vulnerabilities of free market capitalism that allow existence of companies that are socialistic inside. Or you are trying to tell that socialistic method of organisation of production is superior than free market capistlism one and that is why that socialist companies hijack nearly all modern free market?

So even though it may look like a corporation or government is doing something good, its likely just because you're missing something. I will always do opposite of their agenda.

Doing opposite of what enemy wants from you could be dangerous trap. That way you giving enemy way to control you, just in another way. Why not just do what you need, not giving a fuck to any corporation or government at all?

I can confirm this.

Marxism is centered on "oppression". Marxism just decalre any exploitation evil. Yes, exploitation could be evil, but that does not mean that if I hire somebody to help me in my workshop it is evil exploitation. But at the same time the exploitation of citizens by authorities is a good thing.

That marxist idea - to make "opression" from anything and blame everybody in that "crime" leaving that anything perfecly legal to use for ideological "priests" have a wide use in nearly every shit we observe now.

Thanks for your perspective.

Honestly, I think that all that stock trading stuff make more harm than good. Looks like the whole idea of share as a simple way for ordinary man to invest and potentially profit from that investment, receiving dividends from the profit of company, is completely lost and now all that continous stock trading is just a kind of gambling to make the rich richier. Ordinary man even have no right to buy shares on stock now by himself.

As for patents, I even have few, but really I don't bother to patent things I develop periodically. For the reason you mention. Even if some company will use my invention described in patent, I have no enough money and resources to effectively sue it. I think opensource idea is much better for such things. I share my invention with community and as a payment from community I receive a right to use inventions of other people for my profit.

Because we've tried

Where? It will be interesting to check.

Socialism is "from everybody according to abilites, to everybody according to his labour". It was never implemented fully AFAIK. In USSR to hide inability to build that real textbook socialism, government invented "different grades of socialism". And permanently talk about "in the next five years we will be near to transition to developed socialism". And do it every five years again and again.

where the influence for socialism comes from

Obviously it comes from marxism, where socialism was intermediate step of society to communism. Interesting, that Trotsky insist that it is impossible to build socialism in a single country and before building socialism they want to create worldwide revolution. Stalin thought that Trotsky is dumb Jewish bastard and that it is perfectly possible to build socialism in a single country without all that world communist revolution shit. As you know, Trotsky obviously lose that dispute, because Stalin's argument was heavier and sharper. :)

And you don't know your history or maybe spend some time talking with people who have lived in a socialist country.

I grow in USSR and study in school in USSR. We studied all that marxist shit and it was far from what we observed around. Really, that was not as awful as many would think. And it definitely was something that didn't look like what now implemented in the west and posed as socialism or part of it. May be, because it was not "final" socialism.

It won't work.

I'm not so shure. If you take some modern business entity, with high probability you will find plenty things from socialism inside it. The relations between employer and employees, especially in large companies looks like socialism. With all that regulations, ideology, fixed prices, ignorance, absence of initiative, strict ierarchy, complete separation of top managers from lower levels, negative selection, etc. And that is the only thing on the west that resembles socialism. When large western companies began to expand into Russia, many people, who got the job in new branches, was shocked that they are internally looks like what most Russians hated in USSR. Sometimes it was even worse. But somehow nobody, no single western antimarxist is talking about it. May be just because they don't have any clue how socialism looks like?

So, if it is won't work, why large, private, and definitely capitalistic companies build that socialism-like shit inside?

That's pretty much what we have now and only the rich and powerful like it and wish for more of the same.

So, is it possible to somehow make that capitalism or free market or libertariarism invulnerable to that way of things?

In any case there is some rules in that capitalism, free market, whatever. I.e. seller and buyer have to agree on the price. Seller can't force buyer to buy. Buyer can't force seller to sell. And so on. You can't describe capitalism, whatever it is, without declaring some rules.

So the question is - is it possible to add or change some rules to make capitalism at least more resistant to what happens with it now?

Theft and murder, even of small amounts or of unimportant people, are forbidden by natural law, regardless of the economic system and what we name it.

There is no natural law that prohibit insider trading, f.e. Moreover, patent infringing is accounted as a good by natural law. You know, "don't give a fish to one in need, better teach him fishing". But in modern western capitalism they are crimes. Should they be crimes in that "clean" capitalism you talk, or not?

Sorry, I don't know what you mean about usury being a crime.

I mean that usury is prohibited. Just like theft is prohobited in western capitalism. You can't give a loan with interest to make profit. Just like you can't steal to make profit.

capitalism is the only form of economics that has ever worked.

Socialism has never worked.

There was no pure socialism ever. So we don't know. USSR socialism was some kind of state capitalism, where free trade was allowed only among state enterprises, but not among citizens, and private business was prohibited.

Government will always be at the root of the problem.

So, capitalism is vulnerable for government actions. What we need to change to remove that vulnerability from capitalism?

but i cant think of any.

Tox, I2P, Jabber, Matrix, ZeroNet, etc. There are even no possibility to control them. One who seek shall find. Other who do nothing shall not.

Free communication and free from censorship is the only anti-regulation we need to govern ourselves and for free markets to work.

As you see, that does not work. We have everything for free from censorhip communication for a long time. But that is not only thing we need, obviously.

So, don't blame capitalism for all this or you are just playing into the narrative they want you to believe

Who want? I don't know any "they" who want to make usury a crime. Every single "they" I know dreams about making literally everything people use a loan to gain interest and control debtors. I propose a way to completely destroy any way of creation elites grown on ususry. It would be impossible for them to exist if usury will be made equal to theft or murder.

Wrong. You need capitol to rent

You will be provided bed and food for free if you are a good obeying citizen doing you everyday mandatory work.

Create it FROM WHAT? Thin fucking air? That's more of a pipedream than anything a communist dumb shit would say.

You will not believe, but you could synthesise a lot of things literally from thin air if you have enough energy and appropriate technology. You again will not believe ne, but even plants do it without any problems. There is also soil around to use.

Also, there is such thing like fusion, that allow making any substance you need, if, again, you have enough energy and apropriate tech to do it.

You could literally make anything form thin air. Two questions - energy and tech. And, somehow, authorities trying hard to deprive you from both.

I thought the most obvious would be a bartering system but you still need some metric to compare items.

There was attempts in late USSR to build such global system for making global barter possible. But USSR was crushed and that research was buried.

but as a "system" with more than 2 people it doesn't fucking work.

Works easily. With more than 2 people. First have potatoes and want spade, second have spade and want honey, third have honey and want potatoes. Easy as fuck if they are smart enough to just share about their needs and existing commodities to each other. First give potatoes to third, third give honey to second, second give spade to first. I witnessed much more complex schemes among businesses in early 1990s when the money cost nothing in crashed USSR. First Russian stocks was barter ones, where multiple businesses shared their needs and commodities and finding solutions for their problems. If there would heve been powerful enough computers and networks, it could work flawlessly. However, authorities have no ability to tax that deals, so barter was prohibited.

However, barter is not necessary. In modern world the most valuable thing is energy. Everybody need it and, what is the most important, you could mathematically calculate the "price" of any commodity in energy. Energy unit could be the "money" for trade.

Yeah, with jews stealing everything and putting ethnic Russians in camps. You're full of shit.

How? You exactly describe that two marxism casts - Jews who gain the profit and Russians that work in camps for food.

Fascinating to see such rant as a reaction to simple and obvious assumptions and examples. :) What's the cause? Are you shure that money is not something sacral for you?

No other form has worked.

Please, provide an example of capitalistic society where usury is a crime and it has not worked.

Capitalism is the recipe that works

I really in a big doubt that it works. Look around.

free and unbiased press

And how that press is supposed to maximize its profit staying free and unbiased?

people also need uncensored platforms for communication.

We have them for a long time. But nobody wish to use them. Because "iT iS OnLy FoR NeRdS!!! I don't want to RTFM! Twitter is cutier!"

because people will just boycott shitty capitalists.

Why do you think so? One good capitalist make cool cars from stainless steel, with million miles engines, easy repairable and so on. He spend all money on quality and reliability. Cars are good, affordable, could last a century, but not cheap. Other, shitty capitalist make shitty cars from garbage with only quality thing is LCD screen of entertainment system. And spend most money on advertising. Cars are complete shit, but very cheap. So how do you think, how many people will boycott the latter?

corrupt government that allows crooked media and big tech censorship.

So, there is something in capitalism itself that allow existence of corrupt government, crooked media and big tech censorship. It is profitable to corrupt government, crook media and do censorship. There is easy ways and specific capitalism activities that allow to gain a lot of money from nothing to do all that crap.

What does it mean?

That is a proposal on society structure created by Marx and Engels. It includes some kind of philosophy with some basic laws (questionalble and unproved), definition of communism and description of ideology that should be accepted by that future society. All marxism is stated in few extremely boring books. Marx and Engels followers tried to enhance and develop that doctrine, but separated in opinions and started to kill each other.

Shortly, marxism is a howto for building communism. That howto was never fully implemented, and in my opinion will never really work.

There is few interesting tips in that howto, but that interesting and useful tips are greatly cancelled and hidden by any implementors. The example of one of such interesting tip - https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0Nl6aJl/one-thing-they-dont-want-you-to-/

Everyone needs money

Who told that? You need money only in current system. In another systems the concept of money could be completely senseless. You don't need money in the society where you cant be owner (one that WEF dream to build). You also don't need money in society where you could easily create anything you need.

The problem is we don't see our fellow man as constituents, we see them as something to be exploited.

I agree, but that is not absolute thing. You could find examples of non-exploiting societies in some families, groups of friends, may be even in some communities. However that examples have a limit - number of members, every person should know each other personally and fully. And humans can't personally and fully know more than, I suppose, around hundred persons. That examples are not scalable.

Marxists are far ahead in the exploitation game and they project that onto "capitalists".

Marxism, really, is some kind of two-caste society, where one small caste is fully exploit another using ideology. Some kind of sect where regular members praise and feed priests. Money is not needed in that system, meanwhile.

you can trace the effect back to some government intervention.

Without government intervention there can't be any restrictions on the ways of making profit, at least without complete rebuild of society. It's a govenment who is enforcing rules of capitalism. All of them, including making theft and murder for profit a crime.

I'm not shure that this unlimited thing without government interference in completely another society could be named capitalism. Moreover, if you could build a society where you don't need any authority to implement members protection from theft and murder, than you just don't need that capitalism at all.

I have not a single time heard of that being done.

It could work in some libertarian society, where, say, business that hired to enforce society rules allowed to loot the business that did the crime.

Destroying institution of family. Human beings highly probably will prefer family over authorities if they will be forced to choose from. But NWO needs total compliance, and that compliance should be absolute. They can't destroy basic human instincts, so they trying to get rid of family.

well, when you're eating human flesh... :)

You still can not catch it in the plate with the fork if you don't see it. Well, when it is GMO human flash that is glowing in the dark.... :)

IDK, looks like it is some kind of childish show off, just like ugly and senseless but insane expensive woman handbags or man costumes and ties.

It's from the 2020, double numbers now, you know, infaltion and all that stuff.

Did you ever tried to build such table and have a dinner on it? :) I did. As usual, things that looks cool does not always cool to use.

Just take a coffee table with glass top (or put a glass sheet on the cardboard box), cover it with white paper or semi-transparent plastic and put a lamp under the surface. Then try to dinner on that thing. You will be amased.

You will barely see anything in your plate and will experience problems with using fork to eat something from the plate. :) Light from table surface overload your eyes making you unable to see what's in the plate.

Do you mean 3x more here?

Of course. My mistake. Fixed, thank you.

Source on link between NIR and reptiles?

I'm not shure that reptiloids (which is just a settled term to distinctly describe elites) have anything common with Earth reptiles.

Some earth reptiles could feel FIR (heat) to hunt mammals with special sensors on the head. IIRC ferrets could see up to 1000nm (NIR is ~750-1500nm), Also I have a very strange paper in my bookmarks - https://www.cell.com/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)30101-1 (WTF, and who the hell could ever think this out?)

Link between NIR and elites is a theory to explain what we observe. I have no idea is it true, and if it is, how exactly elites utilise NIR presumably to stay intelligent. But while it reduce number of questions and there are no experiments or observations that disprove it, it is a valid theory.

Idea of link between some natural resource and intelligence is not new, meet it in some SciFi novels and Farscape series (Scarrans race, being reptiloids, had to periodically eat specific plant flowers to stay intelligent).

Why assume that an ever-expanding Universe is actually simulated/exists?

Because you could observe it.

Really I don't like simulation theory. To do it, you need some kind of computer more complex, than what it should simulate. Also, that rises a question - who create that computer and why. You end with much more questions than before.

It could be a projection, for example. I know it sounds absurd, but it could, couldn't it?

It should be an enormous holographic realtime projection. Projector will be more complex than projected Universe.

Could you show me this website?

It is not a website. It is an antenna, amplifier, 137Mhz receiver, ADC and software decoder. You could do it for less than $20 using cheap RTL2838 based DVB-T receiver. Or use any transiever that could receive 137Mhz band if you already have one. There are a lot of howtos on receiving raw satellite images on rtl-sdr.com. Simpliest setup is RTL2838 USB dongle, V-pole antenna from oldTV set, and simple opensource software like xwxapt for NOAA satellites or glrpt for Meteor satellites.

You'd need a few dozens of them, but why should that be a problem?

Just receive a picture, and try to think out how it could be done with baloons. You will need a baloon at 800km flying with 7.4km/s speed around the globe.

The speed and the altitude are just numbers. There's no way to verify that.

It is right in what and how you receive. The area you see on image and speed of arriving image strips. Also all that doppler effect and other stuff. You have everything to verify it entirely by yourself without depending on any third-party.

That doesn't look real to me.

Because it is a cuts from Russian educational movie for children wiith animations and all that stuff. They cut out big part with animations with formulas and drawings of orbital mechanics of flight. I don't remember correctly, but it was 7 or 8 grade in school, astronomy lessons. There was an enormous number of educational movies in USSR that heavily used in education process in schools. They are not like Discovery "popular science" thing, they full of formulas, explanations, experiments, and all that scientific stuff layed out sequentially and logically connected. It's a pity that NauchFilm don't have some website with online collection of that movies, you have to order them by mail on DVD.

I think you may be falling for the Russia good/US bad narrative that's been going on over there and in Eastern Europe for decades

No, I fail into logic of sequence of events and continuity of technology achievements. It does not look suspicious if you began Moon exploration from perfectly possible with existing rockets shooting dummy things to the Moon with misses and failures, then few attempts to orbit the Moon, again with normal rate of failures and problems, than attempt to soft-land on surface, again with regular try-fail rate, then land and strat from moon, and so on. Looks just like ordinary workflow. Not like you barely succed in LEO flights and next day you send manned ship to the Moon and everything goes fine.

I have no any distinct opinion on US Moon Landing. I know only that there are a lot of suspicious inconsistencies in what NASA presented to the public. It is perfectly possible that NASA really did manned moon landing, but with a lot of failures and crew deaths, so they had to create that fake show for public for political reasons.

I'm shure that US Moon Landing was technically possibe at the time. But I don't know had it been done really or not and I don't care, because I think it is not important at all.