▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The irony is I ended up developing an intolerance for society, and exited.

Mee to, especially in last years, but my business allow to distance from society and I also delivered all business negotiations with customer managers, lawyers and finacists to my colleague/business partner, and I'm talking mostly with decently sane and competent engineers who directly work with our stuff so no need for me to exit.

In last years, top management, especially of large enterprises become completely dumb and insane. Sometimes seems that they even have their own crazy language and system of concepts, so it is impossible to maintain any dialogue with them. You could spend half of year just to make an agreement on each letter of contract, while enterprise losing multiples of our equipment price every month.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don't need soap to wash that out....water and scrubbing...it's all...trust me.

There are no need for trust anybody. Everyone could easily check it by, f.e. touching mirror or other polished surface after washing hands. At least you have to spend very significant time washing and scrubbing to get rid of oily substances from your skin.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, how much do you make?

Depends on how business going, now it runs a little better, it is $2.5k - $3k / month.

I haven't been an employee since the 80s, but I can see why people wouldn't want to risk the deal they've made by telling anyone else about it. If you knew I was getting $10,000 per hour, would you still be okay with only getting $65 per hour?

I also haven't been employee for a long time. :)

But I think it will depend on the average. If average is $5 per hour, I'll highly likely will be happy with my deal and will not care about your at all. Even if average is unknown, I'll prefer to rely on needs/spent efforts ratio. If that $65/hour cover all my needs and don't demand any significant efforts from me, I'll will not care about your salary too. Also, it depends on hours a month. Interesting, that this situation with $65/h and $10000/h is real. Say, you and I are electronics engineers with similar skills. But I'm repairing smartphones, and you repair highly sophisticated rare industrial equipment. I need an hour to repair smartphone, you need a hour to repair your thing. But I have endless customers who wish to pay me $65/h 24/7, and you could earn your $10000/h only few times a year, since there is only dozen pieces of that rare equipment in whole world. I could have questions only if average is $10000/h or if average is $65/h and we are doing exact same job with exactly same hours a year. And even in that case could be variants, when it could be OK for me. Either I'm altruist with other wealth source and this job is my hobby or lifework, either you just a relative of some top manager or supervising government official (high-ranked tax officer, f.e.). Or we are artists/actors/whatever where job itself does not matter.

In any case I'll try to find a reason for difference first. And highly unlikely I'll have intention to harm your wage, more likely will try to improve my own, by changing employer or acquiring skills.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Interesting, that if you do that with any other nation, say, make a flyer that state that some large successful company top managers are, say, Hungarians, then Hungarians will be proud of that - it is cool when your nation show some significant success.

But every single time when that happens with Jews, they began to whine about antisemitism and try to censor it. That is a hard proof that they perfectly know that their activity in that large company is harmful for the whole population who is a target audience of flyers. Always. Every single time.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard about such demands from employees of western (or with large western share) companies here, but nobody give a fuck to that strange, alien and completely unbased demands.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks. So, this is a kind of saving employer money through obscurity? Does it really works? If it works, that means that average salary among similar positions have to be noticeably lower than fair one. So, most employees have to be underpaid.

Also strange that it is not a open free market where sellers and buyers know each other prices and quality of commodities. That could result in huge drop in quality of commodities, employees skills in that case. If buyers and sellers don't know average prices and quality of commodities, there could not be quality competition.

So, from the other side, employees don't have to improve their skills, they just need to find an employer with highest possible proposal.

It's like you enter the shop to buy a soda and see a shelf with a tons of different cans without price. To find out prices you have to buy all different types, which is impractical, so you just take few random cans and checkout. If quality is not satisfactory, you will have to repeat that random shopping. From the manufacturer side there are no any need to make a soda with better taste - since each buyer have to choose cans randomly, there always be a buyer who will pay your price for your product, independently from the product quality.

If you add all that modern immigrants, diversity and inclusivity crap to that situation, things become even worse. In the shop you have to buy at least one blue and one rainbow cans, so manufacturer could just fill them with water or pee and they will still be sold.

For me it looks like strange casino where both player and casino loose, just because players don't want to show their bids and casino don't want to show his cards.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have a friendly bacterias on your skin and friendly viruses that limit friendly bacteria growth. It is perfectly normal and natural. They are a frontline of our skin protection from different pathogens. That is why excess use of sanitizers during coronahoax was a reason for unpleasant problems with skin of sheeple who just killed them. But that friendly buddies do their jobs and die. If your skin is oily, then all bacteria corpses and weared out viruses stay sticked to oil layer. That corpses not necessary began to stink, it depends on the person, some could began to stink after a hour of sweaty job, others could stay odorless a week, but that organic matter always decaying. Add old skin chips, pollen, dust and you'll get the picture.

Soap don't do any significant harm to living bacterias (if you are not zealously washing your body parts every 10 minutes with tons of soap, of course), but remove oil layer with that spent remnants.

IDK, if you are fine with wearing a layer of decaying organic matter on your oily skin and you are not a stinky person - that's fine. I'm not stinky too, but prefer to wash it out periodically. Without any problems with skin and hair.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Could work for dry hair without any serious activity, but will fail if you have oily hair or work physically. Your skin secreting not only salted water, but oils too. And you can't get rid of oils without some detergent.

And if you really want to feel absolutely CLEAN, you can't get this true feeling without finnish sauna or russian banya. :) Diving into snow is not necessary, cold shower will be good enough. Spend a half dozen minutes at least at 70-80°C (160-180°F) and take a shower. Repeat few times. Use soap at least at first shower. And only after that you could feel being really clean. :)

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Liquid soap + fine sand works perfectly. Used ground coffee is more pleasant, but I'm too lazy to dry and preserve it :)

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That shit is really bad for you.

Most shampoo based on lauryl/laureth sulfates as detergent, that is worse than stearates with ton of different shit that make shampoo look, smell, foam "better".

Use potassium stearate (liquid soap, same as usual soap, but with potassium instead of sodium) instead of shampoo, and that's all.

Soaps (stearates), unfortunately works bad in "hard" water, that is typical for drills and wells in most places, in that case you need either soften your water, either use other, not lauryl/laureth sulfate detergents, say, you could buy a barrel of Hostapon (should be most known in US trademark of natural coconut oil and glycin derivative, ~$10/liter for 30% solution) or similar thing and just use it instead shampoo without all that shitty bullshit marketing "modifiers".

There are a lot of interesting things that hidden from regular people that much better than shit they sell us. They could look not so great and rarely have any public advertising, but they are really cool, harmless and cheap.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

AFAIK the deal with Turkey about new NATO members have a condition of declaring PKK, Komala and other kurdish organisations as terrorists by that new members and extradition of their activists from Sweden to Turkey, may be even including a member of Swedish parliament who is a member of Komala. I'm not shure that Sweden really ready to comply.

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

I noticed that it is hard to remove all that black oil and grease dirt from hands and other body parts after car/truck/tractor repair without soap or some solvent. Also, a lot of rural activity could leave your hands dirty and will have to spent days using water with scrubbing to wash your hands.

What is presumable audience for your advise? People who do nothing?

Soap is easy. Take any natural oil you like and NaOH (sodium hydroxide), little chemistry (sheeple name it magic) and you have soap.

Also, it is possible to use ash as detergent, but since it is basically become alkali after combining with water, don't use it permanently, you will ruin your skin. Better use that alkali form ash to make soap from your favorite oil.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Russians often didn't give a fuck to the state laws even in Stalin years. And do that all way long for millenias and successfully doing that right now.

Americans too, often don't give a fuck to the state laws (all that booze smuggle and other stuff) up to the last decades (book as a proof).

But today I don't see anything near even smugglers. All I see is "we don't like that law, we have to protest/vote/riot/sue/whatever to overturn that law", but no any voices just to ignore or circumvent that law.

Let's take moonshine. AFAIK, it is prohibited to produce moonshine in US for private person without license. Just like it was prohibited in USSR. There was a 1 year jail sentence for that here, but nobody don't give a fuck. There was no problem to find a moonshine for sale or build a cube in USSR. And it was not because of lack of vodka on the market, there was more than enough vodka in USSR up to the very end. At the same time I was hugely surprised that even alternate fuel enthusiasts in US are seriously afraid of making moonshine and don't even want to consider that fuel for their projects, even taking in mind that there exists interesting and cheap catalysts (something near ZSM-5, don't know exact western analogue) that allow to make a direct Regular (92) gas replacement from moonshine in a simple DIY catalythic converter.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Small question:

I often see some anger from americans against some government laws, orders an other shit. Also I saw a lot of proposals of diferent grades of realisticness (could I say so?) but never saw a proposals to just ignore or cheat around that laws.

Is that some local thing or I don't get something important?

Interesting, that I recently found a 1984 book "Guerilla capitalism", where idea of not giving a fuck to the government shit was presented in full.

So is that ability to not give a fuck to the government completely wiped out from American people? Or there is something else that make the way of not giving a fuck somehow inapropriate for Americans?

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's analysts that normalize for prices of currencies.

It is senseless. You could easily normalize noise signal, but it still would be senseless noise.

Until you get rid of noise (USD/EUR/RUB/whatever state currency) in economy analysis, you will not get real picture. You could only get noise, nothing more. That's the point.

Difficult to do without a currency basket approach. USD is large enough you could probably use self normalization.

IDK, but I think unless you completely get rid of fiat in your calculations, you are doomed.

As an alternative approach to find out real economy you have to replace fiat with something real and universal. For now, I suppose it could be an energy and, say, kWh as a unit of price. You could get exact prime cost of anything in kWh spent to produce it. Including employer salaries that spent on other things nominated in kWh and so on. You will get a prime costs of everything in kWh. It will be a huge system of linear equations with profits (difference between prime costs and price for end user) as unknown variables. Total sum should be 0 - you can't put kWhs to the bank or bury in the chest under old oak - all produced energy will be spent to make things (including energy spent for heating/cooling employees apartments and all that stuff). Solving that system you get full picture - all prime costs and all retail costs for all possible commodities. So you could start to find out all that supply-demand and other stuff in that info where is no any noise from fiat currency that effectively hide reality.

It is a huge thing, but I think it is perfectly possible to solve with modern computing power. I know, it is enormous job for a large group of researchers, and I don't have a clue if it is possible to organize such research by means of small anti-elite communities, but it have to be done. May be it will be done after fiat currencies crash, or under some other circumsnaces when there will be no any other way to deal with the mess elites will leave for us.

May be you would not like what you finally find out, but truth doen't have to be pleasant.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What would you consider to be a stable reference point?

I think now it is energy. Say, 1 kWh of energy could be nice reference point. Today you could easily calculate exact real prime cost of any commodity in that "energy currency" and comparing it with real market price in kWh get some real figures about state of economy around that commodity - all that supply/demand/profit/added value/whatever.

In the past it could be a bag of wheat, or something similar. Now it is definitely energy.

I would argue anything in an economy, currency or hard asset, shifts in value all the time

Of course, it is inevitable with technology development and all that stuff. It is slow but very important changes, that show the real development of economy and country, but they are completely invisible being buried under all that meaningless high-frequency and low-frequency trading shit and twerky fiat currency itself. It is like a powerful static noise in radio that makes useful signal obscure. You could endlessly tell any fortunes on that noise but you will never get a real picture.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Similar patterns with gold, oil, and now the crypto.

And that allows us to assume that it is not gold, oil and crypto really change their value. They are not connected, but have similar graphs.

If you see different unlinked variables that have similar behaviour against another one in time, that definitely mean that it is the latter really changes, not other.

Say, some country have a year demand for 1 gazillion barrels of oil. This demand could not change fast. It just can't be that this demand will change every day or even month. It could change, but slowly, year by year - more efficient transportation, better powerstations, few percent more utilisation of oil in plastic production and all that stuff. Very slow change in demand dependent on combination country development and technology advances. In a year you just can't utilize even slightly more than that 1 gazillion barrels, and you will ruin everything if there will be noticeable less than that 1 gazillion barrels.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Costs change, demand changes ...

Costs and demand of what? USD or oil? I don't see how value (usefulness) of oil could change that fast back and forth. But I perfectly understand how easy value of USD could be manipulated by those who print them.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't that means that it was not a real value of oil or bitcoin changed, but only a value of backed by nothing USD? Real value (practical usefulness) of oil can't change if it is same variety. Liter of oil decade ago is same liter of oil now. Nothing changed. The energy density did not change, composition is the same, and so on. Seems that bitcoin practical usefullness was also stable as soon as it began to follow oil price chart.

What if we throw out USD as a measure of value and switch to something meaningful and really independent, say, kWh of energy instead? What charts will we get? They could be much more useful, than charts of price in some meaningless cutted paper.

Price charts of some real things in USD or any other paper could only show how value of USD was manipulated by the owners of printer, nothing more, they are useful only for those who making money out of thin air gambling on stocks or creating stupid propaganda about market. You can't use them for any scientific purpose.

by qbqb
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a Jesus monarchy can over rule democracy. Are you Jesus? Is Trump Jesus to you? Is Biden Jesus to you?

I'm Russian. I don't care much about US presidents, not my concern at all.

However, in Russian Empire monarchs was imposed by patriarch of Russian Orthodox Church. Imposition itself comes from Jesus who imposed apostoles, who imposed first priests and so on. In Russian Orthodox Church you could track the imposition of any priest or monarch directly to the Jesus. So, in some meaning, there was Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire. AFAIK, Russian Orthodox Church is only church in the world where priests imposition still tracked to the Jesus. Not much and tell nothing about a imposed person, but if you care, here it is. A literal sequesnce of impositions hand by hand directly to the Jesus.

Also interesting, that Russian monarch dynasties are not some self-proclaimed persons. Russians voted for them on the special Russian democratic procedure named "Assemblies of the Land" that called on such occasions. All people participated, even serfs. Last time we do it in 1613 when previous dynasty (one with Ivan Grozny) was cut. There was 3 candidates - Russian duke Mikhail Romanov, Vladislav, son of Polish King Sigizmund III and Carl Philipp, son of Swedish king Carl IX. Russians voted for Mikhail Romanov, so he was imposed by Orthodox Church and become Russian czar from new Romanov dynasty.

So, there is how things really happened. Literally, real democracy was used to reestablish Jesus monarchy in Russian Empire.

Democracy and monarchy are not substitutes of each other and not mutually exclusive. It is just a technologies, nothing more. If you are ready to die for just technology, there is definitely something wrong with you.

No one has an automatic right to popularity (if their position is an unpopular one). Popularity amplifies your speech, and unpopularity mutes your speech. That is the rule of democracy-based speech analysis amongst the public (when it is not rigged and functions properly).

Looks like exact cite from some internal documents of current MSM. Total bullshit. Truth don't have to be popular. But there should be a guaranteed way to distribute truth to every single person, even if TPTB don't want that truth.

by qbqb
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Free speech is democracy. You cannot have one without both.

Who told you that? Who proove that scientifically? Why do you think that say, monarchy can't have free speech? Why do you think that democracy can't censor "uncomfortable truth"?

What if in absolutely democratic society majority vote to censor something they don't like? If they can't vote for censorship, it is not democarcy but with free speech. If they can vote for censorship, than there is democracy, but no free speech.

Fuck that sociopolitical pseudosciences with pervert concepts and dogmas based on nothing. Don't fall to that shit. Don't build a cage for your thoughts with that garbage.

by qbqb
▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I live and die for FREE SPEECH as the medium, and MAJORITY RULES as the method.

Highly questionable nowdays.

What is the sense in FREE SPEECH if there is no any way it could reach the MAJORITY that should RULE?

Are you shure that it is a good idea to allow RULING of MAJORITY that jabbing itself with stupid not-a-vaxx and believe in SARS-CoV-2 and other MSM shit?

It is not enough to have only FREE SPEECH and MAJORITY RULES. They are necessary, but in no way sufficient. There should be much more to make them really work.

You need not just FREE SPEECH, but along with the unlimited access to audience, equal to what others (including elites/government/whatever) could achieve. If you have a MSM and conspiracies.win, there is no any sense to die for such "FREE SPEECH" unless MSM and conspiracies.win have equal access to all possible audience.

And you need not just MAJORITY, but absolutely educated and critically thinking MAJORITY, not a herd of sheeple with brains full of MSM propaganda. Are you really wish to die for the RULING of sheeple MAJORITY with MSM shit instead of brains?

Be careful with your wishes, they could easily make them real.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

And there is no any real sense in that - in both cases sea line is an easy workaround. But in case of Baltic countries there is clear and very "obvious" way for non-military actions in return, that, suddenly, perfectly aligned with NWO "green" agenda. In case of Canada there is no such "obvious" counteractions that could be useful for NWO.

▲ 8 ▼
CrazyRussian 8 points ago +8 / -0

Take in mind, that this 3 Baltic states - Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia have common electric network with Russia and Belarus from the USSR times, and get most of electricity from Russia-Belarus. Lithuania once was electricity exporter, but due to "green" agenda and "deliverance from Soviet heritage" it shut down relatevly new and powerful Ingalinskaya nuclear station built by USSR and now that Baltic trinity is total electricity importer. Also, they shut down few fossil fuel power stations, again, due to "green" agenda . So, they could be literally just shut down at any moment.

Highly unlikely Putin will do it, but there is a real possibility to throw 3 EU countries to stone age without any opportunity for them to somehow restore electric power in observable future.

Looks like this is a brutal attempt to set Baltic states up to that insane Agenda 2030 "sustainable energy" narrative to check what will happen to the "civilized" country without electricity.

As for that Russian anclave, there is no problem with switching supply to sea routes from St.Petersburg, they are already working AFAIK.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Read this - https://conspiracies.win/p/11S0bnzZXc/2009-norway-spiral/ there even video of spiral forming.

Failed launch. Spiral is formed by fuel leak or engine exhaust nozzle break, that form tangential thrust, so device begin to spin drawing a spiral in top layers of atmosphere.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›