▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is not mine. I never had any YT/Google/whatever account. And that guy is not even Russian. :)

▲ 6 ▼
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

Take a look at "genesis block" - first block #0 of blockchain, created by network creator, of ETH and you will have no any questions.

ETH was a hoax from the very beginning. More than a half of all ETH coins was created from nowhere at Jul 30, 2015 in 0 block by creators of ETH and sent to their wallets (there obviously was no any other wallets at very start). https://blockchair.com/ethereum/block/0

Genune hoax from the very beginning with the obvious proof right in the blockchain.

Funny, but some online blochain explorers does not show 0 block of ETH, but you could see it locally or on many other blockchain explorers.

Strange, that this obvious and easily prooveable fact is not mentioned in the artice.

Bitcoin, f.e. have a decent 0 block with no coins created from nowhere, only mining reward in it.

So, turning to PoS (Proof of Stake or Piece of Shit, it is equal) gives full control of ETH to those who own more than half of coins. It is ETH creators. It was planned from the very beginning. And transition from PoW to PoS was done exactly at moment when number of coins mined by users come close to number of coins created by owners in 0 block. So, no any need for anybody to play on stock buying more than 50% of coins to obtain full control. It is already under full control.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm waiting for the market to tank a little more to pick up some more physical metals. But it is the way.

Not the best option, I think. AFAIK, in US physical metals was once expropriated from people and there was no any significant resistance. So, they could repeat that anytime.

I think the best investments in our clown world is skills and/or tools. Unlike all that money stuff, both will feed you in any circumstances.

As for doomed... IDK, may be normies are, but that does not mean that we doomed too.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no single trustable government at all now. And seems that it will take centuries for any to gain any trust back. They all lost any trust irreversable. And those who don't was simply destroyed.

That is why completely independent money is a necessity.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

IDK, but for now, my most unreliable partner now is in Germany, not in China. I absolutely don't care about their Germany laws or other political shit, but if you don't pay your debt, or don't ship bought equipment, not because you physically can't, but because your government said that it is inapropriate, than you are an unreliable partner.

Interesting, that I never meet with some "customs problem" delays, "paperwork" delays, "need one more paper with state authorisation" delays from China partners. But it is usual thing with Germany ones. They literally pray on that fucking papers, stamps, signatures and other senseless bureacracy, even taking apart all that sanctions shit. IDK, may be it is because they are under big US holding, but that is not an excuse.

From the other side, Belgian partners, f.e. don't care about all that sanctions stuff. "No problem, let's meet in Turkey or Egypt to do our business", "yes, lets switch to crypto", and so on. They are small company without any big bosses or investors behind.

So, the reliability of partner does not depend on country at all. It depends only on people you doing business with. If that people put government, rules, politics over deal, than they are definitely not reliable. If people don't give a fuck about all that shit and care about their image in the eyes of business partners, they are pretty much reliable. Independence is reliability, suddenly.

Really, all that mess about hegemony is only about what knd of NWO they will install - one where you would be obliged to praise faggots, fake freedom and nonexistent democracy, and will not be allowed to criticize ruling class, or one where you will not be allowed to criticize some dictator, king, or political party. And something tell me that most peasants will be perfectly fine if the latter win, because at least their children will not be indoctrinated with that woke shit and they will not be forced to perticipate in pride parades and other disgusting crap.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

thermonuclear reactors does not have rods, only extremely hot plasma, they are fusion reactors, not fission like NPP.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is why I think that crypto is a very important stage of fair money system development. It undoubtly proved that there is absolutely no need in any corporate/state authority for universal money system to exist. It's time to move onto next stage in fair money system development.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its because QC is based on the pseudo science of special relatively.

It does not. QC is based on quantum mechanics that is incompatible with Einstein special and common relativity. All attempts to somehow combine them into Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything failed, even mathematically. Phylosophically it means that at least one of theories is wrong. Einstein relativity crap is definitely wrong. So, quantum mechanics could be more or less valid thing. At least, it does not lead to numerous weakly based paradoxes and does not insist on dogmatic shit like impossibility of FTL.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Won't happen for a while, she says, but it must eventually.

QC is the same shit as thermonuclear power. Decades of billions grants with no any useful result. Take a look at her twitter, it is all about receiving grants.

The problem with QC is that you need a lot of qubits to do something really useful. But as you increase number of qubits, the uncertainity of result grow too. So, in reality you could have either completely useless but working few qbits quantum computer that gives results with 80% of certainity, or completely useless many qbits computer that gives garbage with 0.01% of certainity instead of results.

And most interesting thing about that quantum uncertainity problem - if you discover a way to overcome it, that also opens doors to many so-called closing technologies, from unlimited, untraceable and secure p2p communications (may be even FTL ones) to all that zero-point energy stuff. It's like a Pandora box of things where each and every one is a direct threat for elites. You will not need conventional cryptography and money, including crypto, if that box will be open. Funny, but breakthrough, necessary for achieving all that overhyped QC goals you heard about, will instantly make that goals obsolete. :)

Obviously, elites don't need that breakthrough, like they don't need a breakthrough in thermonuclear power. So, we are observing decades long money laundering with high expectations and tons of hype without any practical result in QC and will observe it until elites will be destroyed.

And it will be a very good thing for us, if that somehow happen "evetually".

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also, there could be creating chaos and then come some Antichrist-like figure who fix things that was not broken not long ago and sheeple praise him and so on.

In any case, finding, identifying and locating those who pull the strings are more important than anything else. It does not matter what was their real plan, were they insane or not, what they want to achieve, etc if they are dead.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

There could be even worse thing - the masters of puppets are just insane and make absolutely senseless and random moves with their pawns. Just because they can. And than tiny small humans below spend all their efforts in cracking their heads in senseless attempts to find out nonexistent 4D chess strategies of puppets, instead of looking for masters.

There is the only way out of that clown world - identify real masters of puppets and exterminate them completely, leaving them no any possibility to somehow rise up again.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are no any 4D, 3D and even 2D chess players. Only puppets that carry out plain orders of their masters with unknown real agenda.

For some unknown reasons many trying to find out some logic in some collection of events but use wrong basic data about players. Any random sequence of events could be with some effort aligned as some very wise move of one or another player. That absolutely does not mean that the player really do that. Players are dumb. No one with some ability to think by himself would be selected as "player" in current world. Only obedient puppets. It is you, who have brains to imagine 4D chess game, not them.

Even more simple - imagine, that you are looking at regular game of chess and for some unknown reason think that pawns make moves by themselves. And make a conclusion that pawns are very wise beings. They are not. They are just spineless and brainless pawns. Aligning separate pawn moves into some great pawn own strategy is a huge mistake.

We just don't know what puppet masters want to really achieve, that should be the main question.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Acquire money for support and maintenance of shoukd be publicly useful state utilities - roads, army, administration, police, etc.

However, in our clown world there exists also property taxes that are just rent for things people think they own - realty, cars, whatever. Kind of claiming ownership right over people property.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

the purpose of tax is to curtail spending and control inflation

They fully control inflation without interfering with taxes. Just by printing rate and banking money multiplier. Inflation is one of their main tool of population control. Some taxes do not change for decades.

central planning is starvation and misery

Then why every single noticeable business ultimately do hardcore central planning inside? WTF?

You could find free market relations only inside small repair shops, tiny factories or local grocery stores. Everything slightly larger is completely centrally planned, just like North Korea or even worse. And obviously, that North Korea like companies outperform small businesses. That North Korea like companies does not look like they are in starvation and misery.

So, your statement at least questionable.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw it, but as many other experiments of that kind (Third Reich, Paraguay, etc.), they does not break out to anywhere and were cut down or just fade silently.

It is a sign that something is wrong with concept. If we imagine that some decent type of money was invented, without aforementioned problems, then that money had to uncontrollably spread out of experiment location all over the world ignoring borders, laws and other stuff.

As I said, some kind of such success was observed only with bitcoin. But bitcoin, as any crypto have many other problems, so it is also not what we need.

As for barter - it is not that simple, because current money is basically barter too, but we exchange our goods and efforts not to some useful things, but to sheets of paper or digits in bank computer. It is a barter for some unneeded and controllable fake shit, but disguised with some propaganda from state.

Minimum conditions that have to be met to make the currency successfull, I suppose are following:

  • No any authority who could control the currency.
  • Ease of use for exchange
  • Usefulness of currency itself as some needed thing
  • Inability to play with value of currency

For now, I can't think out nothing other than some kind of "energy money" where a unit of energy represent a unit of currency. If you have a tiny battery with 1 kWh of energy, then no authority could play with its value, it is easy to use for exchange, it could be used directly by owner, and so on.

I'm shure there should be other things and concepts of that kind, and it is very interesting thing to explore. May be some of concepts even could be perfectly implementable with current level of tech.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

But we know even simpler solutions from the past can work without much help from tech

Yes, in the past, f.e. a bag of flour was a decent mean of exchange. And most important thing that you could use this "coin" for your own needs without any other third-party, directly. Unless you need some third-party to use your money, it is vulnerable.

Also, bag of flour have another important property - you can't accumulate much and for a long time. You should either use it, either exchange for goods. There was no possibility for extremely wealthy "flour elite" creation.

However, of course, today, bag of flour can't be a widely used mean of exchange. So, we have to think out some modern replacement.

by pkvi
▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

The root of problem is not in form of money, but in ability of some entity, in our case it is governments, to control them and their value.

So, the final solution should be in creating money that could not be controlled by anybody at all.

Closest thing that was invented is p2p crypto, it is controlled by distributed network of independent users, but that independent crypto depends on internet and power that is controlled by state and corporations. Also, crypto could not be used by itself, you have to find somebody who will agree to exchange something to your crypto. So, it is not a final solution.

I think that thinking out some unvulnerable form of money, instead of staiting obvious thing that fiat currency controlled by government or any other third-party is a crap will be much more productive and way more interesting.

by pkvi
▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wasn't money digitized long before crypto? And what money you are talking about? That funny sheets of paper that have value set by CB?

When money lost backing with anything, they become a completely controlled tool of elites. If you think that cash in your pocket is yours, you are deeply misguided. At any time that paper could become nothing at will of some retarded state official. Since that time, it does not matter, are money represented as paper or as digits in bank database. In any case they are totally controlled by government. If you believe that it will be a problem for state to control you if you are using cash, than think again. You could begin from tha fact that every single banknote have unique number. Add cameras everywhere and all "your" purchases and earnings could be tracked easily.

IDK, what kind of money could be a decent replacement for modern crap, may be some kind of batteries, f.e. with kWh as unit of value, whatever. In any case it should be something that you could use directly, without any interaction with anybody. Otherwise money will be exploited by elites again. One who will invent such money will be a legend for millenia, as one of those who finally put the end to the parasites power.

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

The world economy will collapse at 33 Trillion. Why? Freemasonry. Doy. No really that's my real forecast. Magic 33 T and the trapdoor is pulled

If this is your theory, could you bring more light on it? Do you mean that freemasons set some trigger to their favorite number in all that fake fiat economy hoax they build to milk and control humans? Why did they do it, and why they want to destroy their economy hoax now?

▲ 2 ▼
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

To make what we think they want to do with crypto tech, they need one single worldwide CBDC (WCBDC), not many different local CBDCs (LCBDC). It have no any sense, since local banking already fully control all payments made digitally - cards, swift, transfers, whatever. State already have all necessary tools to implement everything they declare LCBDC will allow. But that does not solve a problem with offshore banking at all.

So, all that LCBDC hype in the worst case is some promo of future WCBDC, or just regular money laundering.

Last time I checked LCBDC claims, as far as I could dig any details, it was obvious that they are different and even use different algos. They are incompatible. It would be nearly impossible to somehow join all LCBDCs into WCBDC.

I think the sign of beginning of implementing real WCBDC will be when LCBDC hype will silently vanish. That will mean that they finally ready to roll out WCBDC. May be they will even declare a "failure of LCBDC" or "evil hackers hacked LCBDC", that's why countries should surrender visibility of LCBDC independence and accept WCBDC from IMF or some other entity. Hmmm. I think they will create another new entity in charge of WCBDC, to create new high salary "jobs" for their relatives and ass givers.

▲ 5 ▼
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Please clarify "global interest", because along I agree with naming WHO hoax global, I see 9/11 as local US event to sell "terrorism" shit to Americans in the series of faked events in other countries. That anti-terrorist hoax to implement total surveillance began few years before 9/11 and 9/11 have nothing special in series of government made fake terrorist attacks over the world.

IDK, if Pelosy will shoot Biden and declare herself King of US in live translation, it will be definitely rememberable and important for US, but would have no any serious meaning for the World.

▲ 1 ▼
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eugenics is a tool, so it could not be bad or good. I just stated that it is not an intervention into human evolution, but opposite - allowing evolution to do the job.

I also see nothing bad in using eugenics carefully, f.e. creating conditions where people who are more useful for society have advantages in raising children over those who are parasites. However, it is opposite now, negative eugenics, most useful members of society enshured they have no time and wealth for kids, and dumbed by fake narratives to avoid children. Just like in Idiocracy movie.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Really, deindoctrination is not hard as it seems to be. The question is only in admittance, that indoctrinated are not like us. Then, it will be easy. You can't fully indoctrinate a person with ability to critical thinking. They will change mind fast, as it will be clear for them, that wokeism and other shit is not profitable anymore. Fully indoctrinated are another kind. Their few brain cells are very plastic and they don't think really. They just do what their authorities told them and change their mind in the blink of eye. So take their leaders and force them to announce "new new normal" for their herd. That's all.

But really, there is much more reliable method. Those fully indoctrinated already did everything to eliminate themselves from genetic pool of humanity. They are already can't reproduce as normal people. So, you just have to remove any possibility to somehow get children they still have with help of medical institutions and all that artificial insemination and other stuff. So, their genetic lines would be cutted off. I know, looks like eugenics, but it is not. Just making things go as supposed. Those without brains can't survive in normal way. Their existence is a mistake. They was artificially breeded in hope to replace normal people, especially in positions of political and economical power. So, just leave them to extinct, cutting ways of reproduction they could use and eliminating negative selection in society, go full meritocracy, to not allow them anyhow take a tiniest grain of power.

▲ 3 ▼
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks more like somebody wet dreaming of somehow forcing Russia to use nukes. There are tons of conventional shit in Russia powerful enough to do the job without any problems. More interesting question is why that shit is not used in that war. Do Masters not allow? Then why they will allow nukes?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›