Won't happen for a while, she says, but it must eventually.
QC is the same shit as thermonuclear power. Decades of billions grants with no any useful result. Take a look at her twitter, it is all about receiving grants.
The problem with QC is that you need a lot of qubits to do something really useful. But as you increase number of qubits, the uncertainity of result grow too. So, in reality you could have either completely useless but working few qbits quantum computer that gives results with 80% of certainity, or completely useless many qbits computer that gives garbage with 0.01% of certainity instead of results.
And most interesting thing about that quantum uncertainity problem - if you discover a way to overcome it, that also opens doors to many so-called closing technologies, from unlimited, untraceable and secure p2p communications (may be even FTL ones) to all that zero-point energy stuff. It's like a Pandora box of things where each and every one is a direct threat for elites. You will not need conventional cryptography and money, including crypto, if that box will be open. Funny, but breakthrough, necessary for achieving all that overhyped QC goals you heard about, will instantly make that goals obsolete. :)
Obviously, elites don't need that breakthrough, like they don't need a breakthrough in thermonuclear power. So, we are observing decades long money laundering with high expectations and tons of hype without any practical result in QC and will observe it until elites will be destroyed.
And it will be a very good thing for us, if that somehow happen "evetually".
Its because QC is based on the pseudo science of special relatively.
It does not. QC is based on quantum mechanics that is incompatible with Einstein special and common relativity. All attempts to somehow combine them into Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything failed, even mathematically. Phylosophically it means that at least one of theories is wrong. Einstein relativity crap is definitely wrong. So, quantum mechanics could be more or less valid thing. At least, it does not lead to numerous weakly based paradoxes and does not insist on dogmatic shit like impossibility of FTL.
The main thing in quantum mechanics is that it operates with probabilities, not some exact values. Qubits could have a different probabilities being in 1 or 0,, not different levels or whatever.
For non-binary computers check Soviet tertiary computes of Setun family. They operated with trits, each could have -1, 0 or +1 state, or, in other terms true, unknown, false, or whatever. They was more effective than binary computers of the time, but development was shut down in 70s when binary computers was forced by unknown reason.
Ah yeah...the POWER (potential) of a THERMO (warm) NUCLEUS (nut) for the sustenance of self...a seedy business. But watch out...reactor overload; radio- (Latin radius; rod) activity; the rods are melting, nuclear explosion.
thermonuclear reactors does not have rods, only extremely hot plasma
a) -PLASM (a growth, a development; something molded" + ROD (Latin radius, ray, radix]...both denote growth within the mold of loss.
b) the EX of extreme implies "out of"; hence expression out of impressing aka reaction (living) out of enacting (process of dying).
c) what's the origin of heat? Friction between enacting velocity (flow) and reacting resistance (form) causing vibration and heat.
fusion reactors, not fission
Reaction implies within enacting; hence partial living (fission) within the whole process of dying (fusion). Each one represents fission (perceiving) reacting to fusion (perceivable).
The parasitic few suggest dualism (two states; on or off) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable coexistence (if/then implication)...if fusion; then fission and vice versa.
All represents one in energy; hence being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka partial transmuted out of whole; ingredient out of base; form out of flow; choice out of balance; potential out of potentiality; magnetic out of electric; female out of male; living out of the process of dying; resistance out of velocity; growth out of loss and so on.
Question the perceivable origin of ION (to go; to move; to proceed); then put yourself into it as the perceiving center; hence going from inception towards death; being moved by; being processed. Finally utilize implication (if/then) upon it...if going from inception towards death; then being alive, if being moved by; then being reaction within enacting; if being processed; then existing as resistance within velocity etc.
Notice also that the entire infrastructure of suggested nuclear energy is based upon a core (a center structure) aka the inner partial of the outer whole. If you consent to believe in power hidden inside a core; while surrounded by an outer shell; then how could you ever grow your comprehension of being the inner core (choice) within the outer shell (balance) aka the partial (perceiving) temporary wielding the power of the ongoing whole (perceivable) aka the choice to express everything balance (momentum of motion) impresses?
QC is the same shit as thermonuclear power. Decades of billions grants with no any useful result. Take a look at her twitter, it is all about receiving grants.
The problem with QC is that you need a lot of qubits to do something really useful. But as you increase number of qubits, the uncertainity of result grow too. So, in reality you could have either completely useless but working few qbits quantum computer that gives results with 80% of certainity, or completely useless many qbits computer that gives garbage with 0.01% of certainity instead of results.
And most interesting thing about that quantum uncertainity problem - if you discover a way to overcome it, that also opens doors to many so-called closing technologies, from unlimited, untraceable and secure p2p communications (may be even FTL ones) to all that zero-point energy stuff. It's like a Pandora box of things where each and every one is a direct threat for elites. You will not need conventional cryptography and money, including crypto, if that box will be open. Funny, but breakthrough, necessary for achieving all that overhyped QC goals you heard about, will instantly make that goals obsolete. :)
Obviously, elites don't need that breakthrough, like they don't need a breakthrough in thermonuclear power. So, we are observing decades long money laundering with high expectations and tons of hype without any practical result in QC and will observe it until elites will be destroyed.
And it will be a very good thing for us, if that somehow happen "evetually".
It does not. QC is based on quantum mechanics that is incompatible with Einstein special and common relativity. All attempts to somehow combine them into Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything failed, even mathematically. Phylosophically it means that at least one of theories is wrong. Einstein relativity crap is definitely wrong. So, quantum mechanics could be more or less valid thing. At least, it does not lead to numerous weakly based paradoxes and does not insist on dogmatic shit like impossibility of FTL.
The main thing in quantum mechanics is that it operates with probabilities, not some exact values. Qubits could have a different probabilities being in 1 or 0,, not different levels or whatever.
For non-binary computers check Soviet tertiary computes of Setun family. They operated with trits, each could have -1, 0 or +1 state, or, in other terms true, unknown, false, or whatever. They was more effective than binary computers of the time, but development was shut down in 70s when binary computers was forced by unknown reason.
Ah yeah...the POWER (potential) of a THERMO (warm) NUCLEUS (nut) for the sustenance of self...a seedy business. But watch out...reactor overload; radio- (Latin radius; rod) activity; the rods are melting, nuclear explosion.
thermonuclear reactors does not have rods, only extremely hot plasma, they are fusion reactors, not fission like NPP.
a) -PLASM (a growth, a development; something molded" + ROD (Latin radius, ray, radix]...both denote growth within the mold of loss.
b) the EX of extreme implies "out of"; hence expression out of impressing aka reaction (living) out of enacting (process of dying).
c) what's the origin of heat? Friction between enacting velocity (flow) and reacting resistance (form) causing vibration and heat.
Reaction implies within enacting; hence partial living (fission) within the whole process of dying (fusion). Each one represents fission (perceiving) reacting to fusion (perceivable).
The parasitic few suggest dualism (two states; on or off) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable coexistence (if/then implication)...if fusion; then fission and vice versa.
All represents one in energy; hence being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka partial transmuted out of whole; ingredient out of base; form out of flow; choice out of balance; potential out of potentiality; magnetic out of electric; female out of male; living out of the process of dying; resistance out of velocity; growth out of loss and so on.
Question the perceivable origin of ION (to go; to move; to proceed); then put yourself into it as the perceiving center; hence going from inception towards death; being moved by; being processed. Finally utilize implication (if/then) upon it...if going from inception towards death; then being alive, if being moved by; then being reaction within enacting; if being processed; then existing as resistance within velocity etc.
Notice also that the entire infrastructure of suggested nuclear energy is based upon a core (a center structure) aka the inner partial of the outer whole. If you consent to believe in power hidden inside a core; while surrounded by an outer shell; then how could you ever grow your comprehension of being the inner core (choice) within the outer shell (balance) aka the partial (perceiving) temporary wielding the power of the ongoing whole (perceivable) aka the choice to express everything balance (momentum of motion) impresses?