▲ 1 ▼
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've never seen the bb18 thing confirmed, but it's conceivable explosives were used to blow out plane shaped holes in the buildings.

But (BTW) the graphic usually used to "prove" that they were active on the same floors the planes hit ("e-team" spelled in lights), actually shows a different tower, to the one that they were in, for the "after plane crash" shot. This is sus.

Thermite/Thermate being able to bring the towers down at free fall speed, turning the vast majority of material into clouds of dust which were carried away by air, and with the remainder collapsing with too small a seismic register, into too small a rubble pile on the ground, which continued to fume for a year afterwards... that's not conceivable. Plus very many other aspects:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/iuCrY4trS8N1/

None of that contradicts the dancing Israelis or insider trading, nor is it supposed to. But it does contradict the traditional building demolition narrative though.

▲ 1 ▼
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd only seen snippits of this before without realising they were from a longer documentary. This is excellent, but requires prior knowledge of many aspects of 9/11 truth. To the "uninitiated" it may appear to be completely bonkers, but if you've seen "September 11: New Pearl Harbor" and have kept up with 9/11 truth outside the "mainstream" of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, this is a compelling and essential watch.

Some great debunking of "established" 9/11 truther "facts"... for example, we all know a plane didn't fly into the pentagon right? We all know it's not physically possible... So why are there multiple credible witnesses who swear they saw exactly that? Witnessed a plane fly into the side of the building and not just near it? Why have they been ignored by the "no plane at the pentagon" researchers?

It's a long watch, but totally worth it. I watched it over a couple of days.

▲ 3 ▼
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm building a nice collection of sidebar images & I'll change 'em every once in a while. Not every image works, has to work as 300x300 pixels. .win is gloriously internet retro.

▲ 5 ▼
clemaneuverers 5 points ago +5 / -0

They wont let the internet go down. They need a big audience for the big Alien PsyOp premiere.

▲ 7 ▼
clemaneuverers 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Where Did The Towers Go?" by Judy Wood, color scan, 35mb.

EDIT updated the wiki with higher resolution copy, 50 mbs.

https://rb.gy/2vaafm

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are we dealing with a break away civilization

Axo is light years ahead of me on this stuff, I'm playing catch-up for sure, but here are my 2 cents: Breakaway Civilization with advanced tech seems to be the case, and the more people who are aware of it and looking into it the better. It's important to preserve and pass on what has already been discovered, so no one is starting from scratch because they are decades ahead of us. I've been focused on collecting and downloading masses of stuff related to all this for the past yearish and I am currently in the process of organizing it into a proper digital library for ease of reference and propagation. (I have a feeling such infos are going to become more difficult to find and share in the near future)

Mind control: I don't believe they have any more practical, direct forms of mass mind control than controlling the MSM, school/college education and the world of scientific research. I might be wrong though. The "indirect" approach is constantly developing, being worked on to make it more comprehensive. Restricting freedom of expression on the internet is clearly an important project at the moment.

I don't know what else to say, really. It's a black pill for sure.

How do we defend against DEW

I don't know, but I don't think they are straightforward or easy to use. Running away is probably going to be the best option for most. That's why knowing about them is the most essential thing. They're not like guns or bombs, they seem to take time to work. I believe they could have been working on the buildings even before the "plane" explosions. I think Wood alludes to that in her book somewhere. Then there are the telltale signs she points out that they were working on the buildings, that of course no one knew to look for before, but now could be things people can remember to look out for. in the case of the Cali fires the fact that only some materials were effected and not others. Things don't seem burn the same as normal with DEWs.

By the way the version of Judy wood's book in the wiki is black and white, I just checked. The colour version is better because of the amount of reference images; I have it, but my internet is incredibly slow for uploading at the moment. I'll stick it in a reply here when it's ready.

▲ 5 ▼
clemaneuverers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Dr Woods book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" is linked (in scanned PDF format) in our wiki. There's no official ebook version, someone who owned a copy did that. I've read it and highly recommend it. Of all the theories about what happened on 9/11, Woods "theory" seems to me to be the only based, in an open minded way, on the totality of documentation available.

I say "theory" because she's careful to only point out the evidence. She doesn't know for sure how it was done, but is fairly confident as to what was done, if that makes sense.

Wood is a controversial figure in conspiracy circles. Often claimed to be "controlled opposition" by followers of AE911Truth, Richard Gage, Steven Jones et al. She has been shouted down in recent years by that crowd, which is a shame. Steven Jones is in fact a shill, who has tried to steer the Truth movement towards the thermite theory. Long before 9/11, he was intrinsic in getting LENR research (low energy nuclear reaction) defunded and condemned as not worth researching. He did this by staging a press conference and a vote, not by demonstrating it was worthless, and he misrepresented the research and results of many researchers. Basically he's a spook trying to steer people away from "zero point" energy, the same field of energy generation that was involved in the destruction of the WTC.

It's all pretty complicated and actively suppressed. Mentioning her on reddit was always a compete shitshow of "reeee" and downvotes.

▲ 3 ▼
clemaneuverers 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not one specific meaning, but it's often employed by luciferians, freemasons and occultists in general to signfy that they believe themselves and their path to be wise, or to represent "Molech", who is also represented sometimes by a horned bull:

https://thetruthersjournal.home.blog/2020/01/01/238/

https://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/owl.htm

▲ 6 ▼
clemaneuverers 6 points ago +6 / -0

They actually used globohomo style & NPC face. I originally thought this was a globohomage piss-take.

▲ 2 ▼
clemaneuverers 2 points ago +2 / -0

The measure of a good president is how much you want them to ream your anus, eh?

▲ 1 ▼
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

This one is pretty retarded.

you can see the line of his fly in this higher resolution image from the same event:

https://i.4cdn.org/pol/1623004185879.jpg

▲ 5 ▼
clemaneuverers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Chapter 15, "Protocols Of The Elders of Zion", was removed. Not sure of the details of when or by whom (presume by the publishing house), but anyway a pdf version with the chapter still in it is linked in our wiki:

https://conspiracies.win/wiki/conspiracies-wiki/

▲ 1 ▼
clemaneuverers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thierry Baudet is the leader of Forum voor Democratie(FvD), a Dutch political party. More than half a million people voted for FvD in the march 2021 election.

I guess he'll be receiving an urgent invitation to join his local masonic lodge now - see the film "Occult Forces".

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›