Dr Woods book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" is linked (in scanned PDF format) in our wiki. There's no official ebook version, someone who owned a copy did that. I've read it and highly recommend it. Of all the theories about what happened on 9/11, Woods "theory" seems to me to be the only based, in an open minded way, on the totality of documentation available.
I say "theory" because she's careful to only point out the evidence. She doesn't know for sure how it was done, but is fairly confident as to what was done, if that makes sense.
Wood is a controversial figure in conspiracy circles. Often claimed to be "controlled opposition" by followers of AE911Truth, Richard Gage, Steven Jones et al. She has been shouted down in recent years by that crowd, which is a shame. Steven Jones is in fact a shill, who has tried to steer the Truth movement towards the thermite theory. Long before 9/11, he was intrinsic in getting LENR research (low energy nuclear reaction) defunded and condemned as not worth researching. He did this by staging a press conference and a vote, not by demonstrating it was worthless, and he misrepresented the research and results of many researchers. Basically he's a spook trying to steer people away from "zero point" energy, the same field of energy generation that was involved in the destruction of the WTC.
It's all pretty complicated and actively suppressed. Mentioning her on reddit was always a compete shitshow of "reeee" and downvotes.
Axo is light years ahead of me on this stuff, I'm playing catch-up for sure, but here are my 2 cents: Breakaway Civilization with advanced tech seems to be the case, and the more people who are aware of it and looking into it the better. It's important to preserve and pass on what has already been discovered, so no one is starting from scratch because they are decades ahead of us. I've been focused on collecting and downloading masses of stuff related to all this for the past yearish and I am currently in the process of organizing it into a proper digital library for ease of reference and propagation. (I have a feeling such infos are going to become more difficult to find and share in the near future)
Mind control: I don't believe they have any more practical, direct forms of mass mind control than controlling the MSM, school/college education and the world of scientific research. I might be wrong though. The "indirect" approach is constantly developing, being worked on to make it more comprehensive. Restricting freedom of expression on the internet is clearly an important project at the moment.
I don't know what else to say, really. It's a black pill for sure.
How do we defend against DEW
I don't know, but I don't think they are straightforward or easy to use. Running away is probably going to be the best option for most. That's why knowing about them is the most essential thing. They're not like guns or bombs, they seem to take time to work. I believe they could have been working on the buildings even before the "plane" explosions. I think Wood alludes to that in her book somewhere. Then there are the telltale signs she points out that they were working on the buildings, that of course no one knew to look for before, but now could be things people can remember to look out for. in the case of the Cali fires the fact that only some materials were effected and not others. Things don't seem burn the same as normal with DEWs.
By the way the version of Judy wood's book in the wiki is black and white, I just checked. The colour version is better because of the amount of reference images; I have it, but my internet is incredibly slow for uploading at the moment. I'll stick it in a reply here when it's ready.
Dr Woods book, "Where Did The Towers Go?" is linked (in scanned PDF format) in our wiki. There's no official ebook version, someone who owned a copy did that. I've read it and highly recommend it. Of all the theories about what happened on 9/11, Woods "theory" seems to me to be the only based, in an open minded way, on the totality of documentation available.
I say "theory" because she's careful to only point out the evidence. She doesn't know for sure how it was done, but is fairly confident as to what was done, if that makes sense.
Wood is a controversial figure in conspiracy circles. Often claimed to be "controlled opposition" by followers of AE911Truth, Richard Gage, Steven Jones et al. She has been shouted down in recent years by that crowd, which is a shame. Steven Jones is in fact a shill, who has tried to steer the Truth movement towards the thermite theory. Long before 9/11, he was intrinsic in getting LENR research (low energy nuclear reaction) defunded and condemned as not worth researching. He did this by staging a press conference and a vote, not by demonstrating it was worthless, and he misrepresented the research and results of many researchers. Basically he's a spook trying to steer people away from "zero point" energy, the same field of energy generation that was involved in the destruction of the WTC.
It's all pretty complicated and actively suppressed. Mentioning her on reddit was always a compete shitshow of "reeee" and downvotes.
Axo is light years ahead of me on this stuff, I'm playing catch-up for sure, but here are my 2 cents: Breakaway Civilization with advanced tech seems to be the case, and the more people who are aware of it and looking into it the better. It's important to preserve and pass on what has already been discovered, so no one is starting from scratch because they are decades ahead of us. I've been focused on collecting and downloading masses of stuff related to all this for the past yearish and I am currently in the process of organizing it into a proper digital library for ease of reference and propagation. (I have a feeling such infos are going to become more difficult to find and share in the near future)
Mind control: I don't believe they have any more practical, direct forms of mass mind control than controlling the MSM, school/college education and the world of scientific research. I might be wrong though. The "indirect" approach is constantly developing, being worked on to make it more comprehensive. Restricting freedom of expression on the internet is clearly an important project at the moment.
I don't know what else to say, really. It's a black pill for sure.
I don't know, but I don't think they are straightforward or easy to use. Running away is probably going to be the best option for most. That's why knowing about them is the most essential thing. They're not like guns or bombs, they seem to take time to work. I believe they could have been working on the buildings even before the "plane" explosions. I think Wood alludes to that in her book somewhere. Then there are the telltale signs she points out that they were working on the buildings, that of course no one knew to look for before, but now could be things people can remember to look out for. in the case of the Cali fires the fact that only some materials were effected and not others. Things don't seem burn the same as normal with DEWs.
By the way the version of Judy wood's book in the wiki is black and white, I just checked. The colour version is better because of the amount of reference images; I have it, but my internet is incredibly slow for uploading at the moment. I'll stick it in a reply here when it's ready.
Line of sight is required. Put earth between the weapon and you.
They still seem pretty afraid of our AR-15s... so maybe not.