So, if the war has any validity at all, then the 'enemies' in question would be interested in stabilizing the conflict for the next few years.
At the current pace, there is no question we are in a state of global war in its infancy, as the criminals at the helm continue to pound on the war drum and provide endless hostile inputs where diplomacy should be the norm.
With no provision for diplomacy, the only choice for Russia would be to remove the leaders if they can.
So, lets hold a convention in a tiny little ineffective country, let's configure all the air defense of types already proven useless, practically right next to this so called belligerent global threat.
So, in my opinion, if Russia does not decapitate nato at this stage, then the whole thing is being orchestrated by the controlling factors and both parties in the conflict have no intention of being at 'war'
I would do it. Given the stage and intention of the group, it is the only logical course of action.
Constant stream of bullshit. In a topic you seek to convince everybody else about. Who actually cares, nobody expect those fighting. They expect to win something. Trade continues regardless. In a topic written by morons all eating each other's crap and agreeing. I don't. There is no decapitation. How does that word and concept actually occur. Go look at the definition. Dumbass, retard. Surely you read it somewhere and confused the terminology, because you're a retard. Where a narrative was used, so this conflict continues, or it becomes a larger war. All it's used for. It isn't peace.
But you've expected some other globe off the sacrifice and attrition. Nope. It doesn't care. It trade's how it does, and almost always has done. Veto. Patnerships. Allies. It stops trading in all out war. Nothing changes, because it doesn't agree.
You think Rome falls. Look it's still Rome. Dumbass. It falls when it's completely destroyed, and that is also utterly debatable.
I think you must be retarded, your obvious incoherent ramblings make it clear.
What is decapitation? To take out the leadership.
It is a temporary move because a new head is grown, are you retarded? Like really this simple I would need to explain this to you?
What is the leadership in this case? The talking heads on the microphone constantly ramping up the war efforts.
Initially I read some of your comments and thought, maybe this one is not a completely useless robot retard..
But this most recent comment really reveals you to be a stupid robot.
Rome is long gone, what remains are criminal enterprises popping up and being destroyed, over and over.
Decapitation means, cut off a head. What? Of all those countries? You dumbass. The Head of Nato, hahaha, doesn't mean shit. They're an administrator. A politican. It simply Hydras growing another head.
Take out America. Hahaha. One country, there's all those other Nato countries.
Look up decapitation before saying retarded things.
The concept applies to warfare if you're a Taliban. They kidnap people threatening to cut off their heads, and demand a ransom, it gets weapons they make war with.
But for the sake of understanding your retarded terminology. It is impossible to decapitate anyone who isn't fighting. You cannot cut off the heads of any countries who aren't fighting. Nato is a military/security alliance.
You haven't affected them. What like Economically. They're giving to save the Ukrainian by blowing them up, fund. It stops if you beat Ukraine. Nato will be there regardless, they aren't fighting.
Rome hasn't gone anywhere. It was never destroyed. Even if Jerusalem was. There it is today.
You're such a retard.
bla bla bla, you are obviously a far left nutter, the way you ignore correct information and instead chase after ridiculous lies is just more proof of it.
More retarded jew crap, you are the typical stupid and ignorant mind that shows up and reveals just how fucking stupid people are. Congratulations.
I have already provided more than enough reasonable evidence to prove nato position in the conflict, your choice to ignore reality is your own undoing. It is why all what you know is just lying criminal bullshit from thieves and liars.
To decapitate nato in the early stage of the conflict with Russia would be a historical gesture and would show the resolve of the Russian military complex.
With all those talking heads dead, the first thing that would happen after reviewing the information Russia would provide to each pissant country in the group is obviously more meetings and assigning new talking heads.
All nato countries are completely finished and in the final stages of collapse. usa is the only one of the bunch with military to pretend to be a peer army for Russia.
You have no clue what military is in the modern era, you are like an old useless relic in thought processing, all this stuff is far above you.
Rome is long gone, not even the concrete remains (go mix some fake shit), criminals destroyed it. The remnants of society guided by the romans exists, but like the seeds of all input it gets reduced in time.
Jerusalem has fallen (Again) it is a war torn nation filled with and run by criminals, the only destiny there is continued suffering and death for all of eternity.
Yawn, I am not leftist, I am not a jew, and what I am isn't a retard. You're a dumb ass. Probably the result of being anally retentive. All that comes out of your mouth is bullshit.
There is no decapitation of Nato. For the Alliance based on military and security to break, it requires a different one. Or it to be destroyed.
It is not a civilian institution. No matter the economics there is always military. No matter the government there is always military. No member has left despite disagreements.
Get it through your dumb ass there is no decapitation of Nato. Perhaps it can be eroded politically, geographically, and economically, but that's bullshit without actual conflict. There are far too many members partnered. It could collapse and still be militarily alligned. Ideologically perhaps if another alliance offers the same protocols, or if there isn't the need for such military partnership. Yawn.
Russia aren't fighting Nato directly. Instead it's through a proxy Nato are funding. If the proxy is defeated, Russia gains some international standing. It causes the globe to use its own solutions and perhaps they break away from any agreements with Nato. But it doesn't mean Nato is decapitated. It doesn't mean much.
Trade, trades, with it comes agreements, laws, rules, requirements, investment, funding. It either trades or it doesn't. When it doesn't there is conflict and disagreement.
But there is no decapitation without actual defeat or political unrest where perhaps a country becomes ungovernable and has a coup or civil war.
No, Rome still stands. Unlike the hordes of barbarians