2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's in the interests of the people running the show to keep the masses stabilized. A person with nothing to lose will do crazy things.

3
XharlesDucken 3 points ago +3 / -0

An EMP would take out any ability to connect to starlink as well. If anything, it would be a hack that could damage the hardware on all of the backbone routers simultaneously. I remember an exploit from around 20 years ago that caused the processor to overheat until it fried the socket. I'm pretty sure the alphabet agencies still have exploits that will do that.

by DrLeaks
1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Twitter feed is full of bots exclaiming "DO SOMETHING!!!"

Pretty sure this is some kind of psychological tactic to push people on the edge into action.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Illuminate use Gmail, lol.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty much this. We are well past the point of hiding by choosing a different browser. Even unplugging might just make you light up on their grid. They probably have satellite surveillance that flags anything human or vehicle shaped that is moving around without radio emissions as suspicious.

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, but what's the price of rice in China today?

4
XharlesDucken 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wrote a fictional book series about 10 years ago where the shadow government had replaced all traditional cameras with radio cameras. Since a radio camera can see everything in 3d, unlike normal cameras, there was no hiding anything from the cameras.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

From earth, I can hold my thumb out at arms length and eclipse the sun. Multiply that distance by light-years. The size required to block that distant light shrinks exponentially. The skies should be completely black (like on Cricket). Not only would our own atmosphere block starlight, all of the junk in space would constantly be eclipsing it. There are supposedly more rogue planets than star systems by an order of magnitude, just floating through deep space. Yet, when a star DOES dim, it's huge news to us earthlings, when it should be the norm.

Look at a picture of a comet in our solar system. You can see stars through the thickest part of their coma. At light-years away, those particles should completely block any light.

To put it in lay terms, go stand on one side of a forest and point a flashlight through to someone on the other side. When you are close you may see some light through the trees, but once you move back to any great distance there will be no trace of light coming through the forest.

I discovered this issue while trying to make an at scale computer model of star light using the distances referenced by astronomers. Unless you change the properties of how light behaves, it cannot travel 97 trillion km (the closest star).

I have shared this problem with several astronomers, and they have all found it troubling. One of them said he did the math and that it was indeed, impossible for light to reach earth from those distances.

This is insanely elementary. Every astronomer should have asked these questions before grad school. I can only assume that someone is keeping this question suppressed.

3
XharlesDucken 3 points ago +3 / -0

All of this is based off of the foundation of stars being light-years away, which is demonstrably impossible. There is no way we could see stars at that distance. Dust particles in our atmosphere would eclipse the light from even the closest stars.

When you understand that the nature of space has been grossly misconstrued, it makes any claims of interstellar contact highly suspect. Maybe there are people near us, but certainly not light-years away. If disclosure happens, it's part of a larger hoax.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched her videos the other day. It was a pretty good presentation on MKULTRA and the other CIA mind control programs.

While I'm not religious, the religious undertones of her channel weren't enough to drive me away. There was a lot of good content there.

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is this, e-panhandling? I guess it's easier than standing at the curb at walmart, eh?

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +3 / -1

That bitch is in heat. Sticking the ass out for any takers.

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

If the brain is just a transmitter receiving input from your spirit then your body is just a mech suit that is being used to experience mortality.

Imagine that you have existed for countless ages, know everything there is to know, and can do anything. You reach a point where you do nothing, because every action would lead to a reaction that you already foresee. There would be no point in any further action at this point. You would simply exist with no desire for anything. At this point, maybe you decide that the only way to live an interesting life is to forget everything for a while and experience growth and the accumulation of knowledge once again. So you set up a world where you can go live in a new type of finite body and forget everything for a while and actually live again. Thus, the cycle of life is just a means to escape eternal boredom.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

People say the same thing about Bigfoot, ufo's, you name it. Singling out which conspiracy is too silly is just gate-keeping.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't get me wrong; I don't believe the earth is a globe either. I just don't ever belive anything 100%. I think we are in a simulation or holodeck. We could be in a 30x30 mile room that shifts around us, giving us the appearance of distance while we wander in circles. Just an example, but this world is definitely under some kind of control structure, like a lab or zoo.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love the flat earth conspiracies. I still don't believe the earth is flat, but what they have dug up regarding space programs absolutely belongs here.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically, you could put dedicated communities for each conspiracy. That doesn't mean that they shouldn't be allowed in the conspiracy win. Everyone is allowed their own opinion on what is retarded. Gatekeeping just makes it look more suspicious.

1
XharlesDucken 1 point ago +1 / -0

This site is full of gatekeepers. If you go off script, they all jump in to shut you down.

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nailed it. Either a farm or a lab.

2
XharlesDucken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, I thought it was our local internet, but it was just my phone.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›