B-b-but my based spaceman!
Hopefully this teaches a lesson to those who fell prostrate for him immediately upon him "acting baste"
Most likely they probably want to get all this usage data to train an LLM, but the content moderation is a great bonus
Remember the SPARS document and keep your head on a swivel... This about-face was planned
The main "benefit" I've seen them tout regarding CBDC is speed. That everything will happen instantaneously, because while it seems finances are instantaneous now checks still take time to clear, financial institutions still take time to move money, credit card charges live in pending for a few days.
However everything will be more centralized, yes they can control us now but there are multiple banks, credit unions, people with cash on hand etc. To completely unperson someone from the financial system is still difficult and can thus only be done on a per person per institution basis and not every institution is completely on board (mostly smaller ones).
With CBDC they can completely ban people from the entirety of society with ease. Control by the elites will be upped even further because it will only take one flag and one push of a button. They can easily make it so you can't save also by giving your CBDC expiration thus enforcing that you will own nothing. There are endless ways to abuse this that couldn't be done now.
Now it's possible the entire reason this is being mentioned so much is to distract from something else or build up the fear, but it would represent a much tighter grip of control over people
Yeah because then ubi, digital dollars and all can be pushed. Libtards will take it because they are pushed by envy and cannot deny free shit no matter what strings are attached and conservatards will do anything Trump says
It's totally absurd, these people have now been "revealed", know that pretty much anyone who knows of them does not like them, and then they just straight up say "Trump will defeat us if he wins"
And people just take it at face value
It would appear that way though early on in Musk's "based era" I would be heavily downvoted for any criticism.
Hopefully we're turning a corner
Don't you realize when Trump said it's a great and safe vaccine he was REALLY using "vaccine" as code for ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine? All these casual delusions and more can be yours with Q following
Yep, that's all the stuff they should be against, they'll cheer it though because they're fooled by idols
Yeah, and that is how they'll slip in the digital ID poison pill
Here we go you could see it from a mile away, Elon about to push the things Magas are against but they'll be falling all over themselves to support it because Based Elon and Daddy trump
Turn off everything you can, at least at night. Use wired peripherals as much as possible. As a bonus, wired tech is extremely cheap because everyone wants wireless
They're just another flavor of doomsday cult. Despite successive false predictions, their adherents are completely certain they'll be right about the next one
In NYC they'll let the crime get so bad that restaurants will beg to be allowed to go cashless, then the political class can pretend this was simply the will of the people
Who's possibly downvoting this?
With everything going on in the world and everything we talk about on here my emotions are easily kept in check.
But the Musk situation infuriates me. The amount of red flags is extreme yet so many refuse to even consider he might not be a good guy because he posts memes.
It underscores just how badly people will fall prostrate in desperation for ANY kind of savior figure no matter how their actions may contradict their words - and that makes me realize we may not have enough people to turn this all around
No it was always a limited hangout
My point was not to fear monger but to get at the idea that there's more to the fact that CNN is covering this than the story straight up and throwing out a possibility. It's funny that you have yet to refute anything but say I'm bad at "thinking", then go on to claim I'm the one getting defensive over my ideas. But that sequence of events only goes to prove my original point about what this place has become.
You clearly did not understand what I wrote at all if what you took away was that darpa needed to announce the technology for it to exist as I explained it has already existed for awhile and has even been in use on the Internet for years. However for your point to have any merit knowledge of such technology would probably need to be made widely available, because otherwise the blackmailing would still have value, since the idea behind the blackmailing is that it would destroy them in the eyes of the public.
Not good at what? Everytime I've made a point as to why a specific rationale doesn't jive you just make another one. Non-public AI technology had the ability to make deep fakes for years (hell the technology was somewhat public as people on the chans had been using them for porn for years), that is to say what I don't know of proof of isn't the existence of deep faking AI technology but rather that suddenly NOW is the time the US says to Israel to get bent because their blackmail no longer works, so the final point is possibly valid though highly speculative and the rest really don't fit. And instead of addressing any of the reasons why they don't make sense you would just create another reason. But I get it, this place was once an area for actual debate but now people just get extremely defensive over their ideas
I don't think there's any proof of that, and the fact we walked from "CNN employees are covering this to save their own lives" to "CNN is covering it because Mossad's blackmail on American deep state persons is now useless and the state has decided to turn on them as a result" makes this feel more like a reverse engineering to reach a premise you wanted than an actual logical conclusion
Why would the US be distancing themselves at this time from Israel?
I'd also note this is a much different rationale than we originally started debating. Though I'm still curious to dig further
What about all the whistleblowers over COVID? What about Assange and all the other countless whistleblowers? The fact that CNN is a propaganda outlet and has always been one, is at odds with the idea of them suddenly now finding their journalistic integrity over this specific, damaging incident. Especially when considering they could have chosen to have journalistic integrity about any number of other issues instead. With everything we've seen over the years, it's very difficult for me to make their previous actions congruent with their coverage of this story given such a rationale
Demoralization or edgy larper, maybe both
The best case is he's a grifter who doesn't know what he's talking about.
We're not lucky enough to be living even in that timeline