Musk, actor of the state that he is, continues to push this narrative that the Democrats are bringing in illegals to make them vote Democrat. Even though we all saw how easy it is to steal an election, and have to imagine that the results were predestined for a very long time, people still somehow believe that votes are why illegals are flooding in.

And conservative gatekeepers like Musk just repeat the lies as they do, to keep the people from seeing the truth

But if that 1898 photo was taken at high tide, wouldn't the water at high tide now reach onto the island? People would have noticed that and it would be blasted all over the place by the media

There's much more than just that, disparate cultures having similar mythologies including about world wiping floods and fighting giants. Even creatures like dragons are embedded in cultures all over the world. There was most likely some type of global society or globe-trotting society at one point. Who or what they were is a question we can't answer with the level of evidence we have

And as usual they will slowly release it to the public through one of their private industry puppets, this being through neuralink

Epic "muh two parties" statement there

It's really not difficult since you don't have to address it until after the shot, it's not like they had to run concurrent narratives leading up to it, and coming up with contingencies for an event with two possible outcomes is something people who run small businesses do with regularity, let alone people who are constantly trying to manipulate the public

I don't know about this theory in particular but I think it's wild how people will listen to what Musk says rather than observe what he does but then pretend they've broken out of the paradigm of politics

All these users coming out of the wood work suddenly extolling the value of AI generated songs that contribute nothing special. It makes one hope that this is fake because if not, we truly are screwed

They all upvote at the same time too, it's not always immediately after the post but they always come in chunks

The point is most of it is not board relevant and my removing it from my view does not fix the fact that it's pushing down useful posts for other people.

And the number of upvotes being roughly synchronized between all the .wins, minus the organic interaction they may garner (and upvotes seem applied to all of them at the same time) is mighty suspect and it feels like gaslighting that no one else sees it. Neo might have been spazzing but he had a point

It is spam, most of these are not conspiracy material at all and those that are just barely touch on them.

The user posting them also posts on many .wins at the same time including conspiracy where the mod told them to include a submission statement, they said they would but never did and continued to spam the board with the same posts.

Whether you enjoy AI generated songs or not, it is nevertheless spam

I don't think anyone is as annoyed as you tbh, and so much more than they want to talk about actual conspiracies? I don't know. But hey maybe this isn't a board for conspiracies anymore maybe it's just political news and content creators promoting themselves now

Why does this blog post have so many upvotes?

Are you like a Jehovah's Witness or something? My understanding of Job's curse was he cursed the day he was born, to say it was the fact he had a birthday is maybe technically correct but framing it that way seems engineered to a certain conclusion, since the only reason he'd be cursing that he had a birthday is because he wished he weren't burn.

I don't even celebrate my own birthday (though others in my life will force me to) but I find it strange that the Bible contains explicit prohibitions around things like wearing mixed fabrics, rules about circumcision, and all kinds of super specific things, but requires reading between the lines to figure out that God condemns birthdays

Hadn't you already shared that you blocked this user before?

But who determines consistency? Therein lies even more wiggle room when consistency with pre-established Scripture is not a requirement for the teaching of a Pope to be infallible.

If a man has proven himself to misrepresent the faith, what authority is given to him?

Lol indeed, way to dodge everything else

No I can't because it doesn't exist, that doesn't negate any of the points I made or provide any direct answers to the questions I just asked

Vet them, make them sign some kind of contract, only send certain passages to certain people, use an alias (if you were planning to do that when it releases)

I don't know specifically what you're concerned about with a breach of trust but surely there's a solution to it.

Very much a loophole. The Pope was very clear that it was a moral duty to receive the vaccine, it may not have been written into doctrine but he was very clear. So he's not really special? Aside from a very specific instance of issuing doctrine he's just some guy with opinions?

As far as I know the only people ever censured or excommunicated are those who would possibly weaken the Church were they still allowed to associate with it in some way (e.g. high ranking members going to other churches or speaking up directly against the Vatican) so using the fact they didn't censure a huge portion of the members (an action that would hurt the Church by drastically reducing membership) isn't really material

What's the conspiracy?

I still don't understand why you haven't tried to crowd source the editing on your book

This reply displays a lack of emotional regulation and inability to engage without it being against a strawman, which again, combined with your admitted history, makes a better case for not using marijuana than the content of the post itself

So your claim is that weed makes people liberal? CA, Colorado, and NY were deep blue before the drug's legalization. Yet somehow you're claiming anyone disagreeing with you would take the stance that weed makes people into republicans?

You may not realize it, but your post has made a compelling argument against marijuana usage just not in the way you intended

Just like any substance, such as alcohol or tobacco, the use of marijuana can be beneficial when done by a person with discipline, intelligence, and self-awareness. It can very easily make you into a zombie who is happy accomplishing nothing, but it can have physical health benefits and be a boon to creativity when used correctly.

Based on what I've observed in this world, there is no reason to ever expect the masses to act responsibly without the threat of immediate force. Unless you want to create a police state where all actions are monitored (which has desirable results in some ways but imo the ends don't justify the means and it would probably be in the hands of the malicious anyway), marijuana should be legal and welfare should be depleted. Then, nature will do it's thing to people who self select out of the gene pool