Gold is speculated on, but it is a real, tangible asset with both industrial and historical use. Gold's price (and silver moreso) has been artificially suppressed which is why you saw this price soar, but the price can't be allowed to actually catch up to the relative rarity of the material or it would harm the entire financial system. Additionally, price increases correspond to dollar weakness, as one would expect. Bitcoin dumped like 30+% because less than .1% of the supply was sold. These situations are not remotely comparable in the realm of speculation.
The difference between sound money and a speculative asset
Exit liquidity. Impossible to understand for people who:
- Call Bitcoin (and Bitcoin specifically) the future of currency because of its value in USD
- Pretend to understand the white paper
People (who reproduced) have always had a lot of kids historically, it's only now it's changed. Now they want people to have more kids because otherwise the economy will collapse. The technocrats have no need for an extremely robust population they want a slimmer more pliable populatikn
Your previous argument seemed to be bad people want to do bad things to kids so having kids is bad which would lend itself to extinction. You're saying AI will be removing jobs so we should have less people, without realizing that's the actual end goal here
Ok. So let's say some people will be forced to have kids, because likely people will be forced into all kinds of behaviors. What is your solution? Total human extinction?
No one is forcing people to have kids. Also, it sounds like you do not believe that there is value to life, in which case we will not agree. I would like for humanity to have a future, that is not possible if there is no humanity left. Bad people want to do bad things to other people, that doesn't mean there is no value to life. Absurd proposition
Just because people may push for certain things that doesn't make them directly related. I push for gun rights and also organic foods, that doesn't make those inherently related
Who do you think you're talking to? Also how do birth rates have anything to do with technocracy? You're getting unhinged
I honestly don't know what the fuck you're talking about. I would like humanity to both have a future and have it be free from those who would like to enslave us
Brought to you by Trump and his friends at Palantir.
Of course, for the direction brained, that's not to say "Kamala would be better!!!" Just that, Trump was the one chosen to usher in technocracy. Probably because the conservatives who should be against it in principle will lap it up if it comes from Trump since he's been built up as their hero and the majority of people cannot evaluate actions or ideas without putting it through the tribalist lens of "my team, your team"
"I'm going to do everything necessary to implement agenda 2030"
"W..WHAT?!?!"
"Don't worry, they're not 15 minute cities, they're 'freedom cities'. Don't worry, normalization of paramilitary on the streets, but you'll love it. Don't worry, real value of your money collapsing but I'll keep talking about the S&P 500 and you'll eat it up. Oh and the new FED chair? Bilderberg alum"
"Oh yes daddy Trump!!! Own those libtards!!!"
Trump is totally going to drain the swamp though guys
As if the others options aren't deep state creations
He's clearly aging in these photos, well aside from the first 2. I guess he deaged and is reaging
That is quite a bold claim. While I agree it's quite likely that Musk is both of those things (though it's all second to him being the face of technocracy), to make a claim of equivalence like that is a bit unhinged
Playing good billionaire, bad billionaire over party lines? Somehow it's even worse than red team / blue team
Or turned it off for this post to make a point. It's very obvious that 30 people who don't even engage with comments didn't just magically decide not to upvote this time
Unintentionally based
It was like this in the past too. Post would go up and then get the exact same number of votes on all communities except some of the more active ones where it might have one or two more. He disappeared for awhile but it was really obvious. When called out he would just say things like "I must have fans"
And they said "nah he's one of ours, just keep up the theater for now"
Need those data centers for the AI governance system. China's social credit score is about to look like Candy Crush
Trying to discuss the point brought up
Must be jewish!!
It depends on your goals. Short term investing? That's a big risk. If you're going to buy and hold as a hedge (which I've been doing since $20 for silver and around $3k for gold), then yes. There is too much volatility right now and obvious market manipulation for someone like me to know either way if you're looking for short term returns. The fundamentals show that silver and gold should be worth way more, but market makers are able to keep fundamentals divorced from price action for a loooong time