The other comment was attacking a general worldview they think some users have, described as neo nazi. We can argue about worldviews, just like flat earth vs globe earth.
I don't have a vendetta against you.

Edit: I saw the boomer comment and asked for an edit. I originally thought you meant a different thread. I messed up.

Removed for rule 1.

Argument works just fine without the yid part:

They always were. They’re the untermensch against which the NSDAP warned.

There’s nothing neo about the people here

"For God has not given us a spirit of fearfulness, but one of power, love, and sound judgment." 2 Timothy 1:7

Thanks for your input, I wish I was more advanced with math and science but I do find it fascinating and love thinking about the possibilities. Your arguments and viewpoints are very welcome with me.

I hadn't thought about the politics in the movie or how it was received, I really like any time travel possibilities tho.

Clem simply put the flat earth issue to a vote and the community esteemed it a slippy slope to start banning content.

A Hitler conspiracy would be spicy. Would probably have to be a 'free for all' thread, I have doubts it would stay civil. (There is a flare for that and I'll tag it nsfw for mobile users)

freemasonic kabbahlistic luciferians all the way down..

Yeah, rules are rules, nothing personal.

I think most of us here think the earth is globe like. As for NASA, well big time satanist pyro Jack Parsons had a (hidden) hand in the rocketry program so that is suspicious and probably still ritualistic.

Comment removed for rule 1 violations.

Argument from OperationQ:

Without X you are not even qualified to comment on the matter as there is too much info you are missing out on that I could give you. I appreciate you speaking candidly -- You are on the right path to maybe waking up some day. If you want any info come reach me on X, --

u/RootLevelPrivilege

(I also think the unqualified comment is unnecessary but doesn't break the rules, it is an attack on a worldview OpQ thinks you have.)

Yep.

Thanks for the vote of confidence, I like my little corner of the internet here. But I go on X very rarely, WatchmanB5341

While I agree, due to freewill it is not something I'm willing to moderate. I am usually willing to rebuttal when presented, within my free time and will to do so, without rule violations.

But I do appreciate you editing yourself before posting and it doesn't go unnoticed.

Listen dude, different people think different things and that's not something I'm willing to moderate, rule violations tho, that's within my moderation responsibilities.
Please help me help you help me help you.

Great reporting!!
Do you wanna crosspost to c/weirdweatherchannel?

Removed for rule 1. Comment can be approved upon edit.

I'm no scientist and my main curiosity is the time travel. If one could tap in I imagine it would go exactly like that, returning to your past to recalibrate your future, giving signs you know would work because it's a personal investment.

Everyone used to, but we have moderation now so we're shaking off the dust on the rule. I appreciate your help.

So cool! To join, create an account at the element link in op and let me know your username (can be sent in direct message too) and then I'll send you an invite, it'll be from Community and my name there is noexit.

Thanks for putting this together, I'm gonna add a submission statement and sticky.

SS: Scripts and symbolism surrounding the latest Trump assassination attempt along with signs and symbols surrounding the founding of America and it's current state and what Bill Cooper has been trying to tell us for decades about mystery babylon.

Thanks for your argument. I've asked Another_rando to edit the jewtool part, and now I'm asking you to remove the jewtool retard part. They are rule 1 violations, will you edit?

This is a good argument. The last word violates rule 1 even if you mean it to be helpful, will you edit?

Hey thanks! I appreciate your appreciation. It's a really good rule and it's working out well for the most part.

Ok this clears it up for me, I'm no scientist, haha. Time is funny.

It's an attack on the person not the argument.

The second sentence violates rule 1, which has always been a rule here. Comment can be approved upon edit.

So the science of it is no good?