New thread:

Me: So what I'm hearing is we should (be) better than resorting to those low intelligence tactics, right?

RWR: Don't so-what-you-are-saying me. The problem isn't speech.it's trolling every single time we notice.

Also, please start another thread as this one literally reached rock bottom.

Me: I was summarizing to see if I understood what you are saying correctly, not sure why I shouldn't do that.

Noticing is fine, ad hominem is unnecessary.

So what I'm hearing is we should better than resorting to those low intelligence tactics, right?

We discuss conspiracy facts here too, thanks for your contribution.

Have you looked at the round table thread? We're leaning towards the societal structure of control systems I think: https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARwsAH4ic/round-table-suggestion-thread/c

I just started reading it when I saw it edit.

Here's the thing, we can all free think without ad hominem

Thanks for the info. I don't actually care what the world thinks and defines, I know the Guy that created the whole place and all words.

No, I would like to keep people out of jail for stupid reasons, there are words I'll gladly go to jail for or worse and these ain't them.

I follow a higher rule set than secular politics..

No to both.

Inciting violence is violence..

I'm removing spam.

If you see anyone currently promoting violence please let me know. And thanks.

Listen, a civilized community without rules leads to anarchy because of fallen human nature. On or off the internet. We have short simple rules here.

The firebomber part was a person tho not a pronoun like JG.

Goebbels literally fueled the fire. You can talk with the Lord about what is murder because I heard you don't even have to touch a person to murder them.

Wouldn't doubt it.

It's open and honest not manipulative, this is how people communicate and work together. Have you never seen positive leadership?

It's almost as if he wasn't ever nonviolent.. All hate, all death, all night no light..

https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/goebmain.htm

There is a ton of derailing going on and it's multiple people. I didn't see death threats, is this something recent you refer too or older?

JG is a name of a violent situation/person too. I banned one user for a violent username that was overt.
Both JG and DF are both 'people' that really existed. I wish both would rethink their names but it's not overly violent, tho those in the know, know.

I didn't see violence from him. Some wording is questionable and I'm talking that over with him.

Most people, yeah probably, organs probably going into biodigital convergence stuff like Cortical labs trapping humans brains cells to run their AI computers..

What will it take for everyone to discuss things without resorting to middle school tactics, absolutely ludicrous and yeah, looks like I have a bunch of shoveling to keep up and it's such a waste of everyone's time.. We're in the middle of a learning curve and I'm trying to help people make better choices on their own. Will you be helpful?

Removed a bunch now, stop repeating yourself it's spammy.

Removed 2 repeating comments

I look for the violence. Can we please let go of the infighting name calling?

From a different comment with someone else: There is no actual reason to need to use derogatory language, it's actually counterproductive, did you read my rules post? https://communities.win/c/Conspiracies/p/1ARws81ezP/understanding-the-rules-in-this-/c

And a reminder that resorting to ad hominem (along with all fallacies) often makes one look emoti(o)nal, desperate and out of actual answers or rebuttals, in other words, you've lost, at least keep your dignity and integrity and try again another time having hopefully learned something.

Rule 1

I should have mentioned that yesterday, talking to Graph, he reminded me I can just be checking the queue and be quick to approve new users getting stuck. I like that idea.