3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +4 / -1

You know, it probably would. I honestly prefer the β€œclean break” (no meta posts at all) idea, but it was just a thought for a more β€œmoderate” solution.

3
TallestSkil 3 points ago +5 / -2

Where the absolute fuck do you think you are. Sit down and shut up.

4
TallestSkil 4 points ago +5 / -1

It’s meta content. Rule 3.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

OY VEY GOYIM TRUMP HAS ANY LEVEL OF CONTROL WHATSOEVER

Your comedy is pretty good. You need to work on your serious reporting, though.

1
TallestSkil 1 point ago +3 / -2

Nice link. Didn’t answer the question, though.

[random lies]

lol

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your evidence for my comments being the opposite of what I say they are is what, exactly?

6
TallestSkil 6 points ago +8 / -2

I had a thought about the β€˜meta’ threads that are constantly made. The obvious option is to go back to deleting them, but eventually that results in banning the users doing it because they don’t seem to stop. Still, it’s a good idea. But...

What if we had a sticky to contain them all? Specifically ONE thread where each individual comment chain within can be where people whine impotently about a specific user? That way the venting gets done and the board isn’t cluttered with obvious spam?

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

note doesn’t say what the tweet claims

Grok incorrect about Christianity

other account incorrect about Christianity and Hitler

Good job. Fuck off.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Missing the point, are we?

Again, your split personalities don’t count as separate people, nor do your sockpuppet accounts.

[random lies]

lol

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +3 / -1

[random lies]

lol. β€œWe” isn’t necessary; all your accounts are run by the same person. Your split personalities don’t count.

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +4 / -2

With both TikTok and X controlled by Project 2025

Thanks for admitting they’re owned by the jews.

is the name of the game mass censorship like China when you mention a certain day in 1989?

A certain number from 1945, yeah.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›