Good, do you mean Yahweh, Ehyeh, and Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh?
Because the one who spoke to Moses was the Malakh Yahweh (Ex. 3:2), the same Angelos tou Theou identified with Jesus (Gal. 4:14, Rev. 1:1 ff.). That may be the meaning of the name Ehyeh.
No no, I was asking u/LightBringerFlex.
What well-defined entity do you worship and why would you have any traffic with Yahweh worshippers?
No no, I was asking u/LightBringerFlex.
What well-defined entity do you worship and why would you have any traffic with Yahweh worshippers?
He also said he and Yahweh were one and had the same glory. Do you think the Christian's belief, that Jesus is a testimony of Yahweh in the same way the Abba and the Ruach are, hinders growth?
Your point was?
Seeing as you base your identity on something you don't seem to like (the cross), what is your exact problem with the cross? It's not that the cross tempts people to keep Hanukkah like Jesus did ....
The value of an individual mining reward is very small relative to all extant bitcoins. When you mine often enough, the value of your reward is rightly comparable to the amount of work you've done, all the goal and nongoal calculations averaged together. If Bitcoin rewarded lucky stiffs unduly it'd be unfair, but it's proven rigorously that it doesn't, it rewards committed laborers.
Authors get paid for the thousands of hours of writing, not just for the time it takes an uneducated typist to copy out the final text.
The white paper proves proof. The math is open. Desirable labor processing is a good. It may be "busywork" in one sense, but its value is that it is proven by blockchain to have contributed to objectively awarded holdings, and more have come to realize that this busywork is a lot more valued than that of the federal government deskworkers.
I could certainly publish here my unique further proof that Bitcoin itself involves some deception and frontloading for early adopters, and I have evidence I haven't seen anyone else publish. But this is knowably without my publication, and the distribution system itself is resilient and scalable enough to overcome its flaws. And that's a totally different argument from saying you don't value the proven labor that a bunch of other people value. It works whether you join it or not, and even whether people bail on it ("run" or "crash" it) or not.
Jesus came to give organ to an organism, organically, which is totally different from coming to organize an organization, orgiastically.
I suppose it could well be light and dream, as I hadn't thought about it taking that form; that would solve a couple physics problems. DNA isn't always acidic, is it now? Plus this whole forum communicates with light (via copper or fiberglass).
I spread love at c/Christianity, also hate. I appreciate that you accept my response. There is much on this platform that I address with different types of response. You're free to check in if you can handle the freshness of audience.
I see that you seek other entities than Grays and Reptilians. I recommend Alien Encounters by Missler and Eastman, which reveals that Jesus is such an entity.
Truly Deity is only found within us because all finding happens within us.
Truly Deity is also greater than all things, because it transcends things.
So God is "not outside of us", and also is outside of us.
Keep in mind that angels want to join us as much as we want to join them, and as different entities we have different but complementary destinies.
Angels reveal Deity differently than we do.
All this logically means that of all humans choosing light, one of them is the greatest of all time and has revealed more of Deity than anyone else.
My conclusion is that this man is Jesus Christ and so in choosing light I must weigh what he says (to me and via third parties) as the highest testimony.
The nature of "coming" is exceedingly deeper than explored here.
Deity both IS and COMES: Deity is revealed through the present and is also increased through the present.
That means that every moment is the coming of more Deity into this universe at the same time that it's the expression of the present Deity we already know and experience.
There are also major advances in history that are called comings but predicting them is not the point of this essay.
Rather, we should at all times be conduits for Deity being and coming.
Fair enough, my views have grown over time. So light bodies, I suppose? My primary issue is that our organic energy must still be so much more aligned than currently to overcome the threshold called for for this generation that we should resist e.g. the feeling of letup by 77 million people and we should redouble our synchronization and synergy. c/Reptilians is so quiet nowadays.
Thanks for the hard details on Hawk Tuah. Only Trump can make money in NFTs, and that's because of numismatics and not "nonfungibility".
Yes, u/pkvi_eid, real crypto is mathematically provable labor, which is why it's a real asset. Since BTC proved that, there have been Ponzis and Madoffs everywhere scamming the people who can't tell NFT fake-blockchain from real assets. But BTC keeps rising, overall, because nobody can argue with actual math. Basically the same math as RSA, which is worth trillions.
Why focus on the 1953 document when the 2008 accord was so much wider-ranging?
How do we reconcile "see all as family" with "hybrids that can walk among us undetected"? Sounds like in addition to unity we need a unified detection clearinghouse, which is the Swamp Rangers longterm agenda for Swamp Creatures. Otherwise "they want you divided".
Well, I too extend good faith, even to folks who agree with an anon who calls out Zionism without evidence, and disagree with an anon who expresses interest in your story (while he admits that trust is complex).
The reason I asked is that if you were truly "banned from patriots.win for pointing out a political figure's (Jewish) background", I would stand with you by writing the mods on your behalf because I don't believe they should do that. I also pointed out that, given the evidence, knowing that many who speak that way have more to the story, I'd be interested in helping unravel additional parts to see if there could be further communal learning about what happened.
It's Conspiracies, so anything can happen. I told you my reasons, if you want to complain without actively seeking remedy then I offered in good faith. Looks like there isn't yet a post saying that The Forward said last year David O. Sacks was "Jewish ... born into a Jewish family", so as a polite background article it seems ripe for posting. Would you like me to do it to prove it can be done, or do you think it should be done in meme language, or would you like something else done with your complaint?
"Ethnonationalism"? Is that like declaring that whites have a continuing right to cultivate the majority culture of America? Is the American version different from declaring that racial Jews have a continuing right to cultivate the majority culture of Israel? It would seem by that definition that 146 UN member nations are Zionist.
But I haven't explicitly supported ethnic cleansing or genocide, nor have I supported the deaths that have occurred in this conflict. I said the jury is still out about them and I haven't gotten enough info to make a judgment. I'm sure not going to make the judgment the way it was made about our involvement in say Iraq where the MSM fed us death numbers every minute. I said if there were evidence of Israeli atrocities I'd look into it; but somehow I didn't get the links that were more than airy rumor. You had free rein to post data, you're posting more as we speak, and it doesn't support your implied or stated thesis. Maybe we found one atrocity where both sides were heard and the IDF description was found wanting? I don't remember, I just remember that these counts of myriads don't seem any different from any other war on the other side of the world. Honestly, the Brooklyn bathhouse abuses were worse than the data you showed so far.
Look, to humor you I did a quick search and found that the Sde Teiman camp saw a reservist charged with aggravated abuse, apparently reported on the IDF's own initiative. If the charges are true, well, that's an atrocity. There are suspicions of very much bad behavior there, enough so that there are also suspicions that not all accusations are true. I could be a conspiracist and immediately hold that all kinds of satanic abuse occur there, but the evidence is much more lacking than in a number of other conspiracies about the same. I could be an uber-Zionist and hold that no abuse occurs there, that the charges are false, but there's no reason for that either. So I bide my time. Should I storm Sde Teiman based on rumor? No, if I were of that mind I would storm some local site, or I would go help people in North Carolina. But I can't take abuses conducted in wartime and make them a "genocide" by the slippery Jewish definition. Rather, I trust that abuses will be corrected, first by the organization responsible, and then by outsiders if necessary. I call on God for reparation of all wrongs. But I'm also sensitive to when certain wrongs are being played up so gigantically at the cost of imbalance about many other wrongs.
So your definition doesn't work, your charges don't stick, you're not proving your points with any evidence, you're finding things nowhere in your provided sources, and I have no idea what you want me to do about it.
"States" are relatively easily cognizable entities. Why yes, Israel wasn't a state of any kind for a long time since Judaea Province, 135. But peoples are much harder to cognize, and the chains from Judaea to Israel, and from Palaestina to Palestine, are both hotly contested and so I don't make presumptions about them or their claims as you do.
It may well be that a limited-recognition member state disacknowledged by 28/193 members has certain disadvantages over an observer nonmember state disacknowledged by 47/193 members. A member state can get judged by the ICC, for instance. There's a good case for moral equivalence, which is what I've sought to uphold. I don't know how to judge land claims without both parties agreeing to a mediator or to war.
Two questions again. What is Zionism? How have I met your definition? You seem to be defining Zionism and land claims along lines as subjective as those people, whom I name, who defined "racism" (Hirschfeld) and "genocide" (Lemkin).
See, OP is about there being two sides to accusations.
Palestine wasn't a state of any kind for a long time since Syria Palaestina, 390. Until recently we could talk about it not being a nation just like the Holy See is not a nation but a nonmember observer state; but this year Palestine became a "nonmember observer state with extra condiments". But given that novelty and instability, it's simpler to use shorter words like nonnation.
I told you I was considering the possibility Israel is genociding them. I let you publish maxed-out articles on the subject. I believe I also told you that "genocide" is a weasel word invented by a Jewish lawyer that is doublespeak to mean whatever the speaker wants. One race-based meme counts as genocide. So I don't use the word lightly or really at all.
When I mod, no one is banned for calling attention to realities, facts, truths, or even opinions. They are banned for published behaviors that break the golden rule. Without reviewing the record, it was primarily your illogical misstatement that went far enough beyond the truth, without evidence (such as the above appears to be), plus your overt disrespect for our rights to present you contextualizing evidence. (If you think a mod misbehaved you need to appeal cognizably instead of complain vaporously.) If you keep calling me Zionist without either defining your term or pointing to things I've actually done, that's illogical, and as long as one don't realize and continues doing such at honor-code forums, one gets disciplined.
I tell everyone I worship exactly one Jew. That has shut up everyone; nobody takes that one on directly. If Jesus is Jewish, we worship a Jew; if he isn't, then we have no right to be called real Jews either and other claimants for the title arise.
I never said I was a shabbos goy, I get accused of being Jewish more often than being goyish. What I do (didn't I just say) is to defend the biggest board's big rule "no racism", and then for some reason my defense ends up disproportionately in favor of those races that people are racist against the most. (I could reaffirm No racism against Afrikaners or Zulus! but there's not reason to, is there?) But, having discovered that "racism" is a weasel word coopted and popularized (not invented) by a Jewish doctor that is doublespeak to mean whatever the speaker wants, I am getting away from using that word too. Instead we can speak of not punishing the innocent with the guilty, which has shut up everyone.
TLDR: If you don't have (a) a definition of Zionism and (b) a proof that I have said things that meet the definition, there's more to the story.
Your ban was reduced to one year and expired about two months ago. You are free to contribute to c/Christianity.
Keep in mind the general rules, and guidelines for disagreements (first pinned comment). For instance, stay on topic, be considerate of others, use evidence rather than sweeping assertions, keep tone civil, and commit to pursue the truth wherever it leads. I apologize that this wasn't conveyed to you at the time it happened.
As to the situation described in OP, I'm not sure which prayer request it refers to. But thanks for sharing your views!
I believe this is the same YouTuber whose illiteracy about the 1775 Bible was palpable. Without watching it, he's likely the one whose Bible preface in the fine print says "intercalary", which means exactly what mathematicians have agreed for centuries, that it's sometimes 12 and sometimes 13, on an average of (irrationally near) 7 out of every 19 years. I've reconciled with the notion that it's deliberately (about) 12-7/19, not 12 or 13.
Background evidence for this line of thought is how God likes to focus on dates that round to multiples of three, seven, or ten in the monthly cycle.
We've just had a good unfinished dialogue here about whether the "real" day starts at dawn or otherwise (Julian days start at noon). My conclusion, as with OP, is that there are several answers that all work, without contradiction.
It's been done. If one "rhythm" is more natural than others, I've heard it is actually 25-26 hours, but I don't believe that because I think that a wide range is adaptably natural and 24 is one of those.
On a meta level, the Bible doesn't imply 13 months, instead it implies that math is fuzzy and the 12/13 disparity is intentional, like various other disparities; see Proverbs repeatedly about the 6/7 disparity. But I totally agree that we've lost the moon, and when I regained the moon it was an eye-opener and I could walk both cycles, the moon and the sun. That is, the Biblical calendar is lunisolar, not lunar (Muslim) or solar (majority Christianity).
So the order includes certain deliberate irrationalities, but when you understand them they become as beautiful and easy as pi. Let me know if my haste is less than scrutable.
Humans have this capacity anytime they want. Other experiments show anyone who chooses can set their own cycle; babies do cycles of 2-3 hours, but as you mature you can get to 36-48 or longer consistently. The biggest challenge is the act of will to be going against both the sun and the external culture, but in the absence of both it's much easier!
See, u/Redsky?
Hey Graph, I thought you considered my position a bit more moderate than that. It's kingdom of Jesus Christ, first and ultimately only, and I've inquired a long time whether either state, Israel or America, will survive until then. No firm answer. Seems like they both might roll into Jesus's kingdom if we're blessed, or either might go into exile for deserved reasons. Where'd you get the idea that I was Zionist? Does "Zionist" mean just that I ask people to follow PDW's "no racism" rule evenly, and so then I end up asking this the most about the races that get raced against the most? I know I can get a more detailed answer from you than from the drive-bys whose minds are made up.
Okay, call it amnesia on my part then. I kinda see where OP is going and the issue if any is not there but elsewhere. I'm unclear on what psyops we should beware of with this specific OP other than ascribing too much power to the Anunnaki or the UAPs.