It's Looney Tunes at this point. Seems like a PR op.
Right, I got them mixed up.
Exactly, how do you explain it? They're holding on to such a belief despite all the information they have seen here. This is reinforcing the argument they choose to believe in a lie because they're degenerate rather than ignorant. This is exactly why covidiots double down on all the lies around the coof to this day and don't want to admit they were wrong and fell for the psy op. Countless studies, documents and testimonies prove them wrong and they don't care. The reason is pride and fear blinds them. There's no learning without humility.
Freemasonry is the faggiest religion ever created. That's what Reagan said about the Bohemian grove.
She deserved to die for murdering her child but God gave her a second chance. I this will turn her life around. Moloch and his puppets can suck a cock, he will be destroyed in the end.
It's not lack of mental capacity or lack of knowledge. Their delusion is caused by a moral failing. They have no love for the Truth.
It is. Just not your flavor of gnosticism.
Gnostic gibberish
I beg to differ:
https://www.chabad.org/multimedia/video_cdo/aid/4056257/jewish/The-Rebbe-and-Senator-Kennedy.htm
https://www.thejc.com/news/features/was-robert-kennedy-killed-because-he-supported-israel-mz5tjlsf
It wasn’t merely that Kennedy managed to build the coalition that eluded his brother, though by April he led Carter in polling among Jews, Catholics and liberals. He also broadened that coalition to include new constituencies. In California, he and his wife campaigned openly in gay bars around San Francisco’s Castro district, leading the San Francisco Chronicle to marvel at the “striking diversity” of the crowd. Kennedy pulled under one roof representatives of blue-collar labor unions, LGBT activists, and black and Latino community organizers.
Ain't that a hero?
Interesting. Was RFK assassinated for the same reasons or was he a zionist ball licker (like his son)?
Proof Kennedy was anti-Israel? His family seems to be balls deep into zionism. I've seen the letter where he demanded AIPAC to be registered as foreign agent organization. That's a step in the right direction but it doesn't make him anti-Israel though.
The drug culture is a well documented psy op devised by CIA and Tavistock and is part of the Aquarian conspiracy. The most egregious are the synthetic psychedelics developed in Brave New World military labs - how dimwitted one has to be to think for a second this big pharma wonder juice is good for you?
But the naturally occurring psychoactive drugs like shrooms and plants are not better - they have been used for mind control purposes (inducing trance, trauma, disassociation and hypnosis), witchcraft, voodoo, communicating with demonic entities and degenerate pagan rituals, including human sacrifice, for millennia.
He missed his regular morning coffee at the panorama restaurant of the North tower that day. Such a lucky guy.
We've known this for a while. I mean the coof woke up everyone who could have woken up to the jibby jabs. It's getting boring at this point.
That's a man, baby.
Do you think slavery does not exist in our modern day regimes?
Their noses and methods don't lie though.
I know your works, tribulation, and poverty (but you are rich); and I know the blasphemy of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
Those empires were Christian and that's a historical fact so it's a pointless question.
So, are nations that are engaging in slavery Christian yes or no?
Yes, they can be obviously. Slavery was part of the social order and was not condemned by the Church.
Do you mean they lie about being jewish?
Did most of those evil people happen to be jewish?
That's a loaded question. I already made the argument that it doesn't contradict Christianity and that's what matters. Your initial argument presupposed slavery and Christianity don't mix and I proved you wrong.
The disgusting shill lies again, what a shocker.
Slavery remained a major institution in Russia until 1723, when Peter the Great converted the household slaves into house serfs. The government of Tsar Feodor III had formally converted Russian agricultural slaves into serfs earlier, in 1679.
Serfdom is not slavery, dumbass.
Slavery was common in the early Roman Empire and Classical Greece. It was legal in the Byzantine Empire but it was transformed significantly from the 4th century onward as slavery came to play a diminished role in the economy. Laws gradually diminished the power of slaveholders and improved the rights of slaves by restricting a master's right to abuse, prostitute, expose, and murder slaves.[1] Slavery became rare after the first half of 7th century.[2] From 11th century, semi-feudal relations largely replaced slavery.[3] Under the influence of Christianity, views of slavery shifted: by the 10th century slaves were viewed as potential citizens (the slave as a subject), rather than property or chattel (the slave as an object).[4] Slavery was also seen as "an evil contrary to nature, created by man's selfishness", although it remained legal.[5]
Regardless I don't even grant you slavery contradicts the Christian faith to begin with since it's recognized as an institution in the Bible and it's not condemned. You're just projecting your modern day liberal humanist sensibilities to Christianity:
In Paul's letters to the Ephesians, Paul motivates early Christian servants to remain loyal and obedient to their masters like they are to Christ. In Ephesians 6:5–8, Paul states "Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ".[96] Similar statements regarding obedient slaves can be found in Colossians 3:22–24, 1 Timothy 6:1–2, and Titus 2:9–10.[97][98][99] In Col 4:1, Paul advises members of the church, who are slave masters, to "treat your slaves justly and fairly, realizing that you too have a Master in heaven."[100] Adding to Paul's advice to masters and slaves, he uses slavery as a metaphor. In Romans 1:1, Paul calls himself "a slave of Christ Jesus" and later in Romans 6:18, Paul writes "You have been set free from sin and become slaves to righteousness."[101][102] Also in Galatians, Paul writes on the nature of slavery within the kingdom of God. Galatians 3:28 states: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus."[103] Similar patterns of speech and understanding about slavery are found in Peter's epistles. In 1 Peter 2:18, Saint Peter writes "Slaves, be subject to your masters with all reverence, not only to those who are good and equitable but also to those who are perverse."[104] In 1 Timothy 1:10, Paul condemns the sexually immoral, abusers of themselves with mankind, liars, perjurers, those that kidnap innocents and sell them into slavery,[105] and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine.
So yet again, you fail at your deboonking because you're not as smart as you think you are.
This is why guys like you shouldn't read the Bible. You're quote mining things and doing freestyle interpretation out of context.
Salvation is of the jews means it's from the jews because the prophecy was that Christ will come from the tribes of Israel. But when Christ came He made a covenant with the people of all nations and established His Kingdom, defying the jewish priests (the pharisees) - the Eternal Israel, which is the Church. Thus, salvation belongs to everyone and not to the jews only, God is a Trinity, became a man and was resurrected, fulfilling the prophesies, and Israel is not a ethnic state but the otherworldly Kingdom of God.
Christianity is the opposite of Judaism in every sense. Get educated before parroting bs about things you have superficial understanding on. Islam was not a psy op initially but a poorly sawn together demented religion full of contradictions based on gnosticism, arian heresy and talmudic judaism. It only became a psy op when tptb realized it can be a useful tool for subverting traditional society and Christian culture in the West in the 20th century through globalism, diversity and immigration.
That's easy - they will just apply gender theory and claim females can be males if they feel like it.
Truth is based on language and meaning. If they control language they control truth. This is what 1984 is about.