2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Genesis 3:21 refers to Adam and Eve being given their fallen corporal bodies (they were angel-like pre-fall). God doesn't sacrifice to Himself, that's ridiculous.

But I guess it doesn't matter in free Bible interpretation class. "It's just me and muh Bible, boy". I've always said the sola scriptura protestant approach is an atheist-making machine.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

You'd be surprised to learn that every culture at the time (and much later) did animal sacrifices. Did you think the Ancient Greeks or Romans didn't sacrifice? The main crime Christians were convicted for in Rome was refusing to sacrifice to the pagan gods.

Singling out the OT is grasping at straws. If anything, God forbid idolatry and human sacrifices the Canaanites and other people brought to Baal/Moloch.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you have to do is read comments before replying to them. It’s not hard for someone who isn’t paid to post lies. That you continue to have trouble with this is extremely telling.

If only you could explain yourself like a grown human being and not respond to my argument with "how many times you beat your wife". You were sperging and being bad faith from the get go. At least own your moronic 3rd grade behavior.

Reminder that viruses and bacteria are real and can be seen with home equipment.

Did you prove this? You're begging the question, you fucking idiot. The images you posted are of "virus cultures" not of unadulterated patient tissue or saliva under a microscope. Buying a microscope from Walmart won't help me reproduce them, unless I know how to prepare the culture, genius.

The reminder is you won't see a virus under a microscope in your spit under any circumstances. That is why nobody does that for virus detection. Then I asked If you have evidence for the opposite, to share it and prove you're correct. That's how an argument is resolved, not through whining and cussing (which is only appropriate AFTER you address the actual argument, you dumbass).

You're seriously sperging and there's no talking to you. It's evident from all your comment history.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reported for libel.

Oy vey. Sue me, jew.

Why would I believe you? You're a bold faced liar. As if anyone would burry themselves in a 20+ message thread of ad homs and deflections - "I didn't say that", "you're strawmanning" and when I bring up the exact quote of you saying just that you go "so you admit it?" - you want me to believe someone red through all that circular idiocy and liked your trolling so much as to give you thumbsies? I don't buy it, seeth harder.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. But Hitler fought degeneracy and the jewish banking elite, while Canada is completely cucked by them. The death camps were a smear campaign by the jews seeking revenge. Canada is more akin to the USSR commies (who were mostly jewish) and who terrorized the Russian people and where dozens of concentration camps were running up until the end of the regime.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

How pathetic of you to upvote your comments from your burner account. As if anyone cares about that. And why do you care so much what a random guy on a forum thinks or says? Are you that starved for validation, little troll?

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

You don't have to be a flerfer to disbelief the NASA space propaganda. How hard was it to place some beacon on the moon so that anyone with a telescope could see it?

5
SmithW1984 5 points ago +5 / -0

A pagan demon worshiper meets a zionist demon worshiper. Being deeply religious is not automatically a good thing. Human-sacrificing and Luciferian cults (like theosophy and new age spiritualism) are deeply religious too.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sure?

Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart.

Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's your assertion idiot - it's up to you to prove it. I've given you an argument for why it's false (because they'd use that exact method to identify it instead of PCR and culture) and you ignored and deflected accusing me of strawmanning.

Also, I thought you didn't say this and I twisted it out of context. What happened to that deflection?

I'm done with your trolling, you're obviously bad faith because no one using a computer is this dumb.

6
SmithW1984 6 points ago +6 / -0

Soon stating the truth will put us in camps and psychiatric wards. They did the same to Ezra Pound for exposing the international jewish cabal.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me commenting on the virus pics of your initial comment:

We've seen them - here are some sciency-looking pictures of sub-cellular particles, derived from culturing decomposing tissue in monkey kidney cancer cells and antibiotics that we'll call virions and claim they are the cause of the observed pathology.

You replaying to my comment:

buy a home microscope

spit on a slide

look at it

NOOOOOOOO NONE OF THAT IS REEEEEEEEEEEAL

You again:

Anyone can see bacteria (and even some viruses) with a microscope bought at Walmart.

Thanks for admitting viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere.

The only thing that's twisted is your mind from constantly lying and doing mental gymnastics as if you can't be instantly disproven. Case closed.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which one of the links shows virus particles in saliva viewed under a microscope? You said multiple times one can see the virus this way. This was the point of the whole fucking exchange - don't show me how they cultured cancer cells and added a bunch of shit in the concoction. Show me spit on a microscope slide where virions are observable. Is that fucking hard?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're a special one. Let's try again.

If

viruses and bacteria exist and can be viewed by anyone with simple equipment available anywhere

then why DON'T EVERYBODY DO IT, but do culturing, antigen and PCR instead, you fucking retarded cave-dweller?

Where are the images of the virus observed in the spit under a microscope? Find me a single one and I'll concede.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can't answer, that's ok. Just saying words and blurting accusations isn't cutting it. If I'm strawmanning you, go on and demonstrate it. We both know there's no strawman here - you just tried being witty and made a stupid assertion in the process and instead of owning it, you started dancing around it like a buffoon. I should have known better than to argue with a troll.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

You filthy lying pig-snake, I'm doing internal critique of what you told me. You said I can spit on a slide and see the virus under a microscope. If what you say is correct, why don't they use that same method for detecting the coof?

Now concentrate, stop deflecting like a little bitch and give a straight answer to a simple question based on your own premise.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, dude. The master deflector strikes again.

None of the shit you wrote addressed anything above. I can't decide whether you're being bad faith or you genuinely are IQ deficient and don't get the simple argument I made.

They use PCR and culturing regardless of how effective that is for detecting the supposed virus. That's not the point and neither does it matter if anyone lied about anything during the pandemic. This has literally nothing to do with the argument.

The question was why would they use such relatively complex, time consuming and expensive methods (culturing, PCR), instead of just getting saliva samples under a microscope and finding out if a person has the virus or not?

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, you pretend you pretending it's shitposting doesn't make it so.

I asked you a precise question: If we can detect a virus by looking at spit under a microscope, why don't they use that method to isolate and detect viruses, but instead do PCR and culturing? If a person is sick with a respiratory virus they should have billions of virions in their saliva - isn't that the reason for social distancing and masks?

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

I worry that you ignored my argument and resorted to a regurgitated ad hom instead. If only coming up with snarky, yet unrelated personal remarks proved your point, you may have stood a chance at convincing anybody.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's contradictory. Either viruses are specific RNA/DNA carriers, able to infect and reproduce within the host causing particular pathology or they are what you said - extracellular vesicles and exosomes which can't reproduce, hijack cells and infect other organisms. They are simply cell-garbage.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you're saying I'll see virus particles if I spit on a slide and look at it under a microscope? If it were that easy, how come they couldn't do just that in the so called "virus isolation" experiments?

I concede you're an idiot if you think I need to buy a microscope to debunk your bs when I can use free common sense instead.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›