1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, that's uniatism and is not going to happen. The only way to heal the schism and unite the church is for the Western and Oriental to revert back to the Early Church tradition and rebuke all the heretical teachings they hold (like the filioque, papal supremacy and absolute divine simplicity by the RC and nestorianism by the Orientals). This has been acknowledge by Rome which holds that the Orthodox Church has preserved the dogmas and sacraments of the first 1000 years Church.

It is the Catholics who started going wild with their teachings and doctrines after the schism and we see the fruits in the many contradictions made apparent after Vatican II and the last three Popes who prayed in mosques towards Mecca (John Paul II even kissed the Quran). And now Francis surrendered the faith by doubling down that every religion is equally valid and a path to salvation because they all worship some form of a generic God, contradicting Christ Himself (this is not Francis's idea though, it is present in Vatican II's Nostra Aetate and Lumen Gentium 16).

Seriously, the amount of mental gymnastics it takes to continue being Catholic these days is astounding (and I acknowledge there are problem in Orthodoxy too, but even if we have heretical patriarchs like Bartholomew, it's not destructive to the position because our Church doesn't hinge on one guy).

At this point I consider the Catholic Church and certain heretics in the Orthodox Church to be pushing towards a one world religion of the Antichrist. This is orchestrated by Rockefeller and the World Council of Churches which is the ultimate ecumenist organization.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice, the video fits perfectly. Is this all England?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, because everyone knows the NY Times is definitely not an establishment propaganda arm.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, that's a banger! Is that you OP?

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why you don't take the mark of the beast when you're "invited".

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

We cant do this through violence, but it cant happen with elections either.

What it will take is every single one of us walking up to the steps of every taxpayer owned property and locking all these criminals up and throwing them in jail.

What the fuck, how the fuck are we going to do that when the rich are just fucking mind controlling people to hate each other.

That's the crux of it - they have monopoly on violence and run a covert police state. They use social engineering and mind control to influence people's beliefs and behavior which ultimately subverts the democratic process. This means both violent and non-violent opposition is not a threat to the status quo.

Maybe it's too late, maybe we're already in what Huxley called the Final revolution where there's no coming back. But then again Huxley was a shill for the NWO too. Even if they managed to build a 1984 totalitarian state it would still fall eventually.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I believe the American frontiersmen were decent, honest, hard-working and courageous people. There are still Americans like that and that's exactly what bugs me when I see them worshipping the founding freemasons. There were decent presidents and politicians like Andrew Jackson and James Garfield who were not part of the cabal too.

I mean I get why people downvote me for exposing the FF - they've been indoctrinated into the constitutionalist cult, equating patriotism with those fluffed up enlightenment ideas and probably I would have been too if I were from the US. There's a reason why masonic symbolism is everywhere and is practically institutionalized. The US was the first successfully created masonic state. The Constitution has good sides but my point was it's not grounded on anything meaningful and the claims it makes aren't justified. It may have worked out when people shared a common worldview (which is Christian) and lived in tight-knit communities but it's all dissolving now and we see the fruits of the experiment.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone at that level is in those circles. There's no way to get selected if you're outside of the system. He may have not approved of it but he was part of it.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution was written by a bunch of degenerate revolutionary enlightenment freemasons and illuminists. It's not sacred and the whole appeal to self-evident truth and natural rights is retarded and should be discarded. Both the right and left appeal to those. It's a cult and it's pathetic. Almost as bad as the French being proud of their revolutionary degenerates who were more on the commie side.

True conservatives appeal to God for morality, know that life is a gift and not an entitlement, that there are duties instead of rights and that so called rights are privileges ultimately handed out and suspended by the thread of force which the government has monopoly over. Your constitutional rights get suspended every time there is an "emergency" like fake terrorism or fake viruses out there. Do you still think you have "inaliable rights"? The Enlightenment thinkers were naive and to be frank dumb as hell compared to philosophers before them, to think their little libtard experiment could work out. This is what happens when you think you can take God out of the equation (deists mention god because a deity presents a convenient justification for their New Order of the Ages paradigm) - secular humanist idiocy leading to absolute degeneracy.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

The expert said he's almost certain she did it so I guess this now passes in court.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's easy - they will just apply gender theory and claim females can be males if they feel like it.

Truth is based on language and meaning. If they control language they control truth. This is what 1984 is about.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's Looney Tunes at this point. Seems like a PR op.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right, I got them mixed up.

4
SmithW1984 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly, how do you explain it? They're holding on to such a belief despite all the information they have seen here. This is reinforcing the argument they choose to believe in a lie because they're degenerate rather than ignorant. This is exactly why covidiots double down on all the lies around the coof to this day and don't want to admit they were wrong and fell for the psy op. Countless studies, documents and testimonies prove them wrong and they don't care. The reason is pride and fear blinds them. There's no learning without humility.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Freemasonry is the faggiest religion ever created. That's what Reagan said about the Bohemian grove.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

She deserved to die for murdering her child but God gave her a second chance. I this will turn her life around. Moloch and his puppets can suck a cock, he will be destroyed in the end.

3
SmithW1984 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not lack of mental capacity or lack of knowledge. Their delusion is caused by a moral failing. They have no love for the Truth.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is. Just not your flavor of gnosticism.

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

I beg to differ:

https://www.chabad.org/multimedia/video_cdo/aid/4056257/jewish/The-Rebbe-and-Senator-Kennedy.htm

https://www.thejc.com/news/features/was-robert-kennedy-killed-because-he-supported-israel-mz5tjlsf

It wasn’t merely that Kennedy managed to build the coalition that eluded his brother, though by April he led Carter in polling among Jews, Catholics and liberals. He also broadened that coalition to include new constituencies. In California, he and his wife campaigned openly in gay bars around San Francisco’s Castro district, leading the San Francisco Chronicle to marvel at the “striking diversity” of the crowd. Kennedy pulled under one roof representatives of blue-collar labor unions, LGBT activists, and black and Latino community organizers.

Ain't that a hero?

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. Was RFK assassinated for the same reasons or was he a zionist ball licker (like his son)?

1
SmithW1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Proof Kennedy was anti-Israel? His family seems to be balls deep into zionism. I've seen the letter where he demanded AIPAC to be registered as foreign agent organization. That's a step in the right direction but it doesn't make him anti-Israel though.

2
SmithW1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

The drug culture is a well documented psy op devised by CIA and Tavistock and is part of the Aquarian conspiracy. The most egregious are the synthetic psychedelics developed in Brave New World military labs - how dimwitted one has to be to think for a second this big pharma wonder juice is good for you?

But the naturally occurring psychoactive drugs like shrooms and plants are not better - they have been used for mind control purposes (inducing trance, trauma, disassociation and hypnosis), witchcraft, voodoo, communicating with demonic entities and degenerate pagan rituals, including human sacrifice, for millennia.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›